PAYX · Industrials(services-engineering, accounting, research, management) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2026-05-31
Paychex Inc reported revenue of $6.3 billion in fiscal 2026, after growing 8.2% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin held steady at about 39.8% from 2017, and it earned 23.1% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $15.9 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 66.5% went to dividends and 27.8% to acquisitions. On the accounting screens, it passes 7 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 2.44 is in the grey zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; 1 of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 20266.3B+8.2% a year over 9 years
Operating margin39.8%gross margin 73.4%
Return on invested capital23.1%29.9% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay2.2B35.3% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA1.2×net debt 3.5B
Piotroski F-score7/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B
2017Revenue 3.1BOperating income 1.3B
2018Revenue 3.3BOperating income 1.3B
2019Revenue 3.7BOperating income 1.4B
2020Revenue 4.0BOperating income 1.5B
2021Revenue 4.0BOperating income 1.5B
2022Revenue 4.6BOperating income 1.8B
2023Revenue 4.9BOperating income 2.0B
2024Revenue 5.1BOperating income 2.2B
2025Revenue 5.4BOperating income 2.2B
2026Revenue 6.3BOperating income 2.5B
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
+8.7%
+9.5%
+8.2%
Operating income
+7.3%
+11.4%
+8.0%
Net income
+4.2%
—
—
Earnings per share
+4.4%
—
—
Free cash flow per share
+14.3%
+15.4%
+11.7%
Dividend per share
+10.8%
+12.0%
+10.3%
Shares
-0.2%
-0.1%
-0.1%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 7.1%
0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%
2017
2018Return on invested capital 41.9%
2019Return on invested capital 30.4%
2020Return on invested capital 31.1%
2021Return on invested capital 29.8%
2022Return on invested capital 36.1%
2023Return on invested capital 35.9%
2024Return on invested capital 36.0%
2025Return on invested capital 18.5%
2026Return on invested capital 23.1%
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Economic profit
Economic profit
0500.0M1.0B1.5B
2017
2018Economic profit 821.1M
2019Economic profit 795.7M
2020Economic profit 862.9M
2021Economic profit 852.8M
2022Economic profit 1.1B
2023Economic profit 1.2B
2024Economic profit 1.3B
2025Economic profit 1.0B
2026Economic profit 1.3B
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
47.1%
Return on assets
10.9%
Asset turnover
0.39×
Overheads (SG&A)
36.9% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
2022Net income 1.4BFree cash flow 1.5BAfter stock-based pay 1.4B
2023Net income 1.6BFree cash flow 1.6BAfter stock-based pay 1.5B
2024Net income 1.7BFree cash flow 1.7BAfter stock-based pay 1.7B
2025Net income 1.7BFree cash flow 1.7BAfter stock-based pay 1.6B
2026Net income 1.8BFree cash flow 2.3BAfter stock-based pay 2.2B
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2017–2026
15.9B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 9%1.5B
Acquisitions 28%4.4B
Dividends 67%10.6B
Share buybacks 11%1.7B
More than it generated: funded with cash or new debt -15%-2.3B
Over the same years it paid 610.5M in stock. The share count fell 0.7%. 1.1B of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$0.00$2.00$4.00$6.00$8.00
2017Free cash flow per share $2.39Dividend per share $1.83
2018Free cash flow per share $3.10Dividend per share $2.05
2019Free cash flow per share $3.17Dividend per share $2.29
2020Free cash flow per share $3.64Dividend per share $2.46
2021Free cash flow per share $3.15Dividend per share $2.51
2022Earnings per share $3.84Free cash flow per share $4.01Dividend per share $2.75
2023Earnings per share $4.30Free cash flow per share $4.31Dividend per share $3.24
2024Earnings per share $4.67Free cash flow per share $4.80Dividend per share $3.63
2025Earnings per share $4.58Free cash flow per share $4.72Dividend per share $4.00
2026Earnings per share $4.89Free cash flow per share $6.45Dividend per share $4.42
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
360.0M361.0M362.0M363.0M364.0M
2017Diluted shares 362.6M
2018Diluted shares 361.5M
2019Diluted shares 361.8M
2020Diluted shares 361.0M
2021Diluted shares 362.1M
2022Diluted shares 363.1M
2023Diluted shares 362.3M
