EYE · Health care(ophthalmic goods) · 10 years of annual accounts filed with the SEC · latest fiscal year ended 2026-01-03
Signed in, this page also says what this company is inside your own portfolio: its weight, its share of your risk, and what buying or selling some of it would change. Sign in ›
National Vision Holdings, Inc. reported revenue of $2.0 billion in fiscal 2026. Of the $1.4 billion its operations generated over 10 years, 60.8% went back into the business and 15.5% to buybacks; the share count fell 27.1%. On the accounting screens, it passes 7 of 8 Piotroski tests and its Altman Z'' of 0.82 is in the distress zone; none of the six cross-checks between its statements fires.
Revenue, fiscal 20262.0B
Operating margin3.0%gross margin —
Return on invested capital3.8%3.3% on average over 5 years
Free cash flow after stock pay49.8M2.5% of revenue
Net debt ÷ EBITDA1.3×net debt 197.8M
Piotroski F-score7/8tests of improvement passed
Is it growing?
Revenue and the operating income it turns into. Growth that does not reach operating income is growth bought with margin.
RevenueOperating income
-1.0B01.0B2.0B3.0B
2017
2017Revenue 1.4BOperating income 64.3M
2018Revenue 1.5BOperating income 42.4M
2019Revenue 1.7BOperating income 73.6M
2021Revenue 1.7BOperating income 87.0M
2022Revenue 2.1BOperating income 174.9M
2022Revenue 1.6BOperating income 52.8M
2023Revenue 1.8BOperating income 24.5M
2024Revenue 1.8BOperating income -10.4M
2026Revenue 2.0BOperating income 58.8M
2017201720182019202120222022202320242026
Compound growth a year
3 yrs
5 yrs
9 yrs
Revenue
+6.5%
+3.0%
—
Operating income
+3.7%
-7.5%
—
Net income
-11.1%
-4.0%
—
Earnings per share
-11.2%
-3.5%
—
Free cash flow per share
+134.9%
-13.8%
—
Shares
+0.1%
-0.5%
-3.4%
Falling shares are buybacks: each remaining share owns more of the company.
Does it earn more than its capital costs?
Margins say how much of each sale is kept; return on invested capital says how much the business earns on the money it needs to operate. Growth only creates value when that return is above the cost of the capital.
Return on invested capitalCost of capital today · 9.0%
-5.0%0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%
2017
2017
2018
2019Return on invested capital 5.2%
2021Return on invested capital 5.3%
2022Return on invested capital 10.2%
2022Return on invested capital 2.6%
2023Return on invested capital 0.7%
2024Return on invested capital -0.9%
2026Return on invested capital 3.8%
2017201720182019202120222022202320242026
Economic profit
Economic profit
-150.0M-100.0M-50.0M050.0M
2017
2017
2018
2019Economic profit -50.3M
2021Economic profit -56.3M
2022Economic profit 17.9M
2022Economic profit -93.3M
2023Economic profit -105.7M
2024Economic profit -114.9M
2026Economic profit -57.9M
2017201720182019202120222022202320242026
(return on capital − cost of capital) × capital invested: the profit left after paying for the money used. Today's cost of capital is applied to every year, since a past one cannot be rebuilt honestly.
Return on equity
3.4%
Return on assets
1.5%
Asset turnover
1.00×
Overheads (SG&A)
51.1% of revenue
Is the profit cash, and where does the cash go?
Net income is an accounting opinion; free cash flow is what was left in the bank after investing. Stock-based pay does not leave the bank — shareholders pay it through dilution — so it is shown taken off as well.
Net incomeFree cash flowAfter stock-based pay
-100.0M0100.0M200.0M
2017
2017Net income 43.1MFree cash flow -3.0MAfter stock-based pay -8.1M
2018Net income 23.7MFree cash flow 2.1MAfter stock-based pay -18.8M
2019Net income 32.8MFree cash flow 63.8MAfter stock-based pay 51.1M
2021Net income 36.3MFree cash flow 158.2MAfter stock-based pay 147.4M
2022Net income 128.2MFree cash flow 163.4MAfter stock-based pay 148.5M
2022Net income 42.1MFree cash flow 5.7MAfter stock-based pay -7.9M
2023Net income -65.9MFree cash flow 58.3MAfter stock-based pay 38.1M
2024Net income -28.5MFree cash flow 38.1MAfter stock-based pay 21.4M
2026Net income 29.6MFree cash flow 73.5MAfter stock-based pay 49.8M
2017201720182019202120222022202320242026
Where 10 years of operating cash went, 2017–2026
1.4B generated by the business. Each band is its share of that total.
