MIDD · Industrials(refrigeration & service industry machinery) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2026-01-03
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
Middleby Corp reported revenue of $3.2 billion in fiscal 2026, after growing 3.9% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin held steady at about 18.0% from 2016, and it earned 8.8% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $4.6 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 76.5% went to acquisitions and 32.0% to buybacks; the share count fell 8.6%. On the accounting screens, it passes 4 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 5.27 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; 1 of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 20263.2B+3.9% a year over 9 years
Operating margin18.0%gross margin 39.1%
Return on invested capital8.8%8.9% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay546.0M17.1% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA2.9×net debt 2.0B
Piotroski F-score4/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
02.0B4.0B6.0B
2016Revenue 2.3BOperating income 419.0M
2017Revenue 2.3BOperating income 378.6M
2018Revenue 2.7BOperating income 446.0M
2019Revenue 3.0BOperating income 514.0M
2021Revenue 2.5BOperating income 324.4M
2022Revenue 3.3BOperating income 630.0M
2022Revenue 4.0BOperating income 639.6M
2023Revenue 3.2BOperating income 652.4M
2024Revenue 3.2BOperating income 644.1M
2026Revenue 3.2BOperating income 574.9M
2016201720182019202120222022202320242026
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
-7.4%
+5.0%
+3.9%
Operating income
-3.5%
+12.1%
+3.6%
Free cash flow per share
+30.5%
+3.8%
+9.6%
Shares
-1.7%
-1.1%
-1.0%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 7.9%
0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%
2016Return on invested capital 14.2%
2017Return on invested capital 12.3%
2018Return on invested capital 9.4%
2019Return on invested capital 10.2%
2021Return on invested capital 6.8%
2022Return on invested capital 10.1%
2022Return on invested capital 9.0%
2023Return on invested capital 8.9%
2024Return on invested capital 7.9%
2026Return on invested capital 8.8%
2016201720182019202120222022202320242026
Economic profit
Economic profit
-50.0M050.0M100.0M150.0M
2016Economic profit 124.2M
2017Economic profit 104.7M
2018Economic profit 51.7M
2019Economic profit 88.3M
2021Economic profit -43.2M
2022Economic profit 107.3M
2022Economic profit 56.7M
2023Economic profit 52.3M
2024Economic profit 248,085
2026Economic profit 45.1M
2016201720182019202120222022202320242026
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
-10.0%
Return on assets
-4.4%
Asset turnover
0.51×
Research & development
1.8% of revenue
Overheads (SG&A)
20.7% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-500.0M-250.0M0250.0M500.0M750.0M
2016Net income 284.2MFree cash flow 269.3MAfter stock-based pay 241.4M
2017Net income 298.1MFree cash flow 250.0MAfter stock-based pay 243.7M
2018Net income 317.2MFree cash flow 332.9MAfter stock-based pay 330.4M
2019Net income 352.2MFree cash flow 330.8MAfter stock-based pay 322.7M
2021Net income 207.3MFree cash flow 489.9MAfter stock-based pay 470.3M
2022Net income 488.5MFree cash flow 376.8MAfter stock-based pay 334.5M
2022Net income 436.6MFree cash flow 265.3MAfter stock-based pay 206.9M
2023Net income 400.9MFree cash flow 569.6MAfter stock-based pay 524.5M
2024Net income 428.4MFree cash flow 650.1MAfter stock-based pay 618.2M
2026Net income -277.7MFree cash flow 559.5MAfter stock-based pay 546.0M
2016201720182019202120222022202320242026
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2016–2026
4.6B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 10%477.2M
Acquisitions 77%3.5B
Dividends 0%0
Share buybacks 32%1.5B
More than it generated: funded with cash or new debt -19%-866.9M
Over the same years it paid 255.6M in stock. The share count fell 8.6%. 1.2B of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$-10.00$-5.00$0.00$5.00$10.00$15.00
2016Earnings per share $4.98Free cash flow per share $4.72
2017Earnings per share $5.26Free cash flow per share $4.41
2018Earnings per share $5.70Free cash flow per share $5.99
2019Earnings per share $6.33Free cash flow per share $5.94
2021Earnings per share $3.76Free cash flow per share $8.89
2022Earnings per share $8.62Free cash flow per share $6.65
2022Earnings per share $7.95Free cash flow per share $4.83
2023Earnings per share $7.41Free cash flow per share $10.53
2024Earnings per share $7.90Free cash flow per share $11.99
2026Earnings per share $-5.32Free cash flow per share $10.72
2016201720182019202120222022202320242026
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
52.0M54.0M56.0M58.0M
2016Diluted shares 57.1M
2017Diluted shares 56.7M
2018Diluted shares 55.6M
2019Diluted shares 55.7M
2021Diluted shares 55.1M
2022Diluted shares 56.7M
2022Diluted shares 54.9M
2023Diluted shares 54.1M
