RBC · Industrials(ball & roller bearings) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2026-03-28
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
RBC Bearings Inc reported revenue of $1.9 billion in fiscal 2026. Of the $984.0 million its operations generated over 10 years, 30.1% went to acquisitions and 15.9% back into the business. On the accounting screens, it passes 6 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 4.49 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; 1 of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 20261.9B
Operating margin22.5%gross margin 44.4%
Return on invested capital7.7%7.6% on average over 2 years
Free cash flow after stock pay308.1M16.5% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA1.5×net debt 818.2M
Piotroski F-score6/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
00.5B1.0B1.5B2.0B
2023
2023
2023
2024
2024Revenue 1.6BOperating income 342.2M
2024
2024
2024
2025Revenue 1.6BOperating income 369.9M
2026Revenue 1.9BOperating income 421.0M
2023202320232024202420242024202420252026
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
—
+3.7%
—
Operating income
—
+4.2%
—
Net income
—
+6.5%
—
Earnings per share
—
+4.8%
—
Free cash flow per share
—
+5.5%
—
Shares
—
+1.6%
—
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 9.0%
0.0%2.5%5.0%7.5%10.0%
2023
2023
2023
2024
2024Return on invested capital 7.0%
2024
2024
2024
2025Return on invested capital 7.4%
2026Return on invested capital 7.7%
2023202320232024202420242024202420252026
Economic profit
Economic profit
-100M-75M-50M-25M0
2023
2023
2023
2024
2024Economic profit -82.1M
2024
2024
2024
2025Economic profit -65.2M
2026Economic profit -55.1M
2023202320232024202420242024202420252026
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
8.6%
Return on assets
5.6%
Asset turnover
0.37×
Research & development
1.8% of revenue
Overheads (SG&A)
16.9% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
0100M200M300M400M
2023
2023
2023
2024
2024Net income 209.9MFree cash flow 241.5MAfter stock-based pay 224.1M
2024
2024
2024
2025Net income 246.2MFree cash flow 243.8MAfter stock-based pay 215.4M
2026Net income 287.6MFree cash flow 342.6MAfter stock-based pay 308.1M
2023202320232024202420242024202420252026
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2023–2026
984.0M generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 16%156.1M
Acquisitions 30%296.0M
Dividends 4%40.2M
Share buybacks 2%20.5M
Kept, or used to pay down debt 48%471.2M
Over the same years it paid 80.3M in stock. The buybacks did not even cover what was handed out in stock.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$0$5$10$15
2023
2023
2023
2024
2024Earnings per share $7.19Free cash flow per share $8.27
2024
2024
2024
2025Earnings per share $8.11Free cash flow per share $8.03
2026Earnings per share $9.09Free cash flow per share $10.83
2023202320232024202420242024202420252026
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
29M30M31M32M
2023
2023
2023
2024
2024Diluted shares 29.2M
2024
2024
2024
2025Diluted shares 30.4M
2026Diluted shares 31.6M
2023202320232024202420242024202420252026
Debt and liquidity
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
00.5B1.0B1.5B
2023
2023
2023
2024
2024Net debt 1.1B
2024
2024
2024
2025Net debt 883.3M
2026Net debt 818.2M
2023202320232024202420242024202420252026
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
1.5×
Interest coverage
8× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
2.18 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
282 days collects in 66d, stock 268d, pays in 52d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
6of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✓Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforepassed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✓Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellpassed
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
✕No new sharesShare count did not growfailed
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✓Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforepassed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
4.49safe zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.13 × 6.56+0.82
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.34 × 3.26+1.11
Operating income ÷ assets 0.08 × 6.72+0.55
Equity ÷ liabilities 1.91 × 1.05+2.00
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.47below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 0.97+0.89
Gross margin slipping 1.00+0.53
Soft assets 0.97+0.39
Sales growth 1.14+1.02
Slower depreciation 1.07+0.12
Overheads vs sales 0.99-0.17
Profit not in cash -0.03-0.12
Leverage rising 0.93-0.30
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Capital spending (73M) is well below depreciation (129M).
Benign
Mature assets, or a business that has become less capital-intensive.
Worrying
Under-investing: today's profit is being held up by consuming tomorrow's capacity.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$168.14discounted at 9.0% a year · 56% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
18.5×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
11.2×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
3.3×
Free cash flow yield
5.8%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today2.7B
Everything after, today3.5B
The whole business6.1B
Minus net debt-818.2M
What belongs to shareholders5.3B
Divided among 31.6M shares: <strong>$168.14</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
0200M400M600M
2023
2023
2023
2024
2024Reported 224.1M
2024
2024
2024
2025Reported 215.4M
2026Reported 308.1M
2027Projected 321.4M
2028Projected 349.4M
2029Projected 377.1M
2030Projected 404.2M
2031Projected 430.0M
2032Projected 454.1M
2033Projected 476.1M
2034Projected 495.4M
2035Projected 511.6M
2036Projected 524.4M
2023202320242024202520272029203120332035
Year by year
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
Revenue
2.0B
2.2B
2.4B
2.6B
2.7B
2.9B
3.0B
3.2B
3.3B
3.3B
Growth
9.5%
8.7%
7.9%
7.2%
6.4%
5.6%
4.8%
4.1%
3.3%
2.5%
Cash margin
15.7%
15.7%
15.7%
15.7%
15.7%
15.7%
15.7%
15.7%
15.7%
15.7%
Free cash flow
321.4M
349.4M
377.1M
404.2M
430.0M
454.1M
476.1M
495.4M
511.6M
524.4M
Worth today
294.7M
293.9M
290.9M
285.9M
279.0M
270.2M
259.8M
247.9M
234.8M
220.7M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
8.0%
175
188
205
224
247
8.5%
160
171
185
201
220
9.0%
147
157
168
181
197
9.5%
136
144
154
165
178
10.0%
126
133
141
151
162
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
5.5%
7.5%
9.5%
11.5%
13.5%
12.6%
113
125
137
151
165
14.1%
126
139
153
168
184
15.7%
139
153
168
184
202
17.2%
152
167
183
201
220
18.8%
164
181
199
218
239
All the inputs moving at once
5,000 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.4%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$119.55
Median$168.35
90th percentile$243.30
$100.00$200.00$300.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$140.14</b> and <b>$203.18</b>; one in ten below $119.55, one in ten above $243.30.
Does the long run make sense?
8.4×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 8.4 times that year's EBITDA.
24%To grow 2.5% forever while reinvesting 10% of its after-tax operating profit, the business must earn 24% on the new capital — it has earned 8% on average over the last five years.
56%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 6 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market$750,8333 sale(s) by 3 insider(s)
Under pre-arranged plans0%of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Which large funds report holding it
From the Form 13F of the 28 institutions followed on this site, as of the end of their last reported quarter. A 13F is filed up to 45 days later and shows only long positions in US-listed shares.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.