HAYW · Industrials(refrigeration & service industry machinery) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-12-31
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
Hayward Holdings, Inc. reported revenue of $1.1 billion in fiscal 2025. Of the $1.3 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 43.8% went to buybacks and 21.8% to dividends. On the accounting screens, it passes 8 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 3.76 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; none of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 20251.1B
Operating margin20.8%gross margin 48.0%
Return on invested capital7.5%7.5% on average over 4 years
Free cash flow after stock pay213.9M19.1% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA2.5×net debt 630.2M
Piotroski F-score8/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
00.5B1.0B1.5B
2018
2019Revenue 733.4MOperating income 98.7M
2020Revenue 875.4MOperating income 124.6M
2021Revenue 1.4BOperating income 318.0M
2022
2022
2022Revenue 1.3BOperating income 285.6M
2023Revenue 992.5MOperating income 175.2M
2024Revenue 1.1BOperating income 208.8M
2025Revenue 1.1BOperating income 233.2M
2018201920202021202220222022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
-5.1%
—
—
Operating income
-6.5%
—
—
Net income
-5.5%
—
—
Earnings per share
-4.4%
—
—
Free cash flow per share
+39.6%
—
—
Shares
-1.1%
—
—
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 8.0%
0%5%10%15%
2018
2019
2020
2021Return on invested capital 10.5%
2022
2022
2022Return on invested capital 9.4%
2023Return on invested capital 5.8%
2024Return on invested capital 7.2%
2025Return on invested capital 7.5%
2018201920202021202220222022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
-100M-50M050M100M
2018
2019
2020
2021Economic profit 59.7M
2022
2022
2022Economic profit 31.5M
2023Economic profit -53.8M
2024Economic profit -20.0M
2025Economic profit -12.9M
2018201920202021202220222022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
9.5%
Return on assets
4.8%
Asset turnover
0.36×
Research & development
2.4% of revenue
Overheads (SG&A)
22.0% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
0100M200M300M
2018
2019Net income 8.5MFree cash flow 68.9MAfter stock-based pay 67.4M
2020Net income 43.3MFree cash flow 199.6MAfter stock-based pay 197.7M
2021Net income 203.7MFree cash flow 163.2MAfter stock-based pay 148.2M
2022
2022
2022Net income 179.3MFree cash flow 86.3MAfter stock-based pay 78.4M
2023Net income 80.7MFree cash flow 155.6MAfter stock-based pay 146.4M
2024Net income 118.7MFree cash flow 189.7MAfter stock-based pay 179.1M
2025Net income 151.6MFree cash flow 227.3MAfter stock-based pay 213.9M
2018201920202021202220222022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2018–2025
1.3B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 14%175.1M
Acquisitions 11%139.6M
Dividends 22%275.4M
Share buybacks 44%553.8M
Kept, or used to pay down debt 10%121.8M
Over the same years it paid 59.6M in stock. 494.2M of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$0$50$100$150
2018
2019Earnings per share $3.50Free cash flow per share $28.30Dividend per share $0.09
2020Earnings per share $17.54Free cash flow per share $80.85Dividend per share $111.47
2021Earnings per share $1.02Free cash flow per share $0.81Dividend per share $0.00
2022
2022
2022Earnings per share $0.78Free cash flow per share $0.38Dividend per share $0.00
2023Earnings per share $0.37Free cash flow per share $0.71
2024Earnings per share $0.54Free cash flow per share $0.86
2025Earnings per share $0.68Free cash flow per share $1.02
2018201920202021202220222022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
0100M200M300M
2018
2019Diluted shares 2.4M
2020Diluted shares 2.5M
2021Diluted shares 200.6M
2022
2022
2022Diluted shares 229.7M
2023Diluted shares 220.7M
2024Diluted shares 221.4M
2025Diluted shares 222.2M
2018201920202021202220222022202320242025
Debt and liquidity
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
00.5B1.0B1.5B
2018
2019
2020
2021Net debt 729.2M
2022
2022
2022Net debt 1.1B
2023Net debt 929.1M
2024Net debt 774.9M
2025Net debt 630.2M
2018201920202021202220222022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
2.5×
Interest coverage
5× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
2.94 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
175 days collects in 91d, stock 132d, pays in 48d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
8of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✓Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforepassed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✓Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellpassed
✓More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforepassed
✕No new sharesShare count did not growfailed
✓Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforepassed
✓Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforepassed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
3.76safe zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.20 × 6.56+1.31
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.27 × 3.26+0.88
Operating income ÷ assets 0.07 × 6.72+0.50
Equity ÷ liabilities 1.02 × 1.05+1.07
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.68below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 0.94+0.87
Gross margin slipping 0.96+0.51
Soft assets 0.94+0.38
Sales growth 1.07+0.95
Slower depreciation 0.91+0.11
Overheads vs sales 1.07-0.18
Profit not in cash -0.03-0.16
Leverage rising 0.95-0.31
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
None of the six cross-checks fires for the latest year: receivables and inventory move with revenue, profit turns into cash, investment keeps up with depreciation, the tax rate is ordinary and debt is moderate.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$7.32discounted at 8.0% a year · 56% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
10.7×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
8.8×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
2.0×
Free cash flow yield
13.1%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today985.5M
Everything after, today1.3B
The whole business2.3B
Minus net debt-630.2M
What belongs to shareholders1.6B
Divided among 222.2M shares: <strong>$7.32</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
0100M200M300M
2018
2019Reported 67.4M
2020Reported 197.7M
2021Reported 148.2M
2022
2022
2022Reported 78.4M
2023Reported 146.4M
2024Reported 179.1M
2025Reported 213.9M
2026Projected 159.5M
2027Projected 152.9M
2028Projected 147.8M
2029Projected 144.1M
2030Projected 141.7M
2031Projected 140.5M
2032Projected 140.5M
2033Projected 141.7M
2034Projected 144.0M
2035Projected 147.6M
2018202020222022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
1.1B
1.0B
987.6M
962.9M
946.8M
938.9M
938.9M
946.8M
962.6M
986.6M
Growth
-5.0%
-4.2%
-3.3%
-2.5%
-1.7%
-0.8%
0.0%
0.8%
1.7%
2.5%
Cash margin
15.0%
15.0%
15.0%
15.0%
15.0%
15.0%
15.0%
15.0%
15.0%
15.0%
Free cash flow
159.5M
152.9M
147.8M
144.1M
141.7M
140.5M
140.5M
141.7M
144.0M
147.6M
Worth today
147.7M
131.0M
117.3M
105.9M
96.4M
88.5M
81.9M
76.5M
72.0M
68.3M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
7.0%
8
8
9
11
12
7.5%
7
7
8
9
11
8.0%
6
7
7
8
9
8.5%
5
6
7
7
8
9.0%
5
5
6
6
7
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
-9.0%
-7.0%
-5.0%
-3.0%
-1.0%
12.0%
4
5
6
7
7
13.5%
5
6
7
7
8
15.0%
6
6
7
8
9
16.5%
6
7
8
9
10
17.9%
7
8
9
10
11
All the inputs moving at once
5,000 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.2%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$4.69
Median$7.34
90th percentile$11.76
$5.00$10.00$15.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$5.80</b> and <b>$9.33</b>; one in ten below $4.69, one in ten above $11.76.
Does the long run make sense?
12.2×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 12.2 times that year's EBITDA.
20%To grow 2.5% forever while reinvesting 12% of its after-tax operating profit, the business must earn 20% on the new capital — it has earned 7% on average over the last five years.
56%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 4 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market$1.6M4 sale(s) by 2 insider(s)
Under pre-arranged plans100%of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Companies like this one
Same SEC industry (refrigeration & service industry machinery) first, then the rest of industrials.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.