CAT · Industrials(construction machinery & equip) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-12-31
Caterpillar Inc reported revenue of $67.6 billion in fiscal 2025. Of the $71.4 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 47.2% went to buybacks and 26.7% to dividends. On the accounting screens, it passes 6 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 4.27 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; none of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 202567.6B
Operating margin16.5%gross margin 99.9%
Return on invested capital14.7%16.0% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay8.7B12.8% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA2.0×net debt 26.2B
Piotroski F-score6/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
020.0B40.0B60.0B80.0B
2018
2018Revenue 54.7BOperating income 8.3B
2019
2019Revenue 53.8BOperating income 8.3B
2020Revenue 41.7BOperating income 4.6B
2021Revenue 51.0BOperating income 6.9B
2022Revenue 59.4BOperating income 7.9B
2023Revenue 67.1BOperating income 13.0B
2024Revenue 64.8BOperating income 13.1B
2025Revenue 67.6BOperating income 11.2B
2018201820192019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
+4.4%
+10.1%
—
Operating income
+12.2%
+19.6%
—
Net income
+9.8%
+24.2%
—
Earnings per share
+14.2%
+28.0%
—
Free cash flow per share
+15.7%
+14.1%
—
Dividend per share
+8.2%
+7.3%
—
Shares
-3.8%
-3.0%
—
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 7.0%
0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%
2018
2018Return on invested capital 14.5%
2019
2019Return on invested capital 14.0%
2020Return on invested capital 7.9%
2021Return on invested capital 11.3%
2022Return on invested capital 12.7%
2023Return on invested capital 21.0%
2024Return on invested capital 20.5%
2025Return on invested capital 14.7%
2018201820192019202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B
2018
2018Economic profit 3.4B
2019
2019Economic profit 3.2B
2020Economic profit 382.7M
2021Economic profit 2.1B
2022Economic profit 2.7B
2023Economic profit 6.8B
2024Economic profit 6.9B
2025Economic profit 4.5B
2018201820192019202020212022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
41.7%
Return on assets
9.0%
Asset turnover
0.69×
Research & development
3.2% of revenue
Overheads (SG&A)
10.3% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
05.0B10.0B15.0B
2018
2018Net income 6.1BFree cash flow 5.3BAfter stock-based pay 5.1B
2019
2019Net income 6.1BFree cash flow 5.9BAfter stock-based pay 5.7B
2020Net income 3.0BFree cash flow 5.3BAfter stock-based pay 5.1B
2021Net income 6.5BFree cash flow 6.1BAfter stock-based pay 5.9B
2022Net income 6.7BFree cash flow 6.5BAfter stock-based pay 6.3B
2023Net income 10.3BFree cash flow 11.3BAfter stock-based pay 11.1B
2024Net income 10.8BFree cash flow 10.0BAfter stock-based pay 9.8B
2025Net income 8.9BFree cash flow 8.9BAfter stock-based pay 8.7B
2018201820192019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2018–2025
71.4B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 17%12.1B
Acquisitions 2%1.3B
Dividends 27%19.1B
Share buybacks 47%33.7B
Kept, or used to pay down debt 7%5.2B
Over the same years it paid 1.7B in stock. 32.1B of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$0.00$10.00$20.00$30.00
2018
2018Earnings per share $10.26Free cash flow per share $8.81Dividend per share $3.25
2019
2019Earnings per share $10.74Free cash flow per share $10.32Dividend per share $3.76
2020Earnings per share $5.47Free cash flow per share $9.75Dividend per share $4.09
2021Earnings per share $11.84Free cash flow per share $11.13Dividend per share $4.25
2022Earnings per share $12.64Free cash flow per share $12.20Dividend per share $4.60
2023Earnings per share $20.12Free cash flow per share $21.98Dividend per share $4.99
2024Earnings per share $22.04Free cash flow per share $20.53Dividend per share $5.41
2025Earnings per share $18.81Free cash flow per share $18.88Dividend per share $5.82
2018201820192019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
450.0M500.0M550.0M600.0M
2018
2018Diluted shares 599.4M
2019
2019Diluted shares 567.5M
2020Diluted shares 548.6M
2021Diluted shares 548.5M
2022Diluted shares 530.4M
2023Diluted shares 513.6M
2024Diluted shares 489.4M
2025Diluted shares 472.3M
