MSA · Health care(orthopedic, prosthetic & surgical appliances & supplies) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-12-31
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
MSA Safety Inc reported revenue of $1.9 billion in fiscal 2025, after growing 5.6% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin widened from 14.0% in 2016 to 19.8%, and it earned 14.5% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $2.1 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 40.2% went to acquisitions and 31.4% to dividends; the share count rose 3.6%. On the accounting screens, it passes 5 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 5.65 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; none of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 20251.9B+5.6% a year over 9 years
Operating margin19.8%gross margin 46.5%
Return on invested capital14.5%10.0% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay280.2M14.9% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA0.9×net debt 415.9M
Piotroski F-score5/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B
2016Revenue 1.1BOperating income 160.7M
2017Revenue 1.2BOperating income 39.6M
2018Revenue 1.4BOperating income 173.5M
2019Revenue 1.4BOperating income 188.2M
2020Revenue 1.3BOperating income 171.9M
2021Revenue 1.4BOperating income 22.8M
2022Revenue 1.5BOperating income 239.1M
2023Revenue 1.8BOperating income 231.3M
2024Revenue 1.8BOperating income 389.2M
2025Revenue 1.9BOperating income 371.8M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
+7.1%
+6.8%
+5.6%
Operating income
+15.8%
+16.7%
+9.8%
Net income
+15.8%
+17.6%
+13.1%
Earnings per share
+15.9%
+17.6%
+12.7%
Free cash flow per share
+37.1%
+13.3%
+11.2%
Dividend per share
+4.9%
+4.3%
+5.5%
Shares
-0.1%
+0.0%
+0.4%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 8.4%
0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%
2016Return on invested capital 10.5%
2017Return on invested capital 3.3%
2018Return on invested capital 13.4%
2019Return on invested capital 13.1%
2020Return on invested capital 11.2%
2021Return on invested capital 1.5%
2022Return on invested capital 12.0%
2023Return on invested capital 4.2%
2024Return on invested capital 17.9%
2025Return on invested capital 14.5%
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
-100.0M0100.0M200.0M
2016Economic profit 20.1M
2017Economic profit -54.0M
2018Economic profit 50.3M
2019Economic profit 51.1M
2020Economic profit 31.9M
2021Economic profit -99.0M
2022Economic profit 54.7M
2023Economic profit -65.9M
2024Economic profit 157.4M
2025Economic profit 119.8M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
20.4%
Return on assets
10.9%
Asset turnover
0.73×
Research & development
3.5% of revenue
Overheads (SG&A)
22.1% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
0100.0M200.0M300.0M
2016Net income 91.9MFree cash flow 109.4MAfter stock-based pay 100.2M
2017Net income 26.0MFree cash flow 206.6MAfter stock-based pay 194.9M
2018Net income 124.2MFree cash flow 229.9MAfter stock-based pay 217.7M
2019Net income 138.0MFree cash flow 128.4MAfter stock-based pay 114.6M
2020Net income 124.1MFree cash flow 157.7MAfter stock-based pay 150.7M
2021Net income 21.3MFree cash flow 155.3MAfter stock-based pay 136.4M
2022Net income 179.6MFree cash flow 114.9MAfter stock-based pay 95.3M
2023Net income 58.6MFree cash flow 50.1MAfter stock-based pay 20.1M
2024Net income 285.0MFree cash flow 242.2MAfter stock-based pay 224.0M
2025Net income 278.9MFree cash flow 295.4MAfter stock-based pay 280.2M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2016–2025
2.1B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 20%420.5M
Acquisitions 40%849.4M
Dividends 31%663.6M
Share buybacks 0%0
Kept, or used to pay down debt 8%176.8M
Over the same years it paid 155.9M in stock. The share count rose 3.6%.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$0.00$2.00$4.00$6.00$8.00
2016Earnings per share $2.42Free cash flow per share $2.88Dividend per share $1.29
2017Earnings per share $0.67Free cash flow per share $5.34Dividend per share $1.36
2018Earnings per share $3.19Free cash flow per share $5.90Dividend per share $1.47
2019Earnings per share $3.52Free cash flow per share $3.28Dividend per share $1.62
2020Earnings per share $3.16Free cash flow per share $4.01Dividend per share $1.69
2021Earnings per share $0.54Free cash flow per share $3.94Dividend per share $1.74
2022Earnings per share $4.56Free cash flow per share $2.92Dividend per share $1.81
2023Earnings per share $1.48Free cash flow per share $1.27Dividend per share $1.86
2024Earnings per share $7.21Free cash flow per share $6.13Dividend per share $1.99
2025Earnings per share $7.09Free cash flow per share $7.51Dividend per share $2.09
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
37.5M38.0M38.5M39.0M39.5M40.0M
2016Diluted shares 38.0M
2017Diluted shares 38.7M
2018Diluted shares 39.0M
