BLDR · Consumer discretionary(retail-lumber & other building materials dealers) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-12-31
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
Builders FirstSource, Inc. reported revenue of $15.2 billion in fiscal 2025, after growing 10.1% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin widened from 3.7% in 2016 to 5.2%. Of the $12.1 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 66.6% went to buybacks and 30.2% to acquisitions. On the accounting screens, it passes 5 of 8 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 1.97 is in the grey zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; 1 of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 202515.2B+10.1% a year over 9 years
Operating margin5.2%gross margin 30.4%
Return on invested capital—
Free cash flow after stock pay799.8M5.3% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA—net debt —
Piotroski F-score5/8tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
010B20B30B
2016Revenue 6.4BOperating income 236.3M
2017Revenue 7.0BOperating income 285.1M
2018Revenue 7.7BOperating income 369.0M
2019Revenue 7.3BOperating income 392.3M
2020Revenue 8.6BOperating income 543.9M
2021Revenue 19.9BOperating income 2.4B
2022Revenue 22.7BOperating income 3.8B
2023Revenue 17.1BOperating income 2.2B
2024Revenue 16.4BOperating income 1.6B
2025Revenue 15.2BOperating income 786.3M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
-12.6%
+12.2%
+10.1%
Operating income
-40.7%
+7.7%
+14.3%
Net income
-45.9%
+6.8%
+13.0%
Earnings per share
-38.6%
+7.9%
+13.2%
Free cash flow per share
-27.4%
+43.5%
+25.1%
Shares
-11.9%
-1.1%
-0.2%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 10.2%
0%5%10%15%
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Needs a cost of capital, which comes from the valuation below.
Return on equity
10.0%
Return on assets
3.9%
Asset turnover
1.35×
Overheads (SG&A)
25.2% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
01B2B3B4B
2016Net income 144.3MFree cash flow 115.6MAfter stock-based pay 105.0M
2017Net income 38.8MFree cash flow 116.1MAfter stock-based pay 102.6M
2018Net income 205.2MFree cash flow 181.4MAfter stock-based pay 167.0M
2019Net income 221.8MFree cash flow 391.2MAfter stock-based pay 378.9M
2020Net income 313.5MFree cash flow 148.0MAfter stock-based pay 131.0M
2021Net income 1.7BFree cash flow 1.5BAfter stock-based pay 1.5B
2022Net income 2.7BFree cash flow 3.3BAfter stock-based pay 3.2B
2023Net income 1.5BFree cash flow 1.8BAfter stock-based pay 1.8B
2024Net income 1.1BFree cash flow 1.5BAfter stock-based pay 1.4B
2025Net income 435.2MFree cash flow 853.3MAfter stock-based pay 799.8M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2016–2025
12.1B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 18%2.2B
Acquisitions 30%3.7B
Dividends 0%0
Share buybacks 67%8.1B
More than it generated: funded with cash or new debt -15%-1.8B
Over the same years it paid 295.7M in stock. The share count fell 1.6%. 7.8B of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$0$5$10$15$20
2016Earnings per share $1.27Free cash flow per share $1.02
2017Earnings per share $0.34Free cash flow per share $1.00
2018Earnings per share $1.76Free cash flow per share $1.56
2019Earnings per share $1.90Free cash flow per share $3.34
2020Earnings per share $2.66Free cash flow per share $1.25
2021Earnings per share $8.48Free cash flow per share $7.45
2022Earnings per share $16.82Free cash flow per share $19.94
2023Earnings per share $11.94Free cash flow per share $14.19
2024Earnings per share $9.06Free cash flow per share $12.54
2025Earnings per share $3.89Free cash flow per share $7.63
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
100M125M150M175M200M225M
2016Diluted shares 113.6M
2017Diluted shares 115.6M
2018Diluted shares 116.6M
2019Diluted shares 117.0M
2020Diluted shares 117.9M
2021Diluted shares 203.5M
2022Diluted shares 163.5M
2023Diluted shares 129.0M
2024Diluted shares 119.0M
2025Diluted shares 111.8M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Debt and liquidity
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
—
Interest coverage
— operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
1.86 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
39 days collects in 25d, stock 38d, pays in 25d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
5of 8 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✕Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforefailed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
–Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fell — not reportedno data
✓More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforepassed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✕Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforefailed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
1.97grey zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.12 × 6.56+0.79
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.01 × 3.26+0.04
Operating income ÷ assets 0.07 × 6.72+0.47
Equity ÷ liabilities 0.63 × 1.05+0.66
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.78below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 0.98+0.91
Gross margin slipping 1.08+0.57
Soft assets 1.05+0.42
Sales growth 0.93+0.83
Slower depreciation 1.05+0.12
Overheads vs sales 1.09-0.19
Profit not in cash -0.07-0.33
Leverage rising 0.83-0.27
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Capital spending (363M) is well below depreciation (591M).