2018201820192019202020212022202320242025
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
010.0B20.0B30.0B
2018
2018Net debt 22.8B
2019
2019Net debt 23.2B
2020Net debt 18.7B
2021Net debt 22.2B
2022Net debt 24.7B
2023Net debt 22.1B
2024Net debt 24.9B
2025Net debt 26.2B
2018201820192019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
2.0×
Interest coverage
— operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
1.44 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
68344 days collects in 59d, stock 135087d, pays in 66802d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
6of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✕Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforefailed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✓Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellpassed
✓More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforepassed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✕Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforefailed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
4.27safe zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.16 × 6.56+1.06
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.66 × 3.26+2.16
Operating income ÷ assets 0.11 × 6.72+0.76
Equity ÷ liabilities 0.28 × 1.05+0.29
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.47below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.13+1.04
Gross margin slipping 1.00+0.53
Soft assets 0.96+0.39
Sales growth 1.04+0.93
Slower depreciation 1.07+0.12
Overheads vs sales 1.00-0.17
Profit not in cash -0.03-0.14
Leverage rising 1.00-0.33
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
None of the six cross-checks fires for the latest year: receivables and inventory move with revenue, profit turns into cash, investment keeps up with depreciation, the tax rate is ordinary and debt is moderate.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$512.67discounted at 7.0% a year · 68% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
27.3×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
20.0×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
4.0×
Free cash flow yield
3.6%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today87.1B
Everything after, today181.3B
The whole business268.4B
Minus net debt-26.2B
What belongs to shareholders242.1B
Divided among 472.3M shares: <strong>$512.67</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
05.0B10.0B15.0B20.0B
2018
2018Reported 5.1B
2019
2019Reported 5.7B
2020Reported 5.1B
2021Reported 5.9B
2022Reported 6.3B
2023Reported 11.1B
2024Reported 9.8B
2025Reported 8.7B
2026Projected 9.3B
2027Projected 10.2B
2028Projected 11.0B
2029Projected 11.9B
2030Projected 12.6B
2031Projected 13.4B
2032Projected 14.0B
2033Projected 14.6B
2034Projected 15.1B
2035Projected 15.5B
2018201920202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
74.3B
81.2B
87.9B
94.5B
100.8B
106.7B
112.0B
116.7B
120.6B
123.6B
Growth
10.0%
9.2%
8.3%
7.5%
6.7%
5.8%
5.0%
4.2%
3.3%
2.5%
Cash margin
12.5%
12.5%
12.5%
12.5%
12.5%
12.5%
12.5%
12.5%
12.5%
12.5%
Free cash flow
9.3B
10.2B
11.0B
11.9B
12.6B
13.4B
14.0B
14.6B
15.1B
15.5B
Worth today
8.7B
8.9B
9.0B
9.1B
9.0B
8.9B
8.8B
8.5B
8.2B
7.9B
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
6.0%
533
598
681
793
950
6.5%
472
523
586
668
778
7.0%
422
463
513
575
656
7.5%
380
414
454
503
564
8.0%
345
373
405
445
493
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
10.0%
343
378
416
457
501
11.3%
383
422
464
510
559
12.5%
424
466
513
563
616
13.8%
464
510
561
615
674
15.0%
504
555
609
668
732
All the inputs moving at once
4,991 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.0%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$340.53
Median$512.40
90th percentile$834.29
$500.00$1,000.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$412.91</b> and <b>$654.19</b>; one in ten below $340.53, one in ten above $834.29.
Does the long run make sense?
14.5×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 14.5 times that year's EBITDA.
20778%To grow 2.5% forever while reinvesting 0% of its after-tax operating profit, the business must earn 20778% on the new capital — it has earned 16% on average over the last five years.
68%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.