CZR · Consumer discretionary(hotels & motels) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-12-31
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
Caesars Entertainment, Inc. reported revenue of $11.5 billion in fiscal 2025, after growing 32.7% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin widened from 9.9% in 2016 to 16.2%, and it earned 12.5% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $6.7 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 115.4% went to acquisitions and 81.5% back into the business; the share count rose 336.0%. On the accounting screens, it passes 6 of 8 Piotroski tests and its Altman Z'' of 0.09 is in the distress zone; 3 of the six cross-checks between its statements fire.
Revenue, fiscal 202511.5B+32.7% a year over 9 years
Operating margin16.2%gross margin —
Return on invested capital12.5%57.9% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay402.0M3.5% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA3.3×net debt 10.9B
Piotroski F-score6/8tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
-5.0B05.0B10.0B15.0B
2016Revenue 900.5MOperating income 88.7M
2017Revenue 1.5BOperating income 94.8M
2018Revenue 2.1BOperating income 310.0M
2019Revenue 2.5BOperating income 410.0M
2020Revenue 3.6BOperating income -383.0M
2021Revenue 9.6BOperating income 1.5B
2022Revenue 10.8BOperating income 1.7B
2023Revenue 11.5BOperating income 2.5B
2024Revenue 11.2BOperating income 2.3B
2025Revenue 11.5BOperating income 1.9B
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
+2.0%
+25.9%
+32.7%
Operating income
+2.2%
—
+40.2%
Free cash flow per share
+131.9%
—
+9.1%
Shares
-0.9%
+9.9%
+17.8%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 12.5%
-100.0%0.0%100.0%200.0%300.0%
2016Return on invested capital 5.3%
2017Return on invested capital 11.2%
2018Return on invested capital 5.1%
2019Return on invested capital 7.2%
2020Return on invested capital -2.2%
2021Return on invested capital 9.8%
2022Return on invested capital 11.3%
2023Return on invested capital 231.9%
2024Return on invested capital 24.1%
2025Return on invested capital 12.5%
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
-10.0B010.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B
2016Economic profit -79.0M
2017Economic profit -41.0M
2018Economic profit -317.5M
2019Economic profit -194.7M
2020Economic profit -2.8B
2021Economic profit -495.2M
2022Economic profit -191.9M
2023Economic profit 37.0B
2024Economic profit 1.9B
2025Economic profit -4.7M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
-14.3%
Return on assets
-1.6%
Asset turnover
0.36×
Overheads (SG&A)
16.8% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-2.0B-1.0B01.0B
2016Net income 24.5MFree cash flow 52.2MAfter stock-based pay 48.9M
2017Net income 73.4MFree cash flow 46.7MAfter stock-based pay 40.4M
2018Net income 95.0MFree cash flow 176.3MAfter stock-based pay 163.3M
2019Net income 81.0MFree cash flow 141.5MAfter stock-based pay 121.5M
2020Net income -1.8BFree cash flow -725.0MAfter stock-based pay -804.0M
2021Net income -1.0BFree cash flow 679.0MAfter stock-based pay 597.0M
2022Net income -899.0MFree cash flow 41.0MAfter stock-based pay -60.0M
2023Net income 786.0MFree cash flow 545.0MAfter stock-based pay 441.0M
2024Net income -278.0MFree cash flow -221.0MAfter stock-based pay -315.0M
2025Net income -502.0MFree cash flow 497.0MAfter stock-based pay 402.0M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2016–2025
6.7B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 82%5.4B
Acquisitions 115%7.7B
Dividends 0%0
Share buybacks 6%429.0M
More than it generated: funded with cash or new debt -103%-6.9B
Over the same years it paid 597.7M in stock. The share count rose 336.0%. The buybacks did not even cover what was handed out in stock.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$-15.00$-10.00$-5.00$0.00$5.00
2016Earnings per share $0.51Free cash flow per share $1.09
2017Earnings per share $1.08Free cash flow per share $0.69
2018Earnings per share $1.22Free cash flow per share $2.26
2019Earnings per share $1.03Free cash flow per share $1.79
2020Earnings per share $-13.52Free cash flow per share $-5.58
2021Earnings per share $-4.83Free cash flow per share $3.22
2022Earnings per share $-4.20Free cash flow per share $0.19
2023Earnings per share $3.64Free cash flow per share $2.52
2024Earnings per share $-1.29Free cash flow per share $-1.03
2025Earnings per share $-2.41Free cash flow per share $2.39
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M250.0M
2016Diluted shares 47.7M
2017Diluted shares 68.1M
2018Diluted shares 78.0M
2019Diluted shares 79.0M
2020Diluted shares 130.0M
2021Diluted shares 211.0M
2022Diluted shares 214.0M
2023Diluted shares 216.0M
2024Diluted shares 215.0M
2025Diluted shares 208.0M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
05.0B10.0B15.0B
2016Net debt 739.4M
2017Net debt 2.1B
2018Net debt 3.0B
2019Net debt 2.4B
2020Net debt 12.4B
2021Net debt 12.7B
2022Net debt 11.7B
2023Net debt 11.3B
2024Net debt 11.3B
2025Net debt 10.9B
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
3.3×
Interest coverage
1× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
0.80 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
— collects in 15d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
6of 8 tests passed
✕ProfitableReturn on assets above zerofailed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✕Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforefailed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✓Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellpassed
✓More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforepassed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
–Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year before — not reportedno data
✓Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforepassed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
0.09distress zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets -0.01 × 6.56-0.09
Retained earnings ÷ assets -0.10 × 3.26-0.34
Operating income ÷ assets 0.06 × 6.72+0.39
Equity ÷ liabilities 0.13 × 1.05+0.13
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
The accounts lack too many of the lines it needs.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Capital spending (805M) is well below depreciation (1,417M).
