PRGS · Technology(services-prepackaged software) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-11-30
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
Progress Software Corp reported revenue of $977.8 million in fiscal 2025, after growing 10.3% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin widened from -7.3% in 2016 to 15.7%, and it earned 7.3% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $1.6 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 125.3% went to acquisitions and 43.7% to buybacks; the share count fell 11.0%. On the accounting screens, it passes 7 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of -0.25 is in the distress zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; 1 of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 2025977.8M+10.3% a year over 9 years
Operating margin15.7%gross margin 80.8%
Return on invested capital7.3%8.1% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay164.7M16.8% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA8.2×net debt 1.3B
Piotroski F-score7/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
-500.0M0500.0M1.0B
2016Revenue 405.3MOperating income -29.7M
2017Revenue 389.2MOperating income 57.5M
2018Revenue 379.0MOperating income 67.8M
2019Revenue 413.3MOperating income 40.1M
2020Revenue 442.1MOperating income 107.7M
2021Revenue 531.3MOperating income 116.1M
2022Revenue 602.0MOperating income 132.1M
2023Revenue 694.4MOperating income 110.5M
2024Revenue 753.4MOperating income 124.0M
2025Revenue 977.8MOperating income 153.3M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
+17.5%
+17.2%
+10.3%
Operating income
+5.1%
+7.3%
—
Net income
-8.4%
-1.7%
—
Earnings per share
-8.2%
-1.1%
—
Free cash flow per share
+7.4%
+11.3%
+11.5%
Dividend per share
-70.6%
-51.4%
—
Shares
-0.2%
-0.6%
-1.3%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 6.0%
-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%
2016Return on invested capital -8.1%
2017Return on invested capital 6.0%
2018Return on invested capital 12.6%
2019Return on invested capital 5.9%
2020Return on invested capital 12.2%
2021Return on invested capital 9.8%
2022Return on invested capital 10.5%
2023Return on invested capital 8.2%
2024Return on invested capital 4.6%
2025Return on invested capital 7.3%
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
-100.0M-50.0M050.0M
2016Economic profit -81.8M
2017Economic profit 3,134
2018Economic profit 28.8M
2019Economic profit -625,857
2020Economic profit 44.9M
2021Economic profit 36.5M
2022Economic profit 45.7M
2023Economic profit 25.9M
2024Economic profit -28.7M
2025Economic profit 23.8M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
15.3%
Return on assets
3.0%
Asset turnover
0.40×
Overheads (SG&A)
11.1% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-100.0M0100.0M200.0M300.0M
2016Net income -55.7MFree cash flow 97.1MAfter stock-based pay 74.5M
2017Net income 29.0MFree cash flow 102.3MAfter stock-based pay 88.2M
2018Net income 49.7MFree cash flow 114.1MAfter stock-based pay 93.5M
2019Net income 26.4MFree cash flow 124.5MAfter stock-based pay 101.2M
2020Net income 79.7MFree cash flow 138.3MAfter stock-based pay 114.8M
2021Net income 78.4MFree cash flow 173.9MAfter stock-based pay 144.2M
2022Net income 95.1MFree cash flow 186.1MAfter stock-based pay 149.0M
2023Net income 70.2MFree cash flow 168.3MAfter stock-based pay 127.8M
2024Net income 68.4MFree cash flow 206.3MAfter stock-based pay 159.5M
2025Net income 73.1MFree cash flow 229.5MAfter stock-based pay 164.7M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2016–2025
1.6B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 3%54.1M
Acquisitions 125%2.0B
Dividends 15%234.0M
Share buybacks 44%696.1M
More than it generated: funded with cash or new debt -87%-1.4B
Over the same years it paid 322.9M in stock. The share count fell 11.0%. 373.1M of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$-2.00$0.00$2.00$4.00$6.00
2016Earnings per share $-1.13Free cash flow per share $1.96Dividend per share $0.00
2017Earnings per share $0.60Free cash flow per share $2.11Dividend per share $0.50
2018Earnings per share $1.08Free cash flow per share $2.47Dividend per share $0.56
2019Earnings per share $0.58Free cash flow per share $2.75Dividend per share $0.61
2020Earnings per share $1.76Free cash flow per share $3.05Dividend per share $0.66
2021Earnings per share $1.76Free cash flow per share $3.90Dividend per share $0.71
2022Earnings per share $2.15Free cash flow per share $4.21Dividend per share $0.70
2023Earnings per share $1.57Free cash flow per share $3.77Dividend per share $0.71
2024Earnings per share $1.54Free cash flow per share $4.64Dividend per share $0.71
2025Earnings per share $1.66Free cash flow per share $5.21Dividend per share $0.02
