ARW · Industrials(wholesale-electronic parts & equipment, nec) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-12-31
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
Arrow Electronics, Inc. reported revenue of $30.9 billion in fiscal 2025, after growing 3.1% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin narrowed from 3.7% in 2016 to 2.7%, and it earned 6.7% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $5.3 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 89.0% went to buybacks and 23.0% back into the business; the share count fell 43.2%. On the accounting screens, it passes 5 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 2.77 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; 2 of the six cross-checks between its statements fire.
Revenue, fiscal 202530.9B+3.1% a year over 9 years
Operating margin2.7%gross margin 11.2%
Return on invested capital6.7%11.6% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay-65.1M-0.2% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA2.9×net debt 2.8B
Piotroski F-score5/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
010B20B30B40B
2016Revenue 23.5BOperating income 876.8M
2017Revenue 26.6BOperating income 945.7M
2018Revenue 29.7BOperating income 1.1B
2019Revenue 28.9BOperating income 107.7M
2020Revenue 28.7BOperating income 894.5M
2021Revenue 34.5BOperating income 1.6B
2022Revenue 37.1BOperating income 2.1B
2023Revenue 33.1BOperating income 1.5B
2024Revenue 27.9BOperating income 768.6M
2025Revenue 30.9BOperating income 822.2M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
-6.0%
+1.5%
+3.1%
Operating income
-26.5%
-1.7%
-0.7%
Net income
-26.3%
-0.5%
+1.0%
Earnings per share
-20.6%
+8.0%
+7.5%
Shares
-7.2%
-7.8%
-6.1%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 8.7%
0%5%10%15%20%
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021Return on invested capital 15.2%
2022Return on invested capital 16.9%
2023Return on invested capital 12.0%
2024Return on invested capital 7.0%
2025Return on invested capital 6.7%
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
-0.25B00.25B0.50B0.75B1.00B
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021Economic profit 512.5M
2022Economic profit 761.2M
2023Economic profit 309.0M
2024Economic profit -158.3M
2025Economic profit -192.5M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
8.7%
Return on assets
2.0%
Asset turnover
1.06×
Overheads (SG&A)
7.7% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-0.5B00.5B1.0B1.5B
2016Net income 522.8MFree cash flow 195.0MAfter stock-based pay 155.2M
2017Net income 402.2MFree cash flow -79.4MAfter stock-based pay -118.5M
2018Net income 716.2MFree cash flow 137.4MAfter stock-based pay 91.1M
2019Net income -204.1MFree cash flow 714.8MAfter stock-based pay 673.7M
2020Net income 584.4MFree cash flow 1.2BAfter stock-based pay 1.2B
2021Net income 1.1BFree cash flow 335.9MAfter stock-based pay 299.8M
2022Net income 1.4BFree cash flow -111.9MAfter stock-based pay -154.8M
2023Net income 903.5MFree cash flow 622.2MAfter stock-based pay 580.6M
2024Net income 392.1MFree cash flow 1.0BAfter stock-based pay 1.0B
2025Net income 571.3MFree cash flow -37.2MAfter stock-based pay -65.1M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2016–2025
5.3B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 23%1.2B
Acquisitions 8%399.9M
Dividends 0%0
Share buybacks 89%4.7B
More than it generated: funded with cash or new debt -20%-1.0B
Over the same years it paid 384.7M in stock. The share count fell 43.2%. 4.3B of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
-$10$0$10$20$30
2016Earnings per share $5.68Free cash flow per share $2.12
2017Earnings per share $4.48Free cash flow per share $-0.88
2018Earnings per share $8.10Free cash flow per share $1.55
2019Earnings per share $-2.44Free cash flow per share $8.55
2020Earnings per share $7.43Free cash flow per share $15.72
2021Earnings per share $15.10Free cash flow per share $4.58
2022Earnings per share $21.80Free cash flow per share $-1.71
2023Earnings per share $15.84Free cash flow per share $10.91
2024Earnings per share $7.29Free cash flow per share $19.29
2025Earnings per share $10.93Free cash flow per share $-0.71
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
50M60M70M80M90M100M
2016Diluted shares 92.0M
2017Diluted shares 89.8M
2018Diluted shares 88.4M
2019Diluted shares 83.6M
2020Diluted shares 78.6M
2021Diluted shares 73.4M
2022Diluted shares 65.5M
2023Diluted shares 57.0M
2024Diluted shares 53.8M
2025Diluted shares 52.3M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Debt and liquidity
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
01B2B3B4B
2016Net debt 2.3B
2017Net debt 2.6B
2018Net debt 3.0B
2019Net debt 2.7B
2020Net debt 1.9B
2021Net debt 2.4B
2022Net debt 3.6B
2023Net debt 3.6B
2024Net debt 2.9B
2025Net debt 2.8B
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
2.9×
Interest coverage
4× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
1.36 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
70 days collects in 234d, stock 68d, pays in 232d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
5of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✓Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforepassed
✕Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)failed
✓Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellpassed
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✕Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforefailed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
2.77safe zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.23 × 6.56+1.54
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.23 × 3.26+0.73
Operating income ÷ assets 0.03 × 6.72+0.19
Equity ÷ liabilities 0.29 × 1.05+0.31
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.03below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.37+1.26
Gross margin slipping 1.05+0.55
Soft assets 0.76+0.31
Sales growth 1.10+0.99
Slower depreciation 1.15+0.13
Overheads vs sales 0.98-0.17
Profit not in cash 0.02+0.08
Leverage rising 1.06-0.35
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Receivables are growing 51% against revenue growing 10%.
