SBAC · Real estate(real estate investment trusts) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-12-31
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
SBA Communications Corp reported revenue of $244.5 million in fiscal 2025, after shrinking 19.0% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin widened from 23.7% in 2016 to 549.2%, and it earned 14.2% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $11.2 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 55.0% went to acquisitions and 47.8% to buybacks; the share count fell 14.1%. On the accounting screens, it passes 7 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of -2.65 is in the distress zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; 1 of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 2025244.5M-19.0% a year over 9 years
Operating margin549.2%gross margin 18.6%
Return on invested capital14.2%12.7% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay990.8M405.2% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA7.7×net debt 12.6B
Piotroski F-score7/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B
2016Revenue 1.6BOperating income 387.3M
2017Revenue 104.5MOperating income 458.5M
2018Revenue 125.3MOperating income 544.2M
2019Revenue 153.8MOperating income 583.5M
2020Revenue 128.7MOperating income 633.7M
2021Revenue 204.7MOperating income 782.5M
2022Revenue 296.9MOperating income 925.4M
2023Revenue 194.6MOperating income 923.7M
2024Revenue 152.9MOperating income 1.4B
2025Revenue 244.5MOperating income 1.3B
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
-6.3%
+13.7%
-19.0%
Operating income
+13.2%
+16.2%
+14.8%
Net income
+31.7%
+112.9%
+33.9%
Earnings per share
+32.4%
+115.2%
+36.2%
Free cash flow per share
+0.4%
+2.4%
+8.4%
Dividend per share
+16.7%
+19.5%
—
Shares
-0.6%
-1.1%
-1.7%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 5.7%
0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%
2016Return on invested capital 5.0%
2017Return on invested capital 6.1%
2018Return on invested capital 7.6%
2019Return on invested capital 6.9%
2020Return on invested capital 33.9%
2021Return on invested capital 10.5%
2022Return on invested capital 10.7%
2023Return on invested capital 11.7%
2024Return on invested capital 16.4%
2025Return on invested capital 14.2%
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
-500.0M0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B
2016Economic profit -45.7M
2017Economic profit 26.5M
2018Economic profit 128.0M
2019Economic profit 82.3M
2020Economic profit 1.8B
2021Economic profit 338.7M
2022Economic profit 379.3M
2023Economic profit 432.6M
2024Economic profit 910.9M
2025Economic profit 684.3M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
—
Return on assets
9.1%
Asset turnover
0.02×
Overheads (SG&A)
113.5% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
0500.0M1.0B1.5B
2016Net income 76.2MFree cash flow 602.5MAfter stock-based pay 569.6M
2017Net income 103.7MFree cash flow 671.4MAfter stock-based pay 633.2M
2018Net income 47.5MFree cash flow 700.8MAfter stock-based pay 658.5M
2019Net income 147.0MFree cash flow 815.8MAfter stock-based pay 742.6M
2020Net income 24.1MFree cash flow 997.5MAfter stock-based pay 928.6M
2021Net income 237.6MFree cash flow 1.1BAfter stock-based pay 971.8M
2022Net income 461.4MFree cash flow 1.1BAfter stock-based pay 971.3M
2023Net income 501.8MFree cash flow 1.3BAfter stock-based pay 1.2B
2024Net income 749.5MFree cash flow 1.1BAfter stock-based pay 1.0B
2025Net income 1.1BFree cash flow 1.1BAfter stock-based pay 990.8M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2016–2025
11.2B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 16%1.8B
Acquisitions 55%6.1B
Dividends 19%2.1B
Share buybacks 48%5.3B
More than it generated: funded with cash or new debt -38%-4.2B
Over the same years it paid 677.9M in stock. The share count fell 14.1%. 4.7B of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$0.00$5.00$10.00$15.00
2016Earnings per share $0.61Free cash flow per share $4.81
2017Earnings per share $0.86Free cash flow per share $5.55
2018Earnings per share $0.41Free cash flow per share $6.01
2019Earnings per share $1.28Free cash flow per share $7.11Dividend per share $0.73
2020Earnings per share $0.21Free cash flow per share $8.79Dividend per share $1.83
2021Earnings per share $2.14Free cash flow per share $9.50Dividend per share $2.28
2022Earnings per share $4.22Free cash flow per share $9.79Dividend per share $2.80
2023Earnings per share $4.61Free cash flow per share $12.01Dividend per share $3.40
2024Earnings per share $6.94Free cash flow per share $10.24Dividend per share $3.92
2025Earnings per share $9.80Free cash flow per share $9.92Dividend per share $4.45
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
105.0M110.0M115.0M120.0M125.0M130.0M
2016Diluted shares 125.1M
2017Diluted shares 121.0M
2018Diluted shares 116.5M
2019Diluted shares 114.7M
2020Diluted shares 113.5M
