FTDR · Industrials(services-to dwellings & other buildings) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-12-31
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
Frontdoor, Inc. reported revenue of $2.1 billion in fiscal 2025, after growing 6.8% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin held steady at about 19.9% from 2017, and it earned 22.1% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $2.0 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 36.3% went to buybacks and 31.4% to acquisitions; the share count fell 11.8%. On the accounting screens, it passes 9 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 3.32 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; 1 of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 20252.1B+6.8% a year over 9 years
Operating margin19.9%gross margin 55.3%
Return on invested capital22.1%20.6% on average over 4 years
Free cash flow after stock pay356.0M17.0% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA1.2×net debt 607.0M
Piotroski F-score9/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
01.0B2.0B3.0B
2017Revenue 1.2BOperating income 221.0M
2018
2018Revenue 1.3BOperating income 189.0M
2019Revenue 1.4BOperating income 266.0M
2020Revenue 1.5BOperating income 206.0M
2021Revenue 1.6BOperating income 207.0M
2022Revenue 1.7BOperating income 124.0M
2023Revenue 1.8BOperating income 269.0M
2024Revenue 1.8BOperating income 349.0M
2025Revenue 2.1BOperating income 417.0M
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
+8.0%
+7.3%
+6.8%
Operating income
+49.8%
+15.1%
+7.3%
Net income
+53.1%
+17.9%
+5.3%
Earnings per share
+58.1%
+21.2%
+6.8%
Free cash flow per share
+61.5%
+20.7%
+10.6%
Shares
-3.1%
-2.7%
-1.4%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 5.9%
0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%
2017
2018
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022Return on invested capital 14.1%
2023Return on invested capital 27.7%
2024Return on invested capital 18.5%
2025Return on invested capital 22.1%
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
0100.0M200.0M300.0M
2017
2018
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022Economic profit 54.9M
2023Economic profit 158.8M
2024Economic profit 180.1M
2025Economic profit 229.4M
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
105.4%
Return on assets
11.9%
Asset turnover
0.98×
Overheads (SG&A)
32.0% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M
2017Net income 160.0MFree cash flow 179.0MAfter stock-based pay 175.0M
2018
2018Net income 125.0MFree cash flow 162.0MAfter stock-based pay 158.0M
2019Net income 153.0MFree cash flow 178.0MAfter stock-based pay 169.0M
2020Net income 112.0MFree cash flow 175.0MAfter stock-based pay 158.0M
2021Net income 128.0MFree cash flow 154.0MAfter stock-based pay 129.0M
2022Net income 71.0MFree cash flow 102.0MAfter stock-based pay 80.0M
2023Net income 171.0MFree cash flow 170.0MAfter stock-based pay 144.0M
2024Net income 235.0MFree cash flow 231.0MAfter stock-based pay 205.0M
2025Net income 255.0MFree cash flow 390.0MAfter stock-based pay 356.0M
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2017–2025
2.0B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 13%264.0M
Acquisitions 31%629.0M
Dividends 10%200.0M
Share buybacks 36%727.0M
Kept, or used to pay down debt 9%185.0M
Over the same years it paid 167.0M in stock. The share count fell 11.8%. 560.0M of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$0.00$2.00$4.00$6.00
2017Earnings per share $1.89Free cash flow per share $2.12Dividend per share $0.75
2018
2018Earnings per share $1.48Free cash flow per share $1.91Dividend per share $1.62
2019Earnings per share $1.80Free cash flow per share $2.10
2020Earnings per share $1.31Free cash flow per share $2.05
2021Earnings per share $1.50Free cash flow per share $1.80
2022Earnings per share $0.87Free cash flow per share $1.24
2023Earnings per share $2.11Free cash flow per share $2.10
2024Earnings per share $3.01Free cash flow per share $2.96
2025Earnings per share $3.42Free cash flow per share $5.23
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
70.0M75.0M80.0M85.0M90.0M
2017Diluted shares 84.5M
2018Diluted shares 84.5M
2018Diluted shares 84.7M
2019Diluted shares 84.9M
2020Diluted shares 85.5M
2021Diluted shares 85.5M
2022Diluted shares 82.0M
2023Diluted shares 80.9M
2024Diluted shares 78.0M
2025Diluted shares 74.5M
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M
2017
2018
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022Net debt 317.0M
2023Net debt 268.0M
2024Net debt 778.0M
2025Net debt 607.0M
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
1.2×
Interest coverage
5× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
1.55 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
— collects in 2d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
9of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✓Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforepassed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✓Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellpassed
✓More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforepassed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✓Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforepassed
✓Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforepassed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
3.32safe zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.10 × 6.56+0.68
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.37 × 3.26+1.19
Operating income ÷ assets 0.19 × 6.72+1.31
Equity ÷ liabilities 0.13 × 1.05+0.13
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.90below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 0.88+0.81
Gross margin slipping 0.97+0.51
Soft assets 0.93+0.38
Sales growth 1.14+1.01
Slower depreciation 0.57+0.07
Overheads vs sales 0.96-0.17
Profit not in cash -0.08-0.35
Leverage rising 0.99-0.32
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Capital spending (26M) is well below depreciation (89M).
