SBH · Consumer discretionary(retail-retail stores, nec) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-09-30
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. reported revenue of $3.7 billion in fiscal 2025, after shrinking 0.7% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin narrowed from 12.6% in 2016 to 8.9%, and it earned 14.6% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $3.1 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 34.9% went to buybacks and 32.4% back into the business; the share count fell 30.2%. On the accounting screens, it passes 8 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 3.85 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; none of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 20253.7B-0.7% a year over 9 years
Operating margin8.9%gross margin 51.6%
Return on invested capital14.6%15.9% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay153.4M4.1% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA1.7×net debt 725.8M
Piotroski F-score8/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
01B2B3B4B
2016Revenue 4.0BOperating income 498.3M
2017Revenue 3.9BOperating income 478.6M
2018Revenue 3.9BOperating income 426.6M
2019Revenue 3.9BOperating income 458.5M
2020Revenue 3.5BOperating income 258.8M
2021Revenue 3.9BOperating income 418.4M
2022Revenue 3.8BOperating income 337.6M
2023Revenue 3.7BOperating income 325.0M
2024Revenue 3.7BOperating income 282.7M
2025Revenue 3.7BOperating income 327.8M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
-1.0%
+1.0%
-0.7%
Operating income
-1.0%
+4.8%
-4.5%
Net income
+2.2%
+1.2%
-1.4%
Earnings per share
+4.3%
+3.2%
+2.6%
Free cash flow per share
+47.4%
-9.6%
+2.2%
Shares
-2.0%
-2.0%
-3.9%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 7.7%
0%10%20%30%
2016Return on invested capital 20.6%
2017Return on invested capital 19.5%
2018Return on invested capital 22.0%
2019Return on invested capital 22.2%
2020Return on invested capital 10.0%
2021Return on invested capital 18.5%
2022Return on invested capital 18.4%
2023Return on invested capital 15.0%
2024Return on invested capital 13.0%
2025Return on invested capital 14.6%
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
0100M200M300M
2016Economic profit 195.8M
2017Economic profit 179.5M
2018Economic profit 217.1M
2019Economic profit 224.0M
2020Economic profit 41.6M
2021Economic profit 179.3M
2022Economic profit 147.0M
2023Economic profit 115.2M
2024Economic profit 84.6M
2025Economic profit 114.6M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
24.7%
Return on assets
6.8%
Asset turnover
1.29×
Overheads (SG&A)
42.8% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
0100M200M300M400M
2016Net income 222.9MFree cash flow 202.9MAfter stock-based pay 190.3M
2017Net income 215.1MFree cash flow 253.6MAfter stock-based pay 243.1M
2018Net income 258.0MFree cash flow 286.2MAfter stock-based pay 275.6M
2019Net income 271.6MFree cash flow 212.7MAfter stock-based pay 203.5M
2020Net income 184.6MFree cash flow 316.0MAfter stock-based pay 307.6M
2021Net income 239.9MFree cash flow 308.0MAfter stock-based pay 296.3M
2022Net income 183.6MFree cash flow 57.2MAfter stock-based pay 47.3M
2023Net income 184.6MFree cash flow 158.6MAfter stock-based pay 142.7M
2024Net income 153.4MFree cash flow 145.4MAfter stock-based pay 128.2M
2025Net income 195.9MFree cash flow 172.7MAfter stock-based pay 153.4M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2016–2025
3.1B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 32%1.0B
Acquisitions 2%76.8M
Dividends 0%0
Share buybacks 35%1.1B
Kept, or used to pay down debt 30%945.0M
Over the same years it paid 125.1M in stock. The share count fell 30.2%. 966.2M of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$0$1$2$3
2016Earnings per share $1.50Free cash flow per share $1.36
2017Earnings per share $1.56Free cash flow per share $1.84
2018Earnings per share $2.08Free cash flow per share $2.31
2019Earnings per share $2.26Free cash flow per share $1.77
2020Earnings per share $1.61Free cash flow per share $2.76
2021Earnings per share $2.10Free cash flow per share $2.70
2022Earnings per share $1.66Free cash flow per share $0.52
2023Earnings per share $1.69Free cash flow per share $1.45
2024Earnings per share $1.43Free cash flow per share $1.36
2025Earnings per share $1.89Free cash flow per share $1.66
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
100M120M140M160M
2016Diluted shares 148.8M
2017Diluted shares 138.2M
2018Diluted shares 123.8M
2019Diluted shares 120.3M
2020Diluted shares 114.7M
2021Diluted shares 114.2M
2022Diluted shares 110.3M
2023Diluted shares 109.3M
2024Diluted shares 106.9M
