AVNT · Materials(plastic materials, synth resins & nonvulcan elastomers) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-12-31
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
Avient Corp reported revenue of $3.3 billion in fiscal 2025, after growing 1.2% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin narrowed from 9.1% in 2016 to 6.2%, and it earned 3.5% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $2.6 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 130.9% went to acquisitions and 36.1% back into the business; the share count rose 8.5%. On the accounting screens, it passes 5 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 2.52 is in the grey zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; 2 of the six cross-checks between its statements fire.
Revenue, fiscal 20253.3B+1.2% a year over 9 years
Operating margin6.2%gross margin 31.2%
Return on invested capital3.5%4.5% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay185.9M5.7% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA3.6×net debt 1.4B
Piotroski F-score5/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
01B2B3B4B
2016Revenue 2.9BOperating income 267.7M
2017Revenue 2.6BOperating income 173.1M
2018Revenue 2.9BOperating income 178.6M
2019Revenue 2.9BOperating income 156.8M
2020Revenue 2.2BOperating income 111.6M
2021Revenue 3.3BOperating income 279.7M
2022Revenue 3.4BOperating income 243.3M
2023Revenue 3.1BOperating income 196.8M
2024Revenue 3.2BOperating income 329.3M
2025Revenue 3.3BOperating income 203.5M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
-1.4%
+8.0%
+1.2%
Operating income
-5.8%
+12.8%
-3.0%
Net income
-51.2%
-9.0%
-7.5%
Earnings per share
-51.1%
-9.3%
-8.3%
Free cash flow per share
-12.6%
+4.0%
+2.5%
Dividend per share
+4.6%
+6.5%
+9.5%
Shares
-0.1%
+0.3%
+0.9%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 7.9%
0.0%2.5%5.0%7.5%10.0%
2016Return on invested capital 9.9%
2017Return on invested capital 9.0%
2018Return on invested capital 8.1%
2019Return on invested capital 4.8%
2020Return on invested capital 2.5%
2021Return on invested capital 5.7%
2022Return on invested capital 3.8%
2023Return on invested capital 3.9%
2024Return on invested capital 5.7%
2025Return on invested capital 3.5%
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
-200M-100M0100M
2016Economic profit 39.4M
2017Economic profit 20.9M
2018Economic profit 3.3M
2019Economic profit -72.1M
2020Economic profit -192.3M
2021Economic profit -79.2M
2022Economic profit -187.5M
2023Economic profit -176.2M
2024Economic profit -96.7M
2025Economic profit -187.8M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
3.4%
Return on assets
1.4%
Asset turnover
0.54×
Research & development
3.0% of revenue
Overheads (SG&A)
24.9% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-200M0200M400M600M800M
2016Net income 165.2MFree cash flow 143.4MAfter stock-based pay 135.0M
2017Net income -57.7MFree cash flow 122.8MAfter stock-based pay 112.6M
2018Net income 159.8MFree cash flow 177.7MAfter stock-based pay 166.8M
2019Net income 588.6MFree cash flow 219.1MAfter stock-based pay 207.5M
2020Net income 131.6MFree cash flow 157.9MAfter stock-based pay 146.6M
2021Net income 230.8MFree cash flow 133.2MAfter stock-based pay 122.0M
2022Net income 703.1MFree cash flow 292.9MAfter stock-based pay 279.7M
2023Net income 75.7MFree cash flow 82.2MAfter stock-based pay 69.0M
2024Net income 169.5MFree cash flow 134.9MAfter stock-based pay 119.5M
2025Net income 81.9MFree cash flow 195.0MAfter stock-based pay 185.9M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2016–2025
2.6B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 36%939.2M
Acquisitions 131%3.4B
Dividends 28%719.5M
Share buybacks 14%369.8M
More than it generated: funded with cash or new debt -109%-2.8B
Over the same years it paid 114.5M in stock. The share count rose 8.5%. 255.3M of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
-$2.5$0.0$2.5$5.0$7.5$10.0
2016Earnings per share $1.95Free cash flow per share $1.70Dividend per share $0.48
2017Earnings per share $-0.70Free cash flow per share $1.50Dividend per share $0.54
2018Earnings per share $1.99Free cash flow per share $2.21Dividend per share $0.70
2019Earnings per share $7.58Free cash flow per share $2.82Dividend per share $0.78
2020Earnings per share $1.45Free cash flow per share $1.74Dividend per share $0.79
2021Earnings per share $2.51Free cash flow per share $1.45Dividend per share $0.84
2022Earnings per share $7.63Free cash flow per share $3.18Dividend per share $0.94
2023Earnings per share $0.82Free cash flow per share $0.90Dividend per share $0.98
2024Earnings per share $1.84Free cash flow per share $1.47Dividend per share $1.02
2025Earnings per share $0.89Free cash flow per share $2.12Dividend per share $1.08
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
75M80M85M90M95M
2016Diluted shares 84.6M
2017Diluted shares 82.1M
2018Diluted shares 80.4M
2019Diluted shares 77.7M
2020Diluted shares 90.6M
