WLY · Communication(books: publishing or publishing & printing) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2026-04-30
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. reported revenue of $1.7 billion in fiscal 2026. Of the $2.2 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 37.0% went to acquisitions and 29.7% to dividends. On the accounting screens, it passes 8 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 2.51 is in the grey zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; 2 of the six cross-checks between its statements fire.
Revenue, fiscal 20261.7B
Operating margin16.5%gross margin 74.3%
Return on invested capital17.5%7.9% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay188.7M11.3% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA1.4×net debt 607.8M
Piotroski F-score8/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
-1B01B2B3B
2019
2019
2019Revenue 1.8BOperating income 224.0M
2020Revenue 1.8BOperating income -54.3M
2021Revenue 1.9BOperating income 185.5M
2022Revenue 2.1BOperating income 219.3M
2023Revenue 2.0BOperating income 55.9M
2024Revenue 1.9BOperating income 52.3M
2025Revenue 1.7BOperating income 221.4M
2026Revenue 1.7BOperating income 276.9M
2019201920192020202120222023202420252026
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
-6.0%
-2.9%
—
Operating income
+70.5%
+8.3%
—
Net income
+134.3%
+8.4%
—
Earnings per share
+138.8%
+9.7%
—
Free cash flow per share
+4.2%
-4.7%
—
Dividend per share
+0.6%
+0.5%
—
Shares
-1.9%
-1.2%
—
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 8.4%
-10%0%10%20%
2019
2019
2019Return on invested capital 10.7%
2020Return on invested capital -3.7%
2021Return on invested capital 8.2%
2022Return on invested capital 8.0%
2023Return on invested capital 1.6%
2024Return on invested capital 3.7%
2025Return on invested capital 8.4%
2026Return on invested capital 17.5%
2019201920192020202120222023202420252026
Economic profit
Economic profit
-300M-200M-100M0100M200M
2019
2019
2019Economic profit 36.8M
2020Economic profit -208.2M
2021Economic profit -5.2M
2022Economic profit -7.9M
2023Economic profit -122.4M
2024Economic profit -71.9M
2025Economic profit -647,131
2026Economic profit 139.1M
2019201920192020202120222023202420252026
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
26.1%
Return on assets
8.6%
Asset turnover
0.65×
Overheads (SG&A)
53.4% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-400M-200M0200M400M
2019
2019
2019Net income 168.3MFree cash flow 173.7MAfter stock-based pay 155.3M
2020Net income -74.3MFree cash flow 199.8MAfter stock-based pay 179.8M
2021Net income 148.3MFree cash flow 282.5MAfter stock-based pay 260.5M
2022Net income 148.3MFree cash flow 250.3MAfter stock-based pay 224.6M
2023Net income 17.2MFree cash flow 195.9MAfter stock-based pay 169.4M
2024Net income -200.3MFree cash flow 131.6MAfter stock-based pay 106.6M
2025Net income 84.2MFree cash flow 141.1MAfter stock-based pay 118.9M
2026Net income 221.6MFree cash flow 209.4MAfter stock-based pay 188.7M
2019201920192020202120222023202420252026
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2019–2026
2.2B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 28%601.9M
Acquisitions 37%809.9M
Dividends 30%649.3M
Share buybacks 18%392.9M
More than it generated: funded with cash or new debt -12%-267.9M
Over the same years it paid 180.3M in stock. 212.6M of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
-$5.0-$2.5$0.0$2.5$5.0$7.5
2019
2019
2019Earnings per share $2.91Free cash flow per share $3.00Dividend per share $1.31
2020Earnings per share $-1.32Free cash flow per share $3.56Dividend per share $1.36
2021Earnings per share $2.63Free cash flow per share $5.00Dividend per share $1.36
2022Earnings per share $2.62Free cash flow per share $4.42Dividend per share $1.36
2023Earnings per share $0.31Free cash flow per share $3.48Dividend per share $1.37
2024Earnings per share $-3.65Free cash flow per share $2.39Dividend per share $1.40
2025Earnings per share $1.53Free cash flow per share $2.57Dividend per share $1.39
2026Earnings per share $4.16Free cash flow per share $3.93Dividend per share $1.40
2019201920192020202120222023202420252026
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
52M54M56M58M
2019
2019
2019Diluted shares 57.8M
2020Diluted shares 56.2M
2021Diluted shares 56.5M
2022Diluted shares 56.6M
2023Diluted shares 56.4M
2024Diluted shares 54.9M
2025Diluted shares 54.8M
2026Diluted shares 53.2M
2019201920192020202120222023202420252026
Debt and liquidity
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
0200M400M600M800M
2019
2019
2019Net debt 385.9M
2020Net debt 572.6M
2021Net debt 727.8M
2022Net debt 686.6M
