NOW · Technology(services-prepackaged software) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-12-31
ServiceNow, Inc. reported revenue of $13.3 billion in fiscal 2025, after growing 28.5% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin widened from -27.5% in 2016 to 13.7%. Of the $22.7 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 20.0% went back into the business and 13.8% to buybacks; the share count rose 25.0%. On the accounting screens, it passes 3 of 8 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 2.18 is in the grey zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; none of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 202513.3B+28.5% a year over 9 years
Operating margin13.7%gross margin 77.5%
Return on invested capital—6.0% on average over 2 years
Free cash flow after stock pay2.6B19.7% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA—net debt —
Piotroski F-score3/8tests of improvement passed
Share counts are in today's shares. The SEC's filings restate only recent years after a split, so these jumps were read as splits and the older years scaled to match — otherwise per-share figures would compare different units:
5-for-1 before fiscal 2023.
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
-5.0B05.0B10.0B15.0B
2016Revenue 1.4BOperating income -382.2M
2017Revenue 1.9BOperating income -64.4M
2018Revenue 2.6BOperating income -42.4M
2019Revenue 3.5BOperating income 42.0M
2020Revenue 4.5BOperating income 199.0M
2021Revenue 5.9BOperating income 257.0M
2022Revenue 7.2BOperating income 355.0M
2023Revenue 9.0BOperating income 762.0M
2024Revenue 11.0BOperating income 1.4B
2025Revenue 13.3BOperating income 1.8B
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
+22.4%
+24.1%
+28.5%
Operating income
+72.6%
+55.8%
—
Net income
+75.2%
+71.2%
—
Earnings per share
+73.6%
+70.0%
—
Free cash flow per share
+27.0%
+26.5%
+59.9%
Shares
+0.9%
+0.7%
+2.5%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Needs a cost of capital, which comes from the valuation below.
Return on equity
13.5%
Return on assets
6.7%
Asset turnover
0.51×
Research & development
22.3% of revenue
Overheads (SG&A)
8.5% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-2.0B02.0B4.0B6.0B
2016Net income -414.2MFree cash flow 53.5MAfter stock-based pay -264.1M
2017Net income -116.8MFree cash flow 492.4MAfter stock-based pay 98.4M
2018Net income -26.7MFree cash flow 586.6MAfter stock-based pay 42.7M
2019Net income 626.7MFree cash flow 971.0MAfter stock-based pay 309.0M
2020Net income 119.0MFree cash flow 1.4BAfter stock-based pay 497.0M
2021Net income 230.0MFree cash flow 1.8BAfter stock-based pay 668.0M
2022Net income 325.0MFree cash flow 2.2BAfter stock-based pay 772.0M
2023Net income 1.7BFree cash flow 2.7BAfter stock-based pay 1.1B
2024Net income 1.4BFree cash flow 3.4BAfter stock-based pay 1.7B
2025Net income 1.7BFree cash flow 4.6BAfter stock-based pay 2.6B
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2016–2025
22.7B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 20%4.5B
Acquisitions 11%2.6B
Dividends 0%0
Share buybacks 14%3.1B
Kept, or used to pay down debt 55%12.4B
Over the same years it paid 10.6B in stock. The share count rose 25.0%. The buybacks did not even cover what was handed out in stock.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$-2.00$0.00$2.00$4.00$6.00
2016Earnings per share $-0.49Free cash flow per share $0.06
2017Earnings per share $-0.14Free cash flow per share $0.58
2018Earnings per share $-0.03Free cash flow per share $0.66
2019Earnings per share $0.64Free cash flow per share $0.98
2020Earnings per share $0.12Free cash flow per share $1.35
2021Earnings per share $0.23Free cash flow per share $1.77
2022Earnings per share $0.32Free cash flow per share $2.14
2023Earnings per share $1.68Free cash flow per share $2.63
2024Earnings per share $1.37Free cash flow per share $3.28
2025Earnings per share $1.67Free cash flow per share $4.37
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
800.0M900.0M1.0B1.1B
2016Diluted shares 837.2M
2017Diluted shares 855.9M
2018Diluted shares 889.2M
2019Diluted shares 986.1M
2020Diluted shares 1.0B
2021Diluted shares 1.0B
2022Diluted shares 1.0B
2023Diluted shares 1.0B
2024Diluted shares 1.0B
2025Diluted shares 1.0B
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
-2.0B-1.5B-1.0B-500.0M0
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020Net debt -1.7B
2021Net debt -1.6B
2022Net debt -1.5B
2023
2024
2025
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
—
Interest coverage
— operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
1.00 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
— collects in 72d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
3of 8 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✕Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforefailed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
–Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fell — not reportedno data
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
✕No new sharesShare count did not growfailed
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✕Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforefailed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
2.18grey zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.00 × 6.56+0.01
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.20 × 3.26+0.66
Operating income ÷ assets 0.07 × 6.72+0.47
Equity ÷ liabilities 0.99 × 1.05+1.04
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.93below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 0.97+0.89
Gross margin slipping 1.02+0.54
Soft assets 1.10+0.45
Sales growth 1.21+1.08
Slower depreciation 0.99+0.11
Overheads vs sales 0.99-0.17
Profit not in cash -0.14-0.66
Leverage rising 0.98-0.32
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
None of the six cross-checks fires for the latest year: receivables and inventory move with revenue, profit turns into cash, investment keeps up with depreciation, the tax rate is ordinary and debt is moderate.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
With a free cash flow margin at or below zero in year ten, the business never generates cash for its owners and a DCF says nothing useful. Set a positive margin for year ten to see what it would take.
What it has filed lately
The last twelve months at the SEC, most important first: annual and quarterly reports, events, large holders and insiders.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.