FTAI · Industrials(services-miscellaneous equipment rental & leasing) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-12-31
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
Ftai Aviation Ltd. reported revenue of $2.5 billion in fiscal 2025, after growing 36.9% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin widened from -14.4% in 2016 to 34.1%, and it earned 18.7% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $34.8 million its operations generated over 10 years, 3859.1% went back into the business and 3313.3% to dividends; the share count rose 37.1%. On the accounting screens, it passes 5 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 4.18 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is above the -1.78 line; 3 of the six cross-checks between its statements fire.
Revenue, fiscal 20252.5B+36.9% a year over 9 years
Operating margin34.1%gross margin 46.2%
Return on invested capital18.7%7.6% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay-360.2M-14.4% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA2.9×net debt 3.1B
Piotroski F-score5/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
-1B01B2B3B
2016Revenue 148.7MOperating income -21.4M
2017Revenue 185.1MOperating income 17.2M
2018Revenue 342.1MOperating income 39.2M
2019Revenue 578.8MOperating income 247.7M
2020Revenue 297.9MOperating income 44.0M
2021Revenue 335.6MOperating income 115.3M
2022Revenue 708.4MOperating income 63.9M
2023Revenue 1.2BOperating income 345.7M
2024Revenue 1.7BOperating income 235.9M
2025Revenue 2.5BOperating income 854.4M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
+52.4%
+53.1%
+36.9%
Operating income
+137.4%
+80.9%
—
Dividend per share
-1.5%
-1.3%
-0.7%
Shares
+1.5%
+3.8%
+3.6%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 6.3%
-10%0%10%20%
2016Return on invested capital -1.5%
2017Return on invested capital 1.1%
2018Return on invested capital 1.9%
2019Return on invested capital 7.4%
2020Return on invested capital 1.6%
2021Return on invested capital 3.3%
2022Return on invested capital 3.1%
2023Return on invested capital 8.7%
2024Return on invested capital 4.1%
2025Return on invested capital 18.7%
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
-200M0200M400M600M
2016Economic profit -112.0M
2017Economic profit -91.4M
2018Economic profit -101.7M
2019Economic profit 33.0M
2020Economic profit -142.8M
2021Economic profit -110.9M
2022Economic profit -71.5M
2023Economic profit 63.3M
2024Economic profit -77.8M
2025Economic profit 466.8M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
149.9%
Return on assets
11.5%
Asset turnover
0.57×
Overheads (SG&A)
0.4% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-500M-250M0250M500M750M
2016Net income -20.1MFree cash flow -26.5MAfter stock-based pay -22.8M
2017Net income 134,000Free cash flow -47.5MAfter stock-based pay -48.1M
2018Net income 5.9MFree cash flow -96.3MAfter stock-based pay -97.0M
2019Net income 223.3MFree cash flow -180.1MAfter stock-based pay -181.6M
2020Net income -105.0MFree cash flow -201.7MAfter stock-based pay -201.7M
2021Net income -130.7MFree cash flow -179.4MAfter stock-based pay -179.4M
2022Net income -212.0MFree cash flow -164.9MAfter stock-based pay -167.5M
2023Net income 243.8MFree cash flow 122.8MAfter stock-based pay 121.2M
2024Net income 8.7MFree cash flow -197.2MAfter stock-based pay -203.2M
2025Net income 501.1MFree cash flow -338.5MAfter stock-based pay -360.2M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2016–2025
34.8M generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 3859%1.3B
Acquisitions 2462%857.2M
Dividends 3313%1.2B
Share buybacks 0%0
More than it generated: funded with cash or new debt -9534%-3.3B
Over the same years it paid 31.2M in stock. The share count rose 37.1%.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
-$5.0-$2.5$0.0$2.5$5.0
2016Earnings per share $-0.26Free cash flow per share $-0.35Dividend per share $1.32
2017Earnings per share $0.00Free cash flow per share $-0.63Dividend per share $1.32
2018Earnings per share $0.07Free cash flow per share $-1.15Dividend per share $1.32
2019Earnings per share $2.60Free cash flow per share $-2.09Dividend per share $1.32
2020Earnings per share $-1.22Free cash flow per share $-2.35Dividend per share $1.32
2021Earnings per share $-1.45Free cash flow per share $-1.99Dividend per share $1.31
2022Earnings per share $-2.13Free cash flow per share $-1.66Dividend per share $1.29
2023Earnings per share $2.43Free cash flow per share $1.22Dividend per share $1.19
2024Earnings per share $0.09Free cash flow per share $-1.94Dividend per share $1.20
2025Earnings per share $4.83Free cash flow per share $-3.26Dividend per share $1.23
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
70M80M90M100M110M
2016Diluted shares 75.7M
2017Diluted shares 75.8M
2018Diluted shares 83.7M
2019Diluted shares 86.0M
2020Diluted shares 86.0M
2021Diluted shares 89.9M
2022Diluted shares 99.4M
2023Diluted shares 100.4M
2024Diluted shares 101.5M
2025Diluted shares 103.8M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Debt and liquidity
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
01B2B3B4B
2016Net debt 199.5M
2017Net debt 651.7M
