GEN · Technology(services-prepackaged software) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2026-04-03
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
Gen Digital Inc. reported revenue of $5.0 billion in fiscal 2026, after growing 7.7% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin widened from -6.0% in 2018 to 42.4%, and it earned 12.6% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $8.9 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 111.3% went to dividends and 97.5% to acquisitions; the share count fell 7.3%. On the accounting screens, it passes 7 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 0.50 is in the distress zone and its Beneish M-score is above the -1.78 line; 2 of the six cross-checks between its statements fire.
Revenue, fiscal 20265.0B+7.7% a year over 9 years
Operating margin42.4%gross margin 78.5%
Return on invested capital12.6%10.8% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay1.3B25.7% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA3.0×net debt 7.8B
Piotroski F-score7/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
-2.0B02.0B4.0B6.0B
2018Revenue 2.6BOperating income -154.0M
2018
2019Revenue 2.5BOperating income 158.0M
2020Revenue 2.5BOperating income 355.0M
2021Revenue 2.6BOperating income 896.0M
2022Revenue 2.8BOperating income 1.0B
2023Revenue 3.3BOperating income 1.2B
2024Revenue 3.8BOperating income 1.1B
2025Revenue 3.9BOperating income 1.6B
2026Revenue 5.0BOperating income 2.1B
2018201820192020202120222023202420252026
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
+14.7%
+14.4%
+7.7%
Operating income
+20.7%
+18.8%
—
Net income
-10.0%
+11.9%
-1.7%
Earnings per share
-9.7%
+11.2%
-0.9%
Free cash flow per share
+26.9%
+16.1%
+8.2%
Dividend per share
+0.1%
-4.1%
+5.3%
Shares
-0.3%
+0.6%
-0.8%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 5.7%
0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%
2018Return on invested capital 3.0%
2018
2019Return on invested capital 1.6%
2020Return on invested capital 5.9%
2021Return on invested capital 23.1%
2022Return on invested capital 22.3%
2023Return on invested capital 3.0%
2024Return on invested capital 6.6%
2025Return on invested capital 9.6%
2026Return on invested capital 12.6%
2018201820192020202120222023202420252026
Economic profit
Economic profit
-500.0M0500.0M1.0B
2018Economic profit -276.9M
2018
2019Economic profit -423.0M
2020Economic profit 7.5M
2021Economic profit 537.0M
2022Economic profit 598.9M
2023Economic profit -327.1M
2024Economic profit 95.4M
2025Economic profit 401.2M
2026Economic profit 744.3M
2018201820192020202120222023202420252026
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
37.3%
Return on assets
6.2%
Asset turnover
0.32×
Research & development
8.2% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-2.0B02.0B4.0B
2018Net income 1.1BFree cash flow 808.0MAfter stock-based pay 198.0M
2018
2019Net income 31.0MFree cash flow 1.3BAfter stock-based pay 936.0M
2020Net income 3.9BFree cash flow -950.0MAfter stock-based pay -1.3B
2021Net income 554.0MFree cash flow 700.0MAfter stock-based pay 619.0M
2022Net income 836.0MFree cash flow 968.0MAfter stock-based pay 898.0M
2023Net income 1.3BFree cash flow 751.0MAfter stock-based pay 617.0M
2024Net income 607.0MFree cash flow 2.0BAfter stock-based pay 1.9B
2025Net income 643.0MFree cash flow 1.2BAfter stock-based pay 1.1B
2026Net income 973.0MFree cash flow 1.5BAfter stock-based pay 1.3B
2018201820192020202120222023202420252026
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2018–2026
8.9B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 6%513.0M
Acquisitions 97%8.6B
Dividends 111%9.8B
Share buybacks 49%4.4B
More than it generated: funded with cash or new debt -164%-14.5B
Over the same years it paid 2.1B in stock. The share count fell 7.3%. 2.3B of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$-5.00$0.00$5.00$10.00$15.00
2018Earnings per share $1.70Free cash flow per share $1.21Dividend per share $0.32
2018
2019Earnings per share $0.05Free cash flow per share $2.04Dividend per share $0.34
2020Earnings per share $6.05Free cash flow per share $-1.48Dividend per share $11.63
2021Earnings per share $0.92Free cash flow per share $1.17Dividend per share $0.62
2022Earnings per share $1.41Free cash flow per share $1.64Dividend per share $0.51
2023Earnings per share $2.14Free cash flow per share $1.20Dividend per share $0.50
2024Earnings per share $0.95Free cash flow per share $3.18Dividend per share $0.50
2025Earnings per share $1.03Free cash flow per share $1.93Dividend per share $0.50
2026Earnings per share $1.57Free cash flow per share $2.46Dividend per share $0.50
2018201820192020202120222023202420252026
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
580.0M600.0M620.0M640.0M660.0M680.0M
2018Diluted shares 668.0M
2018
2019Diluted shares 632.0M
2020Diluted shares 643.0M
2021Diluted shares 600.0M
2022Diluted shares 591.0M
2023Diluted shares 624.0M
2024Diluted shares 642.0M
2025Diluted shares 624.0M
2026Diluted shares 619.0M
2018201820192020202120222023202420252026
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
