KMX · Consumer discretionary(retail-auto dealers & gasoline stations) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2026-02-28
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
Carmax Inc reported revenue of $25.9 billion in fiscal 2026, after growing 5.6% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin narrowed from 6.7% in 2017 to 1.9%, and it earned 1.4% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $1.7 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 296.7% went to buybacks and 224.3% back into the business; the share count fell 23.2%. On the accounting screens, it passes 6 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 1.65 is in the grey zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; 1 of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 202625.9B+5.6% a year over 9 years
Operating margin1.9%gross margin 10.8%
Return on invested capital1.4%2.8% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay1.1B4.4% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA20.7×net debt 17.4B
Piotroski F-score6/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
010.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B
2017Revenue 15.9BOperating income 1.1B
2018Revenue 17.1BOperating income 1.1B
2019Revenue 18.2BOperating income 1.2B
2020Revenue 20.3BOperating income 1.2B
2021Revenue 19.0BOperating income 1.1B
2022Revenue 31.9BOperating income 1.6B
2023Revenue 29.7BOperating income 757.2M
2024Revenue 26.5BOperating income 766.3M
2025Revenue 26.4BOperating income 777.3M
2026Revenue 25.9BOperating income 493.8M
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
-4.5%
+6.4%
+5.6%
Operating income
-13.3%
-14.0%
-8.2%
Net income
-20.1%
-19.8%
-9.8%
Earnings per share
-18.0%
-18.0%
-7.1%
Free cash flow per share
+16.1%
+22.5%
—
Shares
-2.6%
-2.2%
-2.9%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 5.1%
0.0%2.0%4.0%6.0%
2017
2018
2019Return on invested capital 5.2%
2020Return on invested capital 5.1%
2021Return on invested capital 4.3%
2022Return on invested capital 5.2%
2023Return on invested capital 2.5%
2024Return on invested capital 2.4%
2025Return on invested capital 2.4%
2026Return on invested capital 1.4%
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Economic profit
Economic profit
-1.0B-750.0M-500.0M-250.0M0250.0M
2017
2018
2019Economic profit 29.5M
2020Economic profit 1.5M
2021Economic profit -150.7M
2022Economic profit 34.9M
2023Economic profit -616.6M
2024Economic profit -663.6M
2025Economic profit -657.3M
2026Economic profit -867.8M
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
4.2%
Return on assets
0.9%
Asset turnover
0.98×
Overheads (SG&A)
9.5% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-4.0B-2.0B02.0B
2017Net income 627.0MFree cash flow -873.5MAfter stock-based pay -965.0M
2018Net income 664.1MFree cash flow -377.4MAfter stock-based pay -439.2M
2019Net income 842.4MFree cash flow -141.7MAfter stock-based pay -216.7M
2020Net income 888.4MFree cash flow -568.5MAfter stock-based pay -677.4M
2021Net income 746.9MFree cash flow 503.2MAfter stock-based pay 381.3M
2022Net income 1.2BFree cash flow -2.9BAfter stock-based pay -3.0B
2023Net income 484.8MFree cash flow 860.6MAfter stock-based pay 775.0M
2024Net income 479.2MFree cash flow -6.7MAfter stock-based pay -126.4M
2025Net income 500.6MFree cash flow 156.5MAfter stock-based pay 21.8M
2026Net income 247.3MFree cash flow 1.2BAfter stock-based pay 1.1B
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2017–2026
1.7B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 224%3.7B
Acquisitions 15%241.6M
Dividends 0%0
Share buybacks 297%4.9B
More than it generated: funded with cash or new debt -436%-7.2B
Over the same years it paid 1.0B in stock. The share count fell 23.2%. 3.9B of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$-20.00$-10.00$0.00$10.00
2017Earnings per share $3.26Free cash flow per share $-4.54
2018Earnings per share $3.60Free cash flow per share $-2.05
2019Earnings per share $4.79Free cash flow per share $-0.81
2020Earnings per share $5.33Free cash flow per share $-3.41
2021Earnings per share $4.52Free cash flow per share $3.05
2022Earnings per share $6.97Free cash flow per share $-17.30
2023Earnings per share $3.03Free cash flow per share $5.39
2024Earnings per share $3.02Free cash flow per share $-0.04
2025Earnings per share $3.21Free cash flow per share $1.00
2026Earnings per share $1.68Free cash flow per share $8.42
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
140.0M160.0M180.0M200.0M
2017Diluted shares 192.2M
2018Diluted shares 184.5M
2019Diluted shares 175.9M
2020Diluted shares 166.8M
2021Diluted shares 165.1M
2022Diluted shares 165.2M
2023Diluted shares 159.8M
2024Diluted shares 158.7M
2025Diluted shares 156.1M
2026Diluted shares 147.6M
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
05.0B10.0B15.0B20.0B
2017
2018
2019Net debt 13.7B
2020Net debt 14.9B
2021Net debt 14.5B
2022Net debt 18.1B
2023Net debt 17.6B
2024Net debt 17.7B
2025Net debt 17.9B
2026Net debt 17.4B
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
20.7×
Interest coverage
4× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
2.20 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
51 days collects in 3d, stock 65d, pays in 18d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
6of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✕Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforefailed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✓Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellpassed
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✓Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforepassed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
1.65grey zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.11 × 6.56+0.72
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.15 × 3.26+0.50
Operating income ÷ assets 0.02 × 6.72+0.13
Equity ÷ liabilities 0.29 × 1.05+0.30
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.70below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.10+1.01
Gross margin slipping 1.01+0.54
Soft assets 0.96+0.39
Sales growth 0.98+0.88
Slower depreciation 0.91+0.10
Overheads vs sales 1.03-0.18
Profit not in cash -0.06-0.27
Leverage rising 1.01-0.33
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Net debt is 20.7 times EBITDA.