2021Diluted shares 92.1M
2022Diluted shares 92.2M
2023Diluted shares 91.8M
2024Diluted shares 92.0M
2025Diluted shares 91.8M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Debt and liquidity
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
00.5B1.0B1.5B2.0B
2016Net debt 1.0B
2017Net debt 1.1B
2018Net debt 1.2B
2019Net debt 364.6M
2020Net debt 1.2B
2021Net debt 1.3B
2022Net debt 1.5B
2023Net debt 1.5B
2024Net debt 1.5B
2025Net debt 1.4B
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
3.6×
Interest coverage
— operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
1.66 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
42 days collects in 49d, stock 60d, pays in 67d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
5of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✕Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforefailed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✓Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellpassed
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✕Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforefailed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
2.52grey zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.09 × 6.56+0.60
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.31 × 3.26+1.01
Operating income ÷ assets 0.03 × 6.72+0.23
Equity ÷ liabilities 0.65 × 1.05+0.68
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.54below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.08+1.00
Gross margin slipping 1.05+0.55
Soft assets 1.02+0.41
Sales growth 1.01+0.90
Slower depreciation 1.00+0.12
Overheads vs sales 1.11-0.19
Profit not in cash -0.04-0.17
Leverage rising 0.95-0.31
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Capital spending (107M) is well below depreciation (186M).
Benign
Mature assets, or a business that has become less capital-intensive.
Worrying
Under-investing: today's profit is being held up by consuming tomorrow's capacity.
Net debt is 3.6 times EBITDA.
Benign
A stable sector with predictable cash flows and comfortable maturities.
Worrying
Little room if earnings fall; the maturity schedule is what to check.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$47.06discounted at 7.9% a year · 62% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
52.7×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
14.7×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
1.8×
Free cash flow yield
4.3%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today2.2B
Everything after, today3.5B
The whole business5.7B
Minus net debt-1.4B
What belongs to shareholders4.3B
Divided among 91.8M shares: <strong>$47.06</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
0100M200M300M400M
2016Reported 135.0M
2017Reported 112.6M
2018Reported 166.8M
2019Reported 207.5M
2020Reported 146.6M
2021Reported 122.0M
2022Reported 279.7M
2023Reported 69.0M
2024Reported 119.5M
2025Reported 185.9M
2026Projected 259.2M
2027Projected 278.3M
2028Projected 297.2M
2029Projected 315.5M
2030Projected 333.1M
2031Projected 349.5M
2032Projected 364.7M
2033Projected 378.2M
2034Projected 390.0M
2035Projected 399.8M
2016201820202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
3.5B
3.8B
4.0B
4.3B
4.5B
4.7B
5.0B
5.1B
5.3B
5.4B
Growth
8.0%
7.4%
6.8%
6.2%
5.6%
4.9%
4.3%
3.7%
3.1%
2.5%
Cash margin
7.4%
7.4%
7.4%
7.4%
7.4%
7.4%
7.4%
7.4%
7.4%
7.4%
Free cash flow
259.2M
278.3M
297.2M
315.5M
333.1M
349.5M
364.7M
378.2M
390.0M
399.8M
Worth today
240.2M
239.0M
236.5M
232.7M
227.6M
221.3M
214.0M
205.6M
196.5M
186.6M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
6.9%
49
55
62
70
81
7.4%
44
48
54
60
69
7.9%
39
43
47
52
59
8.4%
35
38
42
46
51
8.9%
31
34
37
41
45
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
5.9%
29
33
37
41
46
6.6%
33
37
42
47
52
7.4%
37
42
47
52
58
8.1%
42
47
52
58
64
8.8%
46
51
57
64
71
All the inputs moving at once
5,000 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.0%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$25.27
Median$46.91
90th percentile$80.59
$50.00$100.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$34.89</b> and <b>$62.68</b>; one in ten below $25.27, one in ten above $80.59.
Does the long run make sense?
11.7×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 11.7 times that year's EBITDA.
Free growthIn year 10 free cash flow is at or above after-tax operating profit, yet the model grows 2.5% forever. Growth needs reinvestment; this assumes it comes for free, which flatters the terminal value.
62%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 6 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market—none in the period
Under pre-arranged plans—of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Which large funds report holding it
From the Form 13F of the 28 institutions followed on this site, as of the end of their last reported quarter. A 13F is filed up to 45 days later and shows only long positions in US-listed shares.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.