CSL · Materials(fabricated rubber products, nec) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-12-31
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
Carlisle Companies Inc reported revenue of $5.0 billion in fiscal 2025, after growing 4.3% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin widened from 11.8% in 2016 to 20.0%, and it earned 16.8% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $7.5 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 81.1% went to buybacks and 56.2% to acquisitions; the share count fell 33.4%. On the accounting screens, it passes 5 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 6.93 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; 1 of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 20255.0B+4.3% a year over 9 years
Operating margin20.0%gross margin 35.7%
Return on invested capital16.8%15.3% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay935.8M18.6% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA1.5×net debt 1.8B
Piotroski F-score5/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
02.0B4.0B6.0B
2016Revenue 3.4BOperating income 404.2M
2017Revenue 3.8BOperating income 464.0M
2018Revenue 4.5BOperating income 509.0M
2019Revenue 4.5BOperating income 634.1M
2020Revenue 4.0BOperating income 487.8M
2021Revenue 3.8BOperating income 573.4M
2022Revenue 5.4BOperating income 1.2B
2023Revenue 4.6BOperating income 982.8M
2024Revenue 5.0BOperating income 1.1B
2025Revenue 5.0BOperating income 1.0B
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
-2.7%
+4.8%
+4.3%
Operating income
-5.9%
+15.5%
+10.6%
Net income
-7.1%
+18.3%
+12.8%
Earnings per share
-0.9%
+24.1%
+18.0%
Free cash flow per share
+13.0%
+15.5%
+14.8%
Dividend per share
+17.9%
+15.5%
+13.9%
Shares
-6.3%
-4.7%
-4.4%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 6.4%
0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%
2016Return on invested capital 8.0%
2017Return on invested capital 9.0%
2018Return on invested capital 9.8%
2019Return on invested capital 11.9%
2020Return on invested capital 8.5%
2021Return on invested capital 8.1%
2022Return on invested capital 16.4%
2023Return on invested capital 14.8%
2024Return on invested capital 20.4%
2025Return on invested capital 16.8%
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M
2016Economic profit 50.5M
2017Economic profit 105.3M
2018Economic profit 141.7M
2019Economic profit 234.0M
2020Economic profit 97.7M
2021Economic profit 96.0M
2022Economic profit 561.4M
2023Economic profit 432.1M
2024Economic profit 611.8M
2025Economic profit 485.2M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
41.3%
Return on assets
11.8%
Asset turnover
0.80×
Research & development
0.9% of revenue
Overheads (SG&A)
14.8% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
0500.0M1.0B1.5B
2016Net income 250.1MFree cash flow 422.4MAfter stock-based pay 425.0M
2017Net income 365.5MFree cash flow 298.8MAfter stock-based pay 285.6M
2018Net income 611.1MFree cash flow 218.5MAfter stock-based pay 194.6M
2019Net income 472.8MFree cash flow 614.2MAfter stock-based pay 588.1M
2020Net income 320.1MFree cash flow 601.2MAfter stock-based pay 571.3M
2021Net income 421.7MFree cash flow 286.9MAfter stock-based pay 267.5M
2022Net income 924.0MFree cash flow 817.4MAfter stock-based pay 786.2M
2023Net income 767.4MFree cash flow 1.1BAfter stock-based pay 1.0B
2024Net income 1.3BFree cash flow 917.0MAfter stock-based pay 886.9M
2025Net income 740.7MFree cash flow 970.6MAfter stock-based pay 935.8M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2016–2025
7.5B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 17%1.3B
Acquisitions 56%4.2B
Dividends 17%1.2B
Share buybacks 81%6.1B
More than it generated: funded with cash or new debt -71%-5.3B
Over the same years it paid 247.5M in stock. The share count fell 33.4%. 5.8B of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$0.00$10.00$20.00$30.00
2016Earnings per share $3.85Free cash flow per share $6.51Dividend per share $1.30
2017Earnings per share $5.75Free cash flow per share $4.70Dividend per share $1.45
2018Earnings per share $10.05Free cash flow per share $3.59Dividend per share $1.54
2019Earnings per share $8.22Free cash flow per share $10.68Dividend per share $1.79
2020Earnings per share $5.82Free cash flow per share $10.93Dividend per share $2.04
2021Earnings per share $7.93Free cash flow per share $5.39Dividend per share $2.11
2022Earnings per share $17.60Free cash flow per share $15.57Dividend per share $2.56
2023Earnings per share $15.23Free cash flow per share $21.01Dividend per share $3.18
2024Earnings per share $27.85Free cash flow per share $19.47Dividend per share $3.66
2025Earnings per share $17.15Free cash flow per share $22.47Dividend per share $4.19
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
40.0M50.0M60.0M70.0M
2016Diluted shares 64.9M
2017Diluted shares 63.6M
2018Diluted shares 60.8M
