BWXT · Industrials(engines & turbines) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-12-31
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
BWX Technologies, Inc. reported revenue of $3.2 billion in fiscal 2025, after growing 8.4% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin narrowed from 15.1% in 2016 to 12.6%, and it earned 10.3% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $3.0 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 56.7% went back into the business and 31.1% to acquisitions; the share count fell 11.5%. On the accounting screens, it passes 5 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 4.35 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is above the -1.78 line; 1 of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 20253.2B+8.4% a year over 9 years
Operating margin12.6%gross margin 22.9%
Return on invested capital10.3%13.2% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay269.2M8.4% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA3.0×net debt 1.5B
Piotroski F-score5/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
01B2B3B4B
2016Revenue 1.6BOperating income 234.4M
2017Revenue 1.7BOperating income 292.2M
2018Revenue 1.8BOperating income 305.0M
2019Revenue 1.9BOperating income 325.5M
2020Revenue 2.1BOperating income 358.6M
2021Revenue 2.1BOperating income 345.8M
2022Revenue 2.2BOperating income 348.6M
2023Revenue 2.5BOperating income 383.1M
2024Revenue 2.7BOperating income 380.6M
2025Revenue 3.2BOperating income 404.5M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
+12.7%
+8.5%
+8.4%
Operating income
+5.1%
+2.4%
+6.2%
Net income
+11.4%
+3.4%
+6.7%
Earnings per share
+11.3%
+4.2%
+8.2%
Free cash flow per share
+85.2%
—
+6.6%
Dividend per share
+4.4%
+5.7%
+12.1%
Shares
+0.1%
-0.8%
-1.4%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 6.6%
0%10%20%30%
2016Return on invested capital 24.8%
2017Return on invested capital 18.5%
2018Return on invested capital 24.7%
2019Return on invested capital 20.7%
2020Return on invested capital 18.7%
2021Return on invested capital 14.7%
2022Return on invested capital 13.0%
2023Return on invested capital 13.7%
2024Return on invested capital 14.4%
2025Return on invested capital 10.3%
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
050M100M150M200M
2016Economic profit 122.9M
2017Economic profit 94.3M
2018Economic profit 181.4M
2019Economic profit 173.1M
2020Economic profit 179.0M
2021Economic profit 147.5M
2022Economic profit 130.5M
2023Economic profit 152.6M
2024Economic profit 167.6M
2025Economic profit 121.4M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
26.7%
Return on assets
7.7%
Asset turnover
0.75×
Research & development
0.4% of revenue
Overheads (SG&A)
12.3% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-200M0200M400M
2016Net income 183.1MFree cash flow 187.3MAfter stock-based pay 171.9M
2017Net income 147.8MFree cash flow 125.1MAfter stock-based pay 109.9M
2018Net income 227.0MFree cash flow 60.0MAfter stock-based pay 48.1M
2019Net income 244.1MFree cash flow 97.2MAfter stock-based pay 84.5M
2020Net income 278.7MFree cash flow -58.6MAfter stock-based pay -75.4M
2021Net income 305.9MFree cash flow 75.0MAfter stock-based pay 56.4M
2022Net income 238.2MFree cash flow 46.4MAfter stock-based pay 32.3M
2023Net income 245.8MFree cash flow 212.4MAfter stock-based pay 196.5M
2024Net income 281.9MFree cash flow 254.8MAfter stock-based pay 233.1M
2025Net income 328.9MFree cash flow 295.3MAfter stock-based pay 269.2M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2016–2025
3.0B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 57%1.7B
Acquisitions 31%929.9M
Dividends 24%708.1M
Share buybacks 28%845.5M
More than it generated: funded with cash or new debt -40%-1.2B
Over the same years it paid 168.4M in stock. The share count fell 11.5%. 677.1M of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
-$2$0$2$4
2016Earnings per share $1.76Free cash flow per share $1.80Dividend per share $0.36
2017Earnings per share $1.47Free cash flow per share $1.25Dividend per share $0.42
2018Earnings per share $2.27Free cash flow per share $0.60Dividend per share $0.64
2019Earnings per share $2.55Free cash flow per share $1.01Dividend per share $0.68
2020Earnings per share $2.91Free cash flow per share $-0.61Dividend per share $0.76
2021Earnings per share $3.24Free cash flow per share $0.79Dividend per share $0.84
2022Earnings per share $2.60Free cash flow per share $0.51Dividend per share $0.88
2023Earnings per share $2.68Free cash flow per share $2.31Dividend per share $0.92
2024Earnings per share $3.07Free cash flow per share $2.77Dividend per share $0.96
2025Earnings per share $3.58Free cash flow per share $3.21Dividend per share $1.01
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
90M95M100M105M
2016Diluted shares 103.8M
