MSM · Industrials(wholesale-industrial machinery & equipment) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-08-30
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
MSC Industrial Direct Co Inc reported revenue of $3.8 billion in fiscal 2025, after growing 3.1% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin narrowed from 13.1% in 2016 to 8.0%, and it earned 12.1% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $3.6 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 42.3% went to dividends and 28.3% to buybacks; the share count fell 8.5%. On the accounting screens, it passes 5 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 4.09 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; none of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 20253.8B+3.1% a year over 9 years
Operating margin8.0%gross margin 40.8%
Return on invested capital12.1%14.9% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay228.3M6.1% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA1.1×net debt 429.0M
Piotroski F-score5/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
02.0B4.0B6.0B
2016Revenue 2.9BOperating income 376.0M
2017Revenue 2.9BOperating income 379.0M
2018Revenue 3.2BOperating income 420.6M
2019Revenue 3.4BOperating income 400.0M
2020Revenue 3.2BOperating income 350.7M
2021Revenue 3.2BOperating income 301.8M
2022Revenue 3.7BOperating income 468.7M
2023Revenue 4.0BOperating income 483.7M
2024Revenue 3.8BOperating income 390.4M
2025Revenue 3.8BOperating income 301.6M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
+0.7%
+3.4%
+3.1%
Operating income
-13.7%
-3.0%
-2.4%
Net income
-16.3%
-4.5%
-1.6%
Earnings per share
-16.2%
-4.6%
-0.7%
Free cash flow per share
+9.3%
-7.3%
-1.9%
Dividend per share
+4.3%
+2.5%
+7.8%
Shares
-0.1%
+0.1%
-1.0%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 8.5%
0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%
2016Return on invested capital 17.1%
2017Return on invested capital 15.3%
2018Return on invested capital 21.2%
2019Return on invested capital 15.7%
2020Return on invested capital 13.7%
2021Return on invested capital 11.8%
2022Return on invested capital 16.5%
2023Return on invested capital 18.8%
2024Return on invested capital 15.3%
2025Return on invested capital 12.1%
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
0100.0M200.0M300.0M
2016Economic profit 117.2M
2017Economic profit 105.4M
2018Economic profit 203.2M
2019Economic profit 137.7M
2020Economic profit 99.3M
2021Economic profit 62.8M
2022Economic profit 170.6M
2023Economic profit 198.8M
2024Economic profit 129.3M
2025Economic profit 66.3M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
14.4%
Return on assets
8.1%
Asset turnover
1.53×
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M
2016Net income 231.2MFree cash flow 313.2MAfter stock-based pay 299.2M
2017Net income 231.4MFree cash flow 200.3MAfter stock-based pay 186.4M
2018Net income 329.2MFree cash flow 294.7MAfter stock-based pay 279.8M
2019Net income 288.9MFree cash flow 276.7MAfter stock-based pay 260.4M
2020Net income 251.1MFree cash flow 349.7MAfter stock-based pay 332.8M
2021Net income 216.9MFree cash flow 170.7MAfter stock-based pay 153.0M
2022Net income 339.8MFree cash flow 184.8MAfter stock-based pay 165.5M
2023Net income 343.2MFree cash flow 607.1MAfter stock-based pay 588.5M
2024Net income 258.6MFree cash flow 311.3MAfter stock-based pay 292.4M
2025Net income 199.3MFree cash flow 240.9MAfter stock-based pay 228.3M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2016–2025
3.6B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 19%678.0M
Acquisitions 7%268.1M
Dividends 42%1.5B
Share buybacks 28%1.0B
Kept, or used to pay down debt 3%122.5M
Over the same years it paid 163.1M in stock. The share count fell 8.5%. 861.7M of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$0.00$5.00$10.00$15.00
2016Earnings per share $3.79Free cash flow per share $5.13Dividend per share $1.73
2017Earnings per share $4.06Free cash flow per share $3.52Dividend per share $1.79
2018Earnings per share $5.81Free cash flow per share $5.20Dividend per share $2.21
2019Earnings per share $5.20Free cash flow per share $4.98Dividend per share $2.63
2020Earnings per share $4.51Free cash flow per share $6.29Dividend per share $2.99
2021Earnings per share $3.87Free cash flow per share $3.04Dividend per share $2.98
2022Earnings per share $6.06Free cash flow per share $3.30Dividend per share $2.99
2023Earnings per share $6.11Free cash flow per share $10.80Dividend per share $3.14
2024Earnings per share $4.58Free cash flow per share $5.52Dividend per share $3.32
2025Earnings per share $3.57Free cash flow per share $4.31Dividend per share $3.39
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
54.0M56.0M58.0M60.0M62.0M
2016Diluted shares 61.1M
2017Diluted shares 57.0M
2018Diluted shares 56.7M
2019Diluted shares 55.5M
