EMN · Materials(plastic materials, synth resins & nonvulcan elastomers) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-12-31
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
Eastman Chemical Co reported revenue of $8.8 billion in fiscal 2025, after shrinking 0.3% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin narrowed from 15.4% in 2016 to 8.9%, and it earned 6.0% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $13.8 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 41.8% went back into the business and 25.3% to dividends; the share count fell 22.1%. On the accounting screens, it passes 5 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 3.72 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; 1 of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 20258.8B-0.3% a year over 9 years
Operating margin8.9%gross margin 21.1%
Return on invested capital6.0%9.0% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay376.0M4.3% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA3.3×net debt 4.2B
Piotroski F-score5/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
05B10B15B
2016Revenue 9.0BOperating income 1.4B
2017Revenue 9.5BOperating income 1.5B
2018Revenue 10.2BOperating income 1.5B
2019Revenue 9.3BOperating income 1.1B
2020Revenue 8.5BOperating income 740.0M
2021Revenue 10.5BOperating income 1.3B
2022Revenue 10.6BOperating income 1.2B
2023Revenue 9.2BOperating income 1.3B
2024Revenue 9.4BOperating income 1.3B
2025Revenue 8.8BOperating income 776.0M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
-6.1%
+0.7%
-0.3%
Operating income
-12.5%
+1.0%
-6.2%
Net income
-15.8%
-0.2%
-6.3%
Earnings per share
-13.6%
+3.2%
-3.7%
Free cash flow per share
+8.0%
-14.1%
-3.6%
Dividend per share
+2.6%
+4.7%
+6.7%
Shares
-2.5%
-3.3%
-2.7%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 7.6%
0%5%10%15%
2016Return on invested capital 10.2%
2017Return on invested capital 11.8%
2018Return on invested capital 10.7%
2019Return on invested capital 8.1%
2020Return on invested capital 5.9%
2021Return on invested capital 9.4%
2022Return on invested capital 9.2%
2023Return on invested capital 10.4%
2024Return on invested capital 10.0%
2025Return on invested capital 6.0%
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
-400M-200M0200M400M600M
2016Economic profit 283.5M
2017Economic profit 503.0M
2018Economic profit 365.0M
2019Economic profit 50.3M
2020Economic profit -205.6M
2021Economic profit 196.7M
2022Economic profit 158.0M
2023Economic profit 286.9M
2024Economic profit 252.6M
2025Economic profit -171.2M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
8.0%
Return on assets
3.2%
Asset turnover
0.59×
Research & development
2.9% of revenue
Overheads (SG&A)
7.5% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
00.5B1.0B1.5B
2016Net income 854.0MFree cash flow 759.0MAfter stock-based pay 723.0M
2017Net income 1.4BFree cash flow 1.0BAfter stock-based pay 956.0M
2018Net income 1.1BFree cash flow 1.0BAfter stock-based pay 951.0M
2019Net income 759.0MFree cash flow 1.1BAfter stock-based pay 1.0B
2020Net income 478.0MFree cash flow 1.1BAfter stock-based pay 1.0B
2021Net income 857.0MFree cash flow 1.1BAfter stock-based pay 994.0M
2022Net income 793.0MFree cash flow 364.0MAfter stock-based pay 295.0M
2023Net income 894.0MFree cash flow 546.0MAfter stock-based pay 482.0M
2024Net income 905.0MFree cash flow 688.0MAfter stock-based pay 625.0M
2025Net income 474.0MFree cash flow 424.0MAfter stock-based pay 376.0M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2016–2025
13.8B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 42%5.8B
Acquisitions 2%274.0M
Dividends 25%3.5B
Share buybacks 7%900.0M
Kept, or used to pay down debt 24%3.4B
Over the same years it paid 569.0M in stock. The share count fell 22.1%. 331.0M of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$0.0$2.5$5.0$7.5$10.0
2016Earnings per share $5.75Free cash flow per share $5.11Dividend per share $1.83
2017Earnings per share $9.47Free cash flow per share $6.90Dividend per share $2.03
2018Earnings per share $7.56Free cash flow per share $7.10Dividend per share $2.23
2019Earnings per share $5.48Free cash flow per share $7.79Dividend per share $2.48
2020Earnings per share $3.50Free cash flow per share $7.85Dividend per share $2.62
2021Earnings per share $6.25Free cash flow per share $7.76Dividend per share $2.74
2022Earnings per share $6.35Free cash flow per share $2.91Dividend per share $3.05
2023Earnings per share $7.49Free cash flow per share $4.57Dividend per share $3.15
2024Earnings per share $7.68Free cash flow per share $5.84Dividend per share $3.21
2025Earnings per share $4.10Free cash flow per share $3.67Dividend per share $3.30
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
110M120M130M140M150M
2016Diluted shares 148.4M
2017Diluted shares 146.1M
2018Diluted shares 142.9M
