ROCK · Materials(steel works, blast furnaces & rolling & finishing mills) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-12-31
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
Gibraltar Industries, Inc. reported revenue of $1.1 billion in fiscal 2025, after growing 1.6% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin widened from 9.4% in 2017 to 10.8%, and it earned 10.0% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $1.1 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 58.0% went to acquisitions and 20.7% to buybacks; the share count fell 7.0%. On the accounting screens, it passes 4 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 6.03 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; none of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 20251.1B+1.6% a year over 9 years
Operating margin10.8%gross margin 26.9%
Return on invested capital10.0%9.9% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay112.2M9.9% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDANet cash115.7M more cash than debt
Piotroski F-score4/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
00.5B1.0B1.5B
2017Revenue 986.9MOperating income 92.8M
2018
2018Revenue 837.1MOperating income 81.1M
2019Revenue 898.2MOperating income 80.8M
2020Revenue 1.0BOperating income 107.2M
2021Revenue 1.3BOperating income 97.0M
2022Revenue 1.4BOperating income 130.1M
2023Revenue 1.0BOperating income 120.6M
2024Revenue 1.0BOperating income 139.7M
2025Revenue 1.1BOperating income 122.8M
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
-6.5%
+1.9%
+1.6%
Operating income
-1.9%
+2.7%
+3.2%
Free cash flow per share
+16.2%
+11.7%
+9.2%
Shares
-2.3%
-1.8%
-0.8%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 10.2%
0%5%10%15%
2017Return on invested capital 10.1%
2018
2018Return on invested capital 8.1%
2019Return on invested capital 9.2%
2020Return on invested capital 10.0%
2021Return on invested capital 8.5%
2022Return on invested capital 10.6%
2023Return on invested capital 9.7%
2024Return on invested capital 10.5%
2025Return on invested capital 10.0%
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
-20M-10M010M
2017Economic profit -913,907
2018
2018Economic profit -17.2M
2019Economic profit -7.0M
2020Economic profit -2.1M
2021Economic profit -14.4M
2022Economic profit 2.9M
2023Economic profit -4.6M
2024Economic profit 3.0M
2025Economic profit -2.7M
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
-4.7%
Return on assets
-3.2%
Asset turnover
0.81×
Overheads (SG&A)
16.1% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-100M0100M200M300M
2017Net income 62.6MFree cash flow 58.7MAfter stock-based pay 51.5M
2018
2018Net income 63.8MFree cash flow 87.2MAfter stock-based pay 78.0M
2019Net income 65.1MFree cash flow 121.2MAfter stock-based pay 108.6M
2020Net income 64.6MFree cash flow 76.0MAfter stock-based pay 67.9M
2021Net income 75.6MFree cash flow 5.4MAfter stock-based pay -3.3M
2022Net income 82.4MFree cash flow 82.6MAfter stock-based pay 74.2M
2023Net income 110.5MFree cash flow 204.6MAfter stock-based pay 195.7M
2024Net income 137.3MFree cash flow 156.9MAfter stock-based pay 146.8M
2025Net income -44.4MFree cash flow 120.6MAfter stock-based pay 112.2M
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2017–2025
1.1B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 15%159.1M
Acquisitions 58%622.3M
Dividends 0%0
Share buybacks 21%222.4M
Kept, or used to pay down debt 6%68.4M
Over the same years it paid 81.3M in stock. The share count fell 7.0%. 141.1M of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
-$2.5$0.0$2.5$5.0$7.5
2017Earnings per share $1.94Free cash flow per share $1.82
2018
2018Earnings per share $1.96Free cash flow per share $2.68
2019Earnings per share $1.99Free cash flow per share $3.70
2020Earnings per share $1.96Free cash flow per share $2.31
2021Earnings per share $2.29Free cash flow per share $0.16
2022Earnings per share $2.56Free cash flow per share $2.56
2023Earnings per share $3.59Free cash flow per share $6.65
2024Earnings per share $4.46Free cash flow per share $5.10
2025Earnings per share $-1.48Free cash flow per share $4.02
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
29M30M31M32M33M34M
2017Diluted shares 32.2M
2018
2018Diluted shares 32.5M
2019Diluted shares 32.7M
2020Diluted shares 32.9M
2021Diluted shares 33.1M
2022Diluted shares 32.2M
2023Diluted shares 30.8M
2024Diluted shares 30.8M
2025Diluted shares 30.0M
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Debt and liquidity
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
-300M-200M-100M0100M
2017Net debt -12.3M
2018
2018Net debt -86.6M
2019Net debt -191.4M
2020Net debt 53.6M
2021Net debt 10.9M
2022Net debt 71.2M
2023Net debt -99.4M
2024Net debt -269.5M
2025Net debt -115.7M
2017201820182019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
