FAST · Consumer discretionary(retail-building materials, hardware, garden supply) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2025-12-31
Fastenal Co reported revenue of $8.2 billion in fiscal 2025, after growing 8.4% a year over the previous 9 years. Its operating margin held steady at about 20.2% from 2016, and it earned 30.9% on its invested capital in the latest year. Of the $9.3 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 72.1% went to dividends and 20.1% back into the business. On the accounting screens, it passes 7 of 9 Piotroski tests, its Altman Z'' of 12.01 is in the safe zone and its Beneish M-score is below the -1.78 line; none of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 20258.2B+8.4% a year over 9 years
Operating margin20.2%gross margin 45.0%
Return on invested capital30.9%30.0% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay1.0B12.7% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDANet cash151.8M more cash than debt
Piotroski F-score7/9tests of improvement passed
Share counts are in today's shares. The SEC's filings restate only recent years after a split, so these jumps were read as splits and the older years scaled to match — otherwise per-share figures would compare different units:
2-for-1 before fiscal 2023; 2-for-1 before fiscal 2017.
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
02.5B5.0B7.5B10.0B
2016Revenue 4.0BOperating income 795.8M
2017Revenue 4.4BOperating income 881.8M
2018Revenue 5.0BOperating income 999.2M
2019Revenue 5.3BOperating income 1.1B
2020Revenue 5.6BOperating income 1.1B
2021Revenue 6.0BOperating income 1.2B
2022Revenue 7.0BOperating income 1.5B
2023Revenue 7.3BOperating income 1.5B
2024Revenue 7.5BOperating income 1.5B
2025Revenue 8.2BOperating income 1.7B
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
+5.5%
+7.7%
+8.4%
Operating income
+4.4%
+7.7%
+8.5%
Net income
+5.0%
+7.9%
+10.8%
Earnings per share
+5.0%
+8.0%
+10.9%
Free cash flow per share
+11.1%
+2.4%
+13.8%
Dividend per share
+12.2%
+4.6%
+12.6%
Shares
-0.0%
-0.0%
-0.1%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 10.0%
0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%
2016Return on invested capital 21.7%
2017Return on invested capital 23.3%
2018Return on invested capital 27.2%
2019Return on invested capital 26.6%
2020Return on invested capital 27.6%
2021Return on invested capital 27.2%
2022Return on invested capital 29.5%
2023Return on invested capital 32.1%
2024Return on invested capital 30.2%
2025Return on invested capital 30.9%
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Economic profit
Economic profit
0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B
2016Economic profit 271.2M
2017Economic profit 333.5M
2018Economic profit 481.3M
2019Economic profit 500.4M
2020Economic profit 552.6M
2021Economic profit 589.5M
2022Economic profit 725.8M
2023Economic profit 799.6M
2024Economic profit 770.9M
2025Economic profit 852.6M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
31.9%
Return on assets
24.9%
Asset turnover
1.62×
Overheads (SG&A)
24.8% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
0500.0M1.0B1.5B
2016Net income 499.4MFree cash flow 330.4MAfter stock-based pay 326.3M
2017Net income 578.6MFree cash flow 465.3MAfter stock-based pay 460.1M
2018Net income 751.9MFree cash flow 497.9MAfter stock-based pay 492.8M
2019Net income 790.9MFree cash flow 596.3MAfter stock-based pay 590.6M
2020Net income 859.1MFree cash flow 933.7MAfter stock-based pay 928.0M
2021Net income 925.0MFree cash flow 613.5MAfter stock-based pay 607.9M
2022Net income 1.1BFree cash flow 767.2MAfter stock-based pay 760.0M
2023Net income 1.2BFree cash flow 1.3BAfter stock-based pay 1.3B
2024Net income 1.2BFree cash flow 946.8MAfter stock-based pay 938.8M
2025Net income 1.3BFree cash flow 1.1BAfter stock-based pay 1.0B
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2016–2025
9.3B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 20%1.9B
Acquisitions 2%187.4M
Dividends 72%6.7B
Share buybacks 6%534.9M
Kept, or used to pay down debt 0%10.4M
Over the same years it paid 62.3M in stock. The share count fell 0.5%. 472.6M of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$0.00$0.50$1.00$1.50
2016Earnings per share $0.43Free cash flow per share $0.29Dividend per share $0.30
2017Earnings per share $0.50Free cash flow per share $0.40Dividend per share $0.32
2018Earnings per share $0.65Free cash flow per share $0.43Dividend per share $0.38
2019Earnings per share $0.69Free cash flow per share $0.52Dividend per share $0.43
2020Earnings per share $0.75Free cash flow per share $0.81Dividend per share $0.70
2021Earnings per share $0.80Free cash flow per share $0.53Dividend per share $0.56
2022Earnings per share $0.94Free cash flow per share $0.67Dividend per share $0.62
2023Earnings per share $1.01Free cash flow per share $1.10Dividend per share $0.89
2024Earnings per share $1.00Free cash flow per share $0.82Dividend per share $0.78
