GNRC · Technology(motors & generators) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-12-31
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
Generac Holdings Inc. reported revenue of $4.2 billion in fiscal 2025, after growing 12.6% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin narrowed from 14.0% in 2016 to 6.9%, and it earned 6.1% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $3.7 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 33.1% went to buybacks and 29.5% to acquisitions; the share count fell 9.3%. On the accounting screens, it passes 6 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 4.52 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; 1 of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 20254.2B+12.6% a year over 9 years
Operating margin6.9%gross margin 38.3%
Return on invested capital6.1%11.2% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay218.2M5.2% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA1.8×net debt 865.1M
Piotroski F-score6/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
02.0B4.0B6.0B
2016Revenue 1.4BOperating income 202.8M
2017Revenue 1.7BOperating income 250.6M
2018Revenue 2.0BOperating income 357.2M
2019Revenue 2.2BOperating income 372.2M
2020Revenue 2.5BOperating income 479.1M
2021Revenue 3.7BOperating income 721.1M
2022Revenue 4.6BOperating income 566.3M
2023Revenue 4.0BOperating income 386.2M
2024Revenue 4.3BOperating income 536.7M
2025Revenue 4.2BOperating income 289.2M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
-2.7%
+11.1%
+12.6%
Operating income
-20.1%
-9.6%
+4.0%
Net income
-26.4%
-14.6%
+5.7%
Earnings per share
-24.2%
-13.3%
+6.8%
Free cash flow per share
—
-7.4%
+3.8%
Dividend per share
+1.1%
—
+17.4%
Shares
-2.9%
-1.4%
-1.1%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 8.5%
0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%
2016Return on invested capital 30.8%
2017Return on invested capital 13.2%
2018Return on invested capital 16.7%
2019Return on invested capital 15.8%
2020Return on invested capital 16.7%
2021Return on invested capital 18.7%
2022Return on invested capital 12.5%
2023Return on invested capital 7.6%
2024Return on invested capital 11.0%
2025Return on invested capital 6.1%
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
-200.0M0200.0M400.0M
2016Economic profit 92.9M
2017Economic profit 70.2M
2018Economic profit 136.2M
2019Economic profit 135.9M
2020Economic profit 184.4M
2021Economic profit 318.1M
2022Economic profit 147.3M
2023Economic profit -34.3M
2024Economic profit 96.7M
2025Economic profit -90.6M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
6.1%
Return on assets
2.9%
Asset turnover
0.76×
Research & development
5.8% of revenue
Overheads (SG&A)
10.0% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-200.0M0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M
2016Net income 97.2MFree cash flow 210.7MAfter stock-based pay 201.2M
2017Net income 157.8MFree cash flow 224.1MAfter stock-based pay 213.9M
2018Net income 238.3MFree cash flow 199.6MAfter stock-based pay 185.1M
2019Net income 252.0MFree cash flow 248.1MAfter stock-based pay 231.4M
2020Net income 350.6MFree cash flow 424.4MAfter stock-based pay 403.5M
2021Net income 550.5MFree cash flow 301.2MAfter stock-based pay 277.2M
2022Net income 399.5MFree cash flow -27.7MAfter stock-based pay -57.2M
2023Net income 214.6MFree cash flow 392.6MAfter stock-based pay 357.1M
2024Net income 316.3MFree cash flow 604.6MAfter stock-based pay 555.3M
2025Net income 159.6MFree cash flow 268.1MAfter stock-based pay 218.2M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2016–2025
3.7B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 23%866.1M
Acquisitions 29%1.1B
Dividends 0%1.6M
Share buybacks 33%1.2B
Kept, or used to pay down debt 14%519.6M
Over the same years it paid 260.0M in stock. The share count fell 9.3%. 969.7M of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$-5.00$0.00$5.00$10.00$15.00
2016Earnings per share $1.49Free cash flow per share $3.22Dividend per share $0.00
2017Earnings per share $2.52Free cash flow per share $3.58Dividend per share $0.00
2018Earnings per share $3.83Free cash flow per share $3.21Dividend per share $0.01
2019Earnings per share $4.01Free cash flow per share $3.95Dividend per share $0.00
2020Earnings per share $5.50Free cash flow per share $6.66Dividend per share $0.00
2021Earnings per share $8.57Free cash flow per share $4.69Dividend per share $0.00
2022Earnings per share $6.18Free cash flow per share $-0.43Dividend per share $0.00
2023Earnings per share $3.46Free cash flow per share $6.33Dividend per share $0.00
2024Earnings per share $5.24Free cash flow per share $10.02Dividend per share $0.00
2025Earnings per share $2.69Free cash flow per share $4.52Dividend per share $0.00
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
58.0M60.0M62.0M64.0M66.0M
2016Diluted shares 65.4M
2017Diluted shares 62.6M
2018Diluted shares 62.2M
2019Diluted shares 62.9M