Benign
A stable sector with predictable cash flows and comfortable maturities.
Worrying
Little room if earnings fall; the maturity schedule is what to check.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
79% of the value comes from after year 10: this valuation rests mostly on the long run, which is exactly what is least known.
Value per share, with these assumptions$-62.34discounted at 5.1% a year · 79% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
-37.2×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
9.7×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
0.3×
Free cash flow yield
—
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today1.7B
Everything after, today6.4B
The whole business8.2B
Minus net debt-17.4B
What belongs to shareholders-9.2B
Divided among 147.6M shares: <strong>$-62.34</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
-4.0B-2.0B02.0B
2017Reported -965.0M
2018Reported -439.2M
2019Reported -216.7M
2020Reported -677.4M
2021Reported 381.3M
2022Reported -3.0B
2023Reported 775.0M
2024Reported -126.4M
2025Reported 21.8M
2026Reported 1.1B
2027Projected 182.1M
2028Projected 193.2M
2029Projected 204.0M
2030Projected 214.5M
2031Projected 224.7M
2032Projected 234.3M
2033Projected 243.3M
2034Projected 251.5M
2035Projected 258.9M
2036Projected 265.4M
2017201920212023202520272029203120332035
Year by year
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
Revenue
27.6B
29.2B
30.9B
32.5B
34.0B
35.5B
36.8B
38.1B
39.2B
40.2B
Growth
6.5%
6.1%
5.6%
5.2%
4.7%
4.3%
3.8%
3.4%
2.9%
2.5%
Cash margin
0.7%
0.7%
0.7%
0.7%
0.7%
0.7%
0.7%
0.7%
0.7%
0.7%
Free cash flow
182.1M
193.2M
204.0M
214.5M
224.7M
234.3M
243.3M
251.5M
258.9M
265.4M
Worth today
173.3M
174.9M
175.8M
176.0M
175.4M
174.1M
172.0M
169.2M
165.8M
161.7M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
4.1%
-60
-48
-27
13
121
4.6%
-70
-61
-49
-29
10
5.1%
-77
-71
-62
-50
-30
5.6%
-82
-77
-71
-63
-51
6.1%
-86
-82
-78
-72
-64
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
2.5%
4.5%
6.5%
8.5%
10.5%
0.5%
-80
-76
-72
-68
-64
0.6%
-76
-72
-68
-63
-58
0.7%
-71
-67
-62
-57
-52
0.7%
-67
-62
-57
-51
-45
0.8%
-63
-58
-53
-46
-40
All the inputs moving at once
4,610 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.0%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$-260.89
Median$-64.78
90th percentile$154.13
$-500.00$-250.00$0.00$250.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$-158.16</b> and <b>$35.21</b>; one in ten below $-260.89, one in ten above $154.13.
Does the long run make sense?
8.1×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 8.1 times that year's EBITDA.
5%To grow 2.5% forever while reinvesting 47% of its after-tax operating profit, the business must earn 5% on the new capital — it has earned 3% on average over the last five years.
79%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 6 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market—none in the period
Under pre-arranged plans—of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Which large funds report holding it
From the Form 13F of the 28 institutions followed on this site, as of the end of their last reported quarter. A 13F is filed up to 45 days later and shows only long positions in US-listed shares.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.