PBH · Health care(pharmaceutical preparations) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2026-03-31
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
Prestige Consumer Healthcare Inc. reported revenue of $1.1 billion in fiscal 2026, after growing 2.4% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin widened from 23.3% in 2017 to 28.4%, and it earned 7.9% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $2.2 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 17.9% went to buybacks and 17.4% to acquisitions; the share count fell 8.7%. On the accounting screens, it passes 5 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 4.04 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; 1 of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 20261.1B+2.4% a year over 9 years
Operating margin28.4%gross margin 54.7%
Return on invested capital7.9%6.8% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay235.6M21.6% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA2.7×net debt 930.1M
Piotroski F-score5/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
-500.0M0500.0M1.0B1.5B
2017Revenue 882.1MOperating income 205.6M
2018Revenue 1.0BOperating income 215.5M
2019Revenue 975.8MOperating income 67.5M
2020Revenue 963.0MOperating income 291.2M
2021Revenue 943.4MOperating income 297.4M
2022Revenue 1.1BOperating income 329.9M
2023Revenue 1.1BOperating income -22.4M
2024Revenue 1.1BOperating income 342.4M
2025Revenue 1.1BOperating income 336.8M
2026Revenue 1.1BOperating income 309.4M
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
-1.2%
+2.9%
+2.4%
Operating income
—
+0.8%
+4.6%
Net income
—
+2.9%
+11.9%
Earnings per share
—
+3.7%
+13.0%
Free cash flow per share
+4.4%
+3.7%
+7.1%
Shares
-0.8%
-0.8%
-1.0%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 8.0%
-10.0%-5.0%0.0%5.0%10.0%
2017Return on invested capital 4.3%
2018Return on invested capital -8.0%
2019Return on invested capital 2.5%
2020Return on invested capital 7.5%
2021Return on invested capital 8.5%
2022Return on invested capital 8.5%
2023Return on invested capital -0.9%
2024Return on invested capital 9.3%
2025Return on invested capital 9.0%
2026Return on invested capital 7.9%
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Economic profit
Economic profit
-600.0M-400.0M-200.0M0200.0M
2017Economic profit -112.0M
2018Economic profit -505.4M
2019Economic profit -159.5M
2020Economic profit -14.8M
2021Economic profit 13.5M
2022Economic profit 14.4M
2023Economic profit -248.1M
2024Economic profit 37.8M
2025Economic profit 28.7M
2026Economic profit -1.3M
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
10.1%
Return on assets
5.4%
Asset turnover
0.31×
Overheads (SG&A)
10.7% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-200.0M0200.0M400.0M
2017Net income 69.4MFree cash flow 145.7MAfter stock-based pay 137.5M
2018Net income 339.6MFree cash flow 197.6MAfter stock-based pay 188.7M
2019Net income -35.8MFree cash flow 178.8MAfter stock-based pay 171.4M
2020Net income 142.3MFree cash flow 202.6MAfter stock-based pay 194.9M
2021Net income 164.7MFree cash flow 213.4MAfter stock-based pay 204.8M
2022Net income 205.4MFree cash flow 250.3MAfter stock-based pay 241.2M
2023Net income -82.3MFree cash flow 221.9MAfter stock-based pay 209.5M
2024Net income 209.3MFree cash flow 239.4MAfter stock-based pay 225.4M
2025Net income 214.6MFree cash flow 243.3MAfter stock-based pay 232.1M
2026Net income 190.3MFree cash flow 246.4MAfter stock-based pay 235.6M
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2017–2026
2.2B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 5%109.2M
Acquisitions 17%392.4M
Dividends 0%0
Share buybacks 18%401.4M
Kept, or used to pay down debt 60%1.3B
Over the same years it paid 98.1M in stock. The share count fell 8.7%. 303.2M of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$-2.00$0.00$2.00$4.00$6.00$8.00
2017Earnings per share $1.30Free cash flow per share $2.73
2018Earnings per share $6.34Free cash flow per share $3.69
2019Earnings per share $-0.69Free cash flow per share $3.43
2020Earnings per share $2.78Free cash flow per share $3.96
2021Earnings per share $3.25Free cash flow per share $4.22
2022Earnings per share $4.04Free cash flow per share $4.92
2023Earnings per share $-1.65Free cash flow per share $4.45
2024Earnings per share $4.17Free cash flow per share $4.77
2025Earnings per share $4.29Free cash flow per share $4.86
2026Earnings per share $3.91Free cash flow per share $5.06
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
48.0M50.0M52.0M54.0M
2017Diluted shares 53.4M
2018Diluted shares 53.5M
2019Diluted shares 52.1M
2020Diluted shares 51.1M
2021Diluted shares 50.6M
2022Diluted shares 50.8M
2023Diluted shares 49.9M
2024Diluted shares 50.2M
2025Diluted shares 50.1M