2020Diluted shares 63.7M
2021Diluted shares 64.3M
2022Diluted shares 64.7M
2023Diluted shares 62.1M
2024Diluted shares 60.4M
2025Diluted shares 59.3M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
-500.0M0500.0M1.0B1.5B
2016Net debt -51.8M
2017Net debt 797.5M
2018Net debt 677.4M
2019Net debt 509.9M
2020Net debt 180.7M
2021Net debt 736.4M
2022Net debt 1.2B
2023Net debt 1.3B
2024Net debt 990.7M
2025Net debt 865.1M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
1.8×
Interest coverage
4× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
2.03 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
166 days collects in 52d, stock 175d, pays in 61d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
6of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✕Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforefailed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✓Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellpassed
✓More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforepassed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✕Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforefailed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
4.52safe zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.22 × 6.56+1.47
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.54 × 3.26+1.76
Operating income ÷ assets 0.05 × 6.72+0.35
Equity ÷ liabilities 0.90 × 1.05+0.94
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.85below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.00+0.92
Gross margin slipping 1.01+0.53
Soft assets 0.88+0.36
Sales growth 0.98+0.87
Slower depreciation 1.03+0.12
Overheads vs sales 1.51-0.26
Profit not in cash -0.05-0.23
Leverage rising 0.98-0.32
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Inventory is growing 21% against revenue growing -2%.
Benign
Stocking up for a launch, or securing supply.
Worrying
Demand is softening; discounts or write-downs tend to follow.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$119.66discounted at 8.5% a year · 60% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
44.5×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
16.4×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
1.9×
Free cash flow yield
3.1%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today3.2B
Everything after, today4.8B
The whole business8.0B
Minus net debt-865.1M
What belongs to shareholders7.1B
Divided among 59.3M shares: <strong>$119.66</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
-200.0M0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M
2016Reported 201.2M
2017Reported 213.9M
2018Reported 185.1M
2019Reported 231.4M
2020Reported 403.5M
2021Reported 277.2M
2022Reported -57.2M
2023Reported 357.1M
2024Reported 555.3M
2025Reported 218.2M
2026Projected 361.2M
2027Projected 397.5M
2028Projected 433.7M
2029Projected 469.1M
2030Projected 503.0M
2031Projected 534.6M
2032Projected 563.1M
2033Projected 587.8M
2034Projected 608.1M
2035Projected 623.3M
2016201820202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
4.7B
5.1B
5.6B
6.1B
6.5B
6.9B
7.3B
7.6B
7.9B
8.1B
Growth
11.0%
10.1%
9.1%
8.2%
7.2%
6.3%
5.3%
4.4%
3.4%
2.5%
Cash margin
7.7%
7.7%
7.7%
7.7%
7.7%
7.7%
7.7%
7.7%
7.7%
7.7%
Free cash flow
361.2M
397.5M
433.7M
469.1M
503.0M
534.6M
563.1M
587.8M
608.1M
623.3M
Worth today
333.0M
337.9M
339.9M
338.9M
335.0M
328.3M
318.8M
306.8M
292.6M
276.5M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
7.5%
124
135
148
163
183
8.0%
113
122
132
145
160
8.5%
103
111
120
130
142
9.0%
95
101
109
117
127
9.5%
88
93
100
107
115
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
7.0%
9.0%
11.0%
13.0%
15.0%
6.2%
81
89
98
107
117
7.0%
90
99
109
119
130
7.7%
99
109
120
131
143
8.5%
108
119
131
143
156
9.3%
118
129
142
155
169
All the inputs moving at once
5,000 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.0%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$75.30
Median$119.45
90th percentile$185.64
$100.00$200.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$94.64</b> and <b>$150.77</b>; one in ten below $75.30, one in ten above $185.64.
Does the long run make sense?
11.5×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 11.5 times that year's EBITDA.
Free growthIn year 10 free cash flow is at or above after-tax operating profit, yet the model grows 2.5% forever. Growth needs reinvestment; this assumes it comes for free, which flatters the terminal value.
60%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 3 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market$1.3M9 sale(s) by 3 insider(s)
Under pre-arranged plans100%of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Which large funds report holding it
From the Form 13F of the 28 institutions followed on this site, as of the end of their last reported quarter. A 13F is filed up to 45 days later and shows only long positions in US-listed shares.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.