LECO · Industrials(metalworkg machinery & equipment) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-12-31
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc reported revenue of $4.2 billion in fiscal 2025, after growing 7.1% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin widened from 12.5% in 2016 to 17.0%, and it earned 21.1% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $4.4 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 48.5% went to buybacks and 31.7% to acquisitions; the share count fell 18.0%. On the accounting screens, it passes 6 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 7.05 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; none of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 20254.2B+7.1% a year over 9 years
Operating margin17.0%gross margin 36.2%
Return on invested capital21.1%22.3% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay513.9M12.1% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA1.0×net debt 841.4M
Piotroski F-score6/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
02.0B4.0B6.0B
2016Revenue 2.3BOperating income 283.6M
2017Revenue 2.6BOperating income 376.9M
2018Revenue 3.0BOperating income 375.5M
2019Revenue 3.0BOperating income 370.9M
2020Revenue 2.7BOperating income 282.1M
2021Revenue 3.2BOperating income 461.7M
2022Revenue 3.8BOperating income 612.3M
2023Revenue 4.2BOperating income 717.8M
2024Revenue 4.0BOperating income 636.5M
2025Revenue 4.2BOperating income 718.1M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
+4.0%
+9.8%
+7.1%
Operating income
+5.5%
+20.5%
+10.9%
Net income
+3.3%
+20.4%
+11.3%
Earnings per share
+5.0%
+22.2%
+13.8%
Free cash flow per share
+21.7%
+14.5%
+10.6%
Dividend per share
+10.6%
+9.0%
+10.0%
Shares
-1.7%
-1.5%
-2.2%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 7.5%
0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%
2016Return on invested capital 28.4%
2017Return on invested capital 27.3%
2018Return on invested capital 33.0%
2019Return on invested capital 19.3%
2020Return on invested capital 14.6%
2021Return on invested capital 24.8%
2022Return on invested capital 22.6%
2023Return on invested capital 23.6%
2024Return on invested capital 19.4%
2025Return on invested capital 21.1%
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M
2016Economic profit 149.6M
2017Economic profit 185.1M
2018Economic profit 226.2M
2019Economic profit 180.9M
2020Economic profit 108.0M
2021Economic profit 275.0M
2022Economic profit 327.1M
2023Economic profit 390.1M
2024Economic profit 307.1M
2025Economic profit 358.1M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
35.4%
Return on assets
13.8%
Asset turnover
1.12×
Research & development
2.0% of revenue
Overheads (SG&A)
18.9% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
0200.0M400.0M600.0M
2016Net income 198.4MFree cash flow 262.7MAfter stock-based pay 252.3M
2017Net income 247.5MFree cash flow 273.2MAfter stock-based pay 260.5M
2018Net income 287.1MFree cash flow 257.9MAfter stock-based pay 239.4M
2019Net income 293.1MFree cash flow 333.6MAfter stock-based pay 316.9M
2020Net income 206.1MFree cash flow 292.2MAfter stock-based pay 276.8M
2021Net income 276.6MFree cash flow 302.5MAfter stock-based pay 278.7M
2022Net income 472.2MFree cash flow 311.5MAfter stock-based pay 286.2M
2023Net income 545.2MFree cash flow 576.6MAfter stock-based pay 550.3M
2024Net income 466.1MFree cash flow 482.4MAfter stock-based pay 458.3M
2025Net income 520.5MFree cash flow 534.2MAfter stock-based pay 513.9M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2016–2025
4.4B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 18%780.6M
Acquisitions 32%1.4B
Dividends 28%1.2B
Share buybacks 49%2.1B
More than it generated: funded with cash or new debt -26%-1.2B
Over the same years it paid 193.3M in stock. The share count fell 18.0%. 1.9B of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$0.00$2.50$5.00$7.50$10.00
2016Earnings per share $2.91Free cash flow per share $3.85Dividend per share $1.28
2017Earnings per share $3.71Free cash flow per share $4.10Dividend per share $1.39
2018Earnings per share $4.37Free cash flow per share $3.93Dividend per share $1.55
2019Earnings per share $4.68Free cash flow per share $5.32Dividend per share $1.88
2020Earnings per share $3.42Free cash flow per share $4.85Dividend per share $1.96
2021Earnings per share $4.60Free cash flow per share $5.04Dividend per share $2.03
2022Earnings per share $8.04Free cash flow per share $5.30Dividend per share $2.23
2023Earnings per share $9.37Free cash flow per share $9.90Dividend per share $2.54
2024Earnings per share $8.15Free cash flow per share $8.43Dividend per share $2.83
2025Earnings per share $9.32Free cash flow per share $9.56Dividend per share $3.01
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
55.0M60.0M65.0M70.0M
2016Diluted shares 68.2M