Benign
Mature assets, or a business that has become less capital-intensive.
Worrying
Under-investing: today's profit is being held up by consuming tomorrow's capacity.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$132.16discounted at 5.9% a year · 73% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
38.6×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
20.7×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
5.0×
Free cash flow yield
3.6%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today2.8B
Everything after, today7.7B
The whole business10.5B
Minus net debt-607.0M
What belongs to shareholders9.8B
Divided among 74.5M shares: <strong>$132.16</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
0200.0M400.0M600.0M
2017Reported 175.0M
2018
2018Reported 158.0M
2019Reported 169.0M
2020Reported 158.0M
2021Reported 129.0M
2022Reported 80.0M
2023Reported 144.0M
2024Reported 205.0M
2025Reported 356.0M
2026Projected 301.8M
2027Projected 322.8M
2028Projected 343.4M
2029Projected 363.5M
2030Projected 382.6M
2031Projected 400.7M
2032Projected 417.4M
2033Projected 432.5M
2034Projected 445.7M
2035Projected 456.8M
2017201820202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
2.2B
2.4B
2.6B
2.7B
2.9B
3.0B
3.1B
3.2B
3.3B
3.4B
Growth
7.5%
6.9%
6.4%
5.8%
5.3%
4.7%
4.2%
3.6%
3.1%
2.5%
Cash margin
13.4%
13.4%
13.4%
13.4%
13.4%
13.4%
13.4%
13.4%
13.4%
13.4%
Free cash flow
301.8M
322.8M
343.4M
363.5M
382.6M
400.7M
417.4M
432.5M
445.7M
456.8M
Worth today
284.9M
287.7M
288.9M
288.6M
286.8M
283.5M
278.8M
272.7M
265.3M
256.7M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
4.9%
138
160
191
239
320
5.4%
119
135
157
188
234
5.9%
104
116
132
154
184
6.4%
92
102
114
130
151
6.9%
83
91
100
112
127
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
3.5%
5.5%
7.5%
9.5%
11.5%
10.7%
89
98
108
118
129
12.1%
99
109
120
131
144
13.4%
109
120
132
145
159
14.8%
120
132
144
158
173
16.1%
130
143
157
172
188
All the inputs moving at once
4,916 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.0%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$84.32
Median$131.66
90th percentile$231.02
$100.00$200.00$300.00$400.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$103.68</b> and <b>$173.74</b>; one in ten below $84.32, one in ten above $231.02.
Does the long run make sense?
16.6×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 16.6 times that year's EBITDA.
24%To grow 2.5% forever while reinvesting 10% of its after-tax operating profit, the business must earn 24% on the new capital — it has earned 21% on average over the last five years.
73%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 6 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market$3.6M3 sale(s) by 3 insider(s)
Under pre-arranged plans0%of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Which large funds report holding it
From the Form 13F of the 28 institutions followed on this site, as of the end of their last reported quarter. A 13F is filed up to 45 days later and shows only long positions in US-listed shares.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.