AVT · Industrials(wholesale-electronic parts & equipment, nec) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2026-06-27
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
Avnet Inc reported revenue of $27.6 billion in fiscal 2026, after growing 5.2% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin held steady at about 2.6% from 2017, and it earned 6.3% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $1.4 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 167.7% went to buybacks and 84.2% back into the business; the share count fell 35.2%. On the accounting screens, it passes 4 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 4.04 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; 3 of the six cross-checks between its statements fire.
Revenue, fiscal 202627.6B+5.2% a year over 9 years
Operating margin2.6%gross margin 10.4%
Return on invested capital6.3%9.3% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay-403.2M-1.5% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA3.8×net debt 3.1B
Piotroski F-score4/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
-10B010B20B30B
2017Revenue 17.4BOperating income 443.7M
2018Revenue 19.0BOperating income 209.2M
2019Revenue 19.5BOperating income 365.9M
2020Revenue 17.6BOperating income -4.6M
2021Revenue 19.5BOperating income 281.4M
2022Revenue 24.3BOperating income 939.0M
2023Revenue 26.5BOperating income 1.2B
2024Revenue 23.8BOperating income 844.4M
2025Revenue 22.2BOperating income 514.3M
2026Revenue 27.6BOperating income 724.8M
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
+1.4%
+7.2%
+5.2%
Operating income
-15.2%
+20.8%
+5.6%
Net income
-24.3%
+11.6%
-4.9%
Earnings per share
-21.4%
+15.8%
-0.2%
Dividend per share
+6.4%
+10.2%
+7.9%
Shares
-3.7%
-3.6%
-4.7%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 8.4%
-5%0%5%10%15%
2017Return on invested capital 5.4%
2018Return on invested capital -3.3%
2019Return on invested capital 4.7%
2020Return on invested capital -0.2%
2021Return on invested capital 4.7%
2022Return on invested capital 13.4%
2023Return on invested capital 11.9%
2024Return on invested capital 8.5%
2025Return on invested capital 6.4%
2026Return on invested capital 6.3%
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Economic profit
Economic profit
-1.0B-0.5B00.5B
2017Economic profit -209.9M
2018Economic profit -740.1M
2019Economic profit -220.9M
2020Economic profit -442.0M
2021Economic profit -197.7M
2022Economic profit 291.3M
2023Economic profit 272.9M
2024Economic profit 6.9M
2025Economic profit -153.3M
2026Economic profit -175.2M
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
6.7%
Return on assets
2.2%
Asset turnover
1.79×
Overheads (SG&A)
7.3% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-1.0B-0.5B00.5B1.0B
2017Net income 525.3MFree cash flow -489.1MAfter stock-based pay -536.8M
2018Net income -156.4MFree cash flow 97.6MAfter stock-based pay 73.6M
2019Net income 176.3MFree cash flow 412.1MAfter stock-based pay 382.0M
2020Net income -31.1MFree cash flow 656.7MAfter stock-based pay 629.8M
2021Net income 193.1MFree cash flow 40.6MAfter stock-based pay 11.2M
2022Net income 692.4MFree cash flow -268.2MAfter stock-based pay -304.9M
2023Net income 770.8MFree cash flow -908.4MAfter stock-based pay -947.2M
2024Net income 498.7MFree cash flow 463.5MAfter stock-based pay 430.0M
2025Net income 240.2MFree cash flow 577.0MAfter stock-based pay 540.6M
2026Net income 334.4MFree cash flow -354.5MAfter stock-based pay -403.2M
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2017–2026
1.4B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 84%1.2B
Acquisitions 66%944.3M
Dividends 68%976.8M
Share buybacks 168%2.4B
More than it generated: funded with cash or new debt -285%-4.1B
Over the same years it paid 352.1M in stock. The share count fell 35.2%. 2.1B of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
-$10-$5$0$5$10
2017Earnings per share $4.08Free cash flow per share $-3.80Dividend per share $0.69
2018Earnings per share $-1.30Free cash flow per share $0.81Dividend per share $0.74
2019Earnings per share $1.59Free cash flow per share $3.72Dividend per share $0.79
2020Earnings per share $-0.31Free cash flow per share $6.54Dividend per share $0.84
2021Earnings per share $1.93Free cash flow per share $0.41Dividend per share $0.84
2022Earnings per share $6.94Free cash flow per share $-2.69Dividend per share $0.99
2023Earnings per share $8.26Free cash flow per share $-9.73Dividend per share $1.14
2024Earnings per share $5.43Free cash flow per share $5.05Dividend per share $1.22
2025Earnings per share $2.75Free cash flow per share $6.60Dividend per share $1.30
2026Earnings per share $4.01Free cash flow per share $-4.25Dividend per share $1.37
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
80M100M120M140M
2017Diluted shares 128.7M
2018Diluted shares 119.9M
2019Diluted shares 110.8M
2020Diluted shares 100.5M
2021Diluted shares 100.2M
2022Diluted shares 99.8M
2023Diluted shares 93.4M
2024Diluted shares 91.8M
2025Diluted shares 87.4M
2026Diluted shares 83.4M
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Debt and liquidity
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
01B2B3B4B
2017Net debt 942.9M
2018Net debt 1.0B
2019Net debt 1.2B
2020Net debt 947.8M
2021Net debt 1.0B
2022Net debt 1.5B
2023Net debt 2.8B
2024Net debt 2.6B
2025Net debt 2.5B
2026Net debt 3.1B
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
3.8×
Interest coverage
3× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
1.78 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
91 days collects in 91d, stock 90d, pays in 89d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
4of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✕Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zerofailed
✓Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforepassed
✕Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)failed
✓Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellpassed
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✕Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforefailed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
4.04safe zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.38 × 6.56+2.48
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.23 × 3.26+0.74
Operating income ÷ assets 0.05 × 6.72+0.32
Equity ÷ liabilities 0.48 × 1.05+0.51
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-1.94below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.28+1.18
Gross margin slipping 1.03+0.54
Soft assets 0.79+0.32
Sales growth 1.24+1.11
Slower depreciation 0.91+0.10
Overheads vs sales 0.92-0.16
Profit not in cash 0.04+0.19
Leverage rising 1.17-0.38
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Receivables are growing 59% against revenue growing 24%.