Benign
Mature assets, or a business that has become less capital-intensive.
Worrying
Under-investing: today's profit is being held up by consuming tomorrow's capacity.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$246.08discounted at 10.2% a year · 52% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
63.2×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
20.0×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
1.8×
Free cash flow yield
2.9%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today13.3B
Everything after, today14.2B
The whole business27.5B
Minus net debt-0
What belongs to shareholders27.5B
Divided among 111.8M shares: <strong>$246.08</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
01B2B3B4B
2016Reported 105.0M
2017Reported 102.6M
2018Reported 167.0M
2019Reported 378.9M
2020Reported 131.0M
2021Reported 1.5B
2022Reported 3.2B
2023Reported 1.8B
2024Reported 1.4B
2025Reported 799.8M
2026Projected 1.6B
2027Projected 1.8B
2028Projected 1.9B
2029Projected 2.1B
2030Projected 2.3B
2031Projected 2.4B
2032Projected 2.6B
2033Projected 2.7B
2034Projected 2.8B
2035Projected 2.8B
2016201820202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
17.0B
18.9B
20.7B
22.6B
24.3B
26.0B
27.4B
28.7B
29.7B
30.5B
Growth
12.0%
10.9%
9.9%
8.8%
7.8%
6.7%
5.7%
4.6%
3.6%
2.5%
Cash margin
9.4%
9.4%
9.4%
9.4%
9.4%
9.4%
9.4%
9.4%
9.4%
9.4%
Free cash flow
1.6B
1.8B
1.9B
2.1B
2.3B
2.4B
2.6B
2.7B
2.8B
2.8B
Worth today
1.4B
1.5B
1.4B
1.4B
1.4B
1.4B
1.3B
1.2B
1.2B
1.1B
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
9.2%
254
268
285
304
326
9.7%
238
250
264
280
299
10.2%
223
234
246
260
275
10.7%
210
220
230
242
256
11.2%
199
207
216
227
238
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
7.5%
178
193
208
225
243
8.4%
194
210
227
246
265
9.4%
210
227
246
266
288
10.3%
226
245
265
287
310
11.2%
242
262
284
307
333
All the inputs moving at once
5,000 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.0%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$179.02
Median$246.76
90th percentile$340.42
$200.00$300.00$400.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$207.87</b> and <b>$290.66</b>; one in ten below $179.02, one in ten above $340.42.
Does the long run make sense?
13.7×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 13.7 times that year's EBITDA.
Free growthIn year 10 free cash flow is at or above after-tax operating profit, yet the model grows 2.5% forever. Growth needs reinvestment; this assumes it comes for free, which flatters the terminal value.
52%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
What lenders charge, after the tax saving on interest: 6.74% × (1 − 15.1%) = <strong>5.72%</strong>.
Weighted by how much of each the company uses (book value (no price given)): <strong>10.24%</strong>, the rate every future cash flow is discounted at.
What it has filed lately
The last twelve months at the SEC, most important first: annual and quarterly reports, events, large holders and insiders.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 6 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market—none in the period
Under pre-arranged plans—of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Which large funds report holding it
From the Form 13F of the 28 institutions followed on this site, as of the end of their last reported quarter. A 13F is filed up to 45 days later and shows only long positions in US-listed shares.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.