2019Diluted shares 57.5M
2020Diluted shares 55.0M
2021Diluted shares 53.2M
2022Diluted shares 52.5M
2023Diluted shares 50.4M
2024Diluted shares 47.1M
2025Diluted shares 43.2M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
01.0B2.0B3.0B
2016Net debt 211.4M
2017Net debt 1.2B
2018Net debt 784.2M
2019Net debt 1.2B
2020Net debt 1.2B
2021Net debt 2.6B
2022Net debt 2.2B
2023Net debt 1.7B
2024Net debt 1.1B
2025Net debt 1.8B
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
1.5×
Interest coverage
13× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
3.09 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
67 days collects in 43d, stock 51d, pays in 26d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
5of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✕Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforefailed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✕Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellfailed
✓More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforepassed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✕Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforefailed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
6.93safe zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.25 × 6.56+1.61
Retained earnings ÷ assets 1.17 × 3.26+3.82
Operating income ÷ assets 0.16 × 6.72+1.08
Equity ÷ liabilities 0.40 × 1.05+0.42
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.83below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.02+0.94
Gross margin slipping 1.06+0.56
Soft assets 0.93+0.38
Sales growth 1.00+0.89
Slower depreciation 1.00+0.11
Overheads vs sales 1.03-0.18
Profit not in cash -0.06-0.27
Leverage rising 1.32-0.43
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Capital spending (131M) is well below depreciation (196M).
Benign
Mature assets, or a business that has become less capital-intensive.
Worrying
Under-investing: today's profit is being held up by consuming tomorrow's capacity.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$546.19discounted at 6.4% a year · 70% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
31.9×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
21.2×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
5.1×
Free cash flow yield
4.0%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today7.7B
Everything after, today17.7B
The whole business25.4B
Minus net debt-1.8B
What belongs to shareholders23.6B
Divided among 43.2M shares: <strong>$546.19</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
0500.0M1.0B1.5B
2016Reported 425.0M
2017Reported 285.6M
2018Reported 194.6M
2019Reported 588.1M
2020Reported 571.3M
2021Reported 267.5M
2022Reported 786.2M
2023Reported 1.0B
2024Reported 886.9M
2025Reported 935.8M
2026Projected 906.6M
2027Projected 949.4M
2028Projected 991.6M
2029Projected 1.0B
2030Projected 1.1B
2031Projected 1.1B
2032Projected 1.1B
2033Projected 1.2B
2034Projected 1.2B
2035Projected 1.2B
2016201820202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
5.3B
5.5B
5.8B
6.0B
6.2B
6.5B
6.7B
6.9B
7.1B
7.3B
Growth
5.0%
4.7%
4.4%
4.2%
3.9%
3.6%
3.3%
3.1%
2.8%
2.5%
Cash margin
17.2%
17.2%
17.2%
17.2%
17.2%
17.2%
17.2%
17.2%
17.2%
17.2%
Free cash flow
906.6M
949.4M
991.6M
1.0B
1.1B
1.1B
1.1B
1.2B
1.2B
1.2B
Worth today
852.1M
838.7M
823.3M
806.1M
787.1M
766.5M
744.4M
721.1M
696.6M
671.1M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
5.4%
568
647
752
902
1,131
5.9%
498
557
634
738
885
6.4%
441
488
546
622
723
6.9%
396
434
479
537
611
7.4%
358
389
425
470
527
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
1.0%
3.0%
5.0%
7.0%
9.0%
13.8%
368
405
446
489
536
15.5%
409
451
496
544
597
17.2%
451
497
546
600
657
18.9%
493
543
597
655
718
20.6%
534
588
647
710
778
All the inputs moving at once
4,968 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.6%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$359.51
Median$545.81
90th percentile$918.61
$500.00$1,000.00$1,500.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$437.62</b> and <b>$704.25</b>; one in ten below $359.51, one in ten above $918.61.
Does the long run make sense?
19.0×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 19.0 times that year's EBITDA.
Free growthIn year 10 free cash flow is at or above after-tax operating profit, yet the model grows 2.5% forever. Growth needs reinvestment; this assumes it comes for free, which flatters the terminal value.
70%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 4 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market—none in the period
Under pre-arranged plans—of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Which large funds report holding it
From the Form 13F of the 28 institutions followed on this site, as of the end of their last reported quarter. A 13F is filed up to 45 days later and shows only long positions in US-listed shares.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.