2021Diluted shares 111.2M
2022Diluted shares 109.4M
2023Diluted shares 108.9M
2024Diluted shares 108.1M
2025Diluted shares 107.5M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
05.0B10.0B15.0B
2016Net debt 8.6B
2017Net debt 9.2B
2018Net debt 9.8B
2019Net debt 10.2B
2020Net debt 10.8B
2021Net debt 11.9B
2022Net debt 12.7B
2023Net debt 12.1B
2024Net debt 13.4B
2025Net debt 12.6B
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
7.7×
Interest coverage
— operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
0.29 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
— collects in 256d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
7of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✓Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforepassed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✓Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellpassed
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✓Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforepassed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
-2.65distress zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets -0.16 × 6.56-1.08
Retained earnings ÷ assets -0.63 × 3.26-2.04
Operating income ÷ assets 0.12 × 6.72+0.78
Equity ÷ liabilities -0.30 × 1.05-0.31
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.05below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 0.73+0.68
Gross margin slipping 1.20+0.63
Soft assets 1.10+0.44
Sales growth 1.60+1.43
Slower depreciation 1.11+0.13
Overheads vs sales 0.67-0.12
Profit not in cash -0.02-0.10
Leverage rising 0.95-0.31
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Net debt is 7.7 times EBITDA.
Benign
A stable sector with predictable cash flows and comfortable maturities.
Worrying
Little room if earnings fall; the maturity schedule is what to check.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
76% of the value comes from after year 10: this valuation rests mostly on the long run, which is exactly what is least known.
Value per share, with these assumptions$639.32discounted at 5.7% a year · 76% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
65.2×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
49.8×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
332.9×
Free cash flow yield
1.4%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today19.2B
Everything after, today62.2B
The whole business81.4B
Minus net debt-12.6B
What belongs to shareholders68.7B
Divided among 107.5M shares: <strong>$639.32</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B
2016Reported 569.6M
2017Reported 633.2M
2018Reported 658.5M
2019Reported 742.6M
2020Reported 928.6M
2021Reported 971.8M
2022Reported 971.3M
2023Reported 1.2B
2024Reported 1.0B
2025Reported 990.8M
2026Projected 1.8B
2027Projected 2.0B
2028Projected 2.2B
2029Projected 2.4B
2030Projected 2.6B
2031Projected 2.8B
2032Projected 3.0B
2033Projected 3.1B
2034Projected 3.2B
2035Projected 3.3B
2016201820202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
277.5M
311.6M
346.0M
380.0M
412.8M
443.3M
470.6M
493.9M
512.3M
525.1M
Growth
13.5%
12.3%
11.1%
9.8%
8.6%
7.4%
6.2%
4.9%
3.7%
2.5%
Cash margin
634.1%
634.1%
634.1%
634.1%
634.1%
634.1%
634.1%
634.1%
634.1%
634.1%
Free cash flow
1.8B
2.0B
2.2B
2.4B
2.6B
2.8B
3.0B
3.1B
3.2B
3.3B
Worth today
1.7B
1.8B
1.9B
1.9B
2.0B
2.0B
2.0B
2.0B
2.0B
1.9B
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
4.7%
669
804
1,002
1,320
1,911
5.2%
558
654
787
981
1,293
5.7%
473
545
639
769
959
6.2%
407
462
533
626
754
6.7%
354
398
452
521
613
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
9.5%
11.5%
13.5%
15.5%
17.5%
507.3%
406
453
504
558
617
570.7%
463
515
571
632
698
634.1%
520
577
639
706
778
697.5%
576
639
707
780
859
760.9%
633
701
775
855
940
All the inputs moving at once
4,851 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 95.1%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$9.37
Median$46.12
90th percentile$118.74
$0.00$100.00$200.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$23.88</b> and <b>$77.65</b>; one in ten below $9.37, one in ten above $118.74.
Does the long run make sense?
30.7×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 30.7 times that year's EBITDA.
Free growthIn year 10 free cash flow is at or above after-tax operating profit, yet the model grows 2.5% forever. Growth needs reinvestment; this assumes it comes for free, which flatters the terminal value.
76%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 6 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market$54,8021 sale(s) by 1 insider(s)
Under pre-arranged plans0%of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Which large funds report holding it
From the Form 13F of the 28 institutions followed on this site, as of the end of their last reported quarter. A 13F is filed up to 45 days later and shows only long positions in US-listed shares.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.