2017Diluted shares 100.4M
2018Diluted shares 100.0M
2019Diluted shares 95.8M
2020Diluted shares 95.7M
2021Diluted shares 94.5M
2022Diluted shares 91.7M
2023Diluted shares 91.9M
2024Diluted shares 91.9M
2025Diluted shares 91.9M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Debt and liquidity
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
00.5B1.0B1.5B2.0B
2016Net debt 399.5M
2017Net debt 305.5M
2018Net debt 738.0M
2019Net debt 737.6M
2020Net debt 820.1M
2021Net debt 1.2B
2022Net debt 1.3B
2023Net debt 1.1B
2024Net debt 981.4M
2025Net debt 1.5B
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
3.0×
Interest coverage
89× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
2.32 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
11 days collects in 25d, stock 7d, pays in 21d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
5of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✕Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforefailed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✕Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellfailed
✓More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforepassed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✕Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforefailed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
4.35safe zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.21 × 6.56+1.36
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.59 × 3.26+1.93
Operating income ÷ assets 0.09 × 6.72+0.64
Equity ÷ liabilities 0.41 × 1.05+0.43
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-1.66above the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.88+1.73
Gross margin slipping 1.06+0.56
Soft assets 1.14+0.46
Sales growth 1.18+1.06
Slower depreciation 0.98+0.11
Overheads vs sales 1.05-0.18
Profit not in cash -0.04-0.17
Leverage rising 1.19-0.39
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Receivables are growing 122% against revenue growing 18%.
Benign
A shift towards larger customers on longer terms, or sales concentrated at the end of the period.
Worrying
Sales are being made on looser credit, or revenue has been booked that may never be collected.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$49.52discounted at 6.6% a year · 69% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
13.8×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
11.8×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
1.9×
Free cash flow yield
5.9%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today1.9B
Everything after, today4.2B
The whole business6.1B
Minus net debt-1.5B
What belongs to shareholders4.5B
Divided among 91.9M shares: <strong>$49.52</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
-100M0100M200M300M400M
2016Reported 171.9M
2017Reported 109.9M
2018Reported 48.1M
2019Reported 84.5M
2020Reported -75.4M
2021Reported 56.4M
2022Reported 32.3M
2023Reported 196.5M
2024Reported 233.1M
2025Reported 269.2M
2026Projected 201.7M
2027Projected 217.5M
2028Projected 233.1M
2029Projected 248.3M
2030Projected 262.8M
2031Projected 276.3M
2032Projected 288.8M
2033Projected 299.8M
2034Projected 309.3M
2035Projected 317.1M
2016201820202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
3.5B
3.7B
4.0B
4.3B
4.5B
4.8B
5.0B
5.2B
5.3B
5.5B
Growth
8.5%
7.8%
7.2%
6.5%
5.8%
5.2%
4.5%
3.8%
3.2%
2.5%
Cash margin
5.8%
5.8%
5.8%
5.8%
5.8%
5.8%
5.8%
5.8%
5.8%
5.8%
Free cash flow
201.7M
217.5M
233.1M
248.3M
262.8M
276.3M
288.8M
299.8M
309.3M
317.1M
Worth today
189.3M
191.5M
192.6M
192.4M
191.1M
188.5M
184.9M
180.1M
174.3M
167.7M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
5.6%
52
60
71
87
110
6.1%
44
51
59
70
85
6.6%
38
43
50
58
68
7.1%
33
37
42
48
56
7.6%
29
32
36
41
47
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
4.5%
6.5%
8.5%
10.5%
12.5%
4.7%
30
34
38
43
48
5.2%
34
39
44
49
55
5.8%
39
44
50
55
62
6.4%
44
49
55
62
68
7.0%
48
54
61
68
75
All the inputs moving at once
4,976 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.0%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$20.61
Median$49.05
90th percentile$98.19
$50.00$100.00$150.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$33.12</b> and <b>$71.56</b>; one in ten below $20.61, one in ten above $98.19.
Does the long run make sense?
9.1×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 9.1 times that year's EBITDA.
6%To grow 2.5% forever while reinvesting 45% of its after-tax operating profit, the business must earn 6% on the new capital — it has earned 13% on average over the last five years.
69%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
From the Form 13F of the 28 institutions followed on this site, as of the end of their last reported quarter. A 13F is filed up to 45 days later and shows only long positions in US-listed shares.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.