SphinxRisk
Create account
EN

Lennox International Inc

LII · Industrials (air-cond & warm air heatg equip & comm & indl refrig equip) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-12-31

Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›

Lennox International Inc reported revenue of $5.2 billion in fiscal 2025, after growing 3.4% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin widened from 12.9% in 2017 to 20.0%, and it earned 71.3% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $5.1 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 51.8% went to buybacks and 22.8% to dividends; the share count fell 17.3%. On the accounting screens, it passes 6 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 7.18 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; 1 of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.

Revenue, fiscal 2025 5.2B +3.4% a year over 9 years
Operating margin 20.0% gross margin 33.4%
Return on invested capital 71.3% 41.7% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay 609.7M 11.7% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA Net cash 15.9M more cash than debt
Piotroski F-score 6/9 tests of improvement passed

Is it growing?

Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.

RevenueOperating income
Compound growth a year
3 yrs5 yrs9 yrs
Revenue+3.3%+7.4%+3.4%
Operating income+16.6%+16.8%+8.6%
Net income+17.5%+17.7%+11.4%
Earnings per share+17.9%+19.8%+13.7%
Free cash flow per share+47.5%+5.5%+14.6%
Dividend per share+7.2%+9.8%+11.3%
Shares-0.4%-1.7%-2.1%

Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.

Does it earn more than its capital costs?

Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.

GrossOperatingNetFree cash flow

Return on invested capital

Return on invested capital Cost of capital today · 10.2%

Economic profit

Economic profit

(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.

Return on equity
69.3%
Return on assets
19.7%
Asset turnover
1.27×
Research & development
2.0% of revenue
Overheads (SG&A)
13.1% of revenue

Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?

Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.

Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay

Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2017–2025

5.1B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.

  • Reinvested in the business 22% 1.1B
  • Acquisitions 13% 641.7M
  • Dividends 23% 1.2B
  • Share buybacks 52% 2.6B
  • More than it generated: funded with cash or new debt -9% -466.9M

Over the same years it paid 230.6M in stock. The share count fell 17.3%. 2.4B of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.

Per share

Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share

Shares outstanding

Diluted shares

How strong is the balance sheet?

Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.

Net debt
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
-0.0×
Interest coverage
25× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
1.60 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
116 days collects in 41d, stock 122d, pays in 46d

Three classic screens of the accounts

Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.

Piotroski F-score

Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.

6of 9 tests passed
  • ProfitableReturn on assets above zero passed
  • Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zero passed
  • Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year before failed
  • Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals) failed
  • Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fell passed
  • More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year before passed
  • No new sharesShare count did not grow passed
  • Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year before passed
  • Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year before failed

Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.

Altman Z''-score

Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?

7.18safe zone
  • Working capital ÷ assets 0.17 × 6.56+1.14
  • Retained earnings ÷ assets 1.20 × 3.26+3.91
  • Operating income ÷ assets 0.26 × 6.72+1.71
  • Equity ÷ liabilities 0.40 × 1.05+0.42

Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.

Beneish M-score

Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?

-2.30below the -1.78 line
  • Receivables vs sales 0.90+0.83
  • Gross margin slipping 1.00+0.53
  • Soft assets 1.45+0.59
  • Sales growth 0.97+0.87
  • Slower depreciation 0.94+0.11
  • Overheads vs sales 0.96-0.16
  • Profit not in cash 0.01+0.06
  • Leverage rising 0.80-0.26

Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.

Where the statements disagree

Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.

Inventory is growing 35% against revenue growing -3%.

Benign

Stocking up for a launch, or securing supply.

Worrying

Demand is softening; discounts or write-downs tend to follow.

What is it worth, under which assumptions?

A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.

Revenue
M $

revenue of fiscal 2025

%

revenue grew +7.4% a year over the last 5 years; it fades to the terminal rate by the last year

yrs

ten years for growth to fade to the terminal rate

Cash from each sale
%

free cash flow to the firm after stock-based pay ÷ revenue, last 3 fiscal years together

%

the margin in year ten; by default the business keeps today's

The long run
%

growth forever after year ten, below the risk-free rate: no company outgrows the economy forever

The discount rate
%

10-year US Treasury par yield (U.S. Treasury), 2026-09-25

not measured on this public page, which uses only public filings: 1.0 assumes it moves like the market. Sign in to measure it from prices

%

the extra return demanded for holding shares; it cannot be measured, and 4–6% is the common range

%

interest expense ÷ debt = 223.5%, kept between the risk-free rate and +8 points

%

effective rate in the last fiscal year, 19.2%, kept within 0–35%

The price
$

Type the price you see at your broker. It is used only for the reverse questions: what that price implies.

