CWH · Consumer discretionary(retail-auto dealers & gasoline stations) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-12-31
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
Camping World Holdings, Inc. reported revenue of $6.4 billion in fiscal 2025, after growing 4.5% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin narrowed from 8.3% in 2017 to 2.8%, and it earned -9.3% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $1.9 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 67.2% went to acquisitions and 51.2% back into the business. On the accounting screens, it passes 2 of 8 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 0.86 is in the distress zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; 3 of the six cross-checks between its statements fire.
Revenue, fiscal 20256.4B+4.5% a year over 9 years
Operating margin2.8%gross margin 29.5%
Return on invested capital-9.3%17.0% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow—
Net debt ÷ EBITDA4.6×net debt 1.3B
Piotroski F-score2/8tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B
2017Revenue 4.3BOperating income 356.0M
2018
2018Revenue 4.8BOperating income 201.0M
2019Revenue 4.9BOperating income 8.7M
2020Revenue 5.4BOperating income 476.2M
2021Revenue 6.9BOperating income 799.5M
2022Revenue 7.0BOperating income 568.5M
2023Revenue 6.2BOperating income 267.1M
2024Revenue 6.1BOperating income 148.6M
2025Revenue 6.4BOperating income 180.2M
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
-2.9%
+3.2%
+4.5%
Operating income
-31.8%
-17.7%
-7.3%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Needs a cost of capital, which comes from the valuation below.
Return on equity
-39.3%
Return on assets
-1.8%
Asset turnover
1.26×
Overheads (SG&A)
25.2% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-250.0M0250.0M500.0M750.0M
2017Net income 29.9MFree cash flow -97.1MAfter stock-based pay -102.2M
2018
2018Net income 10.4MFree cash flow -118.1MAfter stock-based pay -132.2M
2019Net income -60.6MFree cash flow 163.6MAfter stock-based pay 150.4M
2020Net income 122.3MFree cash flow 662.7MAfter stock-based pay 642.1M
2021Net income 278.5MFree cash flow -93.8MAfter stock-based pay -141.7M
2022Net income 123.7MFree cash flow -20.8MAfter stock-based pay -54.7M
2023Net income 33.4M
2024Net income -38.6M
2025Net income -89.8M
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2017–2025
1.9B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 51%966.8M
Acquisitions 67%1.3B
Dividends 22%424.4M
Share buybacks 14%257.5M
More than it generated: funded with cash or new debt -55%-1.0B
Over the same years it paid 224.7M in stock. 32.8M of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$-10.00$0.00$10.00$20.00
2017Earnings per share $1.12Free cash flow per share $-3.65Dividend per share $0.84
2018
2018Earnings per share $0.12Free cash flow per share $-1.33Dividend per share $0.26
2019Earnings per share $-1.62Free cash flow per share $4.38Dividend per share $0.61
2020Earnings per share $3.06Free cash flow per share $16.56Dividend per share $1.53
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
20.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M
2017Diluted shares 26.6M
2018
2018Diluted shares 88.9M
2019Diluted shares 37.4M
2020Diluted shares 40.0M
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
0500.0M1.0B1.5B
2017Net debt 712.9M
2018
2018Net debt 1.0B
2019Net debt 1.0B
2020Net debt 968.8M
2021Net debt 1.1B
2022Net debt 1.4B
2023Net debt 1.5B
2024Net debt 1.3B
2025Net debt 1.3B
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
4.6×
Interest coverage
— operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
1.20 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
169 days collects in 10d, stock 172d, pays in 12d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
2of 8 tests passed
✕ProfitableReturn on assets above zerofailed
✕Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zerofailed
✕Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforefailed
✕Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)failed
✓Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellpassed
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
–No new sharesShare count did not grow — not reportedno data
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✓Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforepassed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
0.86distress zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.09 × 6.56+0.57
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.00 × 3.26+0.01
Operating income ÷ assets 0.04 × 6.72+0.24
Equity ÷ liabilities 0.05 × 1.05+0.05
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.09below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.36+1.25
Gross margin slipping 1.02+0.54
Soft assets 1.00 (not reported, set to 1)+0.40
Sales growth 1.04+0.93
Slower depreciation 1.00 (not reported, set to 1)+0.12
Overheads vs sales 0.98-0.17
Profit not in cash 0.01+0.04
Leverage rising 1.09-0.36
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Receivables are growing 42% against revenue growing 4%.
Benign
A shift towards larger customers on longer terms, or sales concentrated at the end of the period.
Worrying
Sales are being made on looser credit, or revenue has been booked that may never be collected.
Reported profit comfortably exceeds the cash generated (-90M against -132M).
Benign
Growth consuming working capital, or the seasonality of the year-end.
Worrying
Profit held up by accounting entries that do not turn into money.
Net debt is 4.6 times EBITDA.
Benign
A stable sector with predictable cash flows and comfortable maturities.
Worrying
Little room if earnings fall; the maturity schedule is what to check.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
The SEC accounts lack the lines needed for revenue, free cash flow or the share count, so there is no DCF for this company.
What it has filed lately
The last twelve months at the SEC, most important first: annual and quarterly reports, events, large holders and insiders.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 8 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market—none in the period
Under pre-arranged plans—of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Which large funds report holding it
From the Form 13F of the 28 institutions followed on this site, as of the end of their last reported quarter. A 13F is filed up to 45 days later and shows only long positions in US-listed shares.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.