CRC · Energy(crude petroleum & natural gas) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-12-31
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
California Resources Corp reported revenue of $2.9 billion in fiscal 2025, after growing 4.6% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin widened from 3.8% in 2017 to 20.5%, and it earned 8.7% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $4.9 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 58.6% went back into the business and 27.7% to acquisitions; the share count rose 105.6%. On the accounting screens, it passes 4 of 8 Piotroski tests and its Altman Z'' of 2.32 is in the grey zone; 1 of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 20252.9B+4.6% a year over 9 years
Operating margin20.5%gross margin —
Return on invested capital8.7%10.8% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay504.0M17.3% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA1.0×net debt 1.2B
Piotroski F-score4/8tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
01.0B2.0B3.0B
2017Revenue 1.9BOperating income 73.0M
2018Revenue 2.6BOperating income 769.0M
2019Revenue 2.3BOperating income 429.0M
2020
2020
2021Revenue 2.0BOperating income 293.0M
2022Revenue 2.6BOperating income 812.0M
2023Revenue 2.2BOperating income 808.0M
2024Revenue 2.5BOperating income 620.0M
2025Revenue 2.9BOperating income 598.0M
2017201820192020202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
+3.3%
—
+4.6%
Operating income
-9.7%
—
+26.3%
Net income
-11.5%
—
—
Earnings per share
-15.0%
—
—
Free cash flow per share
+15.7%
—
—
Dividend per share
+27.0%
—
—
Shares
+4.0%
+1.0%
+8.3%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 8.8%
-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%
2017Return on invested capital 1.6%
2018Return on invested capital 15.7%
2019Return on invested capital 9.3%
2020
2020
2021Return on invested capital -9.4%
2022Return on invested capital 22.8%
2023Return on invested capital 22.1%
2024Return on invested capital 9.7%
2025Return on invested capital 8.7%
2017201820192020202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
-600.0M-400.0M-200.0M0200.0M400.0M
2017Economic profit -321.7M
2018Economic profit 339.4M
2019Economic profit 21.6M
2020
2020
2021Economic profit -413.7M
2022Economic profit 343.3M
2023Economic profit 366.8M
2024Economic profit 41.5M
2025Economic profit -3.1M
2017201820192020202020212022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
9.9%
Return on assets
4.9%
Asset turnover
0.39×
Overheads (SG&A)
11.4% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-500.0M-250.0M0250.0M500.0M750.0M
2017Net income -266.0MFree cash flow -123.0MAfter stock-based pay -152.0M
2018Net income 328.0MFree cash flow -229.0MAfter stock-based pay -274.0M
2019Net income -28.0MFree cash flow 221.0MAfter stock-based pay 189.0M
2020
2020
2021Net income 612.0MFree cash flow 466.0MAfter stock-based pay 447.0M
2022Net income 524.0MFree cash flow 311.0MAfter stock-based pay 281.0M
2023Net income 564.0MFree cash flow 468.0MAfter stock-based pay 420.0M
2024Net income 376.0MFree cash flow 355.0MAfter stock-based pay 315.0M
2025Net income 363.0MFree cash flow 543.0MAfter stock-based pay 504.0M
2017201820192020202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2017–2025
4.9B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 59%2.9B
Acquisitions 28%1.3B
Dividends 8%403.0M
Share buybacks 24%1.2B
More than it generated: funded with cash or new debt -19%-909.0M
Over the same years it paid 282.0M in stock. The share count rose 105.6%. 891.0M of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$-10.00$-5.00$0.00$5.00$10.00
2017Earnings per share $-6.26Free cash flow per share $-2.89
2018Earnings per share $6.92Free cash flow per share $-4.83
2019Earnings per share $-0.57Free cash flow per share $4.51Dividend per share $0.00
2020
2020
2021Earnings per share $7.37Free cash flow per share $5.61Dividend per share $0.17
2022Earnings per share $6.75Free cash flow per share $4.01Dividend per share $0.76
2023Earnings per share $7.78Free cash flow per share $6.46Dividend per share $1.12
2024Earnings per share $4.62Free cash flow per share $4.36Dividend per share $1.39
2025Earnings per share $4.15Free cash flow per share $6.21Dividend per share $1.56
2017201820192020202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M
2017Diluted shares 42.5M
2018Diluted shares 47.4M
2019Diluted shares 49.0M
2020
2020Diluted shares 83.3M
2021Diluted shares 83.0M
2022Diluted shares 77.6M
2023Diluted shares 72.5M
2024Diluted shares 81.4M
