QXO · Industrials(wholesale-lumber & other construction materials) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-12-31
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
QXO, Inc. reported revenue of $6.8 billion in fiscal 2025, after growing 77.8% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin widened from -5.0% in 2019 to -3.6%, and it earned -2.2% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $349.9 million its operations generated over 10 years, 3017.2% went to acquisitions and 22.5% back into the business; the share count rose 36219.3%. On the accounting screens, it passes 3 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 3.11 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is above the -1.78 line; 2 of the six cross-checks between its statements fire.
Revenue, fiscal 20256.8B+77.8% a year over 9 years
Operating margin-3.6%gross margin 23.0%
Return on invested capital-2.2%-6.8% on average over 3 years
Free cash flow after stock pay38.7M0.6% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA-5.1×net debt 695.7M
Piotroski F-score3/9tests of improvement passed
Share counts are in today's shares. The SEC's filings restate only recent years after a split, so these jumps were read as splits and the older years scaled to match — otherwise per-share figures would compare different units:
3-for-1 before fiscal 2025; 1-for-8 before fiscal 2023.
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
-2.0B02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B
2019Revenue 38.5MOperating income -1.9M
2020
2020Revenue 41.2MOperating income 223,385
2021Revenue 41.7MOperating income -230,986
2022Revenue 45.0MOperating income -385,379
2023Revenue 54.5MOperating income -1.3M
2024
2024
2024Revenue 56.9MOperating income -71.0M
2025Revenue 6.8BOperating income -245.2M
2019202020202021202220232024202420242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
—
+173.2%
+77.8%
Free cash flow per share
—
-22.0%
—
Shares
+874.4%
+216.3%
+92.5%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Needs a cost of capital, which comes from the valuation below.
Return on equity
-2.9%
Return on assets
-1.8%
Asset turnover
0.43×
Overheads (SG&A)
20.4% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-400.0M-200.0M0200.0M
2019Net income 6.8MFree cash flow -973,979After stock-based pay -990,889
2020
2020Net income 175,647Free cash flow 1.6MAfter stock-based pay 1.6M
2021Net income -134,434Free cash flow 111,273After stock-based pay -330,037
2022Net income -282,219Free cash flow 2.0MAfter stock-based pay 1.8M
2023Net income -1.1MFree cash flow 463,000After stock-based pay 422,000
2024
2024
2024Net income 28.0MFree cash flow 84.7MAfter stock-based pay 50.3M
2025Net income -279.4MFree cash flow 183.2MAfter stock-based pay 38.7M
2019202020202021202220232024202420242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2019–2025
349.9M generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 23%78.8M
Acquisitions 3017%10.6B
Dividends 8%27.6M
Share buybacks 0%0
More than it generated: funded with cash or new debt -2948%-10.3B
Over the same years it paid 179.6M in stock. The share count rose 36219.3%.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$-2.00$0.00$2.00$4.00$6.00
2019Earnings per share $4.03Free cash flow per share $-0.58Dividend per share $0.13
2020
2020Earnings per share $0.10Free cash flow per share $0.95Dividend per share $2.40
2021Earnings per share $-0.07Free cash flow per share $0.06Dividend per share $1.63
2022Earnings per share $-0.15Free cash flow per share $1.03Dividend per share $0.00
2023Earnings per share $-0.54Free cash flow per share $0.23Dividend per share $0.53
2024
2024
2024Earnings per share $0.05Free cash flow per share $0.14Dividend per share $0.03
2025Earnings per share $-0.46Free cash flow per share $0.30Dividend per share $0.00
2019202020202021202220232024202420242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M
2019Diluted shares 1.7M
2020
2020Diluted shares 1.7M
2021Diluted shares 1.9M
2022Diluted shares 1.9M
2023Diluted shares 2.0M
2024Diluted shares 662,500
2024Diluted shares 700,000
2024Diluted shares 612.0M
2025Diluted shares 613.0M
2019202020202021202220232024202420242025
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
-6.0B-4.0B-2.0B02.0B
2019Net debt -8.5M
2020
2020Net debt -6.2M
2021Net debt -6.1M
2022Net debt -6.7M
2023Net debt -4.4M
2024
2024
2024Net debt -5.1B
2025Net debt 695.7M
2019202020202021202220232024202420242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
-5.1×
Interest coverage
-1× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
3.58 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
108 days collects in 61d, stock 104d, pays in 57d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
3of 9 tests passed
✕ProfitableReturn on assets above zerofailed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✕Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforefailed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✕Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellfailed
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
✕No new sharesShare count did not growfailed
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✓Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforepassed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
3.11safe zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.25 × 6.56+1.65
Retained earnings ÷ assets -0.02 × 3.26-0.08
Operating income ÷ assets -0.02 × 6.72-0.10
Equity ÷ liabilities 1.57 × 1.05+1.65
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
96.22above the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 3.53+3.24
Gross margin slipping 1.77+0.93
Soft assets 1.00 (not reported, set to 1)+0.40
Sales growth 120.25+107.26
Slower depreciation 1.00 (not reported, set to 1)+0.12
Overheads vs sales 0.12-0.02
Profit not in cash -0.03-0.16
Leverage rising 32.78-10.72
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Receivables are growing 42311% against revenue growing 11925%.
Benign
A shift towards larger customers on longer terms, or sales concentrated at the end of the period.
Worrying
Sales are being made on looser credit, or revenue has been booked that may never be collected.
The effective tax rate is -17.1%.
Benign
A favourable geographic mix, or legitimate tax credits.
Worrying
Not sustainable; projecting it forward inflates the valuation.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
With a free cash flow margin at or below zero in year ten, the business never generates cash for its owners and a DCF says nothing useful. Set a positive margin for year ten to see what it would take.
What it has filed lately
The last twelve months at the SEC, most important first: annual and quarterly reports, events, large holders and insiders.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 5 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market—none in the period
Under pre-arranged plans—of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Which large funds report holding it
From the Form 13F of the 28 institutions followed on this site, as of the end of their last reported quarter. A 13F is filed up to 45 days later and shows only long positions in US-listed shares.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.