2018Net debt 1.2B
2019Net debt 1.4B
2020Net debt 1.8B
2021Net debt 2.5B
2022Net debt 2.1B
2023Net debt 2.4B
2024Net debt 3.3B
2025Net debt 3.1B
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
2.9×
Interest coverage
3× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
5.28 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
297 days collects in 31d, stock 323d, pays in 56d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
5of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✕Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zerofailed
✓Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforepassed
✕Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)failed
✓Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellpassed
✓More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforepassed
✕No new sharesShare count did not growfailed
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✓Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforepassed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
4.18safe zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.39 × 6.56+2.57
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.06 × 3.26+0.21
Operating income ÷ assets 0.20 × 6.72+1.31
Equity ÷ liabilities 0.08 × 1.05+0.09
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-0.83above the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 0.96+0.89
Gross margin slipping 1.13+0.60
Soft assets 1.66+0.67
Sales growth 1.45+1.29
Slower depreciation 0.68+0.08
Overheads vs sales 0.46-0.08
Profit not in cash 0.19+0.87
Leverage rising 0.94-0.31
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Inventory is growing 117% against revenue growing 45%.
Benign
Stocking up for a launch, or securing supply.
Worrying
Demand is softening; discounts or write-downs tend to follow.
Reported profit comfortably exceeds the cash generated (501M against -311M).
Benign
Growth consuming working capital, or the seasonality of the year-end.
Worrying
Profit held up by accounting entries that do not turn into money.
Capital spending (28M) is well below depreciation (226M).
Benign
Mature assets, or a business that has become less capital-intensive.
Worrying
Under-investing: today's profit is being held up by consuming tomorrow's capacity.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$152.92discounted at 6.3% a year · 75% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
31.7×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
17.6×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
7.6×
Free cash flow yield
-2.3%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today4.8B
Everything after, today14.2B
The whole business19.0B
Minus net debt-3.1B
What belongs to shareholders15.9B
Divided among 103.8M shares: <strong>$152.92</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
-0.5B00.5B1.0B
2016Reported -22.8M
2017Reported -48.1M
2018Reported -97.0M
2019Reported -181.6M
2020Reported -201.7M
2021Reported -179.4M
2022Reported -167.5M
2023Reported 121.2M
2024Reported -203.2M
2025Reported -360.2M
2026Projected 343.4M
2027Projected 420.6M
2028Projected 504.8M
2029Projected 593.1M
2030Projected 682.1M
2031Projected 767.3M
2032Projected 844.1M
2033Projected 907.4M
2034Projected 952.7M
2035Projected 976.5M
2016201820202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
3.1B
3.8B
4.6B
5.4B
6.2B
7.0B
7.7B
8.3B
8.7B
8.9B
Growth
25.0%
22.5%
20.0%
17.5%
15.0%
12.5%
10.0%
7.5%
5.0%
2.5%
Cash margin
11.0%
11.0%
11.0%
11.0%
11.0%
11.0%
11.0%
11.0%
11.0%
11.0%
Free cash flow
343.4M
420.6M
504.8M
593.1M
682.1M
767.3M
844.1M
907.4M
952.7M
976.5M
Worth today
323.0M
372.2M
420.1M
464.3M
502.2M
531.4M
549.9M
556.0M
549.1M
529.4M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
5.3%
160
187
223
275
355
5.8%
137
157
183
218
269
6.3%
118
133
153
178
213
6.8%
103
115
130
150
175
7.3%
90
100
112
127
146
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
21.0%
23.0%
25.0%
27.0%
29.0%
8.8%
98
109
120
132
145
9.9%
112
124
136
150
165
11.0%
126
139
153
168
184
12.0%
140
154
169
186
204
13.2%
154
169
186
204
223
All the inputs moving at once
4,958 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.0%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$89.95
Median$152.00
90th percentile$278.58
$200.00$400.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$115.91</b> and <b>$207.21</b>; one in ten below $89.95, one in ten above $278.58.
Does the long run make sense?
6.8×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 6.8 times that year's EBITDA.
4%To grow 2.5% forever while reinvesting 61% of its after-tax operating profit, the business must earn 4% on the new capital — it has earned 8% on average over the last five years.
75%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 5 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market—none in the period
Under pre-arranged plans—of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Which large funds report holding it
From the Form 13F of the 28 institutions followed on this site, as of the end of their last reported quarter. A 13F is filed up to 45 days later and shows only long positions in US-listed shares.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.