02.5B5.0B7.5B10.0B
2018Net debt 3.3B
2018
2019Net debt 2.7B
2020Net debt 2.0B
2021Net debt 2.7B
2022Net debt 1.8B
2023Net debt 9.0B
2024Net debt 7.8B
2025Net debt 7.3B
2026Net debt 7.8B
2018201820192020202120222023202420252026
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
3.0×
Interest coverage
— operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
0.40 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
— collects in 26d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
7of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✓Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforepassed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✓Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellpassed
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✓Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforepassed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
0.50distress zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets -0.10 × 6.56-0.69
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.02 × 3.26+0.06
Operating income ÷ assets 0.14 × 6.72+0.91
Equity ÷ liabilities 0.20 × 1.05+0.21
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-1.77above the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.66+1.53
Gross margin slipping 1.02+0.54
Soft assets 1.03+0.41
Sales growth 1.27+1.13
Slower depreciation 1.00+0.12
Overheads vs sales 1.00 (not reported, set to 1)-0.17
Profit not in cash -0.04-0.17
Leverage rising 0.99-0.32
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Receivables are growing 111% against revenue growing 27%.
Benign
A shift towards larger customers on longer terms, or sales concentrated at the end of the period.
Worrying
Sales are being made on looser credit, or revenue has been booked that may never be collected.
Capital spending (22M) is well below depreciation (493M).
Benign
Mature assets, or a business that has become less capital-intensive.
Worrying
Under-investing: today's profit is being held up by consuming tomorrow's capacity.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
76% of the value comes from after year 10: this valuation rests mostly on the long run, which is exactly what is least known.
Value per share, with these assumptions$114.00discounted at 5.7% a year · 76% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
72.5×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
30.0×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
15.7×
Free cash flow yield
1.8%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today18.7B
Everything after, today59.6B
The whole business78.4B
Minus net debt-7.8B
What belongs to shareholders70.6B
Divided among 619.0M shares: <strong>$114.00</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
-2.0B02.0B4.0B
2018Reported 198.0M
2018
2019Reported 936.0M
2020Reported -1.3B
2021Reported 619.0M
2022Reported 898.0M
2023Reported 617.0M
2024Reported 1.9B
2025Reported 1.1B
2026Reported 1.3B
2027Projected 1.7B
2028Projected 1.9B
2029Projected 2.1B
2030Projected 2.4B
2031Projected 2.6B
2032Projected 2.8B
2033Projected 2.9B
2034Projected 3.1B
2035Projected 3.2B
2036Projected 3.3B
2018201920212023202520272029203120332035
Year by year
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
Revenue
5.7B
6.5B
7.2B
8.0B
8.7B
9.4B
10.0B
10.6B
11.0B
11.2B
Growth
14.5%
13.2%
11.8%
10.5%
9.2%
7.8%
6.5%
5.2%
3.8%
2.5%
Cash margin
29.4%
29.4%
29.4%
29.4%
29.4%
29.4%
29.4%
29.4%
29.4%
29.4%
Free cash flow
1.7B
1.9B
2.1B
2.4B
2.6B
2.8B
2.9B
3.1B
3.2B
3.3B
Worth today
1.6B
1.7B
1.8B
1.9B
1.9B
2.0B
2.0B
2.0B
1.9B
1.9B
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
4.8%
119
140
172
222
311
5.2%
100
116
138
169
217
5.7%
87
99
114
135
166
6.2%
76
85
96
111
132
6.8%
67
74
83
94
109
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
10.5%
12.5%
14.5%
16.5%
18.5%
23.5%
75
83
91
100
110
26.4%
85
93
103
113
124
29.4%
94
104
114
125
137
32.3%
104
114
125
138
151
35.3%
113
124
137
150
164
All the inputs moving at once
4,871 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 4.4%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$68.95
Median$112.66
90th percentile$206.82
$100.00$200.00$300.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$86.83</b> and <b>$152.50</b>; one in ten below $68.95, one in ten above $206.82.
Does the long run make sense?
17.8×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 17.8 times that year's EBITDA.
Free growthIn year 10 free cash flow is at or above after-tax operating profit, yet the model grows 2.5% forever. Growth needs reinvestment; this assumes it comes for free, which flatters the terminal value.
76%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 6 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market—none in the period
Under pre-arranged plans—of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Which large funds report holding it
From the Form 13F of the 28 institutions followed on this site, as of the end of their last reported quarter. A 13F is filed up to 45 days later and shows only long positions in US-listed shares.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.