RJF · Financials(security brokers, dealers & flotation companies) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-09-30
Raymond James Financial Inc reported revenue of $15.9 billion in fiscal 2025, after growing 12.5% a year over the previous 9 years. Of the $12.6 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 19.3% went to dividends and 16.4% to acquisitions; the share count rose 43.0%. On the accounting screens, it passes 5 of 6 Piotroski tests; none of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 202515.9B+12.5% a year over 9 years
Operating margin—gross margin —
Return on invested capital—
Free cash flow after stock pay2.0B12.5% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA—net debt —
Piotroski F-score5/6tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
05.0B10.0B15.0B20.0B
2016Revenue 5.5BOperating income 916.7M
2017Revenue 6.5BOperating income 1.1B
2018Revenue 7.5BOperating income 1.5B
2019Revenue 8.0BOperating income 1.7B
2020Revenue 8.2BOperating income 1.2B
2021Revenue 9.9BOperating income 1.9B
2022Revenue 11.3BOperating income 2.3B
2023Revenue 13.0BOperating income 3.7B
2024Revenue 14.9B
2025Revenue 15.9B
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
+12.1%
+14.3%
+12.5%
Net income
+12.3%
+21.2%
+16.8%
Earnings per share
+13.8%
+21.6%
+12.2%
Free cash flow per share
—
-10.4%
—
Dividend per share
+16.1%
+15.6%
+11.0%
Shares
-1.4%
-0.4%
+4.1%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
GrossOperatingNetFree cash flow
-50.0%-25.0%0.0%25.0%50.0%75.0%
2016Operating 16.6%Net 9.6%Free cash flow -12.6%
2017Operating 16.5%Net 9.7%Free cash flow -4.8%
2018Operating 20.2%Net 11.5%Free cash flow 10.0%
2019Operating 20.7%Net 12.9%Free cash flow 5.5%
2020Operating 15.1%Net 10.0%Free cash flow 48.3%
2021Operating 19.6%Net 14.2%Free cash flow 66.3%
2022Operating 20.6%Net 13.3%Free cash flow -0.2%
2023Operating 28.1%Net 13.4%Free cash flow -28.4%
2024Net 13.9%Free cash flow 13.1%
2025Net 13.4%Free cash flow 14.1%
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Return on invested capital
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 10.2%
0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Needs a cost of capital, which comes from the valuation below.
Return on equity
17.1%
Return on assets
2.4%
Asset turnover
0.18×
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-5.0B05.0B10.0B
2016Net income 529.4MFree cash flow -695.1MAfter stock-based pay -773.6M
2017Net income 636.0MFree cash flow -315.0MAfter stock-based pay -424.0M
2018Net income 857.0MFree cash flow 750.0MAfter stock-based pay 651.0M
2019Net income 1.0BFree cash flow 439.0MAfter stock-based pay 327.0M
2020Net income 818.0MFree cash flow 3.9BAfter stock-based pay 3.8B
2021Net income 1.4BFree cash flow 6.6BAfter stock-based pay 6.4B
2022Net income 1.5BFree cash flow -19.0MAfter stock-based pay -211.0M
2023Net income 1.7BFree cash flow -3.7BAfter stock-based pay -3.9B
2024Net income 2.1BFree cash flow 1.9BAfter stock-based pay 1.7B
2025Net income 2.1BFree cash flow 2.2BAfter stock-based pay 2.0B
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2016–2025
12.6B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 11%1.4B
Acquisitions 16%2.1B
Dividends 19%2.4B
Share buybacks 11%1.4B
Kept, or used to pay down debt 42%5.2B
Over the same years it paid 1.6B in stock. The share count rose 43.0%. The buybacks did not even cover what was handed out in stock.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$-20.00$0.00$20.00$40.00
2016Earnings per share $3.66Free cash flow per share $-4.81Dividend per share $0.78
2017Earnings per share $4.34Free cash flow per share $-2.15Dividend per share $0.87
2018Earnings per share $5.76Free cash flow per share $5.04Dividend per share $1.01
2019Earnings per share $4.79Free cash flow per share $2.03Dividend per share $0.88
2020Earnings per share $3.89Free cash flow per share $18.78Dividend per share $0.97
2021Earnings per share $6.64Free cash flow per share $31.12Dividend per share $1.03
2022Earnings per share $7.01Free cash flow per share $-0.09Dividend per share $1.29
2023Earnings per share $8.02Free cash flow per share $-17.00Dividend per share $1.64
2024Earnings per share $9.74Free cash flow per share $9.19Dividend per share $1.80
2025Earnings per share $10.33Free cash flow per share $10.87Dividend per share $2.01
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
140.0M160.0M180.0M200.0M220.0M
2016Diluted shares 144.5M
2017Diluted shares 146.6M
2018Diluted shares 148.8M
2019Diluted shares 216.0M
2020Diluted shares 210.3M
2021Diluted shares 211.2M
2022Diluted shares 215.3M
2023Diluted shares 216.9M
2024Diluted shares 212.3M
2025Diluted shares 206.6M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
—
Interest coverage
— operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
— current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
—
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
5of 6 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✕Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforefailed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
–Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fell — not reportedno data
–More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year before — not reportedno data
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
–Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year before — not reportedno data
✓Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforepassed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
The accounts lack a line it needs (retained earnings, current assets or liabilities).