2019Diluted shares 39.2M
2020Diluted shares 39.3M
2021Diluted shares 39.4M
2022Diluted shares 39.4M
2023Diluted shares 39.5M
2024Diluted shares 39.5M
2025Diluted shares 39.3M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
0200.0M400.0M600.0M
2016Net debt 276.7M
2017Net debt 340.3M
2018Net debt 221.2M
2019Net debt 196.2M
2020Net debt 146.5M
2021Net debt 456.8M
2022Net debt 409.9M
2023Net debt 455.2M
2024Net debt 343.5M
2025Net debt 415.9M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
0.9×
Interest coverage
12× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
3.01 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
144 days collects in 60d, stock 125d, pays in 40d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
5of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✕Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforefailed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✕Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellfailed
✓More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforepassed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✕Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforefailed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
5.65safe zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.23 × 6.56+1.49
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.61 × 3.26+1.97
Operating income ÷ assets 0.15 × 6.72+0.98
Equity ÷ liabilities 1.15 × 1.05+1.21
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.50below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.06+0.97
Gross margin slipping 1.02+0.54
Soft assets 1.02+0.41
Sales growth 1.04+0.92
Slower depreciation 1.15+0.13
Overheads vs sales 1.01-0.17
Profit not in cash -0.03-0.16
Leverage rising 0.97-0.32
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
None of the six cross-checks fires for the latest year: receivables and inventory move with revenue, profit turns into cash, investment keeps up with depreciation, the tax rate is ordinary and debt is moderate.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$98.80discounted at 8.4% a year · 59% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
13.9×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
9.7×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
2.3×
Free cash flow yield
7.2%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today1.8B
Everything after, today2.5B
The whole business4.3B
Minus net debt-415.9M
What belongs to shareholders3.9B
Divided among 39.3M shares: <strong>$98.80</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M
2016Reported 100.2M
2017Reported 194.9M
2018Reported 217.7M
2019Reported 114.6M
2020Reported 150.7M
2021Reported 136.4M
2022Reported 95.3M
2023Reported 20.1M
2024Reported 224.0M
2025Reported 280.2M
2026Projected 218.7M
2027Projected 232.9M
2028Projected 246.9M
2029Projected 260.4M
2030Projected 273.5M
2031Projected 285.8M
2032Projected 297.2M
2033Projected 307.6M
2034Projected 316.8M
2035Projected 324.7M
2016201820202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
2.0B
2.1B
2.3B
2.4B
2.5B
2.6B
2.7B
2.8B
2.9B
3.0B
Growth
7.0%
6.5%
6.0%
5.5%
5.0%
4.5%
4.0%
3.5%
3.0%
2.5%
Cash margin
10.9%
10.9%
10.9%
10.9%
10.9%
10.9%
10.9%
10.9%
10.9%
10.9%
Free cash flow
218.7M
232.9M
246.9M
260.4M
273.5M
285.8M
297.2M
307.6M
316.8M
324.7M
Worth today
201.8M
198.3M
193.9M
188.8M
182.9M
176.3M
169.2M
161.6M
153.6M
145.2M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
7.4%
103
111
122
135
151
7.9%
93
101
109
120
132
8.4%
86
92
99
107
117
8.9%
79
84
90
97
105
9.4%
73
77
83
88
95
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
3.0%
5.0%
7.0%
9.0%
11.0%
8.7%
67
74
81
89
97
9.8%
75
82
90
99
108
10.9%
82
90
99
108
118
12.0%
89
98
108
118
129
13.1%
97
106
116
127
139
All the inputs moving at once
5,000 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.0%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$68.04
Median$98.91
90th percentile$147.43
$100.00$150.00$200.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$81.24</b> and <b>$121.41</b>; one in ten below $68.04, one in ten above $147.43.
Does the long run make sense?
8.0×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 8.0 times that year's EBITDA.
9%To grow 2.5% forever while reinvesting 28% of its after-tax operating profit, the business must earn 9% on the new capital — it has earned 10% on average over the last five years.
59%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 6 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market—none in the period
Under pre-arranged plans—of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Which large funds report holding it
From the Form 13F of the 28 institutions followed on this site, as of the end of their last reported quarter. A 13F is filed up to 45 days later and shows only long positions in US-listed shares.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.