2019Diluted shares 138.5M
2020Diluted shares 136.5M
2021Diluted shares 137.1M
2022Diluted shares 124.9M
2023Diluted shares 119.4M
2024Diluted shares 117.9M
2025Diluted shares 115.6M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Debt and liquidity
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
02B4B6B8B
2016Net debt 6.4B
2017Net debt 6.3B
2018Net debt 5.9B
2019Net debt 5.6B
2020Net debt 5.1B
2021Net debt 4.7B
2022Net debt 4.7B
2023Net debt 4.3B
2024Net debt 4.2B
2025Net debt 4.2B
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
3.3×
Interest coverage
4× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
1.37 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
— collects in 31d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
5of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✕Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforefailed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✓Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellpassed
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✕Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforefailed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
3.72safe zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.07 × 6.56+0.44
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.68 × 3.26+2.22
Operating income ÷ assets 0.05 × 6.72+0.35
Equity ÷ liabilities 0.68 × 1.05+0.71
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.58below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.00+0.92
Gross margin slipping 1.16+0.61
Soft assets 1.02+0.41
Sales growth 0.93+0.83
Slower depreciation 1.01+0.12
Overheads vs sales 0.96-0.16
Profit not in cash -0.03-0.16
Leverage rising 0.96-0.32
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Net debt is 3.3 times EBITDA.
Benign
A stable sector with predictable cash flows and comfortable maturities.
Worrying
Little room if earnings fall; the maturity schedule is what to check.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$80.39discounted at 7.6% a year · 61% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
19.6×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
10.5×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
1.5×
Free cash flow yield
4.0%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today5.3B
Everything after, today8.2B
The whole business13.5B
Minus net debt-4.2B
What belongs to shareholders9.3B
Divided among 115.6M shares: <strong>$80.39</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
00.5B1.0B1.5B
2016Reported 723.0M
2017Reported 956.0M
2018Reported 951.0M
2019Reported 1.0B
2020Reported 1.0B
2021Reported 994.0M
2022Reported 295.0M
2023Reported 482.0M
2024Reported 625.0M
2025Reported 376.0M
2026Projected 741.3M
2027Projected 746.7M
2028Projected 753.7M
2029Projected 762.5M
2030Projected 773.1M
2031Projected 785.6M
2032Projected 800.0M
2033Projected 816.4M
2034Projected 835.0M
2035Projected 855.9M
2016201820202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
8.8B
8.9B
8.9B
9.0B
9.2B
9.3B
9.5B
9.7B
9.9B
10.2B
Growth
0.5%
0.7%
0.9%
1.2%
1.4%
1.6%
1.8%
2.1%
2.3%
2.5%
Cash margin
8.4%
8.4%
8.4%
8.4%
8.4%
8.4%
8.4%
8.4%
8.4%
8.4%
Free cash flow
741.3M
746.7M
753.7M
762.5M
773.1M
785.6M
800.0M
816.4M
835.0M
855.9M
Worth today
688.8M
644.6M
604.5M
568.2M
535.3M
505.3M
478.1M
453.3M
430.8M
410.2M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
6.6%
84
95
108
125
148
7.1%
74
82
93
106
123
7.6%
65
72
80
91
104
8.1%
57
63
70
79
89
8.6%
51
56
62
68
77
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
-3.5%
-1.5%
0.5%
2.5%
4.5%
6.7%
46
54
62
70
80
7.6%
54
62
71
81
91
8.4%
62
71
80
91
102
9.3%
69
79
90
101
114
10.1%
77
88
99
112
125
All the inputs moving at once
4,998 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.0%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$42.71
Median$80.27
90th percentile$141.93
$100.00$200.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$58.84</b> and <b>$108.36</b>; one in ten below $42.71, one in ten above $141.93.
Does the long run make sense?
11.4×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 11.4 times that year's EBITDA.
Free growthIn year 10 free cash flow is at or above after-tax operating profit, yet the model grows 2.5% forever. Growth needs reinvestment; this assumes it comes for free, which flatters the terminal value.
61%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 4 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market$234,1111 sale(s) by 1 insider(s)
Under pre-arranged plans0%of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Which large funds report holding it
From the Form 13F of the 28 institutions followed on this site, as of the end of their last reported quarter. A 13F is filed up to 45 days later and shows only long positions in US-listed shares.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.