CCI · Real estate(real estate investment trusts) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-12-31
Crown Castle Inc. reported revenue of $215.0 million in fiscal 2025. Of the $20.5 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 80.4% went to dividends and 33.2% back into the business. On the accounting screens, it passes 6 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of -2.39 is in the distress zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; 4 of the six cross-checks between its statements fire.
Revenue, fiscal 2025215.0M
Operating margin965.1%gross margin 47.4%
Return on invested capital8.0%7.6% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay2.8B1303.3% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA9.8×net debt 27.0B
Piotroski F-score6/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
01.0B2.0B3.0B
2019
2019
2019
2019Revenue 670.0MOperating income 1.6B
2020Revenue 520.0MOperating income 1.9B
2021Revenue 621.0MOperating income 2.0B
2022Revenue 697.0MOperating income 2.4B
2023Revenue 421.0MOperating income 2.1B
2024Revenue 192.0MOperating income 2.1B
2025Revenue 215.0MOperating income 2.1B
2019201920192019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
-32.4%
-16.2%
—
Operating income
-5.1%
+2.2%
—
Net income
-35.8%
-15.9%
—
Earnings per share
-35.9%
-16.4%
—
Free cash flow per share
+22.1%
+14.3%
—
Dividend per share
-7.4%
-0.8%
—
Shares
+0.2%
+0.6%
—
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 5.1%
0.0%2.5%5.0%7.5%10.0%
2019
2019
2019
2019Return on invested capital 5.3%
2020Return on invested capital 6.3%
2021Return on invested capital 6.8%
2022Return on invested capital 8.0%
2023Return on invested capital 6.8%
2024Return on invested capital 8.5%
2025Return on invested capital 8.0%
2019201920192019202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B
2019
2019
2019
2019Economic profit 55.9M
2020Economic profit 354.3M
2021Economic profit 486.7M
2022Economic profit 870.4M
2023Economic profit 523.2M
2024Economic profit 832.1M
2025Economic profit 744.1M
2019201920192019202020212022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
—
Return on assets
1.4%
Asset turnover
0.01×
Overheads (SG&A)
178.1% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-4.0B-2.0B02.0B4.0B
2019
2019
2019
2019Net income 860.0MFree cash flow 641.0MAfter stock-based pay 524.0M
2020Net income 1.1BFree cash flow 1.4BAfter stock-based pay 1.3B
2021Net income 1.1BFree cash flow 1.6BAfter stock-based pay 1.4B
2022Net income 1.7BFree cash flow 1.6BAfter stock-based pay 1.4B
2023Net income 1.5BFree cash flow 2.9BAfter stock-based pay 2.8B
2024Net income -3.9BFree cash flow 2.8BAfter stock-based pay 2.7B
2025Net income 444.0MFree cash flow 2.9BAfter stock-based pay 2.8B
2019201920192019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2019–2025
20.5B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 33%6.8B
Acquisitions 2%374.0M
Dividends 80%16.5B
Share buybacks 2%341.0M
More than it generated: funded with cash or new debt -17%-3.5B
Over the same years it paid 799.0M in stock. The buybacks did not even cover what was handed out in stock.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$-10.00$-5.00$0.00$5.00$10.00
2019
2019
2019
2019Earnings per share $2.06Free cash flow per share $1.53Dividend per share $4.57
2020Earnings per share $2.48Free cash flow per share $3.37Dividend per share $4.95
2021Earnings per share $2.53Free cash flow per share $3.59Dividend per share $5.47
2022Earnings per share $3.86Free cash flow per share $3.61Dividend per share $6.00
2023Earnings per share $3.46Free cash flow per share $6.64Dividend per share $6.27
2024Earnings per share $-8.99Free cash flow per share $6.38Dividend per share $6.29
2025Earnings per share $1.02Free cash flow per share $6.58Dividend per share $4.76
2019201920192019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
415.0M420.0M425.0M430.0M435.0M440.0M
2019
2019
2019
2019Diluted shares 418.0M
2020Diluted shares 425.0M
2021Diluted shares 434.0M
2022Diluted shares 434.0M
2023Diluted shares 434.0M
2024Diluted shares 434.0M
2025Diluted shares 437.0M
2019201920192019202020212022202320242025
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
-10.0B010.0B20.0B30.0B
2019Net debt -149.0M
2019Net debt -190.0M
2019Net debt -82.0M
2019Net debt 18.0B
2020Net debt 19.2B
2021Net debt 20.4B
2022Net debt 22.4B
2023Net debt 23.7B
2024Net debt 24.6B
2025Net debt 27.0B
2019201920192019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
9.8×
Interest coverage
2× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
0.26 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
— collects in 292d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
6of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✓Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforepassed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✕Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellfailed
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
✕No new sharesShare count did not growfailed
✓Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforepassed
✓Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforepassed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
-2.39distress zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets -0.11 × 6.56-0.69
Retained earnings ÷ assets -0.64 × 3.26-2.09
Operating income ÷ assets 0.07 × 6.72+0.44
Equity ÷ liabilities -0.05 × 1.05-0.05
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.63below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.19+1.10
Gross margin slipping 0.93+0.49
Soft assets 1.00+0.40
Sales growth 1.12+1.00
Slower depreciation 1.02+0.12
Overheads vs sales 0.79-0.14
Profit not in cash -0.08-0.39
Leverage rising 1.14-0.37
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Receivables are growing 33% against revenue growing 12%.
