MSI · Technology(radio & tv broadcasting & communications equipment) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-12-31
Motorola Solutions, Inc. reported revenue of $11.7 billion in fiscal 2025. Of the $15.4 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 29.9% went to buybacks and 27.7% to dividends. On the accounting screens, it passes 6 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 1.69 is in the grey zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; 2 of the six cross-checks between its statements fire.
Revenue, fiscal 202511.7B
Operating margin25.6%gross margin 51.7%
Return on invested capital21.2%25.2% on average over 4 years
Free cash flow after stock pay2.3B19.5% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA2.1×net debt 7.2B
Piotroski F-score6/9tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
05.0B10.0B15.0B
2018
2018Revenue 7.3BOperating income 1.3B
2019Revenue 7.9BOperating income 1.6B
2020Revenue 7.4BOperating income 1.4B
2021Revenue 8.2BOperating income 1.7B
2022
2022Revenue 9.1BOperating income 1.7B
2023Revenue 10.0BOperating income 2.3B
2024Revenue 10.8BOperating income 2.7B
2025Revenue 11.7BOperating income 3.0B
2018201820192020202120222022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
+8.6%
+7.4%
—
Operating income
+21.6%
+12.4%
—
Net income
+16.5%
+11.6%
—
Earnings per share
+17.1%
+12.2%
—
Free cash flow per share
+18.6%
+10.6%
—
Dividend per share
+11.8%
+9.2%
—
Shares
-0.6%
-0.5%
—
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 5.4%
0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%
2018
2018Return on invested capital 27.4%
2019Return on invested capital 31.1%
2020Return on invested capital 24.3%
2021Return on invested capital 23.8%
2022
2022Return on invested capital 24.4%
2023Return on invested capital 27.2%
2024Return on invested capital 28.0%
2025Return on invested capital 21.2%
2018201820192020202120222022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B
2018
2018Economic profit 887.7M
2019Economic profit 1.1B
2020Economic profit 875.2M
2021Economic profit 1.0B
2022
2022Economic profit 1.2B
2023Economic profit 1.5B
2024Economic profit 1.7B
2025Economic profit 1.7B
2018201820192020202120222022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
89.4%
Return on assets
11.1%
Asset turnover
0.60×
Research & development
8.3% of revenue
Overheads (SG&A)
16.0% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
01.0B2.0B3.0B
2018
2018Net income 966.0MFree cash flow 878.0MAfter stock-based pay 805.0M
2019Net income 868.0MFree cash flow 1.6BAfter stock-based pay 1.5B
2020Net income 949.0MFree cash flow 1.4BAfter stock-based pay 1.3B
2021Net income 1.2BFree cash flow 1.6BAfter stock-based pay 1.5B
2022
2022Net income 1.4BFree cash flow 1.6BAfter stock-based pay 1.4B
2023Net income 1.7BFree cash flow 1.8BAfter stock-based pay 1.6B
2024Net income 1.6BFree cash flow 2.1BAfter stock-based pay 1.9B
2025Net income 2.2BFree cash flow 2.6BAfter stock-based pay 2.3B
2018201820192020202120222022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2018–2025
15.4B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 13%1.9B
Acquisitions 0%0
Dividends 28%4.3B
Share buybacks 30%4.6B
Kept, or used to pay down debt 30%4.6B
Over the same years it paid 1.4B in stock. 3.3B of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$0.00$5.00$10.00$15.00$20.00
2018
2018Earnings per share $5.62Free cash flow per share $5.10Dividend per share $1.96
2019Earnings per share $4.94Free cash flow per share $8.97Dividend per share $2.16
2020Earnings per share $5.45Free cash flow per share $8.02Dividend per share $2.50
2021Earnings per share $7.17Free cash flow per share $9.18Dividend per share $2.78
2022
2022Earnings per share $7.93Free cash flow per share $9.12Dividend per share $3.08
2023Earnings per share $9.93Free cash flow per share $10.41Dividend per share $3.42
2024Earnings per share $9.23Free cash flow per share $12.49Dividend per share $3.83
2025Earnings per share $12.75Free cash flow per share $15.22Dividend per share $4.31
2018201820192020202120222022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
168.0M170.0M172.0M174.0M176.0M
2018
2018Diluted shares 172.0M
2019Diluted shares 175.6M
2020Diluted shares 174.1M
2021Diluted shares 173.6M
2022
2022Diluted shares 171.9M
2023Diluted shares 172.1M
2024Diluted shares 170.8M
2025Diluted shares 169.0M
2018201820192020202120222022202320242025
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B
2018
2018Net debt 4.1B
2019Net debt 4.1B