2026Diluted shares 48.7M
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
01.0B2.0B3.0B
2017Net debt 2.2B
2018Net debt 2.0B
2019Net debt 1.8B
2020Net debt 1.6B
2021Net debt 1.4B
2022Net debt 1.4B
2023Net debt 1.3B
2024Net debt 1.1B
2025Net debt 894.5M
2026Net debt 930.1M
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
2.7×
Interest coverage
7× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
3.57 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
165 days collects in 64d, stock 118d, pays in 17d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
5of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✕Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforefailed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✓Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellpassed
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✕Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforefailed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
4.04safe zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.09 × 6.56+0.58
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.50 × 3.26+1.63
Operating income ÷ assets 0.09 × 6.72+0.60
Equity ÷ liabilities 1.17 × 1.05+1.23
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.54below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.03+0.95
Gross margin slipping 1.02+0.54
Soft assets 0.99+0.40
Sales growth 0.96+0.85
Slower depreciation 1.41+0.16
Overheads vs sales 1.12-0.19
Profit not in cash -0.02-0.09
Leverage rising 0.99-0.32
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Capital spending (11M) is well below depreciation (31M).
Benign
Mature assets, or a business that has become less capital-intensive.
Worrying
Under-investing: today's profit is being held up by consuming tomorrow's capacity.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$71.10discounted at 8.0% a year · 60% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
18.2×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
12.9×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
4.0×
Free cash flow yield
6.8%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today1.8B
Everything after, today2.6B
The whole business4.4B
Minus net debt-930.1M
What belongs to shareholders3.5B
Divided among 48.7M shares: <strong>$71.10</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M
2017Reported 137.5M
2018Reported 188.7M
2019Reported 171.4M
2020Reported 194.9M
2021Reported 204.8M
2022Reported 241.2M
2023Reported 209.5M
2024Reported 225.4M
2025Reported 232.1M
2026Reported 235.6M
2027Projected 236.9M
2028Projected 243.8M
2029Projected 250.9M
2030Projected 258.0M
2031Projected 265.2M
2032Projected 272.4M
2033Projected 279.6M
2034Projected 286.9M
2035Projected 294.3M
2036Projected 301.6M
2017201920212023202520272029203120332035
Year by year
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
Revenue
1.1B
1.2B
1.2B
1.2B
1.3B
1.3B
1.3B
1.4B
1.4B
1.4B
Growth
3.0%
2.9%
2.9%
2.8%
2.8%
2.7%
2.7%
2.6%
2.6%
2.5%
Cash margin
21.1%
21.1%
21.1%
21.1%
21.1%
21.1%
21.1%
21.1%
21.1%
21.1%
Free cash flow
236.9M
243.8M
250.9M
258.0M
265.2M
272.4M
279.6M
286.9M
294.3M
301.6M
Worth today
219.4M
209.1M
199.3M
189.8M
180.6M
171.8M
163.4M
155.3M
147.5M
140.0M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
7.0%
74
82
91
103
118
7.5%
66
73
80
89
101
8.0%
60
65
71
79
88
8.5%
54
58
64
70
77
9.0%
49
53
57
62
68
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
-1.0%
1.0%
3.0%
5.0%
7.0%
16.9%
45
51
57
63
70
19.0%
51
57
64
71
79
21.1%
57
64
71
79
88
23.2%
63
70
78
87
96
25.4%
69
77
86
95
105
All the inputs moving at once
5,000 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 3.2%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$47.10
Median$71.26
90th percentile$111.68
$50.00$100.00$150.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$57.37</b> and <b>$89.64</b>; one in ten below $47.10, one in ten above $111.68.
Does the long run make sense?
12.6×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 12.6 times that year's EBITDA.
Free growthIn year 10 free cash flow is at or above after-tax operating profit, yet the model grows 2.5% forever. Growth needs reinvestment; this assumes it comes for free, which flatters the terminal value.
60%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 6 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market$18,3501 sale(s) by 1 insider(s)
Under pre-arranged plans100%of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Which large funds report holding it
From the Form 13F of the 28 institutions followed on this site, as of the end of their last reported quarter. A 13F is filed up to 45 days later and shows only long positions in US-listed shares.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.