WMG · Consumer discretionary(services-amusement & recreation services) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-09-30
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
Warner Music Group Corp. reported revenue of $6.7 billion in fiscal 2025, after growing 7.2% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin widened from 6.2% in 2017 to 10.3%, and it earned 11.1% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $5.3 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 58.5% went to dividends and 23.9% to acquisitions. On the accounting screens, it passes 4 of 8 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of -0.85 is in the distress zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; 2 of the six cross-checks between its statements fire.
Revenue, fiscal 20256.7B+7.2% a year over 9 years
Operating margin10.3%gross margin 45.8%
Return on invested capital11.1%13.0% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay485.0M7.2% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA3.3×net debt 3.5B
Piotroski F-score4/8tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
-2B02B4B6B8B
2017Revenue 3.6BOperating income 222.0M
2018Revenue 4.0BOperating income 217.0M
2018
2019Revenue 4.5BOperating income 356.0M
2020Revenue 4.5BOperating income -229.0M
2021Revenue 5.3BOperating income 609.0M
2022Revenue 5.9BOperating income 714.0M
2023Revenue 6.0BOperating income 790.0M
2024Revenue 6.4BOperating income 823.0M
2025Revenue 6.7BOperating income 694.0M
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
+4.3%
+8.5%
+7.2%
Operating income
-0.9%
—
+13.5%
Net income
-12.8%
—
+11.0%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Needs a cost of capital, which comes from the valuation below.
Return on equity
56.4%
Return on assets
3.7%
Asset turnover
0.68×
Overheads (SG&A)
28.2% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-0.5B00.5B1.0B
2017Net income 143.0MFree cash flow 491.0MAfter stock-based pay 421.0M
2018Net income 307.0MFree cash flow 351.0MAfter stock-based pay 289.0M
2018
2019Net income 256.0MFree cash flow 296.0MAfter stock-based pay 246.0M
2020Net income -475.0MFree cash flow 378.0MAfter stock-based pay -230.0M
2021Net income 304.0MFree cash flow 545.0MAfter stock-based pay 500.0M
2022Net income 551.0MFree cash flow 607.0MAfter stock-based pay 568.0M
2023Net income 430.0MFree cash flow 560.0MAfter stock-based pay 511.0M
2024Net income 435.0MFree cash flow 638.0MAfter stock-based pay 586.0M
2025Net income 365.0MFree cash flow 539.0MAfter stock-based pay 485.0M
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2017–2025
5.3B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 17%917.0M
Acquisitions 24%1.3B
Dividends 59%3.1B
Share buybacks 0%16.0M
Kept, or used to pay down debt 0%3.0M
Over the same years it paid 1.0B in stock. The buybacks did not even cover what was handed out in stock.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$0$250,000$500,000$750,000$1,000,000
2017Earnings per share $135,931.56Free cash flow per share $466,730.04Dividend per share $79,847.91
2018Earnings per share $291,825.10Free cash flow per share $333,650.19Dividend per share $879,277.57
2018
2019Earnings per share $241,509.43Free cash flow per share $279,245.28Dividend per share $88,679.25
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
1,0521,0541,0561,0581,060
2017Diluted shares 1,052
2018Diluted shares 1,052
2018
2019Diluted shares 1,060
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Debt and liquidity
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
01B2B3B4B
2017Net debt 2.2B
2018Net debt 2.3B
2018
2019Net debt 2.4B
2020Net debt 2.6B
2021Net debt 2.8B
2022Net debt 3.1B
2023Net debt 3.3B
2024Net debt 3.3B
2025Net debt 3.5B
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
3.3×
Interest coverage
4× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
0.66 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
53 days collects in 73d, stock 6d, pays in 26d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
4of 8 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✕Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforefailed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✓Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellpassed
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
–No new sharesShare count did not grow — not reportedno data
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✕Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforefailed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
-0.85distress zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets -0.15 × 6.56-0.96
Retained earnings ÷ assets -0.14 × 3.26-0.44
Operating income ÷ assets 0.07 × 6.72+0.47
Equity ÷ liabilities 0.07 × 1.05+0.07
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.54below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.02+0.94
Gross margin slipping 1.04+0.55
Soft assets 1.02+0.41
Sales growth 1.04+0.93
Slower depreciation 0.88+0.10
Overheads vs sales 0.96-0.17
Profit not in cash -0.03-0.15
Leverage rising 0.97-0.32
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Capital spending (139M) is well below depreciation (376M).
Benign
Mature assets, or a business that has become less capital-intensive.
Worrying
Under-investing: today's profit is being held up by consuming tomorrow's capacity.
Net debt is 3.3 times EBITDA.
Benign
A stable sector with predictable cash flows and comfortable maturities.
Worrying
Little room if earnings fall; the maturity schedule is what to check.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
The SEC accounts lack the lines needed for revenue, free cash flow or the share count, so there is no DCF for this company.
What it has filed lately
The last twelve months at the SEC, most important first: annual and quarterly reports, events, large holders and insiders.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 6 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market—none in the period
Under pre-arranged plans—of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Which large funds report holding it
From the Form 13F of the 28 institutions followed on this site, as of the end of their last reported quarter. A 13F is filed up to 45 days later and shows only long positions in US-listed shares.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.