NATH · Consumer discretionary(retail-eating places) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2026-03-29
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
Nathans Famous, Inc. reported revenue of $162.1 million in fiscal 2026, after growing 5.0% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin narrowed from 26.0% in 2018 to 18.6%, and it earned 63.0% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $153.9 million its operations generated over 10 years, 29.2% went to dividends and 6.1% to buybacks; the share count fell 2.3%. On the accounting screens, it passes 4 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 7.50 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; 1 of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 2026162.1M+5.0% a year over 9 years
Operating margin18.6%gross margin 34.3%
Return on invested capital63.0%68.7% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay16.7M10.3% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA0.8×net debt 23.7M
Piotroski F-score4/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M
2018Revenue 104.2MOperating income 27.1M
2018
2019Revenue 101.8MOperating income 28.0M
2020Revenue 103.3MOperating income 27.2M
2021Revenue 75.8MOperating income 25.5M
2022Revenue 114.9MOperating income 29.9M
2023Revenue 130.8MOperating income 34.4M
2024Revenue 138.6MOperating income 32.5M
2025Revenue 148.2MOperating income 36.5M
2026Revenue 162.1MOperating income 30.1M
2018201820192020202120222023202420252026
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
+7.4%
+16.4%
+5.0%
Operating income
-4.4%
+3.4%
+1.2%
Net income
+0.7%
+12.6%
+25.3%
Earnings per share
+0.4%
+12.5%
+25.6%
Free cash flow per share
-2.7%
+9.7%
-0.0%
Shares
+0.3%
+0.0%
-0.3%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 4.2%
0.0%25.0%50.0%75.0%100.0%
2018Return on invested capital 28.8%
2018
2019Return on invested capital 27.1%
2020Return on invested capital 25.4%
2021Return on invested capital 21.9%
2022Return on invested capital 41.2%
2023Return on invested capital 73.1%
2024Return on invested capital 87.2%
2025Return on invested capital 78.8%
2026Return on invested capital 63.0%
2018201820192020202120222023202420252026
Economic profit
Economic profit
010.0M20.0M30.0M
2018Economic profit 14.8M
2018
2019Economic profit 17.3M
2020Economic profit 16.9M
2021Economic profit 14.9M
2022Economic profit 19.7M
2023Economic profit 23.8M
2024Economic profit 22.1M
2025Economic profit 25.3M
2026Economic profit 19.9M
2018201820192020202120222023202420252026
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
—
Return on assets
37.3%
Asset turnover
3.02×
Overheads (SG&A)
11.0% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
010.0M20.0M30.0M
2018Net income 2.6MFree cash flow 18.3MAfter stock-based pay 17.9M
2018
2019Net income 21.5MFree cash flow 10.7MAfter stock-based pay 10.5M
2020Net income 13.4MFree cash flow 11.5MAfter stock-based pay 11.4M
2021Net income 11.1MFree cash flow 11.2MAfter stock-based pay 11.1M
2022Net income 13.6MFree cash flow 15.8MAfter stock-based pay 15.8M
2023Net income 19.6MFree cash flow 19.2MAfter stock-based pay 19.0M
2024Net income 19.6MFree cash flow 19.7MAfter stock-based pay 19.0M
2025Net income 24.0MFree cash flow 25.0MAfter stock-based pay 24.0M
2026Net income 20.0MFree cash flow 17.9MAfter stock-based pay 16.7M
2018201820192020202120222023202420252026
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2018–2026
153.9M generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 3%4.6M
Acquisitions 0%0
Dividends 29%44.9M
Share buybacks 6%9.4M
Kept, or used to pay down debt 62%95.1M
Over the same years it paid 4.0M in stock. The share count fell 2.3%. 5.4M of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$0.00$2.00$4.00$6.00$8.00
2018Earnings per share $0.62Free cash flow per share $4.34Dividend per share $4.99
2018
2019Earnings per share $5.09Free cash flow per share $2.54
2020Earnings per share $3.19Free cash flow per share $2.72Dividend per share $1.40
2021Earnings per share $2.69Free cash flow per share $2.72
2022Earnings per share $3.30Free cash flow per share $3.85Dividend per share $1.50
2023Earnings per share $4.80Free cash flow per share $4.70Dividend per share $1.85
2024Earnings per share $4.80Free cash flow per share $4.82
2025Earnings per share $5.87Free cash flow per share $6.11
2026Earnings per share $4.85Free cash flow per share $4.33
2018201820192020202120222023202420252026
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
4.0M4.1M4.2M4.2M4.2M
2018Diluted shares 4.2M
2018
2019Diluted shares 4.2M
2020Diluted shares 4.2M
2021Diluted shares 4.1M
2022Diluted shares 4.1M
2023Diluted shares 4.1M
2024Diluted shares 4.1M
2025Diluted shares 4.1M
2026Diluted shares 4.1M
2018201820192020202120222023202420252026
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M
2018Net debt 87.4M