2025Diluted shares 103.8M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Debt and liquidity
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
00.5B1.0B1.5B2.0B
2016Net debt 1.7B
2017Net debt 1.8B
2018Net debt 1.7B
2019Net debt 1.5B
2020Net debt 1.3B
2021Net debt 992.0M
2022Net debt 1.0B
2023Net debt 955.0M
2024Net debt 886.0M
2025Net debt 725.8M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
1.7×
Interest coverage
5× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
2.26 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
159 days collects in 3d, stock 201d, pays in 46d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
8of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✓Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforepassed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✓Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellpassed
✓More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforepassed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✓Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforepassed
✕Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforefailed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
3.85safe zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.25 × 6.56+1.66
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.31 × 3.26+1.02
Operating income ÷ assets 0.11 × 6.72+0.77
Equity ÷ liabilities 0.38 × 1.05+0.40
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.60below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 0.95+0.87
Gross margin slipping 0.99+0.52
Soft assets 1.03+0.41
Sales growth 1.00+0.89
Slower depreciation 1.11+0.13
Overheads vs sales 0.99-0.17
Profit not in cash -0.03-0.13
Leverage rising 0.89-0.29
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
None of the six cross-checks fires for the latest year: receivables and inventory move with revenue, profit turns into cash, investment keeps up with depreciation, the tax rate is ordinary and debt is moderate.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$25.71discounted at 7.7% a year · 60% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
13.6×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
7.9×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
0.9×
Free cash flow yield
5.7%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today1.4B
Everything after, today2.0B
The whole business3.4B
Minus net debt-725.8M
What belongs to shareholders2.7B
Divided among 103.8M shares: <strong>$25.71</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
0100M200M300M400M
2016Reported 190.3M
2017Reported 243.1M
2018Reported 275.6M
2019Reported 203.5M
2020Reported 307.6M
2021Reported 296.3M
2022Reported 47.3M
2023Reported 142.7M
2024Reported 128.2M
2025Reported 153.4M
2026Projected 187.0M
2027Projected 189.2M
2028Projected 191.7M
2029Projected 194.6M
2030Projected 197.8M
2031Projected 201.5M
2032Projected 205.5M
2033Projected 210.0M
2034Projected 214.9M
2035Projected 220.2M
2016201820202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
3.7B
3.8B
3.8B
3.9B
4.0B
4.0B
4.1B
4.2B
4.3B
4.4B
Growth
1.0%
1.2%
1.3%
1.5%
1.7%
1.8%
2.0%
2.2%
2.3%
2.5%
Cash margin
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
Free cash flow
187.0M
189.2M
191.7M
194.6M
197.8M
201.5M
205.5M
210.0M
214.9M
220.2M
Worth today
173.6M
163.0M
153.3M
144.4M
136.3M
128.8M
121.9M
115.6M
109.8M
104.5M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
6.7%
27
30
33
38
44
7.2%
24
26
29
33
37
7.7%
21
23
26
29
32
8.2%
19
21
23
25
28
8.7%
17
19
21
22
25
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
-3.0%
-1.0%
1.0%
3.0%
5.0%
4.0%
16
18
20
23
25
4.5%
18
21
23
26
29
5.0%
20
23
26
29
32
5.5%
23
25
28
32
35
6.0%
25
28
31
34
38
All the inputs moving at once
5,000 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.0%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$11.38
Median$25.71
90th percentile$47.05
$20.00$40.00$60.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$17.76</b> and <b>$35.49</b>; one in ten below $11.38, one in ten above $47.05.
Does the long run make sense?
8.5×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 8.5 times that year's EBITDA.
10%To grow 2.5% forever while reinvesting 24% of its after-tax operating profit, the business must earn 10% on the new capital — it has earned 16% on average over the last five years.
60%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 6 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market$543,1921 sale(s) by 1 insider(s)
Under pre-arranged plans0%of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Companies like this one
Same SEC industry (retail-retail stores, nec) first, then the rest of consumer discretionary.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.