2020Net debt 3.9B
2021Net debt 3.8B
2022
2022Net debt 4.7B
2023Net debt 4.3B
2024Net debt 3.9B
2025Net debt 7.2B
2018201820192020202120222022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
2.1×
Interest coverage
8× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
1.04 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
59 days collects in 69d, stock 64d, pays in 73d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
6of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✓Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforepassed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✕Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellfailed
✕More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforefailed
✓No new sharesShare count did not growpassed
✓Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforepassed
✕Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforefailed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
1.69grey zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.01 × 6.56+0.08
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.13 × 3.26+0.43
Operating income ÷ assets 0.15 × 6.72+1.04
Equity ÷ liabilities 0.14 × 1.05+0.15
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.45below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.04+0.96
Gross margin slipping 0.99+0.52
Soft assets 1.27+0.51
Sales growth 1.08+0.96
Slower depreciation 0.93+0.11
Overheads vs sales 0.99-0.17
Profit not in cash -0.04-0.16
Leverage rising 1.02-0.33
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
Inventory is growing 28% against revenue growing 8%.
Benign
Stocking up for a launch, or securing supply.
Worrying
Demand is softening; discounts or write-downs tend to follow.
Capital spending (265M) is well below depreciation (425M).
Benign
Mature assets, or a business that has become less capital-intensive.
Worrying
Under-investing: today's profit is being held up by consuming tomorrow's capacity.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
78% of the value comes from after year 10: this valuation rests mostly on the long run, which is exactly what is least known.
Value per share, with these assumptions$513.68discounted at 5.4% a year · 78% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
40.3×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
27.6×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
8.1×
Free cash flow yield
2.6%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today21.1B
Everything after, today73.0B
The whole business94.1B
Minus net debt-7.2B
What belongs to shareholders86.8B
Divided among 169.0M shares: <strong>$513.68</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B
2018
2018Reported 805.0M
2019Reported 1.5B
2020Reported 1.3B
2021Reported 1.5B
2022
2022Reported 1.4B
2023Reported 1.6B
2024Reported 1.9B
2025Reported 2.3B
2026Projected 2.1B
2027Projected 2.3B
2028Projected 2.5B
2029Projected 2.6B
2030Projected 2.8B
2031Projected 3.0B
2032Projected 3.1B
2033Projected 3.2B
2034Projected 3.3B
2035Projected 3.4B
2018201920212022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
12.8B
13.9B
15.0B
16.1B
17.1B
18.1B
19.0B
19.7B
20.4B
20.9B
Growth
9.5%
8.7%
7.9%
7.2%
6.4%
5.6%
4.8%
4.1%
3.3%
2.5%
Cash margin
16.4%
16.4%
16.4%
16.4%
16.4%
16.4%
16.4%
16.4%
16.4%
16.4%
Free cash flow
2.1B
2.3B
2.5B
2.6B
2.8B
3.0B
3.1B
3.2B
3.3B
3.4B
Worth today
2.0B
2.1B
2.1B
2.1B
2.2B
2.2B
2.2B
2.1B
2.1B
2.0B
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
4.4%
535
647
819
1,118
1,764
4.9%
447
524
634
803
1,096
5.4%
382
438
514
622
787
5.9%
332
374
429
504
609
6.4%
292
325
367
421
494
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
5.5%
7.5%
9.5%
11.5%
13.5%
13.2%
340
375
413
455
499
14.8%
382
421
464
510
559
16.4%
423
467
514
564
619
18.1%
465
513
564
619
679
19.7%
507
558
614
674
739
All the inputs moving at once
4,746 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.5%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$303.46
Median$501.10
90th percentile$940.83
$500.00$1,000.00$1,500.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$381.77</b> and <b>$684.50</b>; one in ten below $303.46, one in ten above $940.83.
Does the long run make sense?
20.2×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 20.2 times that year's EBITDA.
15%To grow 2.5% forever while reinvesting 16% of its after-tax operating profit, the business must earn 15% on the new capital — it has earned 25% on average over the last five years.
78%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.