AYI · Technology(electric lighting & wiring equipment) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-08-31
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
Acuity Inc. (DE) reported revenue of $4.3 billion in fiscal 2025, after growing 3.1% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin narrowed from 14.4% in 2016 to 13.0%, and it earned 12.3% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $4.6 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 52.3% went to acquisitions and 48.5% to buybacks; the share count fell 27.8%. On the accounting screens, it passes 4 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 6.26 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; 2 of the six cross-checks between its statements fire.
Revenue, fiscal 20254.3B+3.1% a year over 9 years
Operating margin13.0%gross margin 47.8%
Return on invested capital12.3%14.2% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay487.9M11.2% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA0.7×net debt 474.3M
Piotroski F-score4/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
02B4B6B
2016Revenue 3.3BOperating income 475.2M
2017Revenue 3.5BOperating income 527.5M
2018Revenue 3.7BOperating income 460.8M
2019Revenue 3.7BOperating income 462.9M
2020Revenue 3.3BOperating income 353.9M
2021Revenue 3.5BOperating income 427.6M
2022Revenue 4.0BOperating income 509.7M
2023Revenue 4.0BOperating income 473.4M
2024Revenue 3.8BOperating income 553.3M
2025Revenue 4.3BOperating income 563.9M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
+2.7%
+5.5%
+3.1%
Operating income
+3.4%
+9.8%
+1.9%
Net income
+1.1%
+9.8%
+3.5%
Earnings per share
+4.2%
+14.9%
+7.3%
Free cash flow per share
+31.0%
+8.2%
+10.3%
Dividend per share
+7.6%
+4.4%
+2.5%
Shares
-3.0%
-4.4%
-3.5%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 8.7%
0%5%10%15%20%
2016Return on invested capital 15.4%
2017Return on invested capital 17.0%
2018Return on invested capital 18.2%
2019Return on invested capital 15.8%
2020Return on invested capital 10.7%
2021Return on invested capital 13.0%
2022Return on invested capital 16.3%
2023Return on invested capital 14.6%
2024Return on invested capital 14.8%
2025Return on invested capital 12.3%
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
050M100M150M200M
2016Economic profit 134.8M
2017Economic profit 167.9M
2018Economic profit 197.2M
2019Economic profit 161.2M
2020Economic profit 49.8M
2021Economic profit 108.9M
2022Economic profit 184.5M
2023Economic profit 147.4M
2024Economic profit 175.1M
2025Economic profit 130.8M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
14.6%
Return on assets
8.3%
Asset turnover
0.91×
Research & development
3.2% of revenue
Overheads (SG&A)
34.2% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
0200M400M600M
2016Net income 290.8MFree cash flow 304.2MAfter stock-based pay 276.5M
2017Net income 321.7MFree cash flow 269.3MAfter stock-based pay 237.3M
2018Net income 349.6MFree cash flow 307.9MAfter stock-based pay 275.6M
2019Net income 330.4MFree cash flow 441.7MAfter stock-based pay 412.5M
2020Net income 248.3MFree cash flow 449.9MAfter stock-based pay 411.7M
2021Net income 306.3MFree cash flow 364.9MAfter stock-based pay 332.4M
2022Net income 384.0MFree cash flow 259.8MAfter stock-based pay 222.4M
2023Net income 346.0MFree cash flow 511.4MAfter stock-based pay 469.4M
2024Net income 422.6MFree cash flow 555.2MAfter stock-based pay 508.6M
2025Net income 396.6MFree cash flow 533.0MAfter stock-based pay 487.9M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2016–2025
4.6B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 13%601.9M
Acquisitions 52%2.4B
Dividends 4%201.4M
Share buybacks 49%2.2B
More than it generated: funded with cash or new debt -18%-840.2M
Over the same years it paid 363.0M in stock. The share count fell 27.8%. 1.9B of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$0$5$10$15$20
2016Earnings per share $6.64Free cash flow per share $6.95Dividend per share $0.52
2017Earnings per share $7.43Free cash flow per share $6.22Dividend per share $0.52
2018Earnings per share $8.53Free cash flow per share $7.51Dividend per share $0.52
2019Earnings per share $8.30Free cash flow per share $11.10Dividend per share $0.52
2020Earnings per share $6.27Free cash flow per share $11.36Dividend per share $0.53
2021Earnings per share $8.38Free cash flow per share $9.98Dividend per share $0.52
2022Earnings per share $11.08Free cash flow per share $7.50Dividend per share $0.52
2023Earnings per share $10.76Free cash flow per share $15.90Dividend per share $0.52
2024Earnings per share $13.44Free cash flow per share $17.66Dividend per share $0.58
2025Earnings per share $12.53Free cash flow per share $16.85Dividend per share $0.65
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
30M35M40M45M
2016Diluted shares 43.8M
2017Diluted shares 43.3M
2018Diluted shares 41.0M
2019Diluted shares 39.8M
2020Diluted shares 39.6M
2021Diluted shares 36.6M
2022Diluted shares 34.6M
2023Diluted shares 32.2M
2024Diluted shares 31.4M
2025Diluted shares 31.6M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Debt and liquidity