2024Diluted shares 362.1M
2025Diluted shares 362.0M
2026Diluted shares 360.0M
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
-2.0B02.0B4.0B
2017
2018Net debt -358.2M
2019Net debt 122.8M
2020Net debt -103.3M
2021Net debt -190.5M
2022Net debt 436.4M
2023Net debt -413.6M
2024Net debt -670.3M
2025Net debt 3.3B
2026Net debt 3.5B
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
1.2×
Interest coverage
9× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
1.26 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
—
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
7of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✓Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforepassed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✕Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellfailed
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✓Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforepassed
✓Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforepassed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
2.44grey zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.11 × 6.56+0.72
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.11 × 3.26+0.36
Operating income ÷ assets 0.16 × 6.72+1.04
Equity ÷ liabilities 0.30 × 1.05+0.32
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.64below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.00 (not reported, set to 1)+0.92
Gross margin slipping 0.97+0.51
Soft assets 1.00+0.40
Sales growth 1.16+1.04
Slower depreciation 0.68+0.08
Overheads vs sales 1.10-0.19
Profit not in cash -0.05-0.23
Leverage rising 1.01-0.33
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Capital spending (235M) is well below depreciation (443M).
Benign
Mature assets, or a business that has become less capital-intensive.
Worrying
Under-investing: today's profit is being held up by consuming tomorrow's capacity.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$155.07discounted at 7.1% a year · 67% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
31.7×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
20.1×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
9.4×
Free cash flow yield
4.0%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today19.6B
Everything after, today39.6B
The whole business59.3B
Minus net debt-3.5B
What belongs to shareholders55.8B
Divided among 360.0M shares: <strong>$155.07</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B
2017Reported 830.7M
2018Reported 1.1B
2019Reported 1.1B
2020Reported 1.3B
2021Reported 1.1B
2022Reported 1.4B
2023Reported 1.5B
2024Reported 1.7B
2025Reported 1.6B
2026Reported 2.2B
2027Projected 2.1B
2028Projected 2.3B
2029Projected 2.5B
2030Projected 2.7B
2031Projected 2.9B
2032Projected 3.0B
2033Projected 3.2B
2034Projected 3.3B
2035Projected 3.4B
2036Projected 3.5B
2017201920212023202520272029203120332035
Year by year
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
Revenue
6.9B
7.5B
8.1B
8.7B
9.2B
9.8B
10.2B
10.6B
11.0B
11.3B
Growth
9.5%
8.7%
7.9%
7.2%
6.4%
5.6%
4.8%
4.1%
3.3%
2.5%
Cash margin
31.0%
31.0%
31.0%
31.0%
31.0%
31.0%
31.0%
31.0%
31.0%
31.0%
Free cash flow
2.1B
2.3B
2.5B
2.7B
2.9B
3.0B
3.2B
3.3B
3.4B
3.5B
Worth today
2.0B
2.0B
2.0B
2.0B
2.0B
2.0B
2.0B
1.9B
1.8B
1.8B
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
6.1%
161
179
203
234
277
6.6%
144
158
176
199
230
7.1%
129
141
155
173
195
7.6%
117
127
138
152
170
8.1%
107
115
125
136
149
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
5.5%
7.5%
9.5%
11.5%
13.5%
24.8%
106
116
127
139
152
27.9%
118
129
141
154
168
31.0%
129
142
155
170
185
34.1%
141
154
169
185
202
37.2%
152
167
183
200
218
All the inputs moving at once
4,994 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 4.7%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$106.46
Median$155.00
90th percentile$245.36
$100.00$200.00$300.00$400.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$126.91</b> and <b>$194.86</b>; one in ten below $106.46, one in ten above $245.36.
Does the long run make sense?
14.9×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 14.9 times that year's EBITDA.
Free growthIn year 10 free cash flow is at or above after-tax operating profit, yet the model grows 2.5% forever. Growth needs reinvestment; this assumes it comes for free, which flatters the terminal value.
67%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.