JJSF · Consumer staples(cookies & crackers) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-09-27
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
J&J Snack Foods Corp reported revenue of $1.6 billion in fiscal 2025, after growing 5.3% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin narrowed from 11.4% in 2016 to 5.3%, and it earned 6.6% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $1.2 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 55.9% went back into the business and 34.9% to dividends; the share count rose 4.2%. On the accounting screens, it passes 4 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 6.28 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; none of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 20251.6B+5.3% a year over 9 years
Operating margin5.3%gross margin 29.7%
Return on invested capital6.6%7.1% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay75.9M4.8% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDANet cash105.9M more cash than debt
Piotroski F-score4/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B
2016Revenue 992.8MOperating income 112.8M
2017Revenue 1.1BOperating income 118.1M
2018Revenue 1.1BOperating income 110.8M
2019Revenue 1.2BOperating income 117.0M
2020Revenue 1.0BOperating income 17.2M
2021Revenue 1.1BOperating income 71.2M
2022Revenue 1.4BOperating income 61.8M
2023Revenue 1.6BOperating income 109.5M
2024Revenue 1.6BOperating income 117.5M
2025Revenue 1.6BOperating income 84.3M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
+4.7%
+9.1%
+5.3%
Operating income
+10.9%
+37.4%
-3.2%
Net income
+11.6%
+29.1%
-1.6%
Earnings per share
+10.9%
+28.4%
-2.1%
Free cash flow per share
—
+18.5%
+1.0%
Dividend per share
+7.2%
+7.1%
+8.3%
Shares
+0.6%
+0.5%
+0.5%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 10.2%
0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%
2016Return on invested capital 11.3%
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021Return on invested capital 6.3%
2022Return on invested capital 5.1%
2023Return on invested capital 8.6%
2024Return on invested capital 8.9%
2025Return on invested capital 6.6%
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
-60.0M-40.0M-20.0M020.0M
2016Economic profit 7.1M
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021Economic profit -32.5M
2022Economic profit -46.1M
2023Economic profit -15.1M
2024Economic profit -11.8M
2025Economic profit -34.3M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
6.8%
Return on assets
4.7%
Asset turnover
1.15×
Research & development
0.1% of revenue
Overheads (SG&A)
4.9% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-100.0M-50.0M050.0M100.0M150.0M
2016Net income 76.0MFree cash flow 72.5MAfter stock-based pay 70.1M
2017Net income 79.2MFree cash flow 53.2MAfter stock-based pay 50.1M
2018Net income 103.6MFree cash flow 63.3MAfter stock-based pay 59.5M
2019Net income 94.8MFree cash flow 90.4MAfter stock-based pay 86.1M
2020Net income 18.3MFree cash flow 34.3MAfter stock-based pay 29.7M
2021Net income 55.6MFree cash flow 47.9MAfter stock-based pay 43.7M
2022Net income 47.2MFree cash flow -61.2MAfter stock-based pay -65.5M
2023Net income 78.9MFree cash flow 67.5MAfter stock-based pay 62.2M
2024Net income 86.6MFree cash flow 99.5MAfter stock-based pay 93.3M
2025Net income 65.6MFree cash flow 82.3MAfter stock-based pay 75.9M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2016–2025
1.2B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 56%697.9M
Acquisitions 27%334.4M
Dividends 35%436.0M
Share buybacks 4%53.3M
More than it generated: funded with cash or new debt -22%-273.9M
Over the same years it paid 44.4M in stock. The share count rose 4.2%. 8.8M of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$-5.00$-2.50$0.00$2.50$5.00$7.50
2016Earnings per share $4.05Free cash flow per share $3.86Dividend per share $1.52
2017Earnings per share $4.21Free cash flow per share $2.83Dividend per share $1.64
2018Earnings per share $5.51Free cash flow per share $3.37Dividend per share $1.76
2019Earnings per share $5.00Free cash flow per share $4.77Dividend per share $1.93
2020Earnings per share $0.96Free cash flow per share $1.80Dividend per share $2.21
2021Earnings per share $2.91Free cash flow per share $2.50Dividend per share $2.34
2022Earnings per share $2.46Free cash flow per share $-3.19Dividend per share $2.52
2023Earnings per share $4.08Free cash flow per share $3.50Dividend per share $2.79
2024Earnings per share $4.45Free cash flow per share $5.12Dividend per share $2.93
2025Earnings per share $3.36Free cash flow per share $4.21Dividend per share $3.11
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
18.6M18.8M19.0M19.2M19.4M19.6M
2016Diluted shares 18.8M
2017Diluted shares 18.8M
2018Diluted shares 18.8M
2019Diluted shares 19.0M
2020Diluted shares 19.0M
2021Diluted shares 19.1M
2022Diluted shares 19.2M
2023Diluted shares 19.3M
2024Diluted shares 19.4M
2025Diluted shares 19.5M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
-300.0M-200.0M-100.0M0100.0M
2016Net debt -127.1M