Benign
A shift towards larger customers on longer terms, or sales concentrated at the end of the period.
Worrying
Sales are being made on looser credit, or revenue has been booked that may never be collected.
Capital spending (182M) is well below depreciation (690M).
Benign
Mature assets, or a business that has become less capital-intensive.
Worrying
Under-investing: today's profit is being held up by consuming tomorrow's capacity.
The effective tax rate is 1.4%.
Benign
A favourable geographic mix, or legitimate tax credits.
Worrying
Not sustainable; projecting it forward inflates the valuation.
Net debt is 9.8 times EBITDA.
Benign
A stable sector with predictable cash flows and comfortable maturities.
Worrying
Little room if earnings fall; the maturity schedule is what to check.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
76% of the value comes from after year 10: this valuation rests mostly on the long run, which is exactly what is least known.
Value per share, with these assumptions$66.69discounted at 5.1% a year · 76% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
65.6×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
20.3×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
261.2×
Free cash flow yield
9.6%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today13.6B
Everything after, today42.6B
The whole business56.2B
Minus net debt-27.0B
What belongs to shareholders29.1B
Divided among 437.0M shares: <strong>$66.69</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
01.0B2.0B3.0B
2019
2019
2019
2019Reported 524.0M
2020Reported 1.3B
2021Reported 1.4B
2022Reported 1.4B
2023Reported 2.8B
2024Reported 2.7B
2025Reported 2.8B
2026Projected 1.9B
2027Projected 1.8B
2028Projected 1.8B
2029Projected 1.7B
2030Projected 1.7B
2031Projected 1.7B
2032Projected 1.7B
2033Projected 1.7B
2034Projected 1.7B
2035Projected 1.8B
2019201920202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
204.2M
195.7M
189.2M
184.5M
181.4M
179.9M
179.9M
181.4M
184.4M
189.0M
Growth
-5.0%
-4.2%
-3.3%
-2.5%
-1.7%
-0.8%
0.0%
0.8%
1.7%
2.5%
Cash margin
942.3%
942.3%
942.3%
942.3%
942.3%
942.3%
942.3%
942.3%
942.3%
942.3%
Free cash flow
1.9B
1.8B
1.8B
1.7B
1.7B
1.7B
1.7B
1.7B
1.7B
1.8B
Worth today
1.8B
1.7B
1.5B
1.4B
1.3B
1.3B
1.2B
1.1B
1.1B
1.1B
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
4.1%
71
99
144
230
457
4.6%
50
69
96
141
225
5.1%
35
48
67
94
138
5.6%
24
33
46
64
91
6.1%
15
22
32
45
62
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
-9.0%
-7.0%
-5.0%
-3.0%
-1.0%
753.8%
26
35
44
54
66
848.0%
35
45
55
67
80
942.3%
44
55
67
79
93
1036.5%
53
65
78
92
107
1130.7%
63
75
89
104
121
All the inputs moving at once
4,633 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 141.3%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$-41.81
Median$-36.93
90th percentile$-28.20
$-40.00$-30.00$-20.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$-39.85</b> and <b>$-32.93</b>; one in ten below $-41.81, one in ten above $-28.20.
Does the long run make sense?
28.8×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 28.8 times that year's EBITDA.
263%To grow 2.5% forever while reinvesting 1% of its after-tax operating profit, the business must earn 263% on the new capital — it has earned 8% on average over the last five years.
76%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.