KMT · Industrials(machine tools, metal cutting types) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2026-06-30
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
Kennametal Inc reported revenue of $2.4 billion in fiscal 2026, after growing 1.5% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin widened from 4.6% in 2017 to 20.1%. Of the $1.8 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 74.7% went back into the business and 36.0% to dividends; the share count fell 4.6%. On the accounting screens, it passes 5 of 8 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 5.86 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; 4 of the six cross-checks between its statements fire.
Revenue, fiscal 20262.4B+1.5% a year over 9 years
Operating margin20.1%gross margin 41.2%
Return on invested capital—
Free cash flow after stock pay-115.8M-4.9% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA—net debt —
Piotroski F-score5/8tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
01B2B3B
2017Revenue 2.1BOperating income 94.8M
2018Revenue 2.4BOperating income 290.3M
2019Revenue 2.4BOperating income 328.9M
2020Revenue 1.9BOperating income 22.3M
2021Revenue 1.8BOperating income 102.2M
2022Revenue 2.0BOperating income 218.1M
2023Revenue 2.1BOperating income 192.4M
2024Revenue 2.0BOperating income 170.2M
2025Revenue 2.0BOperating income 143.1M
2026Revenue 2.4BOperating income 472.5M
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
+4.3%
+5.1%
+1.5%
Operating income
+34.9%
+35.8%
+19.5%
Net income
+42.4%
+44.5%
+24.1%
Earnings per share
+44.8%
+46.9%
+24.7%
Dividend per share
-0.3%
-0.1%
-0.1%
Shares
-1.7%
-1.7%
-0.5%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 10.2%
0%5%10%15%20%
2017Return on invested capital 5.9%
2018Return on invested capital 13.6%
2019Return on invested capital 19.6%
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Economic profit
Economic profit
-50M050M100M150M
2017Economic profit -44.0M
2018Economic profit 53.3M
2019Economic profit 125.2M
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
21.8%
Return on assets
10.8%
Asset turnover
0.74×
Research & development
1.8% of revenue
Overheads (SG&A)
20.3% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-400M-200M0200M400M
2017Net income 49.1MFree cash flow 77.3MAfter stock-based pay 56.3M
2018Net income 200.2MFree cash flow 106.3MAfter stock-based pay 85.5M
2019Net income 241.9MFree cash flow 88.2MAfter stock-based pay 65.3M
2020Net income -5.7MFree cash flow -20.4MAfter stock-based pay -36.5M
2021Net income 54.4MFree cash flow 108.4MAfter stock-based pay 83.6M
2022Net income 144.6MFree cash flow -278.4MAfter stock-based pay -299.4M
2023Net income 118.5MFree cash flow 163.6MAfter stock-based pay 138.9M
2024Net income 109.3MFree cash flow 169.5MAfter stock-based pay 145.2M
2025Net income 93.1MFree cash flow 119.4MAfter stock-based pay 97.2M
2026Net income 342.4MFree cash flow -80.9MAfter stock-based pay -115.8M
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2017–2026
1.8B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 75%1.3B
Acquisitions 0%4.0M
Dividends 36%645.2M
Share buybacks 15%271.7M
More than it generated: funded with cash or new debt -26%-468.0M
Over the same years it paid 232.5M in stock. The share count fell 4.6%. 39.2M of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
-$4-$2$0$2$4$6
2017Earnings per share $0.61Free cash flow per share $0.95Dividend per share $0.79
2018Earnings per share $2.42Free cash flow per share $1.28Dividend per share $0.79
2019Earnings per share $2.90Free cash flow per share $1.06Dividend per share $0.79
2020Earnings per share $-0.07Free cash flow per share $-0.25Dividend per share $0.80
2021Earnings per share $0.65Free cash flow per share $1.29Dividend per share $0.79
2022Earnings per share $1.72Free cash flow per share $-3.32Dividend per share $0.79
2023Earnings per share $1.46Free cash flow per share $2.01Dividend per share $0.79
2024Earnings per share $1.37Free cash flow per share $2.12Dividend per share $0.79
2025Earnings per share $1.20Free cash flow per share $1.53Dividend per share $0.79
2026Earnings per share $4.42Free cash flow per share $-1.05Dividend per share $0.79
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
76M78M80M82M84M86M
2017Diluted shares 81.2M
2018Diluted shares 82.8M
2019Diluted shares 83.3M
2020Diluted shares 83.0M
2021Diluted shares 84.3M
2022Diluted shares 83.9M
2023Diluted shares 81.4M
2024Diluted shares 80.0M
2025Diluted shares 77.9M
2026Diluted shares 77.4M
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Debt and liquidity
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
-200M-150M-100M-50M0
2017Net debt -190.6M
2018Net debt -156.9M
2019Net debt -182.0M
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
—
Interest coverage
17× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
2.62 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
258 days collects in 63d, stock 292d, pays in 97d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
5of 8 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✕Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zerofailed
✓Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforepassed
✕Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)failed
–Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fell — not reportedno data
✓More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforepassed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✓Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforepassed
✕Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforefailed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
5.86safe zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.35 × 6.56+2.27
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.47 × 3.26+1.53
Operating income ÷ assets 0.15 × 6.72+1.00
Equity ÷ liabilities 1.01 × 1.05+1.06
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-1.98below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.15+1.06
Gross margin slipping 0.74+0.39
Soft assets 0.76+0.31
Sales growth 1.20+1.07
Slower depreciation 0.89+0.10
Overheads vs sales 0.93-0.16
Profit not in cash 0.11+0.51
Leverage rising 1.29-0.42
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Receivables are growing 38% against revenue growing 20%.