2025Diluted shares 87.4M
2017201820192020202020212022202320242025
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
02.0B4.0B6.0B
2017Net debt 5.3B
2018Net debt 5.2B
2019Net debt 5.0B
2020Net debt 520.0M
2020Net debt 569.0M
2021Net debt 284.0M
2022Net debt 285.0M
2023Net debt 44.0M
2024Net debt 760.0M
2025Net debt 1.2B
2017201820192020202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
1.0×
Interest coverage
— operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
0.89 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
— collects in 42d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
4of 8 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✕Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforefailed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✕Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellfailed
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
✕No new sharesShare count did not growfailed
–Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year before — not reportedno data
✓Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforepassed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
2.32grey zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets -0.02 × 6.56-0.10
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.26 × 3.26+0.84
Operating income ÷ assets 0.08 × 6.72+0.54
Equity ÷ liabilities 0.99 × 1.05+1.03
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
The accounts lack too many of the lines it needs.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Capital spending (322M) is well below depreciation (511M).
Benign
Mature assets, or a business that has become less capital-intensive.
Worrying
Under-investing: today's profit is being held up by consuming tomorrow's capacity.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$153.48discounted at 8.8% a year · 57% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
37.0×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
13.1×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
5.0×
Free cash flow yield
3.8%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today6.2B
Everything after, today8.4B
The whole business14.6B
Minus net debt-1.2B
What belongs to shareholders13.4B
Divided among 87.4M shares: <strong>$153.48</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
-500.0M0500.0M1.0B1.5B
2017Reported -152.0M
2018Reported -274.0M
2019Reported 189.0M
2020
2020
2021Reported 447.0M
2022Reported 281.0M
2023Reported 420.0M
2024Reported 315.0M
2025Reported 504.0M
2026Projected 743.7M
2027Projected 805.3M
2028Projected 866.1M
2029Projected 925.3M
2030Projected 981.9M
2031Projected 1.0B
2032Projected 1.1B
2033Projected 1.1B
2034Projected 1.2B
2035Projected 1.2B
2017201920202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
3.2B
3.4B
3.7B
3.9B
4.2B
4.4B
4.6B
4.8B
5.0B
5.1B
Growth
9.0%
8.3%
7.6%
6.8%
6.1%
5.4%
4.7%
3.9%
3.2%
2.5%
Cash margin
23.4%
23.4%
23.4%
23.4%
23.4%
23.4%
23.4%
23.4%
23.4%
23.4%
Free cash flow
743.7M
805.3M
866.1M
925.3M
981.9M
1.0B
1.1B
1.1B
1.2B
1.2B
Worth today
683.6M
680.5M
672.8M
660.7M
644.4M
624.3M
600.7M
573.9M
544.6M
513.1M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
7.8%
159
171
186
204
225
8.3%
146
156
168
183
200
8.8%
135
143
153
165
179
9.3%
125
132
141
151
162
9.8%
116
122
130
138
148
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
5.0%
7.0%
9.0%
11.0%
13.0%
18.8%
106
116
127
139
151
21.1%
117
128
140
153
167
23.4%
128
140
153
168
183
25.8%
139
152
167
182
199
28.1%
150
165
180
197
215
All the inputs moving at once
5,000 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 3.5%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$110.84
Median$153.69
90th percentile$220.34
$100.00$200.00$300.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$129.07</b> and <b>$184.39</b>; one in ten below $110.84, one in ten above $220.34.
Does the long run make sense?
10.0×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 10.0 times that year's EBITDA.
Free growthIn year 10 free cash flow is at or above after-tax operating profit, yet the model grows 2.5% forever. Growth needs reinvestment; this assumes it comes for free, which flatters the terminal value.
57%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 2 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market$2.7M4 sale(s) by 1 insider(s)
Under pre-arranged plans100%of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Companies like this one
Same SEC industry (crude petroleum & natural gas) first, then the rest of energy.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.