ZBRA · Industrials(general industrial machinery & equipment) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-12-31
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
Zebra Technologies Corp reported revenue of $5.4 billion in fiscal 2025, after growing 4.2% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin widened from 8.7% in 2017 to 13.0%, and it earned 8.6% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $6.4 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 56.0% went to acquisitions and 27.2% to buybacks; the share count fell 4.6%. On the accounting screens, it passes 5 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 3.30 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; 1 of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 20255.4B+4.2% a year over 9 years
Operating margin13.0%gross margin 48.1%
Return on invested capital8.6%11.6% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay668.0M12.4% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA2.7×net debt 2.4B
Piotroski F-score5/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
02.0B4.0B6.0B
2017Revenue 3.7BOperating income 322.0M
2018
2018Revenue 4.2BOperating income 610.0M
2019Revenue 4.5BOperating income 692.0M
2020Revenue 4.4BOperating income 651.0M
2021Revenue 5.6BOperating income 979.0M
2022Revenue 5.8BOperating income 529.0M
2023Revenue 4.6BOperating income 481.0M
2024Revenue 5.0BOperating income 742.0M
2025Revenue 5.4BOperating income 700.0M
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
-2.3%
+3.9%
+4.2%
Operating income
+9.8%
+1.5%
+9.0%
Net income
-3.3%
-3.6%
+42.8%
Earnings per share
-2.4%
-2.6%
+43.5%
Free cash flow per share
+27.3%
-0.5%
+8.2%
Shares
-0.9%
-1.0%
-0.5%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 8.0%
0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%
2017Return on invested capital 2.0%
2018
2018Return on invested capital 16.7%
2019Return on invested capital 20.2%
2020Return on invested capital 17.3%
2021Return on invested capital 21.3%
2022Return on invested capital 9.5%
2023Return on invested capital 8.1%
2024Return on invested capital 10.7%
2025Return on invested capital 8.6%
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
-200.0M0200.0M400.0M600.0M
2017Economic profit -184.0M
2018
2018Economic profit 254.8M
2019Economic profit 378.9M
2020Economic profit 313.4M
2021Economic profit 526.8M
2022Economic profit 67.8M
2023Economic profit 3.6M
2024Economic profit 154.0M
2025Economic profit 34.0M
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
11.7%
Return on assets
4.9%
Asset turnover
0.63×
Research & development
11.0% of revenue
Overheads (SG&A)
8.0% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-500.0M0500.0M1.0B1.5B
2017Net income 17.0MFree cash flow 428.0MAfter stock-based pay 393.0M
2018
2018Net income 421.0MFree cash flow 721.0MAfter stock-based pay 676.0M
2019Net income 544.0MFree cash flow 624.0MAfter stock-based pay 576.0M
2020Net income 504.0MFree cash flow 895.0MAfter stock-based pay 844.0M
2021Net income 837.0MFree cash flow 1.0BAfter stock-based pay 934.0M
2022Net income 463.0MFree cash flow 413.0MAfter stock-based pay 325.0M
2023Net income 296.0MFree cash flow -91.0MAfter stock-based pay -146.0M
2024Net income 528.0MFree cash flow 954.0MAfter stock-based pay 865.0M
2025Net income 419.0MFree cash flow 831.0MAfter stock-based pay 668.0M
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2017–2025
6.4B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 10%608.0M
Acquisitions 56%3.6B
Dividends 0%0
Share buybacks 27%1.7B
Kept, or used to pay down debt 7%464.0M
Over the same years it paid 650.0M in stock. The share count fell 4.6%. 1.1B of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$-10.00$0.00$10.00$20.00
2017Earnings per share $0.32Free cash flow per share $7.97
2018
2018Earnings per share $7.75Free cash flow per share $13.28
2019Earnings per share $9.96Free cash flow per share $11.43
2020Earnings per share $9.35Free cash flow per share $16.60
2021Earnings per share $15.53Free cash flow per share $18.74
2022Earnings per share $8.81Free cash flow per share $7.86
2023Earnings per share $5.72Free cash flow per share $-1.76
2024Earnings per share $10.18Free cash flow per share $18.39
2025Earnings per share $8.18Free cash flow per share $16.23
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
51.0M52.0M53.0M54.0M55.0M
2017Diluted shares 53.7M
2018
2018Diluted shares 54.3M
2019Diluted shares 54.6M
2020Diluted shares 53.9M
2021Diluted shares 53.9M
2022Diluted shares 52.6M
2023Diluted shares 51.7M
2024Diluted shares 51.9M
2025Diluted shares 51.2M
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