Benign
A shift towards larger customers on longer terms, or sales concentrated at the end of the period.
Worrying
Sales are being made on looser credit, or revenue has been booked that may never be collected.
Inventory is growing 106% against revenue growing 20%.
Benign
Stocking up for a launch, or securing supply.
Worrying
Demand is softening; discounts or write-downs tend to follow.
Reported profit comfortably exceeds the cash generated (342M against -4M).
Benign
Growth consuming working capital, or the seasonality of the year-end.
Worrying
Profit held up by accounting entries that do not turn into money.
Capital spending (77M) is well below depreciation (143M).
Benign
Mature assets, or a business that has become less capital-intensive.
Worrying
Under-investing: today's profit is being held up by consuming tomorrow's capacity.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$12.18discounted at 10.2% a year · 49% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
2.8×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
1.5×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
0.4×
Free cash flow yield
-12.3%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today478.8M
Everything after, today464.6M
The whole business943.4M
Minus net debt-0
What belongs to shareholders943.4M
Divided among 77.4M shares: <strong>$12.18</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
-400M-200M0200M
2017Reported 56.3M
2018Reported 85.5M
2019Reported 65.3M
2020Reported -36.5M
2021Reported 83.6M
2022Reported -299.4M
2023Reported 138.9M
2024Reported 145.2M
2025Reported 97.2M
2026Reported -115.8M
2027Projected 67.6M
2028Projected 70.8M
2029Projected 73.9M
2030Projected 77.0M
2031Projected 80.0M
2032Projected 82.9M
2033Projected 85.7M
2034Projected 88.3M
2035Projected 90.7M
2036Projected 93.0M
2017201920212023202520272029203120332035
Year by year
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
Revenue
2.5B
2.6B
2.7B
2.8B
2.9B
3.0B
3.1B
3.2B
3.3B
3.4B
Growth
5.0%
4.7%
4.4%
4.2%
3.9%
3.6%
3.3%
3.1%
2.8%
2.5%
Cash margin
2.7%
2.7%
2.7%
2.7%
2.7%
2.7%
2.7%
2.7%
2.7%
2.7%
Free cash flow
67.6M
70.8M
73.9M
77.0M
80.0M
82.9M
85.7M
88.3M
90.7M
93.0M
Worth today
61.3M
58.2M
55.2M
52.1M
49.1M
46.2M
43.3M
40.5M
37.7M
35.1M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
9.2%
13
13
14
15
16
9.7%
12
12
13
14
15
10.2%
11
12
12
13
14
10.7%
10
11
11
12
13
11.2%
10
10
11
11
12
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
1.0%
3.0%
5.0%
7.0%
9.0%
2.2%
9
10
10
11
12
2.5%
10
10
11
12
13
2.7%
10
11
12
13
14
3.0%
11
12
13
14
15
3.3%
12
13
14
15
16
All the inputs moving at once
5,000 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.0%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$3.77
Median$12.17
90th percentile$22.11
$0.00$10.00$20.00$30.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$7.66</b> and <b>$17.03</b>; one in ten below $3.77, one in ten above $22.11.
Does the long run make sense?
1.4×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 1.4 times that year's EBITDA.
3%To grow 2.5% forever while reinvesting 82% of its after-tax operating profit, the business must earn 3% on the new capital.
49%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
What lenders charge, after the tax saving on interest: 6.74% × (1 − 24.0%) = <strong>5.12%</strong>.
Weighted by how much of each the company uses (book value (no price given)): <strong>10.24%</strong>, the rate every future cash flow is discounted at.
What it has filed lately
The last twelve months at the SEC, most important first: annual and quarterly reports, events, large holders and insiders.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 5 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market$354,7502 purchase(s) by 2 insider(s)
Sold on the open market$903,8352 sale(s) by 2 insider(s)
Under pre-arranged plans0%of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Which large funds report holding it
From the Form 13F of the 28 institutions followed on this site, as of the end of their last reported quarter. A 13F is filed up to 45 days later and shows only long positions in US-listed shares.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.