2024Diluted shares 54.2M
2026Diluted shares 52.2M
2016201720182019202120222022202320242026
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
01.0B2.0B3.0B
2016Net debt 663.6M
2017Net debt 939.2M
2018Net debt 1.8B
2019Net debt 1.8B
2021Net debt 1.5B
2022Net debt 2.2B
2022Net debt 2.6B
2023Net debt 2.2B
2024Net debt 1.8B
2026Net debt 2.0B
2016201720182019202120222022202320242026
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
2.9×
Interest coverage
— operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
2.57 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
156 days collects in 65d, stock 130d, pays in 39d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
4of 9 tests passed
✕ProfitableReturn on assets above zerofailed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✕Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforefailed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✕Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellfailed
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✓Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforepassed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
5.27safe zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.27 × 6.56+1.74
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.64 × 3.26+2.09
Operating income ÷ assets 0.09 × 6.72+0.61
Equity ÷ liabilities 0.78 × 1.05+0.82
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-3.22below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.06+0.98
Gross margin slipping 1.02+0.54
Soft assets 0.79+0.32
Sales growth 1.02+0.91
Slower depreciation 1.09+0.12
Overheads vs sales 1.11-0.19
Profit not in cash -0.14-0.67
Leverage rising 1.16-0.38
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Capital spending (71M) is well below depreciation (105M).
Benign
Mature assets, or a business that has become less capital-intensive.
Worrying
Under-investing: today's profit is being held up by consuming tomorrow's capacity.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$212.15discounted at 7.9% a year · 61% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
—
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
19.1×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
4.1×
Free cash flow yield
4.9%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today5.1B
Everything after, today7.9B
The whole business13.0B
Minus net debt-2.0B
What belongs to shareholders11.1B
Divided among 52.2M shares: <strong>$212.15</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B
2016Reported 241.4M
2017Reported 243.7M
2018Reported 330.4M
2019Reported 322.7M
2021Reported 470.3M
2022Reported 334.5M
2022Reported 206.9M
2023Reported 524.5M
2024Reported 618.2M
2026Reported 546.0M
2027Projected 651.7M
2028Projected 682.5M
2029Projected 712.9M
2030Projected 742.6M
2031Projected 771.4M
2032Projected 799.3M
2033Projected 825.9M
2034Projected 851.2M
2035Projected 874.8M
2036Projected 896.7M
2016201820212022202420272029203120332035
Year by year
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
Revenue
3.4B
3.5B
3.7B
3.8B
4.0B
4.1B
4.3B
4.4B
4.5B
4.6B
Growth
5.0%
4.7%
4.4%
4.2%
3.9%
3.6%
3.3%
3.1%
2.8%
2.5%
Cash margin
19.4%
19.4%
19.4%
19.4%
19.4%
19.4%
19.4%
19.4%
19.4%
19.4%
Free cash flow
651.7M
682.5M
712.9M
742.6M
771.4M
799.3M
825.9M
851.2M
874.8M
896.7M
Worth today
603.8M
585.9M
566.9M
547.1M
526.6M
505.5M
484.0M
462.1M
440.0M
417.9M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
6.9%
221
243
269
303
346
7.4%
199
217
238
264
297
7.9%
180
195
212
233
259
8.4%
164
177
191
208
229
8.9%
150
161
173
187
204
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
1.0%
3.0%
5.0%
7.0%
9.0%
15.5%
139
155
172
190
209
17.4%
156
173
192
212
234
19.4%
173
192
212
234
258
21.3%
190
210
232
256
282
23.3%
207
229
253
278
306
All the inputs moving at once
5,000 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.9%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$145.06
Median$212.51
90th percentile$326.50
$200.00$400.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$173.65</b> and <b>$263.97</b>; one in ten below $145.06, one in ten above $326.50.
Does the long run make sense?
17.2×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 17.2 times that year's EBITDA.
Free growthIn year 10 free cash flow is at or above after-tax operating profit, yet the model grows 2.5% forever. Growth needs reinvestment; this assumes it comes for free, which flatters the terminal value.
61%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 6 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market—none in the period
Under pre-arranged plans—of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Which large funds report holding it
From the Form 13F of the 28 institutions followed on this site, as of the end of their last reported quarter. A 13F is filed up to 45 days later and shows only long positions in US-listed shares.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.