Reinvested in the business 61%868.0M
Acquisitions 0%0
Dividends 12%171.0M
Share buybacks 15%220.7M
Kept, or used to pay down debt 12%168.4M
Over the same years it paid 138.5M in stock. The share count fell 27.1%. 82.2M of the buybacks went beyond offsetting that dilution.
Per share
Earnings per shareFree cash flow per shareDividend per share
$-1.00$0.00$1.00$2.00$3.00
2017
2017Earnings per share $0.70Free cash flow per share $-0.05Dividend per share $2.76
2018Earnings per share $0.30Free cash flow per share $0.03Dividend per share $0.00
2019Earnings per share $0.40Free cash flow per share $0.78Dividend per share $0.00
2021Earnings per share $0.44Free cash flow per share $1.91
2022Earnings per share $1.33Free cash flow per share $1.70
2022Earnings per share $0.52Free cash flow per share $0.07
2023Earnings per share $-0.84Free cash flow per share $0.74
2024Earnings per share $-0.36Free cash flow per share $0.49
2026Earnings per share $0.37Free cash flow per share $0.91
2017201720182019202120222022202320242026
Shares outstanding
Diluted shares
60.0M80.0M100.0M120.0M
2017Diluted shares 110.5M
2017Diluted shares 62.0M
2018Diluted shares 79.0M
2019Diluted shares 81.7M
2021Diluted shares 82.8M
2022Diluted shares 96.1M
2022Diluted shares 80.3M
2023Diluted shares 78.6M
2024Diluted shares 78.6M
2026Diluted shares 80.6M
2017201720182019202120222022202320242026
How strong is the balance sheet?
Debt is not bad in itself; debt the business cannot service in a bad year is. Net debt is debt minus cash, and below zero the company holds more cash than it owes.
Net debt
0200.0M400.0M600.0M
2017
2017
2018
2019Net debt 497.1M
2021Net debt 250.7M
2022Net debt 237.8M
2022Net debt 316.8M
2023Net debt 295.3M
2024Net debt 263.2M
2026Net debt 197.8M
2017201720182019202120222022202320242026
Net debt ÷ EBITDA
1.3×
Interest coverage
— operating income ÷ interest
Current ratio
0.55 current assets ÷ current liabilities
Cash conversion cycle
— collects in 11d
Three classic screens of the accounts
Each asks a different question of the same statements — is it improving, does it look like a company heading for distress, do the accounts resemble ones that were manipulated. None is a verdict; each shows what moves it.
Piotroski F-score
Is the business improving? Nine yes-or-no tests, this year against last.
7of 8 tests passed
✓ProfitableReturn on assets above zeropassed
✓Cash from operationsOperating cash flow above zeropassed
✓Profitability improvedReturn on assets higher than a year beforepassed
✓Profit backed by cashOperating cash flow above net income (low accruals)passed
✓Less long-term debtLong-term debt as a share of assets fellpassed
✓More liquidCurrent ratio higher than a year beforepassed
✕No new sharesShare count did not growfailed
–Better gross marginGross margin higher than a year before — not reportedno data
✓Sells more per assetAsset turnover higher than a year beforepassed
Where it misleads: it measures change, not level. An excellent business that stood still for a year scores low; a poor one recovering from a disaster scores high.
Altman Z''-score
Does the balance sheet look like those of companies that went bankrupt?
0.82distress zone
1.12.6
Working capital ÷ assets -0.09 × 6.56-0.62
Retained earnings ÷ assets 0.13 × 3.26+0.42
Operating income ÷ assets 0.03 × 6.72+0.20
Equity ÷ liabilities 0.78 × 1.05+0.82
Where it misleads: buybacks. A company that returns so much cash that its equity turns small or negative sinks the last two ratios without being anywhere near bankruptcy. Banks and insurers do not fit the model at all.
Beneish M-score
Do the accounts resemble those of companies that manipulated their earnings?
The accounts lack too many of the lines it needs.
Where the statements disagree
Cross-checks between the income statement, the balance sheet and the cash flow for the latest year, each with the benign reading and the worrying one.
None of the six cross-checks fires for the latest year: receivables and inventory move with revenue, profit turns into cash, investment keeps up with depreciation, the tax rate is ordinary and debt is moderate.
What is it worth, under which assumptions?
A company is worth the cash it will generate, brought back to today. This model projects revenue with growth that fades over the years, applies a free cash flow margin, and discounts the result at the cost of capital. Every assumption says where it came from, and all of them can be changed.
Value per share, with these assumptions$0.31discounted at 9.0% a year · 54% of it from after year 10
Type a share price on the left to ask the reverse questions: what growth, what margin or what discount rate that price implies.
