CLFD · Technology(telephone & telegraph apparatus) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-09-30
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
Clearfield, Inc. reported revenue of $150.1 million in fiscal 2025, after growing 8.0% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin narrowed from 14.3% in 2016 to 1.4%. Of the $124.1 million its operations generated over 10 years, 45.3% went to buybacks and 33.5% back into the business; the share count rose 2.4%. On the accounting screens, it passes 6 of 8 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 10.03 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; none of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 2025150.1M+8.0% a year over 9 years
Operating margin1.4%gross margin 33.7%
Return on invested capital—13.3% on average over 4 years
Free cash flow after stock pay17.2M11.5% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA—net debt —
Piotroski F-score6/8tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
-100.0M0100.0M200.0M300.0M
2016Revenue 75.3MOperating income 10.7M
2017Revenue 73.9MOperating income 5.3M
2018Revenue 77.7MOperating income 5.1M
2019Revenue 85.0MOperating income 5.2M
2020Revenue 93.1MOperating income 8.4M
2021Revenue 140.8MOperating income 25.2M
2022Revenue 270.9MOperating income 63.8M
2023Revenue 225.7MOperating income 37.6M
2024Revenue 125.6MOperating income -19.2M
2025Revenue 150.1MOperating income 2.1M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
-17.9%
+10.0%
+8.0%
Operating income
-67.9%
-24.1%
-16.5%
Free cash flow per share
—
+34.4%
+8.8%
Shares
+0.2%
+0.5%
+0.3%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 10.2%
-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021Return on invested capital 19.2%
2022Return on invested capital 33.4%
2023Return on invested capital 9.4%
2024Return on invested capital -8.9%
2025
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
-75.0M-50.0M-25.0M025.0M50.0M
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021Economic profit 9.4M
2022Economic profit 34.3M
2023Economic profit -2.5M
2024Economic profit -52.6M
2025
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
-3.1%
Return on assets
-2.6%
Asset turnover
0.49×
Research & development
1.6% of revenue
Overheads (SG&A)
32.3% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-20.0M020.0M40.0M60.0M
2016Net income 8.0MFree cash flow 10.0MAfter stock-based pay 8.6M
2017Net income 3.8MFree cash flow 4.3MAfter stock-based pay 2.0M
2018Net income 4.3MFree cash flow 3.4MAfter stock-based pay 1.4M
2019Net income 4.6MFree cash flow 12.2MAfter stock-based pay 10.5M
2020Net income 7.3MFree cash flow 4.8MAfter stock-based pay 4.1M
2021Net income 20.3MFree cash flow 8.9MAfter stock-based pay 7.6M
2022Net income 49.4MFree cash flow -6.2MAfter stock-based pay -8.6M
2023Net income 32.5MFree cash flow 10.7MAfter stock-based pay 7.2M
2024Net income -12.5MFree cash flow 12.7MAfter stock-based pay 8.3M
2025Net income -8.1MFree cash flow 21.8MAfter stock-based pay 17.2M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2016–2025
124.1M generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 34%41.6M
Acquisitions 13%16.2M
Dividends 0%0
Share buybacks 45%56.2M
Kept, or used to pay down debt 8%10.1M
Over the same years it paid 24.4M in stock. The share count rose 2.4%. 31.8M of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$-2.00$0.00$2.00$4.00
2016Earnings per share $0.59Free cash flow per share $0.73
2017Earnings per share $0.28Free cash flow per share $0.31
2018Earnings per share $0.32Free cash flow per share $0.25
2019Earnings per share $0.34Free cash flow per share $0.91
2020Earnings per share $0.53Free cash flow per share $0.36
2021Earnings per share $1.47Free cash flow per share $0.64
2022Earnings per share $3.55Free cash flow per share $-0.45
2023Earnings per share $2.17Free cash flow per share $0.72
2024Earnings per share $-0.85Free cash flow per share $0.87
2025Earnings per share $-0.58Free cash flow per share $1.56
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
13.0M13.5M14.0M14.5M15.0M15.5M
2016Diluted shares 13.7M
2017Diluted shares 13.7M
2018Diluted shares 13.5M
2019Diluted shares 13.5M
2020Diluted shares 13.6M
2021Diluted shares 13.8M
2022Diluted shares 13.9M
2023Diluted shares 15.0M
2024Diluted shares 14.6M
2025Diluted shares 14.0M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
-40.0M-30.0M-20.0M-10.0M0
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021Net debt -13.2M
2022Net debt -16.6M
2023Net debt -35.7M
2024Net debt -14.1M
2025
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
—
Interest coverage
— operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