Back to the defaults

SEC from the filings Treasury the 10-year yield measured from prices assumption cannot be measured yours you changed it

Value per share, with these assumptions $252.88 discounted at 10.2% a year · 50% of it from after year 10
$188.2680% of 5,000 simulations$345.59
Cautious $163.37 3.5% growth · 8.9% margin · 11.2% discount · 2.0% forever
Your assumptions $252.88 7.5% growth · 10.5% margin · 10.2% discount · 2.5% forever
Generous $410.36 11.5% growth · 12.1% margin · 9.2% discount · 3.0% forever

Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.

What the value implies, in the usual multiples

At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings11.1×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA7.7×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue1.7×
Free cash flow yield6.8%

From cash flows to a value per share

10 years of cash flow, today4.4B
Everything after, today4.5B
The whole business8.9B
Plus net cash15.9M
What belongs to shareholders9.0B

Divided among 35.4M shares: <strong>$252.88</strong> each.

The projection next to its history

Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.

ReportedProjected
Year by year
2026202720282029203020312032203320342035
Revenue5.6B6.0B6.4B6.7B7.1B7.4B7.7B8.0B8.2B8.5B
Growth7.5%6.9%6.4%5.8%5.3%4.7%4.2%3.6%3.1%2.5%
Cash margin10.5%10.5%10.5%10.5%10.5%10.5%10.5%10.5%10.5%10.5%
Free cash flow588.0M628.8M669.0M708.0M745.3M780.5M813.1M842.4M868.2M889.9M
Worth today533.6M518.0M500.2M480.4M459.1M436.4M412.5M388.0M362.9M337.6M

If the least-known inputs move

Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.

The discount rate and growth forever

discount ↓ · forever →1.5%2.0%2.5%3.0%3.5%
9.2% 261 275 292 311 333
9.7% 244 257 271 287 306
10.2% 230 241 253 267 283
10.7% 217 226 237 249 262
11.2% 205 214 223 233 245

Year-one growth and the final margin

margin ↓ · growth →3.5%5.5%7.5%9.5%11.5%
8.4% 183 198 215 232 251
9.5% 199 216 234 253 273
10.5% 215 233 253 274 296
11.6% 231 251 272 295 319
12.6% 247 268 291 316 342

All the inputs moving at once

5,000 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.0%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.

Half of the simulations land between <b>$215.76</b> and <b>$296.54</b>; one in ten below $188.26, one in ten above $345.59.

Does the long run make sense?

  • 6.3×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 6.3 times that year's EBITDA.
  • 7%To grow 2.5% forever while reinvesting 35% of its after-tax operating profit, the business must earn 7% on the new capital — it has earned 42% on average over the last five years.
  • 50%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
The discount rate, taken apart
  1. What shareholders demand (CAPM): 5.17% risk-free + 1.00 beta × 5.0% premium = <strong>10.17%</strong>.
  2. What lenders charge, after the tax saving on interest: 13.17% × (1 − 19.2%) = <strong>10.65%</strong>.
  3. Weighted by how much of each the company uses (book value (no price given)): <strong>10.18%</strong>, the rate every future cash flow is discounted at.

What it has filed lately

The last twelve months at the SEC, most important first: annual and quarterly reports, events, large holders and insiders.

What its own directors and officers did

Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 5 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.

Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market—none in the period
Under pre-arranged plans—of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
Other lines63 awards · 0 option exercises · 0 tax withholdings
DateWhoWhatSharesPriceValueHolds after
6 Aug 2026 Norris John W IiiDirector Gave as a gift 8,988 — — 168,942
28 May 2026 Norris John W IiiDirector Gave as a gift 990 — — 177,930
26 May 2026 Somasundaram SivasankaranDirector Disposed to the company 343 — — 767
21 May 2026 Buck SherryDirector Received as an award 343 — — 2,306
21 May 2026 Quintos Karen HDirector Received as an award 343 — — 7,253
21 May 2026 Teske Todd JDirector Received as an award 343 — — 7,224

A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.

Which large funds report holding it

From the Form 13F of the 28 institutions followed on this site, as of the end of their last reported quarter. A 13F is filed up to 45 days later and shows only long positions in US-listed shares.