2017Diluted shares 66.6M
2018Diluted shares 65.7M
2019Diluted shares 62.7M
2020Diluted shares 60.2M
2021Diluted shares 60.1M
2022Diluted shares 58.7M
2023Diluted shares 58.2M
2024Diluted shares 57.2M
2025Diluted shares 55.9M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
-500.0M0500.0M1.0B
2016Net debt -377.3M
2017Net debt -324.6M
2018Net debt -358.7M
2019Net debt 512.9M
2020Net debt 458.3M
2021Net debt 524.9M
2022Net debt 924.3M
2023Net debt 709.0M
2024Net debt 873.3M
2025Net debt 841.4M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
1.0×
Interest coverage
12× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
1.82 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
83 days collects in 46d, stock 86d, pays in 49d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
6of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✓Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforepassed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✓Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellpassed
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✕Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforefailed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
7.05safe zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.21 × 6.56+1.36
Retained earnings ÷ assets 1.15 × 3.26+3.75
Operating income ÷ assets 0.19 × 6.72+1.28
Equity ÷ liabilities 0.64 × 1.05+0.67
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.53below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.06+0.97
Gross margin slipping 1.01+0.54
Soft assets 0.99+0.40
Sales growth 1.06+0.94
Slower depreciation 1.01+0.12
Overheads vs sales 0.97-0.17
Profit not in cash -0.04-0.17
Leverage rising 0.97-0.32
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
None of the six cross-checks fires for the latest year: receivables and inventory move with revenue, profit turns into cash, investment keeps up with depreciation, the tax rate is ordinary and debt is moderate.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$251.76discounted at 7.5% a year · 65% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
27.0×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
18.3×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
3.5×
Free cash flow yield
3.7%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today5.3B
Everything after, today9.7B
The whole business14.9B
Minus net debt-841.4M
What belongs to shareholders14.1B
Divided among 55.9M shares: <strong>$251.76</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B
2016Reported 252.3M
2017Reported 260.5M
2018Reported 239.4M
2019Reported 316.9M
2020Reported 276.8M
2021Reported 278.7M
2022Reported 286.2M
2023Reported 550.3M
2024Reported 458.3M
2025Reported 513.9M
2026Projected 576.2M
2027Projected 629.0M
2028Projected 681.4M
2029Projected 732.5M
2030Projected 781.3M
2031Projected 826.9M
2032Projected 868.2M
2033Projected 904.4M
2034Projected 934.6M
2035Projected 957.9M
2016201820202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
4.7B
5.1B
5.5B
5.9B
6.3B
6.7B
7.0B
7.3B
7.6B
7.7B
Growth
10.0%
9.2%
8.3%
7.5%
6.7%
5.8%
5.0%
4.2%
3.3%
2.5%
Cash margin
12.4%
12.4%
12.4%
12.4%
12.4%
12.4%
12.4%
12.4%
12.4%
12.4%
Free cash flow
576.2M
629.0M
681.4M
732.5M
781.3M
826.9M
868.2M
904.4M
934.6M
957.9M
Worth today
536.2M
544.7M
549.2M
549.4M
545.4M
537.2M
524.9M
508.8M
489.3M
466.8M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
6.5%
262
288
322
365
423
7.0%
235
257
283
316
358
7.5%
213
231
252
278
310
8.0%
195
209
227
247
273
8.5%
179
191
206
223
243
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
9.9%
173
189
207
226
247
11.1%
192
210
229
251
273
12.4%
210
230
252
275
300
13.6%
229
251
274
299
327
14.8%
248
271
296
324
353
All the inputs moving at once
4,998 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.0%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$174.31
Median$251.66
90th percentile$388.62
$200.00$400.00$600.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$206.84</b> and <b>$312.47</b>; one in ten below $174.31, one in ten above $388.62.
Does the long run make sense?
13.3×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 13.3 times that year's EBITDA.
47%To grow 2.5% forever while reinvesting 5% of its after-tax operating profit, the business must earn 47% on the new capital — it has earned 22% on average over the last five years.
65%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 6 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market$232,2141 sale(s) by 1 insider(s)
Under pre-arranged plans0%of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Which large funds report holding it
From the Form 13F of the 28 institutions followed on this site, as of the end of their last reported quarter. A 13F is filed up to 45 days later and shows only long positions in US-listed shares.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.