VRTS · Financials(investment advice) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-12-31
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. reported revenue of $852.9 million in fiscal 2025, after growing 11.4% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin widened from 15.8% in 2016 to 19.8%, and it earned 9.3% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $482.8 million its operations generated over 10 years, 166.9% went to acquisitions and 132.3% to buybacks; the share count fell 11.4%. On the accounting screens, it passes 2 of 7 Piotroski tests; 2 of the six cross-checks between its statements fire.
Revenue, fiscal 2025852.9M+11.4% a year over 9 years
Operating margin19.8%gross margin —
Return on invested capital9.3%13.1% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay-98.1M-11.5% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDANet cash88.2M more cash than debt
Piotroski F-score2/7tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B
2016Revenue 322.6MOperating income 50.8M
2017Revenue 425.6MOperating income 58.0M
2018Revenue 552.2MOperating income 113.1M
2019Revenue 563.2MOperating income 124.7M
2020Revenue 603.9MOperating income 143.2M
2021Revenue 979.2MOperating income 325.5M
2022Revenue 886.4MOperating income 197.5M
2023Revenue 845.3MOperating income 151.5M
2024Revenue 906.9MOperating income 182.5M
2025Revenue 852.9MOperating income 168.7M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
-1.3%
+7.1%
+11.4%
Operating income
-5.1%
+3.3%
+14.3%
Net income
+8.4%
+11.2%
+12.1%
Earnings per share
+11.7%
+14.4%
+13.7%
Dividend per share
+14.4%
+26.7%
+20.3%
Shares
-3.0%
-2.8%
-1.3%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
GrossOperatingNetFree cash flow
-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%
2016Operating 15.8%Net 15.0%Free cash flow 5.9%
2017Operating 13.6%Net 8.7%Free cash flow -43.3%
2018Operating 20.5%Net 13.7%Free cash flow -13.4%
2019Operating 22.1%Net 17.0%Free cash flow -7.9%
2020Operating 23.7%Net 13.2%Free cash flow -37.6%
2021Operating 33.2%Net 21.3%Free cash flow 67.4%
2022Operating 22.3%Net 12.0%Free cash flow 14.2%
2023Operating 17.9%Net 16.7%Free cash flow 27.0%
2024Operating 20.1%Net 16.8%Free cash flow -0.4%
2025Operating 19.8%Net 15.9%Free cash flow -8.7%
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Return on invested capital
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 8.6%
0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020Return on invested capital 11.5%
2021Return on invested capital 22.1%
2022Return on invested capital 12.0%
2023Return on invested capital 10.3%
2024Return on invested capital 11.8%
2025Return on invested capital 9.3%
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
050.0M100.0M150.0M
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020Economic profit 26.3M
2021Economic profit 147.7M
2022Economic profit 36.3M
2023Economic profit 18.8M
2024Economic profit 36.7M
2025Economic profit 8.6M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
14.6%
Return on assets
3.2%
Asset turnover
0.20×
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-250.0M0250.0M500.0M750.0M
2016Net income 48.5MFree cash flow 18.9MAfter stock-based pay 6.9M
2017Net income 37.0MFree cash flow -184.4MAfter stock-based pay -204.7M
2018Net income 75.5MFree cash flow -74.3MAfter stock-based pay -97.4M
2019Net income 95.6MFree cash flow -44.3MAfter stock-based pay -66.5M
2020Net income 80.0MFree cash flow -227.1MAfter stock-based pay -248.6M
2021Net income 208.1MFree cash flow 659.9MAfter stock-based pay 633.7M
2022Net income 106.6MFree cash flow 126.1MAfter stock-based pay 102.0M
2023Net income 141.5MFree cash flow 228.3MAfter stock-based pay 201.5M
2024Net income 152.5MFree cash flow -3.8MAfter stock-based pay -36.7M
2025Net income 136.0MFree cash flow -74.1MAfter stock-based pay -98.1M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2016–2025
482.8M generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 12%57.6M
Acquisitions 167%805.7M
Dividends 69%333.6M
Share buybacks 132%638.6M
More than it generated: funded with cash or new debt -280%-1.4B
Over the same years it paid 233.0M in stock. The share count fell 11.4%. 405.6M of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$-50.00$0.00$50.00$100.00
2016Earnings per share $6.20Free cash flow per share $2.42Dividend per share $1.76
2017Earnings per share $5.11Free cash flow per share $-25.44Dividend per share $1.74
2018Earnings per share $8.86Free cash flow per share $-8.71Dividend per share $1.65
2019Earnings per share $11.74Free cash flow per share $-5.43Dividend per share $2.08
2020Earnings per share $10.02Free cash flow per share $-28.48Dividend per share $2.86
2021Earnings per share $26.01Free cash flow per share $82.46Dividend per share $3.92
2022Earnings per share $14.06Free cash flow per share $16.63Dividend per share $6.23
2023Earnings per share $19.18Free cash flow per share $30.96Dividend per share $7.06
2024Earnings per share $21.14Free cash flow per share $-0.53Dividend per share $8.06