2018
2019Net debt 70.0M
2020Net debt 69.0M
2021Net debt 65.8M
2022Net debt 58.1M
2023Net debt 49.2M
2024Net debt 38.5M
2025Net debt 22.7M
2026Net debt 23.7M
2018201820192020202120222023202420252026
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
0.8×
Interest coverage
11× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
2.49 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
—
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
4of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✕Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforefailed
✕Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)failed
✓Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellpassed
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
✕No new sharesShare count did not growfailed
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✓Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforepassed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
7.50safe zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.53 × 6.56+3.45
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.15 × 3.26+0.50
Operating income ÷ assets 0.56 × 6.72+3.77
Equity ÷ liabilities -0.21 × 1.05-0.22
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.29below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.00 (not reported, set to 1)+0.92
Gross margin slipping 1.15+0.61
Soft assets 0.77+0.31
Sales growth 1.09+0.98
Slower depreciation 0.90+0.10
Overheads vs sales 1.13-0.19
Profit not in cash 0.03+0.16
Leverage rising 0.99-0.32
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Capital spending (0M) is well below depreciation (1M).
Benign
Mature assets, or a business that has become less capital-intensive.
Worrying
Under-investing: today's profit is being held up by consuming tomorrow's capacity.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
87% of the value comes from after year 10: this valuation rests mostly on the long run, which is exactly what is least known.
Value per share, with these assumptions$697.77discounted at 4.2% a year · 87% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
143.7×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
93.5×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
17.9×
Free cash flow yield
0.6%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today383.6M
Everything after, today2.5B
The whole business2.9B
Minus net debt-23.7M
What belongs to shareholders2.9B
Divided among 4.1M shares: <strong>$697.77</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M
2018Reported 17.9M
2018
2019Reported 10.5M
2020Reported 11.4M
2021Reported 11.1M
2022Reported 15.8M
2023Reported 19.0M
2024Reported 19.0M
2025Reported 24.0M
2026Reported 16.7M
2027Projected 30.2M
2028Projected 34.7M
2029Projected 39.3M
2030Projected 44.0M
2031Projected 48.5M
2032Projected 52.7M
2033Projected 56.5M
2034Projected 59.7M
2035Projected 62.1M
2036Projected 63.6M
2018201920212023202520272029203120332035
Year by year
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
Revenue
188.8M
217.0M
246.1M
275.2M
303.5M
329.9M
353.6M
373.4M
388.6M
398.3M
Growth
16.5%
14.9%
13.4%
11.8%
10.3%
8.7%
7.2%
5.6%
4.1%
2.5%
Cash margin
16.0%
16.0%
16.0%
16.0%
16.0%
16.0%
16.0%
16.0%
16.0%
16.0%
Free cash flow
30.2M
34.7M
39.3M
44.0M
48.5M
52.7M
56.5M
59.7M
62.1M
63.6M
Worth today
28.9M
31.9M
34.7M
37.3M
39.4M
41.2M
42.3M
42.9M
42.8M
42.1M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
3.2%
728
1,018
1,717
5,742
—
3.7%
558
714
998
1,683
5,628
4.2%
450
546
698
975
1,639
4.7%
377
442
536
686
959
5.2%
323
370
433
526
673
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
12.5%
14.5%
16.5%
18.5%
20.5%
12.8%
474
518
565
616
670
14.4%
530
579
631
688
750
16.0%
585
639
698
761
829
17.6%
641
700
764
833
908
19.2%
696
761
831
906
987
All the inputs moving at once
3,769 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.4%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$337.24
Median$581.84
90th percentile$1,007.52
$500.00$1,000.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$431.13</b> and <b>$786.69</b>; one in ten below $337.24, one in ten above $1,007.52.
Does the long run make sense?
49.9×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 49.9 times that year's EBITDA.
Free growthIn year 10 free cash flow is at or above after-tax operating profit, yet the model grows 2.5% forever. Growth needs reinvestment; this assumes it comes for free, which flatters the terminal value.
87%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 2 filings by 2 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market—none in the period
Under pre-arranged plans—of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Companies like this one
Same SEC industry (retail-eating places) first, then the rest of consumer discretionary.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.