5.42 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
172 days collects in 44d, stock 154d, pays in 26d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
6of 8 tests passed
✕ProfitableReturn on assets above zerofailed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✓Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforepassed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
–Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fell — not reportedno data
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✓Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforepassed
✓Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforepassed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
10.03safe zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.53 × 6.56+3.47
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.35 × 3.26+1.14
Operating income ÷ assets 0.01 × 6.72+0.05
Equity ÷ liabilities 5.12 × 1.05+5.38
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.98below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.09+1.00
Gross margin slipping 0.61+0.32
Soft assets 1.45+0.58
Sales growth 1.20+1.07
Slower depreciation 0.70+0.08
Overheads vs sales 0.90-0.15
Profit not in cash -0.11-0.53
Leverage rising 1.55-0.51
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
None of the six cross-checks fires for the latest year: receivables and inventory move with revenue, profit turns into cash, investment keeps up with depreciation, the tax rate is ordinary and debt is moderate.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$18.42discounted at 10.2% a year · 51% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
—
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
31.3×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
1.7×
Free cash flow yield
6.7%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today125.4M
Everything after, today132.3M
The whole business257.7M
Minus net debt-0
What belongs to shareholders257.7M
Divided among 14.0M shares: <strong>$18.42</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
-10.0M010.0M20.0M30.0M
2016Reported 8.6M
2017Reported 2.0M
2018Reported 1.4M
2019Reported 10.5M
2020Reported 4.1M
2021Reported 7.6M
2022Reported -8.6M
2023Reported 7.2M
2024Reported 8.3M
2025Reported 17.2M
2026Projected 15.7M
2027Projected 17.1M
2028Projected 18.6M
2029Projected 19.9M
2030Projected 21.3M
2031Projected 22.5M
2032Projected 23.6M
2033Projected 24.6M
2034Projected 25.4M
2035Projected 26.1M
2016201820202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
165.1M
180.3M
195.3M
210.0M
224.0M
237.0M
248.9M
259.2M
267.9M
274.6M
Growth
10.0%
9.2%
8.3%
7.5%
6.7%
5.8%
5.0%
4.2%
3.3%
2.5%
Cash margin
9.5%
9.5%
9.5%
9.5%
9.5%
9.5%
9.5%
9.5%
9.5%
9.5%
Free cash flow
15.7M
17.1M
18.6M
19.9M
21.3M
22.5M
23.6M
24.6M
25.4M
26.1M
Worth today
14.2M
14.1M
13.9M
13.5M
13.1M
12.6M
12.0M
11.3M
10.6M
9.9M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
9.2%
19
20
21
23
24
9.7%
18
19
20
21
22
10.2%
17
18
18
19
21
10.7%
16
16
17
18
19
11.2%
15
16
16
17
18
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
7.6%
13
14
16
17
18
8.6%
15
16
17
18
20
9.5%
16
17
18
20
22
10.4%
17
18
20
21
23
11.4%
18
20
21
23
25
All the inputs moving at once
5,000 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.0%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$13.45
Median$18.48
90th percentile$25.47
$20.00$30.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$15.59</b> and <b>$21.73</b>; one in ten below $13.45, one in ten above $25.47.
Does the long run make sense?
23.1×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 23.1 times that year's EBITDA.
Free growthIn year 10 free cash flow is at or above after-tax operating profit, yet the model grows 2.5% forever. Growth needs reinvestment; this assumes it comes for free, which flatters the terminal value.
51%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
What lenders charge, after the tax saving on interest: 6.67% × (1 − 27.2%) = <strong>4.86%</strong>.
Weighted by how much of each the company uses (book value (no price given)): <strong>10.17%</strong>, the rate every future cash flow is discounted at.
What it has filed lately
The last twelve months at the SEC, most important first: annual and quarterly reports, events, large holders and insiders.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 4 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market$138,4182 sale(s) by 2 insider(s)
Under pre-arranged plans50%of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Companies like this one
Same SEC industry (telephone & telegraph apparatus) first, then the rest of technology.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.