2025Earnings per share $19.63Free cash flow per share $-10.69Dividend per share $9.32
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
6.5M7.0M7.5M8.0M8.5M9.0M
2016Diluted shares 7.8M
2017Diluted shares 7.2M
2018Diluted shares 8.5M
2019Diluted shares 8.1M
2020Diluted shares 8.0M
2021Diluted shares 8.0M
2022Diluted shares 7.6M
2023Diluted shares 7.4M
2024Diluted shares 7.2M
2025Diluted shares 6.9M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
-400.0M-300.0M-200.0M-100.0M0
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020Net debt -138.6M
2021Net debt -319.8M
2022Net debt -334.2M
2023Net debt -87.6M
2024Net debt -168.2M
2025Net debt -88.2M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
-0.4×
Interest coverage
— operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
— current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
—
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
2of 7 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✕Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zerofailed
✕Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforefailed
✕Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)failed
✕Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellfailed
–More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year before — not reportedno data
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
–Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year before — not reportedno data
✕Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforefailed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
The accounts lack a line it needs (retained earnings, current assets or liabilities).
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
The accounts lack too many of the lines it needs.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Reported profit comfortably exceeds the cash generated (136M against -67M).
Benign
Growth consuming working capital, or the seasonality of the year-end.
Worrying
Profit held up by accounting entries that do not turn into money.
Capital spending (7M) is well below depreciation (64M).
Benign
Mature assets, or a business that has become less capital-intensive.
Worrying
Under-investing: today's profit is being held up by consuming tomorrow's capacity.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$461.95discounted at 8.6% a year · 58% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
23.5×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
13.4×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
3.6×
Free cash flow yield
-3.1%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today1.3B
Everything after, today1.8B
The whole business3.1B
Plus net cash88.2M
What belongs to shareholders3.2B
Divided among 6.9M shares: <strong>$461.95</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
-250.0M0250.0M500.0M750.0M
2016Reported 6.9M
2017Reported -204.7M
2018Reported -97.4M
2019Reported -66.5M
2020Reported -248.6M
2021Reported 633.7M
2022Reported 102.0M
2023Reported 201.5M
2024Reported -36.7M
2025Reported -98.1M
2026Projected 164.3M
2027Projected 175.0M
2028Projected 185.5M
2029Projected 195.7M
2030Projected 205.4M
2031Projected 214.7M
2032Projected 223.3M
2033Projected 231.1M
2034Projected 238.0M
2035Projected 244.0M
2016201820202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
912.6M
971.9M
1.0B
1.1B
1.1B
1.2B
1.2B
1.3B
1.3B
1.4B
Growth
7.0%
6.5%
6.0%
5.5%
5.0%
4.5%
4.0%
3.5%
3.0%
2.5%
Cash margin
18.0%
18.0%
18.0%
18.0%
18.0%
18.0%
18.0%
18.0%
18.0%
18.0%
Free cash flow
164.3M
175.0M
185.5M
195.7M
205.4M
214.7M
223.3M
231.1M
238.0M
244.0M
Worth today
151.3M
148.3M
144.8M
140.7M
136.0M
130.9M
125.3M
119.4M
113.3M
106.9M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
7.6%
477
512
552
602
664
8.1%
441
470
503
543
592
8.6%
410
434
462
495
534
9.1%
383
404
427
455
487
9.6%
359
377
397
420
447
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
3.0%
5.0%
7.0%
9.0%
11.0%
14.4%
333
361
390
422
457
16.2%
363
393
426
461
499
18.0%
393
426
462
501
542
19.8%
423
459
498
540
585
21.6%
452
491
533
579
628
All the inputs moving at once
5,000 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.7%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$346.34
Median$462.85
90th percentile$645.95
$400.00$600.00$800.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$395.92</b> and <b>$546.71</b>; one in ten below $346.34, one in ten above $645.95.
Does the long run make sense?
11.1×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 11.1 times that year's EBITDA.
Free growthIn year 10 free cash flow is at or above after-tax operating profit, yet the model grows 2.5% forever. Growth needs reinvestment; this assumes it comes for free, which flatters the terminal value.
58%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 6 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market$3.3M10 sale(s) by 3 insider(s)
Under pre-arranged plans0%of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Companies like this one
Same SEC industry (investment advice) first, then the rest of financials.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.