2025Earnings per share $1.09Free cash flow per share $0.91Dividend per share $0.87
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
1.1B1.1B1.2B1.2B
2016Diluted shares 1.2B
2017Diluted shares 1.2B
2018Diluted shares 1.1B
2019Diluted shares 1.1B
2020Diluted shares 1.2B
2021Diluted shares 1.2B
2022Diluted shares 1.2B
2023Diluted shares 1.1B
2024Diluted shares 1.1B
2025Diluted shares 1.2B
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
-200.0M0200.0M400.0M
2016Net debt 277.3M
2017Net debt 298.1M
2018Net debt 332.8M
2019Net debt 170.1M
2020Net debt 159.3M
2021Net debt 153.8M
2022Net debt 324.9M
2023Net debt 38.7M
2024Net debt -55.8M
2025Net debt -151.8M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
-0.1×
Interest coverage
267× operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
4.85 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
171 days collects in 55d, stock 141d, pays in 26d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
7of 9 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✓Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforepassed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✓Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellpassed
✓More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforepassed
✕No new sharesShare count did not growfailed
✕Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year beforefailed
✓Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforepassed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
12.01safe zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets 0.55 × 6.56+3.58
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.77 × 3.26+2.50
Operating income ÷ assets 0.33 × 6.72+2.20
Equity ÷ liabilities 3.56 × 1.05+3.73
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
-2.39below the -1.78 line
-1.78
Receivables vs sales 1.03+0.95
Gross margin slipping 1.00+0.53
Soft assets 0.97+0.39
Sales growth 1.09+0.97
Slower depreciation 1.04+0.12
Overheads vs sales 0.99-0.17
Profit not in cash -0.01-0.03
Leverage rising 0.93-0.31
Where it misleads: fast growth and acquisitions. Sales growth carries a heavy weight, so a company growing 50% a year scores like a suspect without having done anything. It is a screen from a 1999 study, not an accusation.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
None of the six cross-checks fires for the latest year: receivables and inventory move with revenue, profit turns into cash, investment keeps up with depreciation, the tax rate is ordinary and debt is moderate.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$16.82discounted at 10.0% a year · 51% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
15.4×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
10.5×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
2.3×
Free cash flow yield
5.4%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today9.4B
Everything after, today9.8B
The whole business19.2B
Plus net cash151.8M
What belongs to shareholders19.3B
Divided among 1.2B shares: <strong>$16.82</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B
2016Reported 326.3M
2017Reported 460.1M
2018Reported 492.8M
2019Reported 590.6M
2020Reported 928.0M
2021Reported 607.9M
2022Reported 760.0M
2023Reported 1.3B
2024Reported 938.8M
2025Reported 1.0B
2026Projected 1.2B
2027Projected 1.3B
2028Projected 1.4B
2029Projected 1.5B
2030Projected 1.6B
2031Projected 1.6B
2032Projected 1.7B
2033Projected 1.8B
2034Projected 1.8B
2035Projected 1.9B
2016201820202022202420262028203020322034
Year by year
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Revenue
8.8B
9.4B
10.0B
10.6B
11.2B
11.7B
12.2B
12.6B
13.0B
13.3B
Growth
7.5%
6.9%
6.4%
5.8%
5.3%
4.7%
4.2%
3.6%
3.1%
2.5%
Cash margin
14.0%
14.0%
14.0%
14.0%
14.0%
14.0%
14.0%
14.0%
14.0%
14.0%
Free cash flow
1.2B
1.3B
1.4B
1.5B
1.6B
1.6B
1.7B
1.8B
1.8B
1.9B
Worth today
1.1B
1.1B
1.1B
1.0B
969.4M
923.0M
874.1M
823.4M
771.5M
719.0M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
9.0%
17
18
19
21
22
9.5%
16
17
18
19
20
10.0%
15
16
17
18
19
10.5%
14
15
16
17
17
11.0%
14
14
15
15
16
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
3.5%
5.5%
7.5%
9.5%
11.5%
11.2%
12
13
14
15
17
12.6%
13
14
16
17
18
14.0%
14
16
17
18
20
15.4%
15
17
18
20
21
16.8%
16
18
19
21
23
All the inputs moving at once
5,000 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.1%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$12.86
Median$16.85
90th percentile$22.69
$15.00$20.00$25.00$30.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$14.55</b> and <b>$19.52</b>; one in ten below $12.86, one in ten above $22.69.
Does the long run make sense?
8.5×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 8.5 times that year's EBITDA.
28%To grow 2.5% forever while reinvesting 9% of its after-tax operating profit, the business must earn 28% on the new capital — it has earned 30% on average over the last five years.
51%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.