What the value implies, in the usual multiples
At this model's value
Price ÷ earnings
0.8×
Enterprise value ÷ EBITDA
1.5×
Enterprise value ÷ revenue
0.1×
Free cash flow yield
202.4%
From cash flows to a value per share
10 years of cash flow, today101.8M
Everything after, today120.6M
The whole business222.4M
Minus net debt-197.8M
What belongs to shareholders24.6M
Divided among 80.6M shares: <strong>$0.31</strong> each.
The projection next to its history
Reported free cash flow after stock pay, then the model's. A projection that looks nothing like the past needs a reason.
ReportedProjected
-50.0M050.0M100.0M150.0M
2017
2017Reported -8.1M
2018Reported -18.8M
2019Reported 51.1M
2021Reported 147.4M
2022Reported 148.5M
2022Reported -7.9M
2023Reported 38.1M
2024Reported 21.4M
2026Reported 49.8M
2027Projected 14.2M
2028Projected 14.7M
2029Projected 15.1M
2030Projected 15.5M
2031Projected 15.9M
2032Projected 16.4M
2033Projected 16.8M
2034Projected 17.3M
2035Projected 17.7M
2036Projected 18.1M
2017201820212022202420272029203120332035
Year by year
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
Revenue
2.0B
2.1B
2.2B
2.2B
2.3B
2.4B
2.4B
2.5B
2.5B
2.6B
Growth
3.0%
2.9%
2.9%
2.8%
2.8%
2.7%
2.7%
2.6%
2.6%
2.5%
Cash margin
0.7%
0.7%
0.7%
0.7%
0.7%
0.7%
0.7%
0.7%
0.7%
0.7%
Free cash flow
14.2M
14.7M
15.1M
15.5M
15.9M
16.4M
16.8M
17.3M
17.7M
18.1M
Worth today
13.1M
12.3M
11.6M
11.0M
10.4M
9.8M
9.2M
8.7M
8.1M
7.7M
If the least-known inputs move
Value per share as two inputs change at a time. Neighbouring cells that differ a lot are the conclusion: the value depends on numbers nobody knows to a point.
The discount rate and growth forever
discount ↓ · forever →
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
8.0%
0
1
1
1
1
8.5%
0
0
1
1
1
9.0%
0
0
0
0
1
9.5%
-0
-0
0
0
0
10.0%
-0
-0
-0
0
0
Year-one growth and the final margin
margin ↓ · growth →
-1.0%
1.0%
3.0%
5.0%
7.0%
0.6%
-0
-0
-0
0
0
0.6%
-0
-0
0
0
1
0.7%
-0
0
0
1
1
0.8%
0
0
1
1
1
0.8%
0
0
1
1
1
All the inputs moving at once
5,000 valuations, each with growth, final margin, discount rate and growth forever drawn at random around the values on the left (spreads of 3.0%, 2.0%, 1.0% and 0.5%). Not a probability — the spreads are assumptions too — but an honest picture of how wide the answer is.
10th percentile$-7.54
Median$0.38
90th percentile$8.62
$-10.00$0.00$10.00
Half of the simulations land between <b>$-3.68</b> and <b>$4.61</b>; one in ten below $-7.54, one in ten above $8.62.
Does the long run make sense?
1.5×The terminal value prices the business in year 10 at 1.5 times that year's EBITDA.
4%To grow 2.5% forever while reinvesting 67% of its after-tax operating profit, the business must earn 4% on the new capital — it has earned 3% on average over the last five years.
54%of the value comes from after year 10. The more of it, the more the answer depends on the part nobody can see.
Every Form 4 filed in the last twelve months, read line by line: 6 filings by 5 people. Open-market purchases and sales are counted apart from awards, option exercises and shares withheld for taxes.
Bought on the open market—none in the period
Sold on the open market—none in the period
Under pre-arranged plans—of the sales followed a 10b5-1 plan set months earlier
A Form 4 says what happened, when, how many shares and at what price. It does not say why: a sale can be diversification, a tax bill or a plan fixed months earlier, and an award is pay, not a purchase. Nothing here is a reason to buy or sell anything.
Which large funds report holding it
From the Form 13F of the 28 institutions followed on this site, as of the end of their last reported quarter. A 13F is filed up to 45 days later and shows only long positions in US-listed shares.
Accounts from the company's own SEC filings; lines some companies do not report are shown as a dash rather than estimated. The risk-free rate is the 10-year US Treasury yield. A DCF is a way of making assumptions explicit, not a forecast: it states what the company would be worth if the assumptions held. The scores are screens that point where to look, not verdicts. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.