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
The accounts lack too many of the lines it needs.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
None of the six cross-checks fires for the latest year: receivables and inventory move with revenue, profit turns into cash, investment keeps up with depreciation, the tax rate is ordinary and debt is moderate.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$324.49discounted at 10.2% a year · 53% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
31.4×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
—
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
4.2×
Free cash flow yield
3.0%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today31.6B
Everything after, today35.4B
The whole business67.0B
Minus net debt-0
What belongs to shareholders67.0B
Divided among 206.6M shares: <strong>$324.49</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
-5.0B05.0B10.0B
2016Reported -773.6M
2017Reported -424.0M
2018Reported 651.0M
2019Reported 327.0M
2020Reported 3.8B
2021Reported 6.4B
2022Reported -211.0M
2023Reported -3.9B
2024Reported 1.7B
2025Reported 2.0B
2026Projected 3.6B
2027Projected 4.0B
2028Projected 4.5B
2029Projected 5.0B
2030Projected 5.4B
2031Projected 5.9B
2032Projected 6.2B
2033Projected 6.6B
2034Projected 6.8B
2035Projected 7.0B
2016201820202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
18.2B
20.6B
23.1B
25.5B
27.8B
30.0B
31.9B
33.6B
34.9B
35.8B
Growth
14.5%
13.2%
11.8%
10.5%
9.2%
7.8%
6.5%
5.2%
3.8%
2.5%
Cash margin
19.6%
19.6%
19.6%
19.6%
19.6%
19.6%
19.6%
19.6%
19.6%
19.6%
Free cash flow
3.6B
4.0B
4.5B
5.0B
5.4B
5.9B
6.2B
6.6B
6.8B
7.0B
Worth today
3.2B
3.3B
3.4B
3.4B
3.4B
3.3B
3.2B
3.0B
2.9B
2.7B
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
9.2%
336
355
377
402
432
9.7%
313
330
349
370
395
10.2%
294
308
324
343
364
10.7%
277
289
303
319
337
11.2%
261
272
285
298
314
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
10.5%
12.5%
14.5%
16.5%
18.5%
15.7%
235
254
274
296
319
17.6%
256
277
299
323
349
19.6%
277
300
324
351
379
21.5%
299
323
350
378
409
23.5%
320
346
375
406
439
All the inputs moving at once
5,000 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.9%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$247.07
Median$325.14
90th percentile$438.26
$200.00$300.00$400.00$500.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$280.09</b> and <b>$377.30</b>; one in ten below $247.07, one in ten above $438.26.
Does the long run make sense?
53%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
What lenders charge, after the tax saving on interest: 6.68% × (1 − 21.0%) = <strong>5.28%</strong>.
Weighted by how much of each the company uses (book value (no price given)): <strong>10.18%</strong>, the rate every future cash flow is discounted at.
What it has filed lately
The last twelve months at the SEC, most important first: annual and quarterly reports, events, large holders and insiders.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.