FundSharesValueShare of the fundSince the quarter before
Viking Global 30 Jun 2026 1.6M $911.5M 2.6% Added to
Norges Bank (Norway's sovereign fund) 30 Jun 2026 360,498 $206.5M 0.0% New
Bridgewater Associates 30 Jun 2026 63,229 $36.2M 0.1% Added to
Tudor Investment 30 Jun 2026 6,820 $3.9M 0.0% Reduced

All the funds and what they reported ›

Companies like this one

Same SEC industry (air-cond & warm air heatg equip & comm & indl refrig equip) first, then the rest of industrials.

Every figure, year by year

10 fiscal years · 30 measures
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Size
Revenue3.8B—3.9B3.8B3.6B4.2B4.7B5.0B5.3B5.2B
Revenue growth———-2.0%-4.5%+15.4%+12.5%+5.6%+7.2%-2.7%
Operating income494.5M—509.9M656.9M478.5M590.3M656.2M791.5M1.0B1.0B
Net income305.7M—359.0M408.7M356.3M464.0M497.1M591.2M811.1M805.8M
Margins
Gross margin29.3%—28.6%28.4%28.6%28.3%27.2%31.1%33.3%33.4%
Operating margin12.9%—13.1%17.3%13.2%14.1%13.9%15.9%19.5%20.0%
Net margin8.0%—9.2%10.7%9.8%11.1%10.5%11.9%15.2%15.5%
Free cash flow margin5.9%—10.3%7.6%14.7%9.7%4.3%9.8%14.6%12.3%
R&D ÷ revenue1.9%—1.9%1.8%1.8%1.8%1.7%1.9%1.8%2.0%
SG&A ÷ revenue16.6%—15.7%15.4%15.3%14.3%13.3%14.2%13.7%13.1%
Cash
Free cash flow226.8M—400.3M290.5M533.9M408.7M201.2M486.0M782.1M638.8M
Stock-based pay24.9M—26.3M21.3M24.3M24.3M21.8M30.1M28.5M29.1M
Free cash flow after stock pay201.9M—374.0M269.2M509.6M384.4M179.4M455.9M753.6M609.7M
Free cash flow to the firm293.6M—-28.9M393.9M480.0M384.9M189.4M341.6M813.5M566.3M
Free cash flow ÷ net income0.7×—1.1×0.7×1.5×0.9×0.4×0.8×1.0×0.8×
Capex ÷ revenue2.6%—2.5%2.8%2.2%2.5%2.1%5.0%3.1%2.3%
Returns
Return on invested capital395.8%—259.7%348.5%-5330.7%-189.8%104.4%156.3%66.1%71.3%
Return on equity610.2%——————150.4%84.3%69.3%
Return on assets16.2%—19.8%20.1%17.5%21.4%19.4%20.1%22.4%19.7%
Asset turnover2.0×—2.1×1.9×1.8×1.9×1.8×1.7×1.5×1.3×
Economic profit318.9M—377.3M513.3M384.5M515.2M478.1M592.1M714.5M721.7M
Per share
Earnings per share$7.14—$8.73$10.37$9.23$12.37$13.89$16.56$22.66$22.76
Free cash flow per share$5.30—$9.74$7.37$13.83$10.90$5.62$13.61$21.85$18.05
Dividend per share$1.86—$2.28$2.80$3.06$3.37$3.97$4.30$4.48$4.89
Payout ratio26.1%—26.2%27.0%33.1%27.3%28.6%25.9%19.8%21.5%
Book value per share$1.17—$-3.64$-4.32$-0.44$-7.17$-5.67$11.01$26.87$32.86
Diluted shares42.8M—41.1M39.4M38.6M37.5M35.8M35.7M35.8M35.4M
Balance sheet
Net debt-35.6M—254.5M284.6M-114.0M-19.7M658.0M-48.6M-100.6M-15.9M
Net debt ÷ EBITDA-0.1×—0.4×0.4×-0.2×-0.0×0.9×-0.1×-0.1×-0.0×
Interest coverage16.2×—13.3×13.8×16.9×23.6×17.0×15.3×26.9×25.5×
Current ratio1.7×—1.1×1.1×1.6×1.4×0.9×1.6×1.5×1.6×
Cash conversion cycle (days)66—54695957829382116
Scores
Piotroski F-score—026763856
Altman Z''6.18—5.435.916.656.845.297.237.457.18
Beneish M———-2.27-3.02-2.50-2.16-2.61-2.60-2.30

Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.