BMI · Technology(totalizing fluid meters & counting devices) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-12-31
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
Badger Meter Inc reported revenue of $916.7 million in fiscal 2025, after growing 9.8% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin widened from 13.4% in 2016 to 20.0%, and it earned 19.3% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $955.4 million its operations generated over 10 years, 32.3% went to acquisitions and 24.8% to dividends; the share count rose 101686.6%. On the accounting screens, it passes 4 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 8.71 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; 1 of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 2025916.7M+9.8% a year over 9 years
Operating margin20.0%gross margin 41.7%
Return on invested capital19.3%17.3% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay160.5M17.5% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA0.0×net debt 0
Piotroski F-score4/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
00.25B0.50B0.75B1.00B
2016Revenue 393.8MOperating income 52.7M
2017Revenue 402.4MOperating income 56.6M
2018Revenue 433.7MOperating income 56.9M
2019Revenue 424.6MOperating income 62.1M
2020Revenue 425.5MOperating income 65.2M
2021Revenue 505.2MOperating income 78.7M
2022Revenue 565.6MOperating income 87.3M
2023Revenue 703.6MOperating income 118.0M
2024Revenue 826.6MOperating income 157.9M
2025Revenue 916.7MOperating income 183.4M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
+17.5%
+16.6%
+9.8%
Operating income
+28.1%
+23.0%
+14.9%
Net income
+28.7%
+23.5%
+17.9%
Earnings per share
-87.2%
-69.1%
-45.4%
Free cash flow per share
-87.0%
-70.9%
-46.4%
Dividend per share
-88.0%
-70.8%
-46.8%
Shares
+902.2%
+299.0%
+115.9%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 10.2%
0%5%10%15%20%
2016Return on invested capital 11.6%
2017Return on invested capital 11.1%
2018Return on invested capital 13.7%
2019Return on invested capital 14.2%
2020Return on invested capital 13.7%
2021Return on invested capital 15.1%
2022Return on invested capital 15.0%
2023Return on invested capital 17.4%
2024Return on invested capital 19.5%
2025Return on invested capital 19.3%
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
020M40M60M80M
2016Economic profit 4.0M
2017Economic profit 2.7M
2018Economic profit 11.2M
2019Economic profit 13.2M
2020Economic profit 12.5M
2021Economic profit 19.7M
2022Economic profit 20.9M
2023Economic profit 36.7M
2024Economic profit 56.4M
2025Economic profit 64.7M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
19.9%
Return on assets
14.5%
Asset turnover
0.94×
Research & development
2.4% of revenue
Overheads (SG&A)
21.7% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
050M100M150M200M
2016Net income 32.3MFree cash flow 45.6MAfter stock-based pay 44.1M
2017Net income 34.6MFree cash flow 34.7MAfter stock-based pay 33.0M
2018Net income 27.8MFree cash flow 51.7MAfter stock-based pay 47.5M
2019Net income 47.2MFree cash flow 73.2MAfter stock-based pay 72.0M
2020Net income 49.3MFree cash flow 80.5MAfter stock-based pay 79.1M
2021Net income 60.9MFree cash flow 80.8MAfter stock-based pay 78.4M
2022Net income 66.5MFree cash flow 76.6MAfter stock-based pay 73.4M
2023Net income 92.6MFree cash flow 98.1MAfter stock-based pay 92.9M
2024Net income 124.9MFree cash flow 142.2MAfter stock-based pay 136.0M
2025Net income 141.6MFree cash flow 169.7MAfter stock-based pay 160.5M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2016–2025
955.4M generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 11%102.3M
Acquisitions 32%308.8M
Dividends 25%237.3M
Share buybacks 3%33.4M
Kept, or used to pay down debt 29%273.5M
Over the same years it paid 36.1M in stock. The share count rose 101686.6%. The buybacks did not even cover what was handed out in stock.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$0$1,000$2,000$3,000
2016Earnings per share $1,111.70Free cash flow per share $1,569.33Dividend per share $428.95
2017Earnings per share $1,187.56Free cash flow per share $1,191.37Dividend per share $488.30
2018Earnings per share $952.07Free cash flow per share $1,771.46Dividend per share $557.23
2019Earnings per share $1,614.54Free cash flow per share $2,505.75Dividend per share $636.38
2020Earnings per share $1,688.09Free cash flow per share $2,754.67Dividend per share $695.86
2021Earnings per share $2,075.26Free cash flow per share $2,752.88Dividend per share $755.16
2022Earnings per share $2,263.62Free cash flow per share $2,606.21Dividend per share $846.98
2023Earnings per share $3.14Free cash flow per share $3.33Dividend per share $0.99
2024Earnings per share $4.23Free cash flow per share $4.82Dividend per share $1.21
2025Earnings per share $4.79Free cash flow per share $5.74Dividend per share $1.47
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
010M20M30M
2016Diluted shares 29,050
2017Diluted shares 29,111
2018Diluted shares 29,189
2019Diluted shares 29,220
2020Diluted shares 29,230
2021Diluted shares 29,338
2022Diluted shares 29,376
2023Diluted shares 29.5M
2024Diluted shares 29.5M
2025Diluted shares 29.6M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Debt and liquidity