Benign
A shift towards larger customers on longer terms, or sales concentrated at the end of the period.
Worrying
Sales are being made on looser credit, or revenue has been booked that may never be collected.
Reported profit comfortably exceeds the cash generated (571M against 64M).
Benign
Growth consuming working capital, or the seasonality of the year-end.
Worrying
Profit held up by accounting entries that do not turn into money.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$176.11discounted at 8.7% a year · 55% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
16.1×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
12.5×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
0.4×
Free cash flow yield
-0.7%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today5.4B
Everything after, today6.6B
The whole business12.0B
Minus net debt-2.8B
What belongs to shareholders9.2B
Divided among 52.3M shares: <strong>$176.11</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
-0.5B00.5B1.0B1.5B
2016Reported 155.2M
2017Reported -118.5M
2018Reported 91.1M
2019Reported 673.7M
2020Reported 1.2B
2021Reported 299.8M
2022Reported -154.8M
2023Reported 580.6M
2024Reported 1.0B
2025Reported -65.1M
2026Projected 771.9M
2027Projected 784.4M
2028Projected 797.9M
2029Projected 812.5M
2030Projected 828.3M
2031Projected 845.3M
2032Projected 863.7M
2033Projected 883.3M
2034Projected 904.4M
2035Projected 927.1M
2016201820202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
31.3B
31.8B
32.4B
33.0B
33.6B
34.3B
35.0B
35.8B
36.7B
37.6B
Growth
1.5%
1.6%
1.7%
1.8%
1.9%
2.1%
2.2%
2.3%
2.4%
2.5%
Cash margin
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
Free cash flow
771.9M
784.4M
797.9M
812.5M
828.3M
845.3M
863.7M
883.3M
904.4M
927.1M
Worth today
709.9M
663.4M
620.6M
581.2M
544.9M
511.4M
480.5M
451.9M
425.5M
401.1M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
7.7%
184
200
220
243
272
8.2%
166
180
196
215
238
8.7%
151
163
176
192
211
9.2%
138
148
159
172
188
9.7%
126
135
145
156
169
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
-2.5%
-0.5%
1.5%
3.5%
5.5%
2.0%
111
125
140
157
175
2.2%
126
141
158
177
197
2.5%
140
157
176
196
218
2.7%
155
174
194
216
239
3.0%
170
190
212
235
261
All the inputs moving at once
5,000 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.0%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$-4.81
Median$176.06
90th percentile$397.46
$0.00$250.00$500.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$78.81</b> and <b>$281.13</b>; one in ten below $-4.81, one in ten above $397.46.
Does the long run make sense?
13.0×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 13.0 times that year's EBITDA.
Free growthIn year 10 free cash flow is at or above after-tax operating profit, yet the model grows 2.5% forever. Growth needs reinvestment; this assumes it comes for free, which flatters the terminal value.
55%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 6 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market$209,8501 sale(s) by 1 insider(s)
Under pre-arranged plans0%of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
Jean-Claude Carine LamercieSVP, CLCO and Secretary
Sold on the open market
1,000
$209.85
$209,850
11,626
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Which large funds report holding it
From the Form 13F of the 28 institutions followed on this site, as of the end of their last reported quarter. A 13F is filed up to 45 days later and shows only long positions in US-listed shares.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.