01.0B2.0B3.0B
2017Net debt 2.2B
2018
2018Net debt 1.5B
2019Net debt 1.2B
2020Net debt 1.1B
2021Net debt 659.0M
2022Net debt 1.9B
2023Net debt 2.1B
2024Net debt 1.3B
2025Net debt 2.4B
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
2.7×
Interest coverage
— operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
0.97 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
59 days collects in 54d, stock 95d, pays in 91d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
5of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✕Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforefailed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✕Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellfailed
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✓Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforepassed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
3.30safe zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets -0.01 × 6.56-0.04
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.62 × 3.26+2.02
Operating income ÷ assets 0.08 × 6.72+0.55
Equity ÷ liabilities 0.73 × 1.05+0.77
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.57below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.07+0.98
Gross margin slipping 1.01+0.53
Soft assets 1.14+0.46
Sales growth 1.08+0.97
Slower depreciation 1.05+0.12
Overheads vs sales 1.05-0.18
Profit not in cash -0.06-0.27
Leverage rising 1.04-0.34
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Capital spending (86M) is well below depreciation (185M).
Benign
Mature assets, or a business that has become less capital-intensive.
Worrying
Under-investing: today's profit is being held up by consuming tomorrow's capacity.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$167.81discounted at 8.0% a year · 60% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
20.5×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
12.4×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
2.0×
Free cash flow yield
7.8%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today4.4B
Everything after, today6.5B
The whole business11.0B
Minus net debt-2.4B
What belongs to shareholders8.6B
Divided among 51.2M shares: <strong>$167.81</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
-500.0M0500.0M1.0B
2017Reported 393.0M
2018
2018Reported 676.0M
2019Reported 576.0M
2020Reported 844.0M
2021Reported 934.0M
2022Reported 325.0M
2023Reported -146.0M
2024Reported 865.0M
2025Reported 668.0M
2026Projected 578.8M
2027Projected 601.0M
2028Projected 623.0M
2029Projected 644.8M
2030Projected 666.3M
2031Projected 687.4M
2032Projected 708.0M
2033Projected 728.1M
2034Projected 747.5M
2035Projected 766.2M
2017201820202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
5.6B
5.8B
6.0B
6.3B
6.5B
6.7B
6.9B
7.1B
7.2B
7.4B
Growth
4.0%
3.8%
3.7%
3.5%
3.3%
3.2%
3.0%
2.8%
2.7%
2.5%
Cash margin
10.3%
10.3%
10.3%
10.3%
10.3%
10.3%
10.3%
10.3%
10.3%
10.3%
Free cash flow
578.8M
601.0M
623.0M
644.8M
666.3M
687.4M
708.0M
728.1M
747.5M
766.2M
Worth today
535.7M
514.8M
494.0M
473.2M
452.6M
432.2M
412.0M
392.1M
372.6M
353.5M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
7.0%
175
193
215
243
278
7.5%
157
171
189
211
238
8.0%
141
153
168
185
207
8.5%
127
138
150
164
182
9.0%
116
125
135
147
161
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
8.2%
106
119
133
149
166
9.3%
120
135
151
168
186
10.3%
134
150
168
187
207
11.3%
148
166
185
205
228
12.4%
163
182
202
224
248
All the inputs moving at once
5,000 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.0%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$105.56
Median$167.78
90th percentile$268.47
$100.00$200.00$300.00$400.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$132.13</b> and <b>$214.26</b>; one in ten below $105.56, one in ten above $268.47.
Does the long run make sense?
11.6×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 11.6 times that year's EBITDA.
Free growthIn year 10 free cash flow is at or above after-tax operating profit, yet the model grows 2.5% forever. Growth needs reinvestment; this assumes it comes for free, which flatters the terminal value.
60%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 5 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market$1.6M3 sale(s) by 3 insider(s)
Under pre-arranged plans0%of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Which large funds report holding it
From the Form 13F of the 28 institutions followed on this site, as of the end of their last reported quarter. A 13F is filed up to 45 days later and shows only long positions in US-listed shares.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.