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
44.0M46.0M48.0M50.0M
2016Diluted shares 49.5M
2017Diluted shares 48.5M
2018Diluted shares 46.1M
2019Diluted shares 45.3M
2020Diluted shares 45.3M
2021Diluted shares 44.6M
2022Diluted shares 44.2M
2023Diluted shares 44.7M
2024Diluted shares 44.4M
2025Diluted shares 44.0M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
-500.0M0500.0M1.0B1.5B
2016Net debt -72.0M
2017Net debt -11.6M
2018Net debt 11.0M
2019Net debt 140.5M
2020Net debt 284.5M
2021Net debt 404.9M
2022Net debt 361.8M
2023Net debt 597.0M
2024Net debt 1.4B
2025Net debt 1.3B
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
8.2×
Interest coverage
2× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
0.49 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
— collects in 73d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
7of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✓Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforepassed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✓Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellpassed
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✓Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforepassed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
-0.25distress zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets -0.17 × 6.56-1.09
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.05 × 3.26+0.17
Operating income ÷ assets 0.06 × 6.72+0.42
Equity ÷ liabilities 0.24 × 1.05+0.25
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.56below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 0.92+0.85
Gross margin slipping 1.02+0.54
Soft assets 0.98+0.40
Sales growth 1.30+1.16
Slower depreciation 1.02+0.12
Overheads vs sales 0.93-0.16
Profit not in cash -0.07-0.31
Leverage rising 0.96-0.31
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Net debt is 8.2 times EBITDA.
Benign
A stable sector with predictable cash flows and comfortable maturities.
Worrying
Little room if earnings fall; the maturity schedule is what to check.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$14.35discounted at 6.0% a year · 75% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
8.6×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
12.1×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
2.0×
Free cash flow yield
26.1%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today488.3M
Everything after, today1.4B
The whole business1.9B
Minus net debt-1.3B
What belongs to shareholders631.8M
Divided among 44.0M shares: <strong>$14.35</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M
2016Reported 74.5M
2017Reported 88.2M
2018Reported 93.5M
2019Reported 101.2M
2020Reported 114.8M
2021Reported 144.2M
2022Reported 149.0M
2023Reported 127.8M
2024Reported 159.5M
2025Reported 164.7M
2026Projected 41.9M
2027Projected 48.4M
2028Projected 55.0M
2029Projected 61.7M
2030Projected 68.2M
2031Projected 74.4M
2032Projected 79.8M
2033Projected 84.4M
2034Projected 87.8M
2035Projected 90.0M
2016201820202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
1.1B
1.3B
1.5B
1.7B
1.9B
2.0B
2.2B
2.3B
2.4B
2.5B
Growth
17.0%
15.4%
13.8%
12.2%
10.6%
8.9%
7.3%
5.7%
4.1%
2.5%
Cash margin
3.7%
3.7%
3.7%
3.7%
3.7%
3.7%
3.7%
3.7%
3.7%
3.7%
Free cash flow
41.9M
48.4M
55.0M
61.7M
68.2M
74.4M
79.8M
84.4M
87.8M
90.0M
Worth today
39.5M
43.0M
46.2M
48.8M
50.9M
52.3M
52.9M
52.8M
51.8M
50.1M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
5.0%
16
23
33
47
70
5.5%
10
15
22
31
45
6.0%
5
9
14
21
30
6.5%
2
5
9
14
20
7.0%
-1
1
4
8
13
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
13.0%
15.0%
17.0%
19.0%
21.0%
2.9%
1
4
6
10
13
3.3%
4
7
10
14
18
3.7%
8
11
14
18
22
4.0%
11
14
18
22
27
4.4%
14
18
22
27
32
All the inputs moving at once
4,933 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.0%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$-13.62
Median$13.79
90th percentile$59.65
$0.00$50.00$100.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$-1.46</b> and <b>$34.39</b>; one in ten below $-13.62, one in ten above $59.65.
Does the long run make sense?
6.5×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 6.5 times that year's EBITDA.
3%To grow 2.5% forever while reinvesting 74% of its after-tax operating profit, the business must earn 3% on the new capital — it has earned 8% on average over the last five years.
75%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 6 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market$983,9254 sale(s) by 3 insider(s)
Under pre-arranged plans100%of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Companies like this one
Same SEC industry (services-prepackaged software) first, then the rest of technology.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.