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
-100M-50M050M
2016Net debt 38.0M
2017Net debt 33.4M
2018Net debt 5.0M
2019Net debt -44.4M
2020Net debt -72.3M
2021Net debt -87.2M
2022Net debt 0
2023Net debt 0
2024Net debt 0
2025Net debt 0
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
0.0×
Interest coverage
36× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
3.36 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
99 days collects in 45d, stock 104d, pays in 49d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
4of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✕Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforefailed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✕Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellfailed
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
✕No new sharesShare count did not growfailed
✓Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforepassed
✕Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforefailed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
8.71safe zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.37 × 6.56+2.40
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.66 × 3.26+2.16
Operating income ÷ assets 0.19 × 6.72+1.27
Equity ÷ liabilities 2.74 × 1.05+2.88
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.20below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.20+1.11
Gross margin slipping 0.96+0.50
Soft assets 1.61+0.65
Sales growth 1.11+0.99
Slower depreciation 1.06+0.12
Overheads vs sales 1.05-0.18
Profit not in cash -0.04-0.20
Leverage rising 1.07-0.35
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Receivables are growing 33% against revenue growing 11%.
Benign
A shift towards larger customers on longer terms, or sales concentrated at the end of the period.
Worrying
Sales are being made on looser credit, or revenue has been booked that may never be collected.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$73.90discounted at 10.2% a year · 53% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
15.4×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
11.2×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
2.4×
Free cash flow yield
7.3%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today1.0B
Everything after, today1.2B
The whole business2.2B
Minus net debt-0
What belongs to shareholders2.2B
Divided among 29.6M shares: <strong>$73.90</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
0100M200M300M
2016Reported 44.1M
2017Reported 33.0M
2018Reported 47.5M
2019Reported 72.0M
2020Reported 79.1M
2021Reported 78.4M
2022Reported 73.4M
2023Reported 92.9M
2024Reported 136.0M
2025Reported 160.5M
2026Projected 110.3M
2027Projected 126.8M
2028Projected 143.7M
2029Projected 160.7M
2030Projected 177.2M
2031Projected 192.7M
2032Projected 206.5M
2033Projected 218.1M
2034Projected 227.0M
2035Projected 232.6M
2016201820202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
1.1B
1.2B
1.4B
1.6B
1.7B
1.9B
2.0B
2.1B
2.2B
2.3B
Growth
16.5%
14.9%
13.4%
11.8%
10.3%
8.7%
7.2%
5.6%
4.1%
2.5%
Cash margin
10.3%
10.3%
10.3%
10.3%
10.3%
10.3%
10.3%
10.3%
10.3%
10.3%
Free cash flow
110.3M
126.8M
143.7M
160.7M
177.2M
192.7M
206.5M
218.1M
227.0M
232.6M
Worth today
100.0M
104.3M
107.3M
108.8M
108.9M
107.4M
104.4M
100.0M
94.4M
87.8M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
9.2%
76
81
86
92
98
9.7%
71
75
79
84
90
10.2%
67
70
74
78
83
10.7%
63
66
69
73
77
11.2%
59
62
65
68
71
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
12.5%
14.5%
16.5%
18.5%
20.5%
8.3%
53
58
62
67
72
9.3%
58
63
68
74
79
10.3%
63
68
74
80
86
11.4%
68
74
80
86
93
12.4%
73
79
85
92
100
All the inputs moving at once
5,000 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.0%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$54.40
Median$74.11
90th percentile$101.54
$50.00$75.00$100.00$125.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$62.79</b> and <b>$87.04</b>; one in ten below $54.40, one in ten above $101.54.
Does the long run make sense?
6.4×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 6.4 times that year's EBITDA.
8%To grow 2.5% forever while reinvesting 31% of its after-tax operating profit, the business must earn 8% on the new capital — it has earned 17% on average over the last five years.
53%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
What lenders charge, after the tax saving on interest: 6.74% × (1 − 24.9%) = <strong>5.06%</strong>.
Weighted by how much of each the company uses (book value (no price given)): <strong>10.24%</strong>, the rate every future cash flow is discounted at.
What it has filed lately
The last twelve months at the SEC, most important first: annual and quarterly reports, events, large holders and insiders.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 5 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market$101,5721 purchase(s) by 1 insider(s)
Sold on the open market—none in the period
Under pre-arranged plans—of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Which large funds report holding it
From the Form 13F of the 28 institutions followed on this site, as of the end of their last reported quarter. A 13F is filed up to 45 days later and shows only long positions in US-listed shares.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.