ATI · Materials(steel pipe & tubes) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-12-28
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
ATI Inc reported revenue of $4.6 billion in fiscal 2025, after growing 1.2% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin widened from 8.9% in 2019 to 14.0%, and it earned 28.0% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $2.0 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 80.2% went back into the business and 55.1% to buybacks; the share count fell 3.2%. On the accounting screens, it passes 9 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 3.89 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; none of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 20254.6B+1.2% a year over 9 years
Operating margin14.0%gross margin 22.0%
Return on invested capital28.0%24.4% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay304.7M6.6% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDANet cash385.6M more cash than debt
Piotroski F-score9/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
-2.0B02.0B4.0B6.0B
2019Revenue 4.1BOperating income 366.3M
2020Revenue 3.0BOperating income -1.3B
2021
2021Revenue 2.8BOperating income 117.6M
2022Revenue 2.8BOperating income 117.6M
2022Revenue 3.8BOperating income 287.3M
2023Revenue 3.8BOperating income 316.1M
2023Revenue 4.2BOperating income 466.4M
2024Revenue 4.4BOperating income 608.9M
2025Revenue 4.6BOperating income 640.9M
2019202020212021202220222023202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
+6.1%
+10.4%
+1.2%
Operating income
+26.6%
+40.4%
+6.4%
Net income
+7.7%
+17.0%
+5.4%
Earnings per share
+10.0%
+18.7%
+5.8%
Free cash flow per share
+55.8%
—
+21.0%
Shares
-2.1%
-1.5%
-0.4%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 10.2%
-300.0%-200.0%-100.0%0.0%100.0%
2019Return on invested capital 15.3%
2020Return on invested capital -254.4%
2021
2021Return on invested capital -22.0%
2022
2022Return on invested capital 23.9%
2023Return on invested capital 27.8%
2023Return on invested capital 18.8%
2024Return on invested capital 23.6%
2025Return on invested capital 28.0%
2019202020212021202220222023202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
-1.5B-1.0B-500.0M0500.0M
2019Economic profit 108.3M
2020Economic profit -1.4B
2021
2021Economic profit -262.9M
2022
2022Economic profit 149.1M
2023Economic profit 191.6M
2023Economic profit 120.9M
2024Economic profit 272.7M
2025Economic profit 326.9M
2019202020212021202220222023202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
22.4%
Return on assets
7.9%
Asset turnover
0.90×
Research & development
0.5% of revenue
Overheads (SG&A)
8.0% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-2.0B-1.5B-1.0B-500.0M0500.0M
2019Net income 252.5MFree cash flow 61.9M
2020Net income -1.6BFree cash flow 30.4MAfter stock-based pay 27.5M
2021
2021Net income -38.2MFree cash flow -136.5MAfter stock-based pay -157.6M
2022Net income 184.6MFree cash flow -136.5MAfter stock-based pay -157.6M
2022Net income 130.9MFree cash flow 94.0MAfter stock-based pay 68.0M
2023Net income 323.5MFree cash flow 94.0MAfter stock-based pay 68.0M
2023Net income 410.8MFree cash flow -114.8MAfter stock-based pay -143.9M
2024Net income 367.8MFree cash flow 168.1MAfter stock-based pay 134.0M
2025Net income 404.3MFree cash flow 333.7MAfter stock-based pay 304.7M
2019202020212021202220222023202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2019–2025
2.0B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 80%1.6B
Acquisitions 0%0
Dividends 0%0
Share buybacks 55%1.1B
More than it generated: funded with cash or new debt -35%-700.7M
Over the same years it paid 189.3M in stock. The share count fell 3.2%. 905.7M of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$-15.00$-10.00$-5.00$0.00$5.00
2019Earnings per share $1.72Free cash flow per share $0.42Dividend per share $0.00
2020Earnings per share $-12.43Free cash flow per share $0.24
2021
2021Earnings per share $-0.30Free cash flow per share $-1.07
2022Earnings per share $1.21Free cash flow per share $-0.89
2022Earnings per share $0.87Free cash flow per share $0.62
2023Earnings per share $2.14Free cash flow per share $0.62
2023Earnings per share $2.74Free cash flow per share $-0.77
2024Earnings per share $2.51Free cash flow per share $1.15
2025Earnings per share $2.85Free cash flow per share $2.35
2019202020212021202220222023202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
120.0M130.0M140.0M150.0M160.0M
2019Diluted shares 146.5M
2020Diluted shares 126.5M
2021
2021Diluted shares 127.1M
2022Diluted shares 152.7M
2022Diluted shares 151.2M
2023Diluted shares 151.2M
2023Diluted shares 150.0M
2024Diluted shares 146.6M
2025Diluted shares 141.8M
2019202020212021202220222023202320242025
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
-800.0M-600.0M-400.0M-200.0M0
2019Net debt -479.3M
2020Net debt -628.1M
2021
2021Net debt -556.4M
2022
2022Net debt -542.3M
2023Net debt -542.3M
2023Net debt -712.0M
2024Net debt -540.8M
