CMCO · Industrials(construction machinery & equip) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2026-03-31
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
Columbus Mckinnon Corp reported revenue of $1.2 billion in fiscal 2026, after growing 7.2% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin narrowed from 3.7% in 2017 to -10.0%, and it earned -3.5% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $514.4 million its operations generated over 10 years, 679.6% went to acquisitions and 29.7% back into the business; the share count rose 37.5%. On the accounting screens, it passes 3 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 1.20 is in the grey zone and its Beneish M-score is above the -1.78 line; 4 of the six cross-checks between its statements fire.
Revenue, fiscal 20261.2B+7.2% a year over 9 years
Operating margin-10.0%gross margin 30.1%
Return on invested capital-3.5%3.2% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay-173.6M-14.5% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA-54.0×net debt 2.3B
Piotroski F-score3/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
-500.0M0500.0M1.0B1.5B
2017Revenue 637.1MOperating income 23.7M
2018Revenue 839.4MOperating income 68.3M
2019Revenue 876.3MOperating income 69.4M
2020Revenue 809.2MOperating income 89.8M
2021Revenue 649.6MOperating income 42.3M
2022Revenue 906.6MOperating income 73.8M
2023Revenue 936.2MOperating income 97.8M
2024Revenue 1.0BOperating income 107.1M
2025Revenue 963.0MOperating income 54.6M
2026Revenue 1.2BOperating income -119.3M
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
+8.4%
+12.9%
+7.2%
Dividend per share
+0.2%
+3.4%
+6.5%
Shares
-0.1%
+3.5%
+3.6%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Needs a cost of capital, which comes from the valuation below.
Return on equity
-15.8%
Return on assets
-4.8%
Asset turnover
0.25×
Research & development
1.8% of revenue
Overheads (SG&A)
14.9% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-300.0M-200.0M-100.0M0100.0M
2017Net income 9.0MFree cash flow 46.1MAfter stock-based pay 40.2M
2018Net income 22.1MFree cash flow 55.1MAfter stock-based pay 49.6M
2019Net income 42.6MFree cash flow 67.2MAfter stock-based pay 61.0M
2020Net income 59.7MFree cash flow 97.4MAfter stock-based pay 92.9M
2021Net income 9.1MFree cash flow 86.6MAfter stock-based pay 78.6M
2022Net income 29.7MFree cash flow 35.8MAfter stock-based pay 24.5M
2023Net income 48.4MFree cash flow 71.0MAfter stock-based pay 60.6M
2024Net income 46.6MFree cash flow 42.4MAfter stock-based pay 30.3M
2025Net income -5.1MFree cash flow 24.2MAfter stock-based pay 17.9M
2026Net income -229.5MFree cash flow -164.1MAfter stock-based pay -173.6M
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2017–2026
514.4M generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 30%152.7M
Acquisitions 680%3.5B
Dividends 12%61.7M
Share buybacks 2%11.0M
More than it generated: funded with cash or new debt -623%-3.2B
Over the same years it paid 79.8M in stock. The share count rose 37.5%. The buybacks did not even cover what was handed out in stock.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$-10.00$-5.00$0.00$5.00
2017Earnings per share $0.43Free cash flow per share $2.21Dividend per share $0.16
2018Earnings per share $0.95Free cash flow per share $2.36Dividend per share $0.16
2019Earnings per share $1.80Free cash flow per share $2.84Dividend per share $0.20
2020Earnings per share $2.50Free cash flow per share $4.08Dividend per share $0.24
2021Earnings per share $0.38Free cash flow per share $3.58Dividend per share $0.24
2022Earnings per share $1.04Free cash flow per share $1.26Dividend per share $0.23
2023Earnings per share $1.68Free cash flow per share $2.46Dividend per share $0.28
2024Earnings per share $1.61Free cash flow per share $1.46Dividend per share $0.28
2025Earnings per share $-0.18Free cash flow per share $0.84Dividend per share $0.28
2026Earnings per share $-7.99Free cash flow per share $-5.71Dividend per share $0.28
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
20.0M22.5M25.0M27.5M30.0M
2017Diluted shares 20.9M
2018Diluted shares 23.3M
2019Diluted shares 23.7M
2020Diluted shares 23.9M
2021Diluted shares 24.2M
2022Diluted shares 28.4M
2023Diluted shares 28.8M
2024Diluted shares 29.0M
2025Diluted shares 28.7M
2026Diluted shares 28.7M
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
01.0B2.0B3.0B
2017Net debt 343.7M
2018Net debt 300.3M
2019Net debt 229.2M
2020Net debt 136.9M
2021Net debt 46.8M
2022Net debt 382.3M
2023Net debt 324.9M
2024Net debt 403.2M
2025Net debt 405.0M
2026Net debt 2.3B
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
-54.0×
Interest coverage
— operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
2.02 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
— collects in 116d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
3of 9 tests passed
✕ProfitableReturn on assets above zerofailed
✕Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zerofailed
✕Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforefailed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✕Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellfailed
✓More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforepassed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✕Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforefailed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
1.20grey zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.12 × 6.56+0.82
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.03 × 3.26+0.09
Operating income ÷ assets -0.02 × 6.72-0.17
Equity ÷ liabilities 0.43 × 1.05+0.46
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-1.62above the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.85+1.71
Gross margin slipping 1.12+0.59
Soft assets 1.00+0.40
Sales growth 1.24+1.11
Slower depreciation 1.97+0.23
Overheads vs sales 1.34-0.23
Profit not in cash -0.02-0.08
Leverage rising 1.53-0.50
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Receivables are growing 130% against revenue growing 24%.
Benign
A shift towards larger customers on longer terms, or sales concentrated at the end of the period.
Worrying
Sales are being made on looser credit, or revenue has been booked that may never be collected.
Inventory is growing 207% against revenue growing 24%.
Benign
Stocking up for a launch, or securing supply.
Worrying
Demand is softening; discounts or write-downs tend to follow.
Capital spending (18M) is well below depreciation (77M).
Benign
Mature assets, or a business that has become less capital-intensive.
Worrying
Under-investing: today's profit is being held up by consuming tomorrow's capacity.
The effective tax rate is -11.1%.
Benign
A favourable geographic mix, or legitimate tax credits.
Worrying
Not sustainable; projecting it forward inflates the valuation.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
With a free cash flow margin at or below zero in year ten, the business never generates cash for its owners and a DCF says nothing useful. Set a positive margin for year ten to see what it would take.
What it has filed lately
The last twelve months at the SEC, most important first: annual and quarterly reports, events, large holders and insiders.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 5 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market$47,1351 purchase(s) by 1 insider(s)
Sold on the open market—none in the period
Under pre-arranged plans—of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Companies like this one
Same SEC industry (construction machinery & equip) first, then the rest of industrials.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.