-0.8×
Interest coverage
70× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
1.72 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
42 days collects in 39d, stock 51d, pays in 48d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
4of 9 tests passed
✕ProfitableReturn on assets above zerofailed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✕Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforefailed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✕Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellfailed
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✓Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforepassed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
6.03safe zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.19 × 6.56+1.24
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.60 × 3.26+1.95
Operating income ÷ assets 0.09 × 6.72+0.59
Equity ÷ liabilities 2.14 × 1.05+2.25
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-3.28below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 0.94+0.87
Gross margin slipping 1.10+0.58
Soft assets 0.95+0.38
Sales growth 1.11+0.99
Slower depreciation 0.97+0.11
Overheads vs sales 1.06-0.18
Profit not in cash -0.15-0.71
Leverage rising 1.46-0.48
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
None of the six cross-checks fires for the latest year: receivables and inventory move with revenue, profit turns into cash, investment keeps up with depreciation, the tax rate is ordinary and debt is moderate.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$66.53discounted at 10.2% a year · 48% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
—
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
12.3×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
1.7×
Free cash flow yield
5.6%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today975.4M
Everything after, today903.7M
The whole business1.9B
Plus net cash115.7M
What belongs to shareholders2.0B
Divided among 30.0M shares: <strong>$66.53</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
-50M050M100M150M200M
2017Reported 51.5M
2018
2018Reported 78.0M
2019Reported 108.6M
2020Reported 67.9M
2021Reported -3.3M
2022Reported 74.2M
2023Reported 195.7M
2024Reported 146.8M
2025Reported 112.2M
2026Projected 147.7M
2027Projected 150.7M
2028Projected 153.9M
2029Projected 157.3M
2030Projected 160.8M
2031Projected 164.4M
2032Projected 168.3M
2033Projected 172.3M
2034Projected 176.5M
2035Projected 180.9M
2017201820202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
1.2B
1.2B
1.2B
1.2B
1.3B
1.3B
1.3B
1.4B
1.4B
1.4B
Growth
2.0%
2.1%
2.1%
2.2%
2.2%
2.3%
2.3%
2.4%
2.4%
2.5%
Cash margin
12.8%
12.8%
12.8%
12.8%
12.8%
12.8%
12.8%
12.8%
12.8%
12.8%
Free cash flow
147.7M
150.7M
153.9M
157.3M
160.8M
164.4M
168.3M
172.3M
176.5M
180.9M
Worth today
134.0M
124.0M
114.9M
106.5M
98.7M
91.6M
85.0M
79.0M
73.4M
68.2M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
9.2%
69
72
76
80
86
9.7%
65
68
71
75
79
10.2%
61
64
67
70
74
10.7%
58
60
63
66
69
11.2%
55
57
59
62
65
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
-2.0%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
10.2%
49
53
57
62
66
11.5%
53
57
62
67
72
12.8%
57
62
67
72
78
14.0%
61
66
71
77
83
15.3%
65
70
76
82
89
All the inputs moving at once
5,000 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.0%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$51.97
Median$66.71
90th percentile$88.06
$60.00$80.00$100.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$58.20</b> and <b>$76.39</b>; one in ten below $51.97, one in ten above $88.06.
Does the long run make sense?
12.6×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 12.6 times that year's EBITDA.
Free growthIn year 10 free cash flow is at or above after-tax operating profit, yet the model grows 2.5% forever. Growth needs reinvestment; this assumes it comes for free, which flatters the terminal value.
48%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
What lenders charge, after the tax saving on interest: 6.74% × (1 − 22.9%) = <strong>5.19%</strong>.
Weighted by how much of each the company uses (book value (no price given)): <strong>10.24%</strong>, the rate every future cash flow is discounted at.
What it has filed lately
The last twelve months at the SEC, most important first: annual and quarterly reports, events, large holders and insiders.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 5 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market—none in the period
Under pre-arranged plans—of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Companies like this one
Same SEC industry (steel works, blast furnaces & rolling & finishing mills) first, then the rest of materials.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.