P · Technology(computer storage devices) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2026-02-01
Everpure, Inc. reported revenue of $3.7 billion in fiscal 2026, after growing 15.2% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin widened from -16.3% in 2018 to 3.1%, and it earned 6.7% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $4.1 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 35.1% went to buybacks and 31.6% back into the business; the share count rose 67.8%. On the accounting screens, it passes 5 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 1.43 is in the grey zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; 2 of the six cross-checks between its statements fire.
Revenue, fiscal 20263.7B+15.2% a year over 9 years
Operating margin3.1%gross margin 70.4%
Return on invested capital6.7%4.5% on average over 4 years
Free cash flow after stock pay134.1M3.7% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDANet cash854.9M more cash than debt
Piotroski F-score5/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
-1.0B01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B
2018Revenue 1.0BOperating income -167.4M
2019Revenue 1.4BOperating income -169.3M
2020Revenue 1.6BOperating income -191.3M
2021Revenue 1.7BOperating income -261.0M
2022Revenue 2.2BOperating income -98.4M
2022
2023Revenue 2.8BOperating income 83.5M
2024Revenue 2.8BOperating income 53.6M
2025Revenue 3.2BOperating income 85.3M
2026Revenue 3.7BOperating income 114.8M
2018201920202021202220222023202420252026
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
+10.0%
+10.9%
+15.2%
Operating income
+11.2%
—
—
Net income
+37.1%
—
—
Earnings per share
+36.6%
—
—
Free cash flow per share
-0.0%
+10.8%
+53.6%
Shares
+0.4%
+3.7%
+5.9%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Needs a cost of capital, which comes from the valuation below.
Return on equity
13.0%
Return on assets
4.0%
Asset turnover
0.78×
Research & development
26.3% of revenue
Overheads (SG&A)
8.7% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-500.0M-250.0M0250.0M500.0M750.0M
2018Net income -159.9MFree cash flow 7.7MAfter stock-based pay -143.0M
2019Net income -178.4MFree cash flow 64.2MAfter stock-based pay -146.5M
2020Net income -201.0MFree cash flow 101.7MAfter stock-based pay -125.0M
2021Net income -282.1MFree cash flow 92.7MAfter stock-based pay -149.7M
2022Net income -143.3MFree cash flow 307.8MAfter stock-based pay 20.9M
2022
2023Net income 73.1MFree cash flow 609.1MAfter stock-based pay 281.5M
2024Net income 61.3MFree cash flow 482.6MAfter stock-based pay 151.1M
2025Net income 106.7MFree cash flow 526.9MAfter stock-based pay 105.6M
2026Net income 188.2MFree cash flow 615.7MAfter stock-based pay 134.1M
2018201920202021202220222023202420252026
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2018–2026
4.1B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 32%1.3B
Acquisitions 10%411.4M
Dividends 0%0
Share buybacks 35%1.4B
Kept, or used to pay down debt 23%955.1M
Over the same years it paid 2.7B in stock. The share count rose 67.8%. The buybacks did not even cover what was handed out in stock.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$-2.00$-1.00$0.00$1.00$2.00
2018Earnings per share $-0.78Free cash flow per share $0.04
2019Earnings per share $-0.81Free cash flow per share $0.29
2020Earnings per share $-0.79Free cash flow per share $0.40
2021Earnings per share $-1.05Free cash flow per share $0.35
2022Earnings per share $-0.50Free cash flow per share $1.08
2022
2023Earnings per share $0.22Free cash flow per share $1.80
2024Earnings per share $0.18Free cash flow per share $1.45
2025Earnings per share $0.31Free cash flow per share $1.54
2026Earnings per share $0.55Free cash flow per share $1.80
2018201920202021202220222023202420252026
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
200.0M250.0M300.0M350.0M
2018Diluted shares 204.4M
2019Diluted shares 221.0M
2020Diluted shares 252.8M
2021Diluted shares 267.8M
2022Diluted shares 285.9M
2022
2023Diluted shares 339.2M
2024Diluted shares 332.6M
2025Diluted shares 342.7M
2026Diluted shares 343.0M
2018201920202021202220222023202420252026
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
-1.0B-500.0M0500.0M
2018
2019
2020
2021Net debt 418.7M
2022Net debt 320.6M
2022
2023Net debt -6.3M
2024Net debt -602.5M
2025Net debt -623.6M
2026Net debt -854.9M
2018201920202021202220222023202420252026
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
-3.4×
Interest coverage
34× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
1.60 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
68 days collects in 94d, stock 26d, pays in 52d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
5of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✓Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforepassed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✕Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellfailed
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
✕No new sharesShare count did not growfailed
✓Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforepassed
✕Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforefailed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
1.43grey zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.25 × 6.56+1.62
Retained earnings ÷ assets -0.25 × 3.26-0.82
Operating income ÷ assets 0.02 × 6.72+0.17
Equity ÷ liabilities 0.45 × 1.05+0.47
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.87below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.20+1.10
Gross margin slipping 0.99+0.52
Soft assets 0.93+0.38
Sales growth 1.16+1.03
Slower depreciation 1.05+0.12
Overheads vs sales 0.96-0.17
Profit not in cash -0.15-0.69
Leverage rising 1.01-0.33
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Receivables are growing 39% against revenue growing 16%.
Benign
A shift towards larger customers on longer terms, or sales concentrated at the end of the period.
Worrying
Sales are being made on looser credit, or revenue has been booked that may never be collected.
Inventory is growing 77% against revenue growing 16%.
Benign
Stocking up for a launch, or securing supply.
Worrying
Demand is softening; discounts or write-downs tend to follow.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
With a free cash flow margin at or below zero in year ten, the business never generates cash for its owners and a DCF says nothing useful. Set a positive margin for year ten to see what it would take.
What it has filed lately
The last twelve months at the SEC, most important first: annual and quarterly reports, events, large holders and insiders.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.