2025Net debt -385.6M
2019202020212021202220222023202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
-0.5×
Interest coverage
6× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
2.66 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
140 days collects in 55d, stock 143d, pays in 58d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
9of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✓Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforepassed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✓Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellpassed
✓More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforepassed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✓Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforepassed
✓Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforepassed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
3.89safe zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.33 × 6.56+2.15
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.09 × 3.26+0.30
Operating income ÷ assets 0.13 × 6.72+0.84
Equity ÷ liabilities 0.57 × 1.05+0.60
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.70below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 0.92+0.85
Gross margin slipping 0.94+0.50
Soft assets 0.97+0.39
Sales growth 1.05+0.94
Slower depreciation 0.99+0.11
Overheads vs sales 1.01-0.17
Profit not in cash -0.04-0.19
Leverage rising 0.85-0.28
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
None of the six cross-checks fires for the latest year: receivables and inventory move with revenue, profit turns into cash, investment keeps up with depreciation, the tax rate is ordinary and debt is moderate.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$33.30discounted at 10.2% a year · 52% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
11.7×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
5.4×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
0.9×
Free cash flow yield
6.5%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today2.1B
Everything after, today2.3B
The whole business4.3B
Plus net cash385.6M
What belongs to shareholders4.7B
Divided among 141.8M shares: <strong>$33.30</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
-200.0M0200.0M400.0M600.0M
2019
2020Reported 27.5M
2021
2021Reported -157.6M
2022Reported -157.6M
2022Reported 68.0M
2023Reported 68.0M
2023Reported -143.9M
2024Reported 134.0M
2025Reported 304.7M
2026Projected 241.1M
2027Projected 269.7M
2028Projected 298.4M
2029Projected 326.8M
2030Projected 354.0M
2031Projected 379.4M
2032Projected 402.2M
2033Projected 421.6M
2034Projected 437.1M
2035Projected 448.0M
2019202120222023202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
5.2B
5.8B
6.4B
7.0B
7.6B
8.2B
8.6B
9.1B
9.4B
9.6B
Growth
13.0%
11.8%
10.7%
9.5%
8.3%
7.2%
6.0%
4.8%
3.7%
2.5%
Cash margin
4.7%
4.7%
4.7%
4.7%
4.7%
4.7%
4.7%
4.7%
4.7%
4.7%
Free cash flow
241.1M
269.7M
298.4M
326.8M
354.0M
379.4M
402.2M
421.6M
437.1M
448.0M
Worth today
218.9M
222.2M
223.2M
221.8M
218.1M
212.1M
204.1M
194.2M
182.7M
170.0M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
9.2%
34
36
38
41
43
9.7%
32
34
36
38
40
10.2%
30
32
33
35
37
10.7%
29
30
31
33
34
11.2%
27
28
30
31
32
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
9.0%
11.0%
13.0%
15.0%
17.0%
3.7%
25
27
29
31
33
4.2%
27
29
31
33
36
4.7%
29
31
33
36
38
5.1%
31
33
36
38
41
5.6%
33
35
38
41
44
All the inputs moving at once
5,000 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.0%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$19.95
Median$33.27
90th percentile$50.51
$20.00$40.00$60.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$25.93</b> and <b>$41.58</b>; one in ten below $19.95, one in ten above $50.51.
Does the long run make sense?
3.5×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 3.5 times that year's EBITDA.
4%To grow 2.5% forever while reinvesting 58% of its after-tax operating profit, the business must earn 4% on the new capital — it has earned 24% on average over the last five years.
52%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
What lenders charge, after the tax saving on interest: 13.17% × (1 − 19.9%) = <strong>10.56%</strong>.
Weighted by how much of each the company uses (book value (no price given)): <strong>10.18%</strong>, the rate every future cash flow is discounted at.
What it has filed lately
The last twelve months at the SEC, most important first: annual and quarterly reports, events, large holders and insiders.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 2 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market$15.7M6 sale(s) by 2 insider(s)
Under pre-arranged plans83%of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Which large funds report holding it
From the Form 13F of the 28 institutions followed on this site, as of the end of their last reported quarter. A 13F is filed up to 45 days later and shows only long positions in US-listed shares.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.