Benign
Mature assets, or a business that has become less capital-intensive.
Worrying
Under-investing: today's profit is being held up by consuming tomorrow's capacity.
The effective tax rate is -2.5%.
Benign
A favourable geographic mix, or legitimate tax credits.
Worrying
Not sustainable; projecting it forward inflates the valuation.
Net debt is 3.3 times EBITDA.
Benign
A stable sector with predictable cash flows and comfortable maturities.
Worrying
Little room if earnings fall; the maturity schedule is what to check.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$1,696.14discounted at 12.5% a year · 47% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
—
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
111.1×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
31.7×
Free cash flow yield
0.1%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today192.5B
Everything after, today171.2B
The whole business363.7B
Minus net debt-10.9B
What belongs to shareholders352.8B
Divided among 208.0M shares: <strong>$1,696.14</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
-20.0B020.0B40.0B60.0B
2016Reported 48.9M
2017Reported 40.4M
2018Reported 163.3M
2019Reported 121.5M
2020Reported -804.0M
2021Reported 597.0M
2022Reported -60.0M
2023Reported 441.0M
2024Reported -315.0M
2025Reported 402.0M
2026Projected 19.0B
2027Projected 23.3B
2028Projected 27.9B
2029Projected 32.8B
2030Projected 37.8B
2031Projected 42.5B
2032Projected 46.7B
2033Projected 50.2B
2034Projected 52.7B
2035Projected 54.1B
2016201820202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
14.4B
17.6B
21.1B
24.8B
28.5B
32.1B
35.3B
37.9B
39.8B
40.8B
Growth
25.0%
22.5%
20.0%
17.5%
15.0%
12.5%
10.0%
7.5%
5.0%
2.5%
Cash margin
132.4%
132.4%
132.4%
132.4%
132.4%
132.4%
132.4%
132.4%
132.4%
132.4%
Free cash flow
19.0B
23.3B
27.9B
32.8B
37.8B
42.5B
46.7B
50.2B
52.7B
54.1B
Worth today
16.9B
18.4B
19.6B
20.5B
21.0B
21.0B
20.5B
19.6B
18.3B
16.7B
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
11.5%
1,756
1,834
1,921
2,017
2,126
12.0%
1,656
1,726
1,803
1,888
1,983
12.5%
1,566
1,628
1,696
1,771
1,855
13.0%
1,484
1,540
1,601
1,668
1,742
13.5%
1,410
1,460
1,515
1,574
1,640
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
21.0%
23.0%
25.0%
27.0%
29.0%
105.9%
1,232
1,328
1,430
1,539
1,655
119.2%
1,345
1,451
1,563
1,683
1,811
132.4%
1,459
1,573
1,696
1,827
1,967
145.6%
1,572
1,696
1,829
1,971
2,123
158.9%
1,685
1,819
1,962
2,116
2,279
All the inputs moving at once
5,000 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 19.9%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$967.63
Median$1,174.58
90th percentile$1,447.12
$1,000.00$1,250.00$1,500.00$1,750.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$1,058.40</b> and <b>$1,306.13</b>; one in ten below $967.63, one in ten above $1,447.12.
Does the long run make sense?
47.7×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 47.7 times that year's EBITDA.
Free growthIn year 10 free cash flow is at or above after-tax operating profit, yet the model grows 2.5% forever. Growth needs reinvestment; this assumes it comes for free, which flatters the terminal value.
47%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
What lenders charge, after the tax saving on interest: 13.17% × (1 − 0.0%) = <strong>13.17%</strong>.
Weighted by how much of each the company uses (book value (no price given)): <strong>12.48%</strong>, the rate every future cash flow is discounted at.
What it has filed lately
The last twelve months at the SEC, most important first: annual and quarterly reports, events, large holders and insiders.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 5 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market$11.0M9 sale(s) by 5 insider(s)
Under pre-arranged plans0%of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Which large funds report holding it
From the Form 13F of the 28 institutions followed on this site, as of the end of their last reported quarter. A 13F is filed up to 45 days later and shows only long positions in US-listed shares.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.