Benign
A shift towards larger customers on longer terms, or sales concentrated at the end of the period.
Worrying
Sales are being made on looser credit, or revenue has been booked that may never be collected.
Reported profit comfortably exceeds the cash generated (334M against -281M).
Benign
Growth consuming working capital, or the seasonality of the year-end.
Worrying
Profit held up by accounting entries that do not turn into money.
Net debt is 3.8 times EBITDA.
Benign
A stable sector with predictable cash flows and comfortable maturities.
Worrying
Little room if earnings fall; the maturity schedule is what to check.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$85.97discounted at 8.4% a year · 59% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
21.4×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
12.8×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
0.4×
Free cash flow yield
-5.6%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today4.2B
Everything after, today6.0B
The whole business10.2B
Minus net debt-3.1B
What belongs to shareholders7.2B
Divided among 83.4M shares: <strong>$85.97</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
-1.0B-0.5B00.5B1.0B
2017Reported -536.8M
2018Reported 73.6M
2019Reported 382.0M
2020Reported 629.8M
2021Reported 11.2M
2022Reported -304.9M
2023Reported -947.2M
2024Reported 430.0M
2025Reported 540.6M
2026Reported -403.2M
2027Projected 523.7M
2028Projected 557.7M
2029Projected 591.2M
2030Projected 623.7M
2031Projected 654.9M
2032Projected 684.4M
2033Projected 711.7M
2034Projected 736.6M
2035Projected 758.7M
2036Projected 777.7M
2017201920212023202520272029203120332035
Year by year
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
Revenue
29.6B
31.5B
33.4B
35.2B
37.0B
38.6B
40.2B
41.6B
42.8B
43.9B
Growth
7.0%
6.5%
6.0%
5.5%
5.0%
4.5%
4.0%
3.5%
3.0%
2.5%
Cash margin
1.8%
1.8%
1.8%
1.8%
1.8%
1.8%
1.8%
1.8%
1.8%
1.8%
Free cash flow
523.7M
557.7M
591.2M
623.7M
654.9M
684.4M
711.7M
736.6M
758.7M
777.7M
Worth today
483.0M
474.4M
463.8M
451.3M
437.1M
421.3M
404.1M
385.7M
366.4M
346.4M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
7.4%
90
100
112
126
144
7.9%
80
88
98
109
123
8.4%
71
78
86
95
107
8.9%
64
70
76
84
93
9.4%
57
62
68
74
82
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
3.0%
5.0%
7.0%
9.0%
11.0%
1.4%
51
58
66
75
85
1.6%
59
67
76
86
96
1.8%
67
76
86
97
108
1.9%
75
85
96
107
120
2.1%
84
94
106
118
132
All the inputs moving at once
5,000 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.0%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$-54.83
Median$85.37
90th percentile$250.90
$0.00$200.00$400.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$12.88</b> and <b>$166.90</b>; one in ten below $-54.83, one in ten above $250.90.
Does the long run make sense?
10.6×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 10.6 times that year's EBITDA.
45%To grow 2.5% forever while reinvesting 6% of its after-tax operating profit, the business must earn 45% on the new capital — it has earned 9% on average over the last five years.
59%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 7 filings by 7 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market—none in the period
Under pre-arranged plans—of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Which large funds report holding it
From the Form 13F of the 28 institutions followed on this site, as of the end of their last reported quarter. A 13F is filed up to 45 days later and shows only long positions in US-listed shares.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.