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
-500M-250M0250M500M
2016Net debt -58.0M
2017Net debt 45.8M
2018Net debt 227.7M
2019Net debt -104.4M
2020Net debt -159.6M
2021Net debt 3.0M
2022Net debt 289.8M
2023Net debt 97.7M
2024Net debt -349.6M
2025Net debt 474.3M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
0.7×
Interest coverage
13× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
1.95 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
62 days collects in 50d, stock 85d, pays in 73d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
4of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✕Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforefailed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✕Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellfailed
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
✕No new sharesShare count did not growfailed
✓Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforepassed
✕Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforefailed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
6.26safe zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.17 × 6.56+1.11
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.90 × 3.26+2.94
Operating income ÷ assets 0.12 × 6.72+0.80
Equity ÷ liabilities 1.34 × 1.05+1.41
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.59below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 0.93+0.86
Gross margin slipping 0.97+0.51
Soft assets 1.35+0.55
Sales growth 1.13+1.01
Slower depreciation 0.83+0.09
Overheads vs sales 1.07-0.18
Profit not in cash -0.04-0.20
Leverage rising 1.18-0.39
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Inventory is growing 36% against revenue growing 13%.
Benign
Stocking up for a launch, or securing supply.
Worrying
Demand is softening; discounts or write-downs tend to follow.
Capital spending (68M) is well below depreciation (133M).
Benign
Mature assets, or a business that has become less capital-intensive.
Worrying
Under-investing: today's profit is being held up by consuming tomorrow's capacity.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$261.77discounted at 8.7% a year · 57% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
20.9×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
12.6×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
2.0×
Free cash flow yield
5.9%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today3.8B
Everything after, today4.9B
The whole business8.8B
Minus net debt-474.3M
What belongs to shareholders8.3B
Divided among 31.6M shares: <strong>$261.77</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
0200M400M600M800M
2016Reported 276.5M
2017Reported 237.3M
2018Reported 275.6M
2019Reported 412.5M
2020Reported 411.7M
2021Reported 332.4M
2022Reported 222.4M
2023Reported 469.4M
2024Reported 508.6M
2025Reported 487.9M
2026Projected 495.6M
2027Projected 521.2M
2028Projected 546.4M
2029Projected 571.0M
2030Projected 594.8M
2031Projected 617.6M
2032Projected 639.2M
2033Projected 659.5M
2034Projected 678.2M
2035Projected 695.1M
2016201820202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
4.6B
4.8B
5.1B
5.3B
5.5B
5.7B
5.9B
6.1B
6.3B
6.4B
Growth
5.5%
5.2%
4.8%
4.5%
4.2%
3.8%
3.5%
3.2%
2.8%
2.5%
Cash margin
10.8%
10.8%
10.8%
10.8%
10.8%
10.8%
10.8%
10.8%
10.8%
10.8%
Free cash flow
495.6M
521.2M
546.4M
571.0M
594.8M
617.6M
639.2M
659.5M
678.2M
695.1M
Worth today
455.8M
440.9M
425.1M
408.5M
391.4M
373.7M
355.7M
337.5M
319.2M
300.9M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
7.7%
271
292
316
345
381
8.2%
249
267
286
310
339
8.7%
231
245
262
281
305
9.2%
214
227
241
257
277
9.7%
200
211
223
237
253
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
1.5%
3.5%
5.5%
7.5%
9.5%
8.6%
183
200
218
238
259
9.7%
201
220
240
262
285
10.8%
219
240
262
286
311
11.9%
237
259
284
309
337
13.0%
255
279
305
333
364
All the inputs moving at once
5,000 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.0%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$185.93
Median$262.17
90th percentile$378.08
$200.00$400.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$218.41</b> and <b>$315.92</b>; one in ten below $185.93, one in ten above $378.08.
Does the long run make sense?
11.1×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 11.1 times that year's EBITDA.
Free growthIn year 10 free cash flow is at or above after-tax operating profit, yet the model grows 2.5% forever. Growth needs reinvestment; this assumes it comes for free, which flatters the terminal value.
57%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 4 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market$340,7462 purchase(s) by 2 insider(s)
Sold on the open market$3.3M4 sale(s) by 2 insider(s)
Under pre-arranged plans75%of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Which large funds report holding it
From the Form 13F of the 28 institutions followed on this site, as of the end of their last reported quarter. A 13F is filed up to 45 days later and shows only long positions in US-listed shares.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.