MAN · Industrials(services-help supply services) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-12-31
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
ManpowerGroup Inc. reported revenue of $18.0 billion in fiscal 2025, after shrinking 1.0% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin narrowed from 3.8% in 2016 to 0.8%, and it earned -0.6% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $4.9 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 51.3% went to buybacks and 26.0% to dividends; the share count fell 34.2%. On the accounting screens, it passes 1 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 2.14 is in the grey zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; 3 of the six cross-checks between its statements fire.
Revenue, fiscal 202518.0B-1.0% a year over 9 years
Operating margin0.8%gross margin 16.7%
Return on invested capital-0.6%6.2% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay-187.7M-1.0% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA3.3×net debt 771.5M
Piotroski F-score1/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
010.0B20.0B30.0B
2016Revenue 19.7BOperating income 745.5M
2017Revenue 21.0BOperating income 789.2M
2018Revenue 22.0BOperating income 796.7M
2019Revenue 20.9BOperating income 644.9M
2020Revenue 18.0BOperating income 187.6M
2021Revenue 20.7BOperating income 585.4M
2022Revenue 19.8BOperating income 581.7M
2023Revenue 18.9BOperating income 255.8M
2024Revenue 17.9BOperating income 306.0M
2025Revenue 18.0BOperating income 150.1M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
-3.2%
-0.0%
-1.0%
Operating income
-36.3%
-4.4%
-16.3%
Dividend per share
-18.6%
-8.4%
-1.7%
Shares
-4.1%
-4.4%
-4.5%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 7.3%
-5.0%0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%
2016Return on invested capital 14.8%
2017Return on invested capital 15.7%
2018Return on invested capital 16.1%
2019Return on invested capital 11.5%
2020Return on invested capital 0.9%
2021Return on invested capital 10.9%
2022Return on invested capital 11.4%
2023Return on invested capital 3.4%
2024Return on invested capital 5.7%
2025Return on invested capital -0.6%
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
-400.0M-200.0M0200.0M400.0M
2016Economic profit 237.9M
2017Economic profit 310.8M
2018Economic profit 320.0M
2019Economic profit 158.3M
2020Economic profit -229.7M
2021Economic profit 128.4M
2022Economic profit 140.1M
2023Economic profit -125.6M
2024Economic profit -51.3M
2025Economic profit -292.8M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
-0.6%
Return on assets
-0.1%
Asset turnover
1.96×
Overheads (SG&A)
15.9% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-500.0M0500.0M1.0B
2016Net income 443.7MFree cash flow 543.1MAfter stock-based pay 516.0M
2017Net income 545.4MFree cash flow 346.2MAfter stock-based pay 317.5M
2018Net income 556.7MFree cash flow 418.4MAfter stock-based pay 390.6M
2019Net income 465.7MFree cash flow 761.5MAfter stock-based pay 735.2M
2020Net income 23.8MFree cash flow 885.7MAfter stock-based pay 861.5M
2021Net income 382.4MFree cash flow 580.6MAfter stock-based pay 543.8M
2022Net income 373.8MFree cash flow 347.7MAfter stock-based pay 310.1M
2023Net income 88.8MFree cash flow 270.0MAfter stock-based pay 241.3M
2024Net income 145.1MFree cash flow 258.1MAfter stock-based pay 230.8M
2025Net income -13.3MFree cash flow -161.4MAfter stock-based pay -187.7M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2016–2025
4.9B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 12%606.3M
Acquisitions 23%1.1B
Dividends 26%1.3B
Share buybacks 51%2.5B
More than it generated: funded with cash or new debt -13%-628.3M
Over the same years it paid 290.8M in stock. The share count fell 34.2%. 2.2B of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$-5.00$0.00$5.00$10.00$15.00$20.00
2016Earnings per share $6.27Free cash flow per share $7.67Dividend per share $1.67
2017Earnings per share $8.03Free cash flow per share $5.10Dividend per share $1.82
2018Earnings per share $8.55Free cash flow per share $6.43Dividend per share $1.96
2019Earnings per share $7.72Free cash flow per share $12.63Dividend per share $2.14
2020Earnings per share $0.41Free cash flow per share $15.19Dividend per share $2.21
2021Earnings per share $6.90Free cash flow per share $10.48Dividend per share $2.47
2022Earnings per share $7.08Free cash flow per share $6.59Dividend per share $2.65
2023Earnings per share $1.76Free cash flow per share $5.36Dividend per share $2.86
2024Earnings per share $3.00Free cash flow per share $5.34Dividend per share $3.02
2025Earnings per share $-0.29Free cash flow per share $-3.46Dividend per share $1.43
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
40.0M50.0M60.0M70.0M80.0M
2016Diluted shares 70.8M
2017Diluted shares 67.9M
2018Diluted shares 65.1M
2019Diluted shares 60.3M
2020Diluted shares 58.3M
2021Diluted shares 55.4M
2022Diluted shares 52.8M
2023Diluted shares 50.4M
2024Diluted shares 48.3M
2025Diluted shares 46.6M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
-500.0M0500.0M1.0B
2016Net debt 226.9M