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021Net debt -283.2M
2022Net debt 19.8M
2023Net debt -22.6M
2024Net debt -73.4M
2025Net debt -105.9M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
-0.7×
Interest coverage
56× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
2.72 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
73 days collects in 42d, stock 57d, pays in 27d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
4of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✕Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforefailed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✕Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellfailed
✓More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforepassed
✕No new sharesShare count did not growfailed
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✕Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforefailed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
6.28safe zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.22 × 6.56+1.44
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.61 × 3.26+1.98
Operating income ÷ assets 0.06 × 6.72+0.41
Equity ÷ liabilities 2.33 × 1.05+2.45
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.84below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 0.97+0.89
Gross margin slipping 1.04+0.55
Soft assets 0.97+0.39
Sales growth 1.01+0.90
Slower depreciation 0.97+0.11
Overheads vs sales 1.03-0.18
Profit not in cash -0.07-0.34
Leverage rising 1.00-0.33
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
None of the six cross-checks fires for the latest year: receivables and inventory move with revenue, profit turns into cash, investment keeps up with depreciation, the tax rate is ordinary and debt is moderate.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$53.60discounted at 10.2% a year · 51% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
16.0×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
6.0×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
0.6×
Free cash flow yield
7.2%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today461.5M
Everything after, today480.4M
The whole business941.9M
Plus net cash105.9M
What belongs to shareholders1.0B
Divided among 19.5M shares: <strong>$53.60</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
-100.0M-50.0M050.0M100.0M
2016Reported 70.1M
2017Reported 50.1M
2018Reported 59.5M
2019Reported 86.1M
2020Reported 29.7M
2021Reported 43.7M
2022Reported -65.5M
2023Reported 62.2M
2024Reported 93.3M
2025Reported 75.9M
2026Projected 59.1M
2027Projected 64.0M
2028Projected 68.9M
2029Projected 73.6M
2030Projected 78.1M
2031Projected 82.3M
2032Projected 86.1M
2033Projected 89.5M
2034Projected 92.4M
2035Projected 94.7M
2016201820202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
1.7B
1.9B
2.0B
2.1B
2.3B
2.4B
2.5B
2.6B
2.7B
2.8B
Growth
9.0%
8.3%
7.6%
6.8%
6.1%
5.4%
4.7%
3.9%
3.2%
2.5%
Cash margin
3.4%
3.4%
3.4%
3.4%
3.4%
3.4%
3.4%
3.4%
3.4%
3.4%
Free cash flow
59.1M
64.0M
68.9M
73.6M
78.1M
82.3M
86.1M
89.5M
92.4M
94.7M
Worth today
53.7M
52.7M
51.5M
49.9M
48.1M
46.0M
43.7M
41.2M
38.6M
36.0M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
9.2%
55
58
61
65
69
9.7%
52
54
57
60
64
10.2%
49
51
54
56
59
10.7%
47
48
51
53
55
11.2%
44
46
48
50
52
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
5.0%
7.0%
9.0%
11.0%
13.0%
2.7%
40
43
46
50
53
3.1%
43
47
50
54
57
3.4%
46
50
54
58
62
3.8%
50
53
57
62
66
4.1%
53
57
61
66
71
All the inputs moving at once
5,000 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.0%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$26.28
Median$53.64
90th percentile$86.90
$50.00$100.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$38.65</b> and <b>$69.83</b>; one in ten below $26.28, one in ten above $86.90.
Does the long run make sense?
4.6×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 4.6 times that year's EBITDA.
16%To grow 2.5% forever while reinvesting 15% of its after-tax operating profit, the business must earn 16% on the new capital — it has earned 7% on average over the last five years.
51%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
What lenders charge, after the tax saving on interest: 6.67% × (1 − 24.1%) = <strong>5.06%</strong>.
Weighted by how much of each the company uses (book value (no price given)): <strong>10.17%</strong>, the rate every future cash flow is discounted at.
What it has filed lately
The last twelve months at the SEC, most important first: annual and quarterly reports, events, large holders and insiders.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 4 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market$48,9021 purchase(s) by 1 insider(s)
Sold on the open market—none in the period
Under pre-arranged plans—of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Which large funds report holding it
From the Form 13F of the 28 institutions followed on this site, as of the end of their last reported quarter. A 13F is filed up to 45 days later and shows only long positions in US-listed shares.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.