2020Diluted shares 55.6M
2021Diluted shares 56.1M
2022Diluted shares 56.0M
2023Diluted shares 56.2M
2024Diluted shares 56.4M
2025Diluted shares 55.9M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M
2016Net debt 214.2M
2017Net debt 315.9M
2018Net debt 177.9M
2019Net debt 406.6M
2020Net debt 490.3M
2021Net debt 743.1M
2022Net debt 749.9M
2023Net debt 403.8M
2024Net debt 478.5M
2025Net debt 429.0M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
1.1×
Interest coverage
13× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
1.68 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
109 days collects in 41d, stock 105d, pays in 37d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
5of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✕Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforefailed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✓Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellpassed
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✕Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforefailed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
4.09safe zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.20 × 6.56+1.32
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.18 × 3.26+0.57
Operating income ÷ assets 0.12 × 6.72+0.82
Equity ÷ liabilities 1.30 × 1.05+1.37
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.73below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.04+0.96
Gross margin slipping 1.01+0.53
Soft assets 0.97+0.39
Sales growth 0.99+0.88
Slower depreciation 0.88+0.10
Overheads vs sales 1.00 (not reported, set to 1)-0.17
Profit not in cash -0.05-0.26
Leverage rising 1.02-0.33
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
None of the six cross-checks fires for the latest year: receivables and inventory move with revenue, profit turns into cash, investment keeps up with depreciation, the tax rate is ordinary and debt is moderate.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$109.33discounted at 8.5% a year · 57% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
30.7×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
16.7×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
1.7×
Free cash flow yield
3.7%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today2.8B
Everything after, today3.7B
The whole business6.5B
Minus net debt-429.0M
What belongs to shareholders6.1B
Divided among 55.9M shares: <strong>$109.33</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
0200.0M400.0M600.0M
2016Reported 299.2M
2017Reported 186.4M
2018Reported 279.8M
2019Reported 260.4M
2020Reported 332.8M
2021Reported 153.0M
2022Reported 165.5M
2023Reported 588.5M
2024Reported 292.4M
2025Reported 228.3M
2026Projected 382.5M
2027Projected 395.4M
2028Projected 408.4M
2029Projected 421.3M
2030Projected 434.2M
2031Projected 447.0M
2032Projected 459.7M
2033Projected 472.2M
2034Projected 484.5M
2035Projected 496.6M
2016201820202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
3.9B
4.0B
4.2B
4.3B
4.4B
4.6B
4.7B
4.8B
4.9B
5.1B
Growth
3.5%
3.4%
3.3%
3.2%
3.1%
2.9%
2.8%
2.7%
2.6%
2.5%
Cash margin
9.8%
9.8%
9.8%
9.8%
9.8%
9.8%
9.8%
9.8%
9.8%
9.8%
Free cash flow
382.5M
395.4M
408.4M
421.3M
434.2M
447.0M
459.7M
472.2M
484.5M
496.6M
Worth today
352.4M
335.7M
319.4M
303.6M
288.2M
273.4M
259.0M
245.1M
231.7M
218.8M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
7.5%
113
122
133
146
162
8.0%
104
111
120
130
143
8.5%
96
102
109
118
128
9.0%
89
94
100
107
116
9.5%
83
87
93
99
106
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
-0.5%
1.5%
3.5%
5.5%
7.5%
7.8%
76
83
91
99
108
8.8%
83
91
100
109
119
9.8%
91
100
109
120
131
10.8%
99
108
119
130
142
11.8%
106
117
128
140
153
All the inputs moving at once
5,000 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.0%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$75.85
Median$109.52
90th percentile$160.49
$100.00$150.00$200.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$90.30</b> and <b>$133.30</b>; one in ten below $75.85, one in ten above $160.49.
Does the long run make sense?
16.0×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 16.0 times that year's EBITDA.
Free growthIn year 10 free cash flow is at or above after-tax operating profit, yet the model grows 2.5% forever. Growth needs reinvestment; this assumes it comes for free, which flatters the terminal value.
57%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 5 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market$156,2941 sale(s) by 1 insider(s)
Under pre-arranged plans0%of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Which large funds report holding it
From the Form 13F of the 28 institutions followed on this site, as of the end of their last reported quarter. A 13F is filed up to 45 days later and shows only long positions in US-listed shares.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.