2017Net debt 258.5M
2018Net debt 433.6M
2019Net debt 47.6M
2020Net debt -463.6M
2021Net debt 253.7M
2022Net debt 326.0M
2023Net debt 412.3M
2024Net debt 422.4M
2025Net debt 771.5M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
3.3×
Interest coverage
2× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
1.11 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
— collects in 97d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
1of 9 tests passed
✕ProfitableReturn on assets above zerofailed
✕Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zerofailed
✕Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforefailed
✕Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)failed
✕Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellfailed
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✕Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforefailed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
2.14grey zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.06 × 6.56+0.40
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.41 × 3.26+1.33
Operating income ÷ assets 0.02 × 6.72+0.11
Equity ÷ liabilities 0.29 × 1.05+0.30
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.36below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.10+1.02
Gross margin slipping 1.04+0.55
Soft assets 0.93+0.38
Sales growth 1.01+0.90
Slower depreciation 1.03+0.12
Overheads vs sales 1.02-0.18
Profit not in cash 0.01+0.05
Leverage rising 1.05-0.34
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Reported profit comfortably exceeds the cash generated (-13M against -104M).
Benign
Growth consuming working capital, or the seasonality of the year-end.
Worrying
Profit held up by accounting entries that do not turn into money.
Capital spending (57M) is well below depreciation (86M).
Benign
Mature assets, or a business that has become less capital-intensive.
Worrying
Under-investing: today's profit is being held up by consuming tomorrow's capacity.
Net debt is 3.3 times EBITDA.
Benign
A stable sector with predictable cash flows and comfortable maturities.
Worrying
Little room if earnings fall; the maturity schedule is what to check.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$66.64discounted at 7.3% a year · 62% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
—
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
16.4×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
0.2×
Free cash flow yield
-6.0%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today1.5B
Everything after, today2.4B
The whole business3.9B
Minus net debt-771.5M
What belongs to shareholders3.1B
Divided among 46.6M shares: <strong>$66.64</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
-500.0M0500.0M1.0B
2016Reported 516.0M
2017Reported 317.5M
2018Reported 390.6M
2019Reported 735.2M
2020Reported 861.5M
2021Reported 543.8M
2022Reported 310.1M
2023Reported 241.3M
2024Reported 230.8M
2025Reported -187.7M
2026Projected 203.8M
2027Projected 204.4M
2028Projected 205.6M
2029Projected 207.3M
2030Projected 209.6M
2031Projected 212.5M
2032Projected 216.0M
2033Projected 220.2M
2034Projected 225.1M
2035Projected 230.7M
2016201820202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
18.0B
18.0B
18.1B
18.3B
18.5B
18.7B
19.0B
19.4B
19.8B
20.3B
Growth
0.0%
0.3%
0.6%
0.8%
1.1%
1.4%
1.7%
1.9%
2.2%
2.5%
Cash margin
1.1%
1.1%
1.1%
1.1%
1.1%
1.1%
1.1%
1.1%
1.1%
1.1%
Free cash flow
203.8M
204.4M
205.6M
207.3M
209.6M
212.5M
216.0M
220.2M
225.1M
230.7M
Worth today
189.9M
177.4M
166.2M
156.2M
147.1M
139.0M
131.6M
125.0M
119.1M
113.7M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
6.3%
70
78
88
102
120
6.8%
61
68
76
86
100
7.3%
55
60
67
75
85
7.8%
49
54
59
65
73
8.3%
44
48
53
58
64
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
-4.0%
-2.0%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
0.9%
42
47
53
59
66
1.0%
48
53
60
67
74
1.1%
53
60
67
74
82
1.2%
59
66
73
82
91
1.4%
64
72
80
89
99
All the inputs moving at once
4,997 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.0%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$-85.79
Median$67.48
90th percentile$241.07
$-200.00$0.00$200.00$400.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$-10.88</b> and <b>$152.80</b>; one in ten below $-85.79, one in ten above $241.07.
Does the long run make sense?
18.3×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 18.3 times that year's EBITDA.
Free growthIn year 10 free cash flow is at or above after-tax operating profit, yet the model grows 2.5% forever. Growth needs reinvestment; this assumes it comes for free, which flatters the terminal value.
62%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 5 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market—none in the period
Under pre-arranged plans—of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Which large funds report holding it
From the Form 13F of the 28 institutions followed on this site, as of the end of their last reported quarter. A 13F is filed up to 45 days later and shows only long positions in US-listed shares.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.