2023Net debt 641.6M
2024Net debt 691.3M
2025Net debt 713.6M
2026Net debt 607.8M
2019201920192020202120222023202420252026
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
1.4×
Interest coverage
6× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
0.54 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
13 days collects in 53d, stock 16d, pays in 57d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
8of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✓Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforepassed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✓Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellpassed
✓More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforepassed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✓Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforepassed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
2.51grey zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets -0.14 × 6.56-0.91
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.67 × 3.26+2.19
Operating income ÷ assets 0.11 × 6.72+0.72
Equity ÷ liabilities 0.49 × 1.05+0.51
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.46below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.07+0.98
Gross margin slipping 1.00+0.53
Soft assets 1.01+0.41
Sales growth 1.00+0.89
Slower depreciation 0.93+0.11
Overheads vs sales 0.95-0.16
Profit not in cash -0.02-0.07
Leverage rising 0.93-0.31
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Capital spending (51M) is well below depreciation (143M).
Benign
Mature assets, or a business that has become less capital-intensive.
Worrying
Under-investing: today's profit is being held up by consuming tomorrow's capacity.
The effective tax rate is 3.0%.
Benign
A favourable geographic mix, or legitimate tax credits.
Worrying
Not sustainable; projecting it forward inflates the valuation.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$48.18discounted at 8.4% a year · 55% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
11.6×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
7.5×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
1.9×
Free cash flow yield
7.4%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today1.4B
Everything after, today1.7B
The whole business3.2B
Minus net debt-607.8M
What belongs to shareholders2.6B
Divided among 53.2M shares: <strong>$48.18</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
0100M200M300M
2019
2019
2019Reported 155.3M
2020Reported 179.8M
2021Reported 260.5M
2022Reported 224.6M
2023Reported 169.4M
2024Reported 106.6M
2025Reported 118.9M
2026Reported 188.7M
2027Projected 225.9M
2028Projected 220.5M
2029Projected 216.6M
2030Projected 214.1M
2031Projected 212.9M
2032Projected 213.0M
2033Projected 214.4M
2034Projected 217.2M
2035Projected 221.3M
2036Projected 226.8M
2019201920212023202520272029203120332035
Year by year
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
Revenue
1.6B
1.6B
1.6B
1.5B
1.5B
1.5B
1.5B
1.6B
1.6B
1.6B
Growth
-3.0%
-2.4%
-1.8%
-1.2%
-0.6%
0.1%
0.7%
1.3%
1.9%
2.5%
Cash margin
13.9%
13.9%
13.9%
13.9%
13.9%
13.9%
13.9%
13.9%
13.9%
13.9%
Free cash flow
225.9M
220.5M
216.6M
214.1M
212.9M
213.0M
214.4M
217.2M
221.3M
226.8M
Worth today
208.3M
187.5M
169.8M
154.8M
141.9M
131.0M
121.6M
113.5M
106.7M
100.8M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
7.4%
50
54
60
66
74
8.0%
45
49
53
59
65
8.4%
41
45
48
52
58
8.9%
38
41
44
47
51
9.4%
35
37
40
43
46
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
-7.0%
-5.0%
-3.0%
-1.0%
1.0%
11.1%
31
35
39
43
48
12.5%
35
39
44
49
54
13.9%
39
43
48
54
59
15.3%
42
47
53
59
65
16.7%
46
52
57
64
70
All the inputs moving at once
5,000 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.1%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$33.11
Median$48.32
90th percentile$72.47
$25.00$50.00$75.00$100.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$39.49</b> and <b>$59.39</b>; one in ten below $33.11, one in ten above $72.47.
Does the long run make sense?
9.6×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 9.6 times that year's EBITDA.
19%To grow 2.5% forever while reinvesting 13% of its after-tax operating profit, the business must earn 19% on the new capital — it has earned 8% on average over the last five years.
55%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 7 filings by 7 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market—none in the period
Under pre-arranged plans—of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Companies like this one
Same SEC industry